I have an entity framework class (Document) with a child (Provider) that has an array of objects (Documents). I want to pull my Document class and include it's Provider child but not include the Provider's array of Document objects. I can't remove the documents property from Provider because I do need the documents array at other times. How do I pull the documents with providers, but exclude each providers documents array with linq?
Here's my class structure:
Document {
public string DocumentName { get; set; }
public virtual Provider Provider { get; set; }
}
Provider {
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Document> Documents { get; set; }
}
I'm trying to get my document objects using linq like this:
db.Documents.Where(x => x.Id == Id)
.Include(x => x.Provider)
.ToList();
And here's what the result looks like:
[{
'DocumentName': 'document_one.pdf',
'Provider': {
'Name': 'Jim Smith',
'Documents': [
{
'DocumentName': 'document_one.pdf'
},
{
'DocumentName': 'document_two.pdf'
},
]
}
}]
So how do I accomplish getting this exact result set, just without the Provider.Documents array being populated? Again, I can't remove the Documents property from the Provider class because I need it at other times.
Assuming this is only for Get's and not for saving just Iterate the documents and set them to null.
var documents = db.Documents.Where(x => x.Id == Id)
.Include(x => x.Provider)
.ToList()
documents.ForEach(x => x.Provider.Documents = null);
My guess is you don't want this because it's being exposed to the client during serialization, If that's the case you probably should be creating A DTO
I found a blog post and a SO answer I combined to answer my question. I have to create a special DTO for the documents in which the Provider property is also a special DTO for the providers. The DTO's can exclude the properties then I have to do a select statement to convert the database classes into the DTO's like this:
db.Documents.Where(x => x.Id = Id)
.Include(x => x.Provider)
.Select(x => new DocumentDTO{
DocumentName = x.DocumentName,
Provider = new ProviderDTO{
Name = x.Provider.Name
}
})
.ToList();
Blog post here.
SO answer here.
Related
In my project, that uses EF Core 6, I have an entity that looks like this:
public class Animal
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; } = null!;
// ... many other fields that exist in the database
virtual public bool IsRelatedToGoldenCity { get; set; }
}
With IsRelatedToGoldenAnimal being a value that will be calculated in a sub-query. Since there are many fields in this class, I would like to not have to write all them down in the select where the sub-query will happen. Something like:
var query = Context.Animal
.Include(x => x.Whatever)
.Select(x => new Animal
{
...x, // mimicking JavaScript's spread operator here
IsRelatedToGoldenCity = Context.Cities.Select(...).Where(...).Any(),
});
return await query.ToListAsync();
Is there a way to do something like this?
You can use ToList and ForEach
var animals = await Context.Animal
.Include(x => x.Whatever)
.ToListAsync();
animals.ForEach(x => x.IsRelatedToGoldenCity = "");
I'm using the latest version of ABP from abp.io and have two entities with a many-many relationship. These are:
public class GroupDto : AuditedEntityDto<Guid>
{
public GroupDto()
{
this.Students = new HashSet<Students.StudentDto>();
}
public string Name { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Students.StudentDto> Students { get; set; }
}
and
public class StudentDto : AuditedEntityDto<Guid>
{
public StudentDto()
{
this.Groups = new HashSet<Groups.GroupDto>();
}
public string Name { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Groups.GroupDto> Groups { get; set; }
}
I set up the following test to check that I am retrieving the related entities, and unfortunately the Students property is always empty.
public async Task Should_Get_List_Of_Groups()
{
//Act
var result = await _groupAppService.GetListAsync(
new PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto()
);
//Assert
result.TotalCount.ShouldBeGreaterThan(0);
result.Items.ShouldContain(g => g.Name == "13Ck" && g.Students.Any(s => s.Name == "Michael Studentman"));
}
The same is true of the equivalent test for a List of Students, the Groups property is always empty.
