We are trying to build a Kubernetes node on our Private VMware infrastructure. I have the cluster up and running and and ingress running, however I can't figure out how to route traffic to the ingress.
We are using Rancher 2.0.7.
I would like to have the following setup if possible:
DNSMadeEasy.com to handle DNS A Records (DNS to External IP)
Firewall we host (External IP to Static Private IP)
Kubernetes Ingress (Private IP to Cluster Load balanced Ingress)
Load Balanced Ingress (Ingress to Service with multiple instances)
I can figure out the DNS and firewall routing, however I can't figure out how to set a static External IP address on the Ingress Load Balancer.
I can see you can specify a Host name in the Load balancer, however how does this become publicly available?
Could it be because we don;t have an external Load Balancer?
What am I missing on setup of the Ingress/Load balancer?
Thank you in advance, I have spent about two weeks trying to get this to work.
You need to be able to set the Ingress Service to type=LoadBalancer. With on-prem infrastructure, this either requires you to have an external loadbalancer like an F5.
One option to have this working is to use MetalLb
Related
help me figure it out.
I have a Bare Metal Kubernetes cluster with three nodes, each node has a public ip.
I have installed MetalLB and IngressController.
It is not clear to me which IP should I redirect domains and subdomains to so that they can be resolved by the Ingress Controller?
I need to initially define on which node the Ingress Controller will be launched?
I need to install the Ingress Controller, and then look at the worker node, on which it will be installed and send all domains or subdomains there?
What happens if, after restarting the cluster, the ingress controller will be deployed on another node?
All the tutorials I've seen show how it works locally or with a cloud load balancer.
Help me understand how this should work correctly.
Usually, when you install MetalLB, you configure a pool of addresses which can be used to assign new IPs at LoadBalancer services whenever they are created. Such IP addresses need to be available, they cannot be created out of nothing of course.. they could be in lease from your hosting provider for example.
If instead you have a private Bare Metal cluster which serves only your LAN network, you could just select a private range of IP addresses which are not used.
Then, once MetalLB is running, what happens is the following:
Someone / something creates a LoadBalancer services (an HELM Chart, a user with a definition, with commands, etc)
The newly created service needs an external IP. MetalLB will select one address from the configured selected range and assign it to that service
MetalLb will start to announce using standard protocol that the IP address can now be reached by contacting the cluster, it can work either in Layer2 mode (one node of the cluster holds that additional IP address) or BGP (true load balancing across all nodes of the cluster)
From that point, you can just reach the new service by contacting this newly assigned IP address (which is NOT the ip of any of the cluster nodes)
Usually, the Ingress Controller will just bring a LoadBalancer service (which will grab an external IP address from MetalLb) and then, you can reach hte Ingress Controller from that IP.
As for your other questions, you don't need to worry about where the Ingress Controller is running or similar, it will be automatically handled.
The only thing you may want to do is to make the domain names which you want to serve point to the external IP address assigned to the Ingress Controller.
Some docs:
MetalLB explanations
Bitnami MetalLB chart
LoadBalancer service docs
As an alternative (especially when you want "static" ip addresses) I should mention HAProxy, installed external to kubernetes cluster in a bare_server/vm/lxc_container/etc. and configured to send all incoming 80/433 traffic to the NodePort of ingress controller on all kubernetes workers (if no ingress pod is running on that worker traffic will be forwarded by kubernetes).
Of course, nowadays ip addresses are also "cattle", not "pets" anymore, so MetalLB is more of a "kubernetish" solution, but who knows ...
This is the link describing HAProxy solution (I am not affiliated with the author):
https://itnext.io/bare-metal-kubernetes-with-kubeadm-nginx-ingress-controller-and-haproxy-bb0a7ef29d4e
I have installed my kubernetes cluster on Jelastic. Now, I tried to define a service of LoadBalancer type and would like it to be provided with an external IP. The external IP is currently marked as pending. What should I do to make it non-pending? Do I have to provide the worker nodes with an external IPv4?
In my current setup, my worker nodes have no IPv4 because I put an nginx load-balancer in front of the cluster:
The IPv4 is set on the nginx node. Is that a problem? If I want to access my loadbalancer service inside of my kubernetes cluster, what should I do?
For LoadBalancer service type to work, the cloud provider must implemenet the relevant APIs to get it to work.
With regard to Jelastic, as per their docs, they don't support it https://docs.jelastic.com/kubernetes-exposing-services/:
Jelastic PaaS does not support the LocaBalancer service type currently.
In Jelastic Public IP addresses have to be attached to worker nodes.
Every worker node has ingress controller instance running (based oт nginx/haproxy/traefik) with http/https listeners that can forward traffic to the required service.
You have just to bind your domain as CNAME to Environment FQDN and every your worker node can accept requests in RR-DNS mode.
Does this scenario works for you or you have a specific requirement to use external load balancer?
By default, when Public IPs are not attached to worker instances the traffic is going through the Shared Load Balancer.
P.S. If you install Certification Manager Addon to your K8s cluster - you can also issue free Let's Encrypt certificates.
We have a request to expose certain pods in an AKS environment to the internet for 3rd party use.
Currently we have a private AKS cluster with a managed standard SKU load balancer in front using the advanced azure networking (basically Calico) where each Pod gets its own private IP from the Vnet IP space. All private IPs currently route through a firewall via user defined route in order to reach the internet, and vice versa. Traffic between on prem routes over a VPN connection through the azure virtual wan. I don’t want to change any existing routing behavior unless 100% necessary.
