Is there any environment variable or something how to change the maxVarCharLength like tablePrefix in JobRepositoryFactoryBean.java?
I couldn't find any config class where this setter method is called
public void setMaxVarCharLength(int maxVarCharLength) {
this.maxVarCharLength = maxVarCharLength;
}
It is up to you to call this method in order to set the maxVarCharLength property. The JobRepositoryFactoryBean will then use the value you set to create the JobRepository. You can find an example here: https://docs.spring.io/spring-batch/4.0.x/reference/html/job.html#configuringJobRepository
Related
I have a method that I need to test. I would like to do so from the console. Here is the method, as well as some metadata from the class:
Include HS.Common
Class Custom.class Extends Ens.BusinessOperation
{
Parameter ADAPTER = "EnsLib.EMail.OutboundAdapter";
Property Adapter As EnsLib.EMail.OutboundAdapter;
Method SendMessage(pSubject As %String, pMessage As %String, pEmailAddresses) As %Status
{
set tSC=$$$OK
set tMailMessage=##class(%Net.MailMessage).%New()
do tMailMessage.To.Insert($PIECE(pEmailAddresses,",",1))
for tI=2:1:$LENGTH(pEmailAddresses,",") {
do tMailMessage.Cc.Insert($PIECE(pEmailAddresses,",",tI))
}
set tMailMessage.Subject=pSubject
set tMailMessage.Charset="iso-8859-1"
set tSC=tMailMessage.TextData.Write(pMessage)
quit:'tSC
Set tSC1=..Adapter.SendMail(tMailMessage)
if 'tSC1 {
//Log warning about being unable to send mail.
do $SYSTEM.Status.DecomposeStatus(tSC1,.err)
$$$LOGWARNING("Could not send email: "_err(err))
kill err
}
quit tSC
}
...other methods here...
}
but when I perform this command:
set tResult = ##class(Custom.class).SendMessage("Test Subject","Test Message","my#email.com")
I get this error:
Set tSC1=..Adapter.SendMail(tMailMessage)
^
<NO CURRENT OBJECT>zSendMessage+11^Custom.class.1
I tried instantiating adapter, much like the property definition, before calling the method but that did not work. How can I call this method from a console session?
this method is an instance method, and you can't call it directly just for some class. Before, you should create an object, and then for that object, you can call any instance methods. But you still trying to call Ensemble classes, it is not so easy, because you should prepare environment, such as configured and started Ensemble Production, your class should be added as an Operation, configured and activated.
set oper=##class(Custom.class).%New("configName")
where configName - name for that operation in your production, by default it is same as class name (e.g. "Custom.class"). And now you can call your method.
write oper.SendMessage("testSubj","test body","my#mail.com")
But I would not recommend such way. It would be better if you test it through production, just sent test messages to this operation.
I have a object property in my Class which is private and marked as read-only.
private var readOnlyObj:Object;
I can only access it with a get method:
public function get readOnly(){ return readOnlyObj }
I can access it by:
var objClass = new MyClass();
trace(objClass.readOnly)
And if i'll try to modify it:
objClass.readOnly = new Object();
I'll get an error:
Error# Property is read only.
Now my question is:
How do I set the properties of my readOnlyObj as read-only?
If I have set the object in the constructor:
readOnlyObj["property1"] = 0;
And modify that property by:
objClass.readOnly["property1"] = 2;
It is valid. I want set the property1 to a read-only property. Is this possible? Thank You!
You can do this by returning a duplicate of the original object and not the object itself.
The transform properties of DisplayObjects work like this: you can get the object property from a get function and can modify the object, but such modification has no effect until