I have a date in UTC (timestamp with time zone):
test=# select ('2018-05-31T21:00:00+00'::timestamptz);
timestamptz
------------------------
2018-05-31 21:00:00+00
(1 row)
I want to convert it to another timezone, for example UTC+2. The documentation states that at time zone should do it for me:
Experession
<timestamp with time zone> AT TIME ZONE <zone>
Return type
timestamp without time zone
Description
Convert the given time stamp with time zone to the new time zone, with no time zone designation
See here.
But when I try to do it, I get strange results:
test# select ('2018-05-31T21:00:00+00'::timestamptz) at time zone 'utc+2';
timezone
---------------------
2018-05-31 19:00:00
(1 row)
I am pretty sure that 21 hours in UTC is 23 hours in UTC+2 (that's the reason for +2, after all).
What am I doing wrong here?
Your problem is the POSIX standard that according to the documentation decrees that
Another issue to keep in mind is that in POSIX time zone names, positive offsets are used for locations west of Greenwich. Everywhere else, PostgreSQL follows the ISO-8601 convention that positive timezone offsets are east of Greenwich.
Related
I'm trying to understand how the session time zone works in PostgreSQL.
When I set session time zone to '01:00', returned date is in '-01:00'. Sign is always inverted and I do not understand this behavior.
How can this be explained?
postgres=# set time zone '00:00';
SET
postgres=# select timestamp with time zone '2017-11-29 15:00:00.000000+00';
timestamptz
------------------------
2017-11-29 15:00:00+00
(1 row)
postgres=# set time zone '01:00';
SET
postgres=# select timestamp with time zone '2017-11-29 15:00:00.000000+00';
timestamptz
------------------------
2017-11-29 14:00:00-01
(1 row)
postgres=# set time zone '-01:00';
SET
postgres=# select timestamp with time zone '2017-11-29 15:00:00.000000+00';
timestamptz
------------------------
2017-11-29 16:00:00+01
(1 row)
example, here
ts is time (text) - just time as we say it, :
not_aware the time if we don't know its timezone (local to the saying person)
aware the time, but knowing the timezone of it(if server time zone is UTC, then of utc zone)
, so:
s=# with s(city,tz) as (values('Moscow','UTC+3'),('New York','UTC-5'))
, ts as (select '2017-01-01 00:00:00'::text ts)
select *,ts::timestamp at time zone tz not_aware, ts::timestamptz at time zone tz aware
from s
join ts on true;
city | tz | ts | not_aware | aware
----------+-------+---------------------+------------------------+---------------------
Moscow | UTC+3 | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 | 2017-01-01 03:00:00+00 | 2016-12-31 21:00:00
New York | UTC-5 | 2017-01-01 00:00:00 | 2016-12-31 19:00:00+00 | 2017-01-01 05:00:00
(2 rows)
lets say you you come from Lodon and have have watches that show UTC0 time
- local for London (this is your server with timezone UTC0). Now are fly to Moscow, looking at the Kremlin Clock and you see the ts, midnight. Your watches are aware of time difference and they show you that to Ney Year is in three hours (this is timestamptz - aware column). This is why UTC+3 requires to minus the time. Because for your server Moscow time is in future, thus when you see local 2017, for server it is still 2016 and gonna be like it for +3 hours...
Now the behaviour that you expected (not_aware column) is more tricky. The server runs at UTC0, but has to pretend it know nothing about the "real time". As timestamp without time zone is such type. So it behaves as if you were watching new year celebration on Red Square on TV and would just scroll the bar to adjust your watches to Kremlin Clock, so in fact the time you see is your London time +3 (not_aware) column.
I came across this while looking for answers to other questions.
In case you never figured it out:
I think this is a quirk of the timezone parsing code trying to follow POSIX syntax, as noted above. You get the same behavior by e.g. SET TIME ZONE 'CET1:00'; or SET TIME ZONE 'CET1'.
I think the "actual" SQL way of saying what you were trying to say is SET TIME ZONE 1.
You probably don't want to have this be set as your timezone anyhow because it doesn't track DST changes. You probably want to choose a timezone by name from the tz database, for example America/New_York or (going with the GMT+1 example) Europe/Madrid.
I'm struggling to understand how "AT TIME ZONE 'localtime'" exactly work? By playing with it, I found out that it acts exactly as "AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'"... But why? Is "localtime" a synonym of "UTC" in postgres? Or it comes from some setting (environment? connection timezone? although checked both, seems they are not related)...
There's "localtime" function but I think it is not involved here.