My question is, how do you expose an existing private AKS cluster’s specific Pods to be accessible from the internet? The entire cluster does not need to be exposed to the internet. The issue I foresee is the ephemeral Pods and ever changing IPs making simple NATing in the firewalls not an option. I’ve also thought about simply making a new AKS cluster with a public load balancer. The issue here though is security as it must still go through the firewalls and likely could with existing user defined routes
What is the recommended way to setup the architecture where certain Pods in AKS can be accessible over the internet, while still allowing those Pods to access the Pods over the private network. I want to avoid exposing all Pods to the internet
There are a couple of options that you can use in order to expose your application to
outside your network, such as: Service:
NodePort: Exposes the Service on each Node’s IP at a static port (the NodePort). A ClusterIP Service, to which the NodePort Service routes, is automatically created. You’ll be able to contact the NodePort Service, from outside the cluster, by requesting <NodeIP>:<NodePort>.
LoadBalancer: Exposes the Service externally using a cloud provider’s load balancer. NodePort and ClusterIP Services, to which the external load balancer routes, are automatically created.
Also, there is another option that is use an ingress, IMO this is the best way to expose HTTP applications externally, because it's possible to create rules by path and host, and gives you much more flexibility than services. For ingress only HTTP/HTTPS is supported, if you need TCP then go to Services
I'd recommend you take a look in this links to understand in deep how services and ingress works:
Kubernetes Services
Kubernetes Ingress
NGINX Ingress
AKS network concepts
Deploy nginx ingress controller and bind the ingress controller service to a public Load Balancer. Define Ingress rules for the kubernetes services that you want to access from internet. Note that ingress controller enables entry point to the services running inside kubernetes
Several years later and wanted to update.
We did successfully implement a scalable ingress option into our private AKS cluster using NGINX as the ingress. The basic flow was
Public IP > NAT to frontend private IP of NGINX > NGINX path rules that point to your pod/service
Taking a URL as an example for a microservice of www.example.com/service1, the public DNS entry you create is what resolves www.example.com to the public IP that you will NAT to the private IP of NGINX. Then, the rules you create within NGINX take the specific /service1 path of the URL and use it to route to the specific service you pointed it at. It behaves much like URL switching in other load balancers. That is really all NGINX is doing for you. In NGINX syntax, this involves specifying a hosts name (URL) and an associated rule with a backend path and service name. The service name in this example is service1 and the path is / because service1 sits just behind the root.
Something like this saves cost by using less public IPs. For example, you can use a subdomain to easily NAT traffic to a seperate test environment. www.test.example.com and www.example.com can point to separate public IPs, which you can NAT to separate AKS clusters running NGINX. In this way, your NGINX rules can be identical because it's only looking for /service1 which hopefully you've mirrored test and prod environments.
Many ways to do this but a few recommendations from lessons learned
use subdomains to break out multiple environments
standardize your NGINX private front end IP across envronments (make them all end in .100 as an example
create a standard NGINX ingress template where you really only need to modify the serviceName. Your hostName should be static within an environment
have your devs include this and deploy their microservices with helm rather than relying on an infrastructure team to update NGINX services. Sort of defeats the devops mentality and speed gains
I'm new to GKE and K8S so please bare with me and my silliness. I currently have a GKE cluster that has two nodes in the default node pool and the cluster is exposed via a LoadBalancer type service.
These nodes are tasked with calling a Compute Engine instance via HTTP. I have a Firewall rule set in GCP to deny ingress traffic to the GCE instance except the one coming from the GKE cluster.
The issue is that the traffic isn't coming from the LoadBalancer's service IP but rather from the nodes themselves, so whitelisting the services' IP has no effect and I have to whitelist the IPs of the nodes instead of the cluster. This is not ideal, since each time a new node is created I have to change the Firewall rule. I understand that once you have a service set up in the cluster, all traffic will be directed towards the IP of the service, so why is this happening? What am I doing wrong? Please let me know if you need more details and thanks in advance.
YAML of the service:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/XBZmE.png
When you create a service on GKE, and you expose it to internet, a load balancer is created. This load balancer manage only the ingress traffic (traffic from internet to your GKE cluster).
When your pod initiate a communication, the traffic is not managed by the load balancer, but by the node that host the pod, if the node have a public IP (Instead of denied the traffic to GCE instance, simply remove the public IP, it's easier and safer!).
If you want to manage the IP for egress traffic originated by your pod, you have to set up a Cloud NAT on your GKE cluster.
I have created a k8s service (type=loadbalancer) with a numbers of pods behind. To my understanding, all packets initiazed from the pods will have the source ip as PodIP, wheareas those responding the inbound traffic will have the source ip as LoadBalancer IP. So my questions are:
Is my claim true, or there are times the source IP will be the node IP instead?
Are there any tricks in k8s, which I can change the source IP in the first scenario from PodIP to LB IP??
Any way to specify a designated pod IP??
The Pods are running in the internal network while the load balancer is exposed on the Internet, so the addresses of the packets will look more or less like this:
[pod1] <-----> [load balancer] <-----> [browser]
10.1.0.123 10.1.0.234 201.123.41.53 217.123.41.53
For specifying the pod IP have a look at SessionAffinity.
As user315902 said, Azure ACS k8s exposed service to internet with Azure load balancer.
Architectural diagram of Kubernetes deployed via Azure Container Service:
Is my claim true, or there are times the source IP will be the node IP
instead?
If we expose the service to internet, I think the source IP will be the load balancer public IP address. In ACS, if we expose multiple services to internet, Azure LB will add multiple public IP addresses.
Are there any tricks in k8s, which I can change the source IP in the
first scenario from PodIP to LB IP??
Do you mean you want to use node public IP address to expose the service to internet? if yes, I think we can't use node IP to expose service to internet. In Azure, we had to use LB to expose service to internet.