I am struggling with Enterprise Architect Relationship Matrices and would like to know if it is possible to group elements on the X and Y axis such as show in the figure below:
In the previous example elements 1 - 5 on the horizontal axis are grouped into label "Financial" and elements from 6 - 10 are grouped into label "Customer". On the vertical axis elements from 01 - 06 are grouped into label "Financial".
I would like to use the same structuring with an Enterprise Architect Relationship Matrix.
I already tried to put these elements in different packages and have the pakage name prefixed on the element name. However in that case all elements are ordered alphabetically which is not the desired behaviour.
If it was possible to colour the elements this would be an alternative for me.
So my question is, is this somehow possible or is there an alternative way to achieve a similar outcome?
Thank you for your help and suggestions!
Ronald
No, I'm afraid that is not possible.
As an alternative you could include the type of element into the name of the elements.
Something like
FIN - 002 - IT Compliance and support of..
INT - 012 - Enablement and support of...
Related
I have 15 pie charts on one worksheet (one for each year since 2006). At the minute I can either have them in a vertical line or a horizontal line but I want to have them in 3 rows of 5, how do I go about doing that?
Thanks in advance (from a Tableau newbie) !
What you're looking for could be a tecnqique that consists in creating two additional calculated field for row_indicator and column_indicator.
So assuming you have a pie for each product_category you could create something like this for rows:
if prdocuct_category in ('a','b','c','d','e') then 1
elseif prdocuct_category in ('f','g','h','i','j') then 2
else 3
end
Once you've done the same for columns, you can use those two fields in the worksheet as first field in row/column shelf.
Otherwise, you can check the small multiple technique which is more or less the same and splits your by in groups according to the square root.
Check this tecnique in this video:
https://www.vizwiz.com/2016/03/tableau-tip-tuesday-how-to-create-small.html
Very new to QGIS. I'm using it to analyse agricultural field microplots for research.
I need to give each field plot its own object which I've done so by using the "create grid" tool. But I need to assign a column and row number to each object in the attribute table to make it easier to sort the data. This should start in the bottom left (1:1) and ascend in row for objects above (2:1) and ascend in column for objects to the right (1:2).
I've orientated the grid to start in the bottom left and learned that by using #row_number, I can re-number the objects from 1 to the total number of objects. But I need to add column number and row number to the attribute table.
Is there a simple way of doing this?
I think the most accessible option here is using the field calculator to add two integer columns to the attribute table. For a rectilinear grid with cells_y cells in the y direction (24 in this case) the expressions are something like
floor(("id" - 1) / cells_y) + 1
where id is the attribute table column with the cell number (set automatically by Vector -> Research Tools -> Create grid or, in the OP's case, to #rownumber).
For the y index it's
cells_y + 1 - if(("id" % cells_y) = 0, cells_y, "id" % cells_y)
This is for the ones based indexing asked for here; remove the + 1 bits for zero-based. Similarly, subtracting (as is done with y here) or not subtracting (x here) the modulus part flips the directions in which the cells are numbered. This approach can also be used in PyQGIS.
There's a few grid plugins for QGIS and several similar StackOverflow questions (like this one) which may also be of interest.
looking to have a basic text grid by month by product, and then have a single filter on only 2 of the measures. For example:
Measures Filter
------------------
[ ] Sales <-- only show this
[X] Quantity <-- and this as options
[ ] Interest (don't show in filter)
[ ] Fee ( don't show in filter)
JAN | FEB | MAR | APR | MAY | etc ...
products
ITEM1 x x x x x
ITEM2 x x x x x
ITEM3 x x x x x
So the user can basically toggle between Sales or Quantity, and whichever they click on will fill out the x by month.
I was able to get this to work for everything except only showing the 2 measures I want to filter for. It only shows all measures for me in the filter and I can't figure out how to hide them.
What I did was
Drag Date to columns
Drag Product and MeasureNames to Rows
Can someone please help me on getting this correct? Any help or guidance is appreciated!
This is not the correct use case of FILTERS. Filters are normally used to filter (read subset) the data (read rows). Say for example If your dataset has 1000 rows/records and you want some report/visual/aggregation on say 500 rows (based on some criteria of course) you have to filter the data. For selection of argument (user based) in some report/viz, etc. Parameters are used.
Your desired example output is also a perfect case of use of Parameters. You may proceed as follows-
Step-1 Create a parameter (say parameter 1) with values as SALES and QUANTITY.
Step-2 Create a calculated field (say CF1) with the following calculation
CASE [parameter 1]
WHEN 'SALES` THEN [sales]
WHEN 'Quantity' then [Quantity]
END
Note: It is assumed that your field/column names in dataset are sales and Quantity
Step-3 Build your view (Crosstab here) with
months on Columns shelf
products on rows shelf
CF1 on text in Marks card (alternatively just double click it)
Choose measure for aggregation of CF1 as desired (default will be sum)
Step-4 right click paramter 1 and click show parameter. (select desired measure for aggregation in crosstab)
VOILA your desired view is complete. Good luck.
There is another options to add to Anil's good suggestion. You can also use Measure Names as a filter. Hide all measures apart from those you want in the filter, then put Measure Names on the filter shelf.
However, this means you can't use the hidden measures from the data source elsewhere, which can be a deal breaker. Duplicating the data source is a way around that limitation.
But if you only want to show the 2 measures and are happy with single select, then choosing the measure by parameter is the better option, as Anil suggests.
I have a dataset with dog ids, dog names, and neighborhoods. I would like to display the n most popular dog names for each neighborhood. How can I do that?
I figured how to display counts for each name in each neighborhood, by simply dragging 'Neighborhood' and 'Animal Name' in 'Rows', and 'CNT(Animal Name)' in 'Columns'. But I don't know how to select the top 3 or 4 names for each neighborhood.
I'm going to use Tableau's Sample Superstore dataset to walk through one way you can show the top N number of Products by Category. This example will easily transfer to Dog Names by Neighborhood.
I'll start by creating a Tableau calculation we'll use as a filter later.
RANK(COUNT([Product Name]))
I'll then put the Category and Product Names dimension on the Rows shelf and the Count of Product Names on the Text marks card.
We'll then place our Production Popularity table calculation on the filter shelf.
When the dialog box appears, just click OK.
Now we need to edit how our Table calculation runs to get the Top N Product Names within each Category.
Select Specific dimension and then uncheck Category or Neighborhood in your case.
Now we need to go edit our filter.
For this example, I'll set the upper limit to 3.
Click OK and you should see the top 3 Product Names by Category.
Of course, you'll want to adjust this example to fit your data.
Hope this was helpful. Happy vizzing!
I'm new to MATLAB and am stumped with an assignment for my research position. I need to create a For loop that compares two sets of data (day one and day 2) from 180 electrodes. However, we only have overlapping data from 175 electrodes (common_chans). I need to make a list of all possible electrode combinations from day 1 and day 2 of the common_chans electrodes, and have it display as an Y x 2 matrix for the all the combinations.
Any suggestions on how to do this? I feel like it's simple but I just don't have the background. Thanks!
Not sure I understood your question correctly, but if you need to make a list of all possible pairs:
nchoosek(1:175,2)
This displays a 15225 x 2 matrix.
This assumes that you don't care about the order (e.g. once you compared electrode 3 with electrode 6, this assumes you don't want to compare again electrode 6 with electrode 3). So this is different from Luis' link.