Sample SQLs:
# date
Thu Dec 8 12:00:05 AEDT 2016
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP;
----------------------------
2016-12-08 01:13:29.444725
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP AT TIME ZONE 'America/New_York';
-------------------------------
2016-12-08 06:08:31.183103+00
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP AT TIME ZONE'localtime';
------------------------------
2016-12-08 01:09:25.294063+00
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP AT TIME ZONE 'utc';
-------------------------------
2016-12-08 01:09:44.32587+00 -- SAME AS ABOVE
# SET TIME ZONE 'America/New_York';
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP;
----------------------------
2016-12-07 20:13:34.924647
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP AT TIME ZONE 'localtime';
------------------------------
2016-12-07 15:10:08.188197-05
# SELECT LOCALTIMESTAMP AT TIME ZONE 'utc';
------------------------------
2016-12-07 15:10:44.88332-05 -- SAME AS ABOVE
Any hint? Is it documented somewhere?
A timestamp in Postgres does not actually store any timezone information. Rather, this information comes from the timezone which is set by the server. Internally, all timestamp information is recorded in UTC time. So, for example, if you stored timestamp information from a timezone other than UTC, Postgres would first convert that timestamp to UTC before storing it.
From the documentation:
For timestamp with time zone, the internally stored value is always in UTC (Universal Coordinated Time, traditionally known as Greenwich Mean Time, GMT). An input value that has an explicit time zone specified is converted to UTC using the appropriate offset for that time zone. If no time zone is stated in the input string, then it is assumed to be in the time zone indicated by the system's timezone parameter, and is converted to UTC using the offset for the timezone zone.
To your actual question, localtime is just the timezone of the server which is always UTC.
Furthermore, it appears that Postgres' localtime simply wraps the C library function localtime(), which attempts to find the local system time (which is in default UTC time). Again, from the documentation:
If timezone is not specified in postgresql.conf or as a server command-line option, the server attempts to use the value of the TZ environment variable as the default time zone. If TZ is not defined or is not any of the time zone names known to PostgreSQL, the server attempts to determine the operating system's default time zone by checking the behavior of the C library function localtime(). The default time zone is selected as the closest match among PostgreSQL's known time zones. (These rules are also used to choose the default value of log_timezone, if not specified.)
I am new to PostgreSQL and I was wondering if there is a direct way to just convert the timestamp values in a table to a different timezone using a function. In my case it is UTC to EST.
These are the values for example that I need to convert to EST (not just one value but all the values in the table)
date
-------------------
2015-10-24 16:38:46
2016-01-19 18:27:00
2016-01-24 16:14:34
2016-02-09 23:05:49
2016-02-11 20:46:26
Here in London, we are currently 1 hour ahead of UTC. So - if I take your timezone without timestamp and say it is in UTC I will get it printed for my local timezone.
richardh=> SELECT ((timestamp '2015-10-24 16:38:46') AT TIME ZONE 'UTC');
timezone
------------------------
2015-10-24 17:38:46+01
(1 row)
But you want "EST" which seems to be somewhere in the Americas, judging by the value returned. You can wrap the expression in a little SQL function if you wanted to.
richardh=> SELECT ((timestamp '2015-10-24 16:38:46') AT TIME ZONE 'UTC') AT TIME ZONE 'EST';
timezone
---------------------
2015-10-24 11:38:46
(1 row)
Edit: how to do it in a query
SELECT ((stored_timestamp AT TIME ZONE 'UTC') AT TIME ZONE 'EST') AS local_timestamp
FROM my_table;
Similarly
execute
SELECT '2015-10-24 16:38:46'::timestamp AT time zone 'EST';
timezone
------------------------
2015-10-24 21:38:46+00
(1 row)
I usually leave everything in UTC and convert when it is time to show.
I use something like:
SELECT my_date_utc AT time zone 'utc' at time zone 'est' From ....
If you have problem accessing with your zone, you can simply pass your zone interval also.
To convert timestamp from IST to UTC.
SELECT '2020-12-14 06:38:46'::timestamp AT time zone INTERVAL '+05:30';
timezone
------------------------
2015-10-24 11:38:46+00
(1 row)
To convert timestamp from UTC to IST.
SELECT '2020-12-14 06:38:46'::timestamp AT time zone INTERVAL '-05:30';
timezone
------------------------
2020-12-14 12:08:46+00
(1 row)
It is 12:22 here in Los Angeles now.
I find that I have to reverse the UST and america/los_angeles arguments:
ods=> SELECT NOW(),(NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'america/los_angeles') AT TIME ZONE 'utc';;
now | timezone
-------------------------------+-------------------------------
2022-04-22 19:22:35.943605+00 | 2022-04-22 12:22:35.943605+00
(1 row)
Am I missing something?
