I'm creating a Unet application, where the server is responsible for spawning units, and the clients (obviously) see the units and their movements. Clients can spawn stuff via server commands, and typical interactions.
What i'm hoping to allow, however, is each client to redefine their global 'origin' point. So if i'm in the world and i see it in front of me, i'd like to be able to turn around and determine that "hey! that point over there is now the origin", and have all the components move to that new location (which should be handled automatically by the NetworkTransforms).
Does anyone know how i would be able to accomplish this? Or even implement some sort of NetworkTransformOffset script based off the network transform?
Yes....
By moving everything by an amount equal to -1 * new_origin yourself.
Related
im making a multiplayer FPS game, and I have pretty much all the networking done and working. The issue is, that photon is syncing to players local movement, but if u have a bad connection, you could not tell it is happening cause player send late updates to the server and you can see other players lagging but you can move free and smoothly.
Im aware a lot of games work this way but i also know there are games like medal of honor that your player get stock in the last place every one else saw you. I need to know how to implement this on my game, because gameplay depends on it.
What you describe is "local prediction" of actions / movement.
If I understand this right, you want clients to not act or move if there wasn't a confirmation? If so, you'd need an authoritative host or server. You'd always wait for a confirmation from the host to move the player in any way.
But .. this is not going to work well. Players will feel the lag very much and this is annoying.
You probably want to predict the movement, then correct the local situation if the server disagrees.
I would recommend using Fusion instead of PUN for shooters. It can be run with host and has a nice API to reconcile the actual state from prediction to what the host simulated.
Let's say I have an open world game that supports multiple players.
The game stores their positioning by X and Y in this world.
Also, whoever is playing the game can see a canvas of 11x11, where his player-self is represented on this screen, always centered.
The game world has 1000x1000 squares to walk using keys.
What I know is that:
I could emit events whenever a player walks,
check this event data at the server-side (to see if it is possible and the speed is correct/anti-cheating measures),
update the game state which contains all players and positioning,
re-emit this state from the server so every client would be able to render properly this new player.
The problem is, should I really update someone who isn't even being seen?
When everyone is walking around, moving items, earning levels, etc - those events are being emitted from the client, and that's okay, but thinking about the server-side, it will re-emit that for each update state, and, maybe that will be overloaded?
Also, sending the whole game state, even if it isn't being rendered, opens so many breaches to cheating that this made me think that there is another option.
I'm a beginner at Networking and Game Development, and that is being hard to get into my mind - so I decided to try and put it into a question. This way, maybe with someone reading what I'm thinking about, I might get some clarification. Perhaps I'm just thinking about it the wrong way.
Q: should I really update someone who isn't even being seen?
There is no need.
The normal way MMORPG games do in the server side is to cyclely process network packages and some other calculations like the connection of players like skill cast or something else.
The central of a server may look like below
void run()
{
while (true)
{
processNetwork();
processSkills();
processMoves();
...
}
}
The loop will run several times a second, like 20 frames a second is enough cause players can not feel the little frame, they think they move/play smoothly but the trueth is not.
For your question, player only need to see some little area, when he moves, the server will braodcast his postion to others in the area and the players in his area in the next frame.
And that is just the simpliest model, actual model will be more complicated and we will detach different functions of the game to different server, sucn as chat server, battle server, auction server and others.
I have managed to sync my ridigbodies real good but I just noticed that when a client (that's not the master) collides with one it doesn't move, it's locked, while reading on the net I had an idea when the object collides with a rigidbody I just transfer the ownership of that object to that client for the moment for this client to process the collision (I have tested this and it works really good, both clients sync perfectly)
is this recommended? performance-wise and security/cheating wise?
Thanks!
Short answer:
Transferring ownership of a GameObject to a client, when that client needs to control and update the object data, is fine. In cases of detecting cheating possibilities, always have one client (typically the master client or a dedicated server) validate, correct and sync the data to all clients.
I will not make any assumptions. Based on your explanation of the issue, it seems your GameObject Rigidbody IsKinematic was not being synced, causing the collisions having different effects at each client end. But in case that might not be the issue, I have a longer answer hoping it might help for this or other scenarios.
