I downloaded and installed Postsharp the essentials version which according to the matrix on their website includes caching.
I added it to my project by right clicking and selecting the Add Postsharp option.
When I go into my project to play with testing and I type:
using PostSharp.Patterns
Patterns is not an option for me, I have Aspects, Collections, Constraints... but no Patterns.
Am I missing a reference, is this a license issue?
PostSharp is split into multiple NuGet packages. Selecting "Add PostSharp to project" only installs the core package (PostSharp). In your case, you need to install PostSharp.Patterns.Caching. Please note that you will also need to specify the caching backend, see the documentation on caching.
Related
I am reviewing our TFS access code after we upgraded to VS 2017 and VSTS Online.
I found out from another question on this site that the recommended way to access the TFS libraries is via a NuGetPackage.
Great, that's surely better than referencing from the Team Explorer installation folder.
However, the NuGet package in question added over 45 references to my project.
I believe I am only using 4-6 of them.
I found this question which discussed the fact that the package files do not have to go into source control.
That's good to know.
However, the references have been added as "Copy Local" and so they are all currently being copied to my output directory. This has caused my application to more than treble in size. It just doesn't seem like good practice.
Do people usually just ignore this and trade off against the fact they are getting great dependency management?
Or manually remove the non-required references...? Do future updates put the references back?
Or have I incorrectly consumed the package in some way...?
There are a lot of NuGet questions on this site. I did search but please accept my apologies if this is a duplicate.
Do people usually just ignore this and trade off against the fact they are getting great dependency management?
Add all dependencies to the project is the default behavior of NuGet. At this moment, there is not such option so that we could choose some of those dependencies.
Although all dependencies are added to the project as "Copy Local", when we publish our application, we could exclude those unneeded dependencies by changing the Publish Status from Include (Auto) to Exclude:
In this case, those non-required references are not included into the application.
Or manually remove the non-required references...? Do future updates
put the references back?
Yes, you can manually remove those non-required references, but when you update the package next time, those removed references would be re-add again.
Besides, as you said, you are only using 4-6 of them. You can try to custom a nuget package only including those 4-6 references.
Create nuget package from dlls
Hope this helps.
I have 2 projects: A & B that I want to publish as NuGet Packages but I don't know how to develop efficiently in Visual Studio.
Solution 1
Project A
Project B - references Project A as NuGet reference
When I make a change to Project A that is needed in Project B do I have to publish Project A? Is there a way to get the project reference functionality during development? Maybe Project B shouldn't reference Project A via NuGet?
There must be a good way to handle this situation, no? I've reviewed the NuGet docs but I couldn't find anything. There must be docs/blogs/SO posts to read more about this... I'm struggling to come up w/ the right keywords.
You might want to look at this extension: NuGet Reference Switcher for Visual Studio 2017
This allows you to switch between NuGet packages and project references during development.
Check out this blog post: https://markheath.net/post/multiple-nuget-single-repo
Basically, dotnet pack handles this for you automatically. You use regular project references when developing.
There must be a good way to handle this situation, no?
The best solutions is that the project-to-project reference should be recommend when the referenced project is modified frequently, the nuget reference is more appropriate when share the reference project to others or publish it. Just like NuGet Reference Switcher doing.
For some more detailed info, you can check following thread:
nuget packages in local work
NuGet has many advantages as a package manager for the Microsoft
development platform, this does not mean that it is not flawed. Just
as you encountered, if the referenced project is modified frequently,
we have to rebuild it, build nuget, publish it for each modification.
That will bring a lot of boring work. To resolve this disadvantages,
the Project-to-project references should be a better way.
The
advantage of a project-to-project reference is that it creates a
dependency between the projects in the build system. The dependent
project will be built if it has changed since the last time the
referencing project was built. A file reference does not create a
build dependency, so it is possible to build the referencing project
without building the dependent project.
You could add following Post-build event command to pack your project after building.
"the nuget.exe path\nuget.exe" pack "project path\NuGetPackageLibrary.csproj" -OutputDirectory "Your target path"
When your build successful, the package in target path will be replaced by the latest version.
I would expect some kind of filter to exists on website or in console.
This isn't easy right now, unfortunately. There's an issue open on the NuGet Github about adding a filter to the website.
Right now, the best way to tell if a package will work with .NET Core is by examining the frameworks it supports in the Dependencies section.
If .NETStandard is listed, the package supports .NET Core via the .NET Platform Standard:
If a package's Dependencies section doesn't mention .NETStandard, or the Dependencies section is completely empty, it does not support .NET Core:
Setup a .NET Core project in the version you want. I keep 1.1 and 2.0 projects around for futzing with this. Then try and add the nuget to the project.
For instance, ASPOSE will NOT add to a 1.1 project, but will add to a 2.0 project.
Easiest route in the short term until they fix this somehow.
Obviously this is no guarantee it still works but gives you a good idea if its api compat.
I've noticed that in eclipse if you Right click on a project -> Grails Tools -> You have the option to 'Download Source Jars'.
What is the point of this and what are some common reasons as to why you would want to do this?
Grails 2.2.3
Edit:
I'm not even sure what grails does instead of that.
Many (most) libraries (JARs, "artifacts" in the Maven terminology) publish a sources archive alongside their binary artifacts in the repositories. This can be useful for Eclipse to show you the Javadoc and source code when you're using the library in your projects. As #JonSkeet commented above, it's very useful to have source code available directly in the IDE when using a library.
By default, Grails does not download the sources for artifacts; this option triggers it to do so and attach the sources to the binary JARs.
Agreed with E-Riz.
Here are the reasons I use the sources:
i want to have a deeper understanding of how the library works when debugging my own depending code
i want to find a possible bug in the library, so I can fork it and apply my own patch. i will possibly share this with the maintainers as a pull request if I'm willing to spend that much time on it.
i want to find out what logging systems it uses that might be poorly documented, so I can see better what their code is doing during runtime, to troubleshooting complicated problems.
I have an update site that contains some 100 - 200 features and many more plugins. For some users all of these are needed, so I'd like to simplify the installation process by creating one feature that they can install. This feature would then contain all the contents of the update site.
I've created a new feature project and my plan is to add the contents of the original update site as included features and plugins in this project.
Problems is; In my feature project, when adding feature in the "included features" tab, I can only add features that are currently installed in my Eclipse platform. I'd rather not install those 200 features just so I can add them.
Is there a way to work around this?
Without the features installed in your target platform, you will need to edit the feature.xml file directly. All you need to do is to add the following for each feature that you want to include:
<includes
id="<add_feature_id>"
version="0.0.0"/>
Your build process (PDE or tycho) should add the proper version numbers for you.
I think you should have a detailed look at the Eclipse target platform concept. The features don't need to be installed in your current Eclipse platform (i.e. the IDE), they need to be installed in the target platform to be available for an update site.
If you never defined a target platform, your currently running application will be taken as IDE, and that is where your confusion might come from.
When I try to manipulate a feature I only need to have them in my workspace. No reason to install them.