You should always store the main reference of a date in UTC and either convert it to a time zone in your queries or store the specific timezone version of the data in another column. The reason for this is that it is quick and easy to convert a date from UTC to another time zone as long as you know that the timezone that it is stored as is UTC. It takes the guess work out of it. Alternatively, you can store the date WITH the timezone.
If you have an operation that automatically populates the date with the system clock of your server, then you can either
A: Change the operation to use UTC time
B: Change the system clock on the server to UTC
I had the same problem, I am working with different regions and timezones, I need to just fix the timezone in the query the way it doesn't effect other customers around the regions and I havent changed the table structure or any thing(Open–closed principle) . What I did In my query:
SELECT TO_CHAR(current_timestamp at time zone 'Australia/Melbourne', 'DD/MM/YYYY hh24:mi AM') as date_of_extract
This worked for me and I could change the 'UTC' defult timezone for my postgressql to the 'Australia/Melbourne'(any time zone you are looking into). hope this is helpful.
Building off of #Leandro Castro's answer...
To get current time in in timezone, use the CURRENT_TIME function:
SELECT CURRENT_TIME(0) AT time zone 'utc' at time zone 'est';
I store timestamps with time zone in my postgres database. The server time zone is UTC. All the timestamptzs are stored as UTC datetimes.
Now, I'd like to retrieve those timestamps, but for a specific time zone (e.g. US/Pacific). Because of daylight savings time, the correct time zone is sometimes PDT and sometimes PST. So I can't just run a query like select t at time zone 'pdt' because this will be wrong for the pst dates.
Is there a way to pull the dates from the database in the correct time zone?
According to the documentation, together with TIME ZONE code you can also specify locales. For your case you can use something like that:
ds=# SELECT current_setting('TIMEZONE');
current_setting
-----------------
UTC
(1 row)
ds=# SELECT now();
now
-------------------------------
2015-11-05 00:35:03.126317+00
(1 row)
pm7=# SELECT now() AT TIME ZONE 'America/Los_Angeles';
timezone
----------------------------
2015-11-04 16:35:06.344367
(1 row)
Are timestamp values stored differently in PostgreSQL when the data type is WITH TIME ZONE versus WITHOUT TIME ZONE? Can the differences be illustrated with simple test cases?
The differences are covered at the PostgreSQL documentation for date/time types. Yes, the treatment of TIME or TIMESTAMP differs between one WITH TIME ZONE or WITHOUT TIME ZONE. It doesn't affect how the values are stored; it affects how they are interpreted.
The effects of time zones on these data types is covered specifically in the docs. The difference arises from what the system can reasonably know about the value:
With a time zone as part of the value, the value can be rendered as a local time in the client.
Without a time zone as part of the value, the obvious default time zone is UTC, so it is rendered for that time zone.
The behaviour differs depending on at least three factors:
The timezone setting in the client.
The data type (i.e. WITH TIME ZONE or WITHOUT TIME ZONE) of the value.
Whether the value is specified with a particular time zone.
Here are examples covering the combinations of those factors:
foo=> SET TIMEZONE TO 'Japan';
SET
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP;
timestamp
---------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE;
timestamptz
------------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00+09
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00+03'::TIMESTAMP;
timestamp
---------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00+03'::TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE;
timestamptz
------------------------
2011-01-01 06:00:00+09
(1 row)
foo=> SET TIMEZONE TO 'Australia/Melbourne';
SET
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP;
timestamp
---------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00'::TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE;
timestamptz
------------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00+11
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00+03'::TIMESTAMP;
timestamp
---------------------
2011-01-01 00:00:00
(1 row)
foo=> SELECT '2011-01-01 00:00:00+03'::TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE;
timestamptz
------------------------
2011-01-01 08:00:00+11
(1 row)
I try to explain it more understandably than the referred PostgreSQL documentation.
Neither TIMESTAMP variants store a time zone (or an offset), despite what the names suggest. The difference is in the interpretation of the stored data (and in the intended application), not in the storage format itself:
TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE stores local date-time (aka. wall calendar date and wall clock time). Its time zone is unspecified as far as PostgreSQL can tell (though your application may knows what it is). Hence, PostgreSQL does no time zone related conversion on input or output. If the value was entered into the database as '2011-07-01 06:30:30', then no mater in what time zone you display it later, it will still say year 2011, month 07, day 01, 06 hours, 30 minutes, and 30 seconds (in some format). Also, any offset or time zone you specify in the input is ignored by PostgreSQL, so '2011-07-01 06:30:30+00' and '2011-07-01 06:30:30+05' are the same as just '2011-07-01 06:30:30'.