I found one single related answer for abp.io (which is not the same as ABP, it's a newer/different framework) https://stackoverflow.com/a/62913782/7801941 but unfortunately when I add an equivalent to my StudentAppService I get the error -
CS1061 'IRepository<Student, Guid>' does not contain a definition for
'Include' and no accessible extension method 'Include' accepting a
first argument of type 'IRepository<Student, Guid>' could be found
(are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
The code for this is below, and the error is being thrown on the line that begins .Include
public class StudentAppService :
CrudAppService<
Student, //The Student entity
StudentDto, //Used to show students
Guid, //Primary key of the student entity
PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto, //Used for paging/sorting
CreateUpdateStudentDto>, //Used to create/update a student
IStudentAppService //implement the IStudentAppService
{
private readonly IRepository<Students.Student, Guid> _studentRepository;
public StudentAppService(IRepository<Student, Guid> repository)
: base(repository)
{
_studentRepository = repository;
}
protected override IQueryable<Student> CreateFilteredQuery(PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto input)
{
return _studentRepository
.Include(s => s.Groups);
}
}
This implements this interface
public interface IStudentAppService :
ICrudAppService< // Defines CRUD methods
StudentDto, // Used to show students
Guid, // Primary key of the student entity
PagedAndSortedResultRequestDto, // Used for paging/sorting
CreateUpdateStudentDto> // Used to create/update a student
{
//
}
Can anyone shed any light on how I should be accessing the related entities using the AppServices?
Edit: Thank you to those who have responded. To clarify, I am looking for a solution/explanation for how to access entities that have a many-many relationship using the AppService, not the repository.
To aid with this, I have uploaded a zip file of my whole source code, along with many of the changes I've tried in order to get this to work, here.
You can lazy load, eagerly load or configure default behaviour for the entity for sub-collections.
Default configuration:
Configure<AbpEntityOptions>(options =>
{
options.Entity<Student>(studentOptions =>
{
studentOptions.DefaultWithDetailsFunc = query => query.Include(o => o.Groups);
});
});
Eager Load:
//Get a IQueryable<T> by including sub collections
var queryable = await _studentRepository.WithDetailsAsync(x => x.Groups);
//Apply additional LINQ extension methods
var query = queryable.Where(x => x.Id == id);
//Execute the query and get the result
var student = await AsyncExecuter.FirstOrDefaultAsync(query);
Or Lazy Load:
var student = await _studentRepository.GetAsync(id, includeDetails: false);
//student.Groups is empty on this stage
await _studentRepository.EnsureCollectionLoadedAsync(student, x => x.Groups);
//student.Groups is filled now
You can check docs for more information.
Edit:
You may have forgotten to add default repositories like:
services.AddAbpDbContext<MyDbContext>(options =>
{
options.AddDefaultRepositories();
});
Though I would like to suggest you to use custom repositories like
IStudentRepository:IRepository<Student,Guid>
So that you can scale your repository much better.
I have a Category table and it has a Parent Category, I try to iterate over all the categories and get the parents categories with it's Inverse Parent but some of them returns without the inverse parents from unknown reason.
Categories.cs
public partial class Categories
{
public Categories()
{
InverseParent = new HashSet<Categories>();
}
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? ParentId { get; set; }
public DateTime CreateDate { get; set; }
public bool? Status { get; set; }
public virtual Categories Parent { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Categories> InverseParent { get; set; }
}
This is how I try to iterate them to create a select list items:
var parentCategories = await _context.Categories.
Include(x => x.Parent).
Where(x => x.Status == true).
Where(x => x.Parent != null).
Select(x => x.Parent).
Distinct().
ToListAsync();
foreach (var parent in parentCategories)
{
SelectListGroup group = new SelectListGroup() { Name = parent.Id.ToString() };
foreach (var category in parent.InverseParent)
{
categories.Add(new SelectListItem { Text = category.Id.ToString(), Value = category.Id.ToString(), Group = group });
}
}
So the problem is that some of my parent categories returns all their children categories and some don't and I don't why.
There are several issues with that code, all having some explaination in the Loading Related Data section of the documentation.
First, you didn't ask EF Core to include InverseParent, so it's more logically to expect it to be always null.
What you get is a result of the following Eager Loading behavior:
Tip
Entity Framework Core will automatically fix-up navigation properties to any other entities that were previously loaded into the context instance. So even if you don't explicitly include the data for a navigation property, the property may still be populated if some or all of the related entities were previously loaded.
Second, since the query is changing it's initial shape (Select, Disctinct), it's falling into Ignored Includes category.
With that being said, you should build the query other way around - starting directly with parent categories and including InverseParent:
var parentCategories = await _context.Categories
.Include(x => x.InverseParent)
.Where(x => x.InverseParent.Any(c => c.Status == true)) // to match your query filter
.ToListAsync();
While you are including Include(x => x.Parent), you don't seem to do the same for InverseParent. This might affect your results exactly the way you describe. Would including it fix it?
parentCategories = await _context.Categories.
Include(x => x.Parent).
Include(x => x.InverseParent).
Where(x => x.Status == true).
Where(x => x.Parent != null).
Select(x => x.Parent).
Distinct().
