I'm having some troubles with a nginx pod inside a kubernetes cluster located on GCP which should be able to access a service located on app engine.
I have set firewall rules in the app engine to deny all and only allow some ips but the ip which hits my app engine service isn't the IP of the load balancer of my Nginx but instead the IP of one of the node of the cluster.
An image is better than 1000 words, then here's an image of our architecture :
The problem is: The ip which hits app engine's firewall is IP A whereas I thought i'd be IP B. IP A changes everytime I kill/create the cluster. If it were IP B, I could easily open this IP in App engine's firewall rules as I've put her static. Anyone has an idea how to have IP B instead of IP A ?
Thanks
The IP address assigned to your nginx "load balancer" is (likely) not an IP owned or managed by your Kubernetes cluster. Services of type LoadBalancer in GKE use Google Cloud Load Balancers. These are an external abstraction which terminates inbound connections in Google's front-end infrastructure and passes traffic to the individual k8s nodes in the cluster for onward delivery to your k8s-hosted service.
Pods in a Kubernetes cluster will, by default, route egress traffic out of the cluster using the configuration of their host node. In GKE, this route corresponds to the gateway of the VPC in which the cluster (and, by extension, Compute Engine instances) exists. The public IP of cluster nodes will change as they are added and removed from the pool.
A workaround uses a dedicated instance with a static external IP to process egress traffic leaving your VPC (i.e. egress from your cluster). Google has a tutorial for this purpose here: https://cloud.google.com/solutions/using-a-nat-gateway-with-kubernetes-engine
There are k8s-native solutions, but these will be unsuitable in a GKE context at present due to the inability to maintain any node with a non-ephemeral public IP.
Related
I'm trying to understand how traffic can be forwarded to an on-premise Kubernetes cluster.
It's clear to me that in a public Cloud provider, the underlying infrastructure of the Cloud can automatically manage and forward traffic to a Kubernetes distribution, such as EKS, GKE, AKS, by assining a LoadBalancer IP to a Kubernetes Service. Then, after a few seconds, this service will receive an external IP and will be reachable from the outside world.
On the other hand, in an on-premise Kubernetes cluster, by assigning a LoadBalancer IP to a service, it stays on pending forever, unless you assign a node IP, but what if you want to assign a different IP from a private IP range? In order to tackle this, in my homelab, I've deployed metallb inside my K3s cluster. The metallb is configured to use a private IP range of my network, let's say 10.0.0.0/24. Now, services of type LoadBalancer can consume an address of this range, e.g. my Ingress Controller can receive 10.0.2.3 as its external IP.
I can't understand what's metallb doing under the hood. How metallb "listens" to an address of the range and forwards traffic to my cluster. Can this be achieved without a metallb? I've tried setting an ExternalIP directly to a service of type LoadBalancer, but it never managed to claim that specific IP without it.
In addition, I'm aware that this can also be achieved with a "physical" load-balancer solution, such as NGINX and HAProxy, that sits in front of the cluster. To my understanding, technically this does the same thing as metallb. With such a solution configured, an address can be listened and be forwarded to the cluster. But my question here is, can this be achieved without those technologies? Can a Kubernetes Cluster listen to an external address and accept traffic without an intermediate solution? Maybe through Firewall rules and port-forwarding?
Your time is highly appreciated!
This involves some of the core networking concepts like NATing, you can have two networks one local and one external CIDR. For exposing the services you can NAT the local CIDR with external CIDR and configure required firewall rules for making your cluster serve the public.
I have installed my kubernetes cluster on Jelastic. Now, I tried to define a service of LoadBalancer type and would like it to be provided with an external IP. The external IP is currently marked as pending. What should I do to make it non-pending? Do I have to provide the worker nodes with an external IPv4?
In my current setup, my worker nodes have no IPv4 because I put an nginx load-balancer in front of the cluster:
The IPv4 is set on the nginx node. Is that a problem? If I want to access my loadbalancer service inside of my kubernetes cluster, what should I do?
For LoadBalancer service type to work, the cloud provider must implemenet the relevant APIs to get it to work.
With regard to Jelastic, as per their docs, they don't support it https://docs.jelastic.com/kubernetes-exposing-services/:
Jelastic PaaS does not support the LocaBalancer service type currently.
In Jelastic Public IP addresses have to be attached to worker nodes.
Every worker node has ingress controller instance running (based oт nginx/haproxy/traefik) with http/https listeners that can forward traffic to the required service.
You have just to bind your domain as CNAME to Environment FQDN and every your worker node can accept requests in RR-DNS mode.
Does this scenario works for you or you have a specific requirement to use external load balancer?
By default, when Public IPs are not attached to worker instances the traffic is going through the Shared Load Balancer.
P.S. If you install Certification Manager Addon to your K8s cluster - you can also issue free Let's Encrypt certificates.
I'm new to GKE and K8S so please bare with me and my silliness. I currently have a GKE cluster that has two nodes in the default node pool and the cluster is exposed via a LoadBalancer type service.
These nodes are tasked with calling a Compute Engine instance via HTTP. I have a Firewall rule set in GCP to deny ingress traffic to the GCE instance except the one coming from the GKE cluster.