For Java developers: it's analogous to java.time.LocalDateTime.
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE stores a point on the UTC time line. How it looks (how many hours, minutes, etc.) depends on your time zone, but it always refers to the same "physical" instant (like the moment of an actual physical event). The
input is internally converted to UTC, and that's how it's stored. For that, the offset of the input must be known, so when the input contains no explicit offset or time zone (like '2011-07-01 06:30:30') it's assumed to be in the current time zone of the PostgreSQL session, otherwise the explicitly specified offset or time zone is used (as in '2011-07-01 06:30:30+05'). The output is displayed converted to the current time zone of the PostgreSQL session.
For Java developers: It's analogous to java.time.Instant (with lower resolution though), but with JDBC and JPA 2.2 you are supposed to map it to java.time.OffsetDateTime (or to java.util.Date or java.sql.Timestamp of course).
Some say that both TIMESTAMP variations store UTC date-time. Kind of, but it's confusing to put it that way in my opinion. TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE is stored like a TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE, which rendered with UTC time zone happens to give the same year, month, day, hours, minutes, seconds, and microseconds as they are in the local date-time. But it's not meant to represent the point on the time line that the UTC interpretation says, it's just the way the local date-time fields are encoded. (It's some cluster of dots on the time line, as the real time zone is not UTC; we don't know what it is.)
Here is an example that should help. If you have a timestamp with a timezone, you can convert that timestamp into any other timezone. If you haven't got a base timezone it won't be converted correctly.
SELECT now(),
now()::timestamp,
now() AT TIME ZONE 'CST',
now()::timestamp AT TIME ZONE 'CST'
Output:
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------------------------
now | 2018-09-15 17:01:36.399357+03
now | 2018-09-15 17:01:36.399357
timezone | 2018-09-15 08:01:36.399357
timezone | 2018-09-16 02:01:36.399357+03
Timestamptz vs Timestamp
The timestamptz field in Postgres is basically just the timestamp field where Postgres actually just stores the “normalised” UTC time, even if the timestamp given in the input string has a timezone.
If your input string is: 2018-08-28T12:30:00+05:30 , when this timestamp is stored in the database, it will be stored as 2018-08-28T07:00:00.
The advantage of this over the simple timestamp field is that your input to the database will be timezone independent, and will not be inaccurate when apps from different timezones insert timestamps, or when you move your database server location to a different timezone.
To quote from the docs:
For timestamp with time zone, the internally stored value is always in
UTC (Universal Coordinated Time, traditionally known as Greenwich Mean
Time, GMT). An input value that has an explicit time zone specified is
converted to UTC using the appropriate offset for that time zone. If
no time zone is stated in the input string, then it is assumed to be
in the time zone indicated by the system’s TimeZone parameter, and is
converted to UTC using the offset for the timezone zone. To give a
simple analogy, a timestamptz value represents an instant in time, the
same instant for anyone viewing it. But a timestamp value just
represents a particular orientation of a clock, which will represent
different instances of time based on your timezone.
For pretty much any use case, timestamptz is almost always a better choice. This choice is made easier with the fact that both timestamptz and timestamp take up the same 8 bytes of data.
source:
https://hasura.io/blog/postgres-date-time-data-types-on-graphql-fd926e86ee87/
The diffrences are shown in PostgreSQL official docs. Please refer the docs for deep digging.
In a nutshell TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE doesn't save any timezone related informations if you give date time with timezone info,it takes date & time only and ignores timezone
For example
When I save this 12:13, 11 June 2021 IST to PostgreSQL TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE will reject the timezone information and saves the date time 12:13,11 June 2021
But the the case of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE it saves the timezone info in UTC format.
For example
When I save this 12:13, 11 June 2021 IST to PostgreSQL TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE type variable it will interpret this time to UTC value and
stored as shown in below 6:43,11 June 2021 UTC
NB : UTC + 5.30 is IST
During the time conversion time returned by TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE will be stored in UTC format and we can convert it to the required timezone like IST or PST etc.
So the recommented timestamp type in PostgreSQL is TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE or TIMESTAMPZ
Run the following to see diff in pgAdmin:
create table public.testts (tz timestamp with time zone, tnz timestamp without time zone);
insert into public.testts values(now(), now());
select * from public.testts;
If you have similar issues I had of timestamp precision in Angular / Typescript / Node API / PostgreSql environment, hope my complete answer and solution will help you out.