Longer version:
Sync Rigidibody data over the network where it is fundamentally required to be present on the client GameObject. The rest of the Rigidbody data can be created / calculated / simulated on each client individually:
This way, you will make sure all parameters of that Rigidbody are correct (e.g. isKinematic is correctly enabled/disabled on all clients)
Your games will always have the minimum required data to create/simulate the rest of the events and effects properly, reducing network lags and improving performance.
Where data validation is required, the master client will always validate the non-master client data, makes the crucial adjustments and decisions and updates the room data for all clients where necessary. This reduces the chances of players cheating.
Developers will find bugs easier when the events that are supposed to take place on each client, do not align with what is expected. This shows itself more often in scenarios where several events should take place at the same time and on each client.
Much longer version:
When I use PUN2 on GameObjects in my games, I only sync Rigidbody where those GameObjects require Rigidbody values to be present on the clients during collisions to perform specific tasks (e.g. using the velocity or direction for dynamic sound/visual effects), or when the master is validating and correcting the data needed for the non-master clients (as a result of network delay or cheat/hack tampering the data on client side).
When using PUN2 (up to this date), I update its class internal code to my needs. For example, PhotonRigidbodyView does not sync the kinematic state of a Rigidbody yet. When I need this in my games, I could override the class with my CustomPhotonRigidbodyView class (and/or updating the PhotonRigidbodyView a bit).
Does it effect the performance when using PhotonRigidbodyView? Yes, when not used with care, it does decrease it when there are too many objects syncing over the network at the same time. The clients will see jagged movements.
Does it allow cheaters to take advantage of this data, manipulate it and send it over to the clients? Yes, if the game is vulnerable to basic cheats. Then again, the topic of security/cheat detection is quite vast, so for each game definition of "basic" cheats are different.
Is it a good idea to transfer ownership momentarily to be processed on client side? Yes in some cases, other cases no:
If doing this momentary transfer is the only place you do this and it solves all your problems (except cheating), then use it so you won't spend too much time fixing this one part in a different way.
If the Rigidbody or Transform data is being validated and/or synced, either constantly or in periodic intervals by one client (to prevent cheating or to sync client data properly at crucial times), then it is fine to transfer momentarily too.
I typically transfer ownership, when the object data must be changed by the client (e.g. grabbing / dragging around / shooting / throwing) and once the action is performed, ownership will be back to the master to be validated and synced for all clients (including the one that just transferred the ownership). This results in more time spent on testing, catching unwanted (possibly unseen) bugs, and reduced cheating possibilities.
In case a developer working on your game has not properly optimized the Collider and/or Rigidbody components for each GameObject yet, please make sure you have done so before syncing their data over the network. This page in Unity doc may be a good reference to check whether your GameObjects need to be static colliders or dynamic colliders:
https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/class-Rigidbody.html
https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/CollidersOverview.html
Once the GameObjects that need a Rigidbody component are identified, then you can decide which ones need to be fully synced over the network or partially synced and/or their ownership transferred when required.
I hope my answer does not confuse any of the readers. If there is anything not clear, please mention in the comment and I will improve my answer for you.
Update: 2019-05-10 (reply to the 2nd comment):
For a pool game involving so many GameObjects, I would not transfer the ownership of all objects to a client. I would:
Create a struct holding the necessary information such as:
ball_id: indicating which ball is being hit by the pool stick
hit_info: a Vector3 representing the position (on the ball surface) and direction of the hit applied to the ball, by the hit stick.
hit_force: the required force to apply to the Rigidbody of the ball that is being hit by the hit stick.
and any other information that I might need, when the player hits the ball with stick.
I can then combine this information and pass them to the AddForceAtPosition method of the Rigidbody of the ball.
Dispatch this struct in the room, for all the clients to receive.
Once each client receives this message, including the sender, (in OnEvent as EventData containing the Phton Event Data), it will apply this info to the correct ball and will create its own version of physics (small differences will be noticed between each client).
This way:
I have the minimum amount of information passed over the network to make the simulations happen on all clients
Improved performance of the game by avoiding parsing and applying unnecessary Rigidbody data
Reduced the cheating possibilities of a client moving any of the other balls that they are not supposed to, around the table or into the pots.
To increase security as well as making sure the balls on all clients are exactly where they are supposed to be, another struct will be dispatched for example by the master client, indicating the exact position (and rotation) of each ball on the pool table (or in the pot).