ToListAsync();
foreach (var parent in parentCategories)
{
SelectListGroup group = new SelectListGroup() { Name = parent.Id.ToString() };
foreach (var category in parent.InverseParent)
{
categories.Add(new SelectListItem { Text = category.Id.ToString(), Value = category.Id.ToString(), Group = group });
}
}
UPD: Since you are selecting x => x.Parent anyway it might be necessary to use ThenInclude() method instead.
I work with ASP.NET MVC With Durandal/Breeze templates.
Let's say I have the following class:
public class Person
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Firstname { get; set; }
public string Lastname { get; set; }
public virtual List<Person> Friends { get; set; }
}
With the following EF Fluent API:
modelBuilder.Entity<Person>()
.HasMany(m => m.Friends)
.WithMany()
.Map(m => m.ToTable("Friends"));
The database is generated successfully.
The problem is when I perform a que
ry with Breeze (client side) I have no data for the Friends property.
var query = entityQuery.from('Person')
.where('id', '==', 123)
.expand("Friends");
When the query is executed I get as result the requested People entity with all the data except the Friends property is always an empty array. When I check the Json answer I see that also the data are transmitted. Even data for the Friends property. However they are not linked to the Friends property itself.
My question: what do I have to do to have my Friends property filled with values?
Thanks.
You must declare a foreign key in Person. Breeze requires the FK to correctly resolve associations.
Edit:
I just realized you are asking about a many-to-many relationship. (yeah, I should have read the post title...)
Breeze does not support many-to-many associations.
However, you could have two one-to-many relationships to work as a many-to-many. (i.e. many-to-one-to-many) In this case, you will need to define the linking table/entity and the foreign key as mentioned earlier. (see http://www.breezejs.com/documentation/navigation-properties)
Try this answer: *Note that this is incomplete because i do not see the other table that you are trying to m-2-m with Persons. ( You will only want to use Persons Table and the 2nd Table , NOT table=Friends.
db.Person
.Include(c => c.Friends)
.Where(c => c.Friends.Any(up => up.FriendVlaue == c.FirstName)) //c.from Persons
.Select(c => new
{
PersonID = c.ID,
PersonName = c.FirstName,
PersonCount = c.Person.Count()
})
{
From This answer
You should include Friends in the results. You can do this by adding Include("Friends")at Server Side API.
[HttpGet]
public IQueryable<Person> Persons()
{
return _contextProvider.Persons.Include("Friends");
}
If you don't want to return always the Friendsreference, you can create another method in the API such as PersonsWithFriends as suggested in here (Specialized query actions).
Background
I am creating a projection from a parent/child relationship that includes a Name property of the parent and a list of the children's Ids.
Code
private class ParentChildInfo
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<int> ChildIds { get; set; }
}
var infos = ctx.Masters.Include(m => m.Children).Select(
m => new ParentChildInfo()
{
Name = m.Name,
ChildIds = m.Children.Where(c => c.SomeProp.StartsWith("SpecialValue"))
.Select(c => c.Id).ToList()
}).ToList();
Unfortunately that produced the error
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.Int32] ToList[Int32]
That lead me to this post, which suggested (in the comments) making the following changes:
private class ParentChildInfo
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<int> ChildIds { get; set; } // No longer List<int>
}
var infos = ctx.Masters.Include(m => m.Children).Select(
m => new ParentChildInfo()
{
Name = m.Name,
ChildIds = m.Children.Where(c => c.SomeProp.StartsWith("SpecialValue"))
.Select(c => c.Id) // Dropped the .ToList()
}).ToList();
I originally wanted to get lists rather than enumerables because the code that uses the result runs for several minutes, and I did not want to tie up the DbContext that long.
I use the code like this:
using (MyContext ctx = new MyContext())
{
// code from above that populates infoes
}
foreach (var info in infoes)
{
// use info.ChildIds
}
I planned to move the foreach into the using so that I can enumerate the ChildIds, but hit F5 instead and was surprised to see that the code works.
Question
Given that the DbContext is disposed at that point and ChildIds is an IEnumerable<int> rather than List<int>, why exactly can I enumerate ChildIds?
It is because the ToList() of the infos query actually executes the query. So the collection ctx.Masters is enumerated and the projections are populated. Even without the Include it would notice that Master.Children is addressed and emit the SQL join. The implementing type of IEnumerable<int> ChildIds is probably List<int>.
You did .ToList() on the query so the query was executed and all the results are materialized and the connection to the database should be closed. I assume it would not work if you did not have .ToList() since (at least in EF5) the results are being processed in streaming fashion and entities are materialized when requested (i.e. on each iteration in the loop).