The issue is that the traffic isn't coming from the LoadBalancer's service IP but rather from the nodes themselves, so whitelisting the services' IP has no effect and I have to whitelist the IPs of the nodes instead of the cluster. This is not ideal, since each time a new node is created I have to change the Firewall rule. I understand that once you have a service set up in the cluster, all traffic will be directed towards the IP of the service, so why is this happening? What am I doing wrong? Please let me know if you need more details and thanks in advance.
YAML of the service:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/XBZmE.png
When you create a service on GKE, and you expose it to internet, a load balancer is created. This load balancer manage only the ingress traffic (traffic from internet to your GKE cluster).
When your pod initiate a communication, the traffic is not managed by the load balancer, but by the node that host the pod, if the node have a public IP (Instead of denied the traffic to GCE instance, simply remove the public IP, it's easier and safer!).
If you want to manage the IP for egress traffic originated by your pod, you have to set up a Cloud NAT on your GKE cluster.
I have a GKE cluster set up with Cloud NAT, so traffic from any node/container going outward would have the same external IP. (I needed this for whitelisting purposes while working with 3rd-party services).
Now, if I want to deploy a proxy server onto this cluster that does basic traffic forwarding, how do I expose the proxy server "endpoint"? Or more generically, how do I expose a service if I deploy it to this GKE cluster?
Proxy server running behind NAT ?
Bad idea, unless it is only for your kubernetes cluster workload, but you didn't specify anywhere that it should be reachable only by other Pods running in the same cluster.
As you can read here:
Cloud NAT does not implement unsolicited inbound connections from the
internet. DNAT is only performed for packets that arrive as responses
to outbound packets.
So it is not meant to be reachable from outside.
If you want to expose any application within your cluster, making it available for other Pods, use simple ClusterIP Service which is the default type and it will be created as such even if you don't specify its type at all.
Normally, to expose a service endpoint running on a Kubernetes cluster, you have to use one of the Service Types, as Pods have internal IP addresses and are not addressable externally.
The possible service types:
ClusterIP: this also uses an internal IP address, and is therefore not addressable externally.
NodePort: this type opens a port on every node in your Kubernetes cluster, and configures iptables to forward traffic arriving to this port into the Pods providing the actual service.
LoadBalancer: this type opens a port on every node as with NodePort, and also allocates a Google Cloud Load Balancer service, and configures that service to access the port opened on the Kubernetes nodes (actually load balancing the incoming traffic between your operation Kubernetes nodes).
ExternalName: this type configures the Kubernetes internal DNS server to point to the specified IP address (to provide a dynamic DNS entry inside the cluster to connect to external services).
Out of those, NodePort and LoadBalancer are usable for your purposes. With a simple NodePort type Service, you would need publicly accessible node IP addresses, and the port allocated could be used to access your proxy service through any node of your cluster. As any one of your nodes may disappear at any time, this kind of service access is only good if your proxy clients know how to switch to another node IP address. Or you could use the LoadBalancer type Service, in that case you can use the IP address of the configured Google Cloud Load Balancer for your clients to connect to, and expect the load balancer to forward the traffic to any one of the running nodes of your cluster, which would then forward the traffic to one of the Pods providing this service.
For your proxy server to access the Internet as a client, you also need some kind of public IP address. Either you give the Kubernetes nodes public IP addresses (in that case, if you have more than a single node, you'd see multiple source IP addresses, as each node has its own IP address), or if you use private addresses for your Kubernetes nodes, you need a Source NAT functionality, like the one you already use: Cloud NAT
We have had our database running on Kubernetes cluster (deployed to our private network) in Google cloud for a few months now. Last week we noticed that for some reason the IP address of all underlying nodes (VMs) changed. This caused an outage. We have been using the NodePort configuration of Kubernetes for our service to access our database (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#nodeport).
We understand that the IP address of the pods within the VMs are dynamic and will eventually change, however we did not know that the IP address of the actual nodes (VMs) may also change. Is this normal? Does anyone know what can cause a VM IP address change in a Kubernetes cluster?
From the documentation about Ephemeral IP Addresses on GCP,
When you create an instance or forwarding rule without specifying an
IP address, the resource is automatically assigned an ephemeral
external IP address. Ephemeral external IP address are released from a
resource if you delete the resource. For VM instances, if you stop the
instance, the IP address is also released. Once you restart the
instance, it is assigned a new ephemeral external IP address.
You can assign static external IP addresses to instances, but as #Notauser mentioned, it is not recommended for Kubernetes nodes. This is because you may configure autoscaler for your instance groups and node sizes can be minimized or maximized.
Also, you need to reserve a static IP address for each node, which is not recommended. Moreover you will waste Static IP address resources and if the reserved static IP addresses are not used, you will still be charged for that.
Otherwise you can configure HTTP loadbalancer using ingress and then reserve a static IP address for your load balancer. Instead of using NodePort you should use ClusterIP type services and create an ingress rule forwarding the traffic to those services.
If you are using a managed Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster, this is expected as nodes are mortal and might be replaced or restarted if it becomes unresponsive for example. Therefore the node's IP will change. There is currently no way to assign a static (fixed) public IP to nodes. In this case you should expose your DB service as cluster IP instead. it will have an unchanged static IP. Here's an example on how to do that.
Alternatively, if you are using a non-managed kubernetes cluster in Compute Engine (GCE) then you simply have to promote your nodes IP's to static.