I would sync the ball positions periodically (either at pre-defined intervals or at specific moments of my choosing depending on the game state) to all clients to overcome any incorrect positions at any moment in the game. This periodic sync can be done by the master client or a dedicated server.
When I try to access the location of my Player Camera Manager on the server it returns 0, 0, 0.
I think that I tried every option on setting the Player Camera Manager respectively the Player Controller in all the replicated options. To be clear: At first, I used my common sense but after a week of failure I tried every combination with no success.
As an example: Here is how I tried to access the Location and the forward Vector for a Line Trace
I also tried to set the Camera Manager as a variable (I tried both server and client) and then access it on the server.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix that?
Any help is much appreciated.
APlayerCameraManager is not an actor that replicates, so I'd expect that blueprints to only work on the client. You'll have to replicate the values you need back to the server.
If you're making a first person game APawn replicates a variable named RemoteViewPitch that may be enough depending on what you're doing.
You can do it just make an interface function with input the information that you need from the manager then go to character and assign that to it then go to the manager blueprint and get the information and use controlled pawn to get ur player ref and call interface function
Right now I'm trying to make a mmorpg for the iPhone. I have it set up so that the iPhone requests for the player positions several times a second. How it does this is that the client sends a request using asynchronous NSURLConnection to a php page that loads the positions from a mysql database and returns it in json. However, it takes about .5 seconds from when the positions are requested to when they actually get loaded. This seems really high, are there any obvious things that could cause this?
Also, this causes the player movement on the client to be really choppy too. Are there any algorithms or ways to reduce the choppiness of the player movement?
Start measuring how long the database query takes when you run it outside your iPhone.
Then measure how long it takes when you send the same http request from something other than your iPhone(It's e.g. a 10-15 line c# program to figure this out).
If none of the above show any sort of significant latency, the improvements need to be done on the iPhone side. Some things to look out for:
GPRS/3G has rather high latency
GPRS/3G has rather high bit error rates - meaning there's going to be quite a few dropped packets now and then which will cause tcp to retransmit and you'll experience even higher latency
HTTP has a lot of overhead.
JSON adds a lot of overhead.
Maybe you'll need to come up with a compact binary format for your messages, and drop HTTP in favor of a custom protocol - maybe even revert to UDP
The above points generally don't apply, but they do if you need to provide a smooth experience over high latency,low bandwidt, flaky connections.
At the very least, make sure you're not setting up a new TCP connection for every request. You need to use http keep-alive.
I don't have any specific info on player movement algorithms, but what is often used is some sort of movement prediction.
You know the direction the player is moving, you can derive the speed if it's not always constant - this means you can interpolate over time and guess his new position, adjust the on screen position while you're querying for the actual position, and adjust back to the actual position when you get the query response.
The trick is to always interpolate over time within certain boundaries. If your prediction was a bit off compared to what the query returned, don't immediatly snap the positon back to the real position. Do interpolation between the current position and the desired postion over a handful of frames.
On the server side you should be using some system that keep running and that keeps the database connection open all the time. Preferably it would also cache things instead of requesting them from database all the time.
Also, do not make a new HTTP request for every update. It would be best if you hadn't need to use HTTP at all, as it really isn't suitable for realtime comminunication.
GPRS typically has 600 ms ping time, 3G has 300 ms and HSPA has 100 ms. See which mode is being used. Notice that some devices (I don't know of iPhone) drop from HSPA to regular 3G for power-saving reasons whenever there is not enough traffic to justify the faster mode.
As for position, a rather common practice is to apply a linear prediction, i.e. make the character continue movement in current direction, at the current speed, even when no data from server is available yet.
Most importantly: benchmark/profile to see where the latencies are. Is it your server, the network connection or the application.
Loading the player positions that fast has downsides.
It hammers your server.
3G isn't really meant to support low-latency applications
So I don't see a mmorpg working without some necessary shortcuts at this time, e.g. extrapolating paths based on their velocity and position. Loading positions will not work as fast as you want, especially with a server based on PHP of all things.
Either way, when developing for a mobile platform you're going to have to make sacrifices in terms of features versus a fully-featured desktop implementation.
I might also reimplement some of the more critical stuff if not the whole server in a faster language, e.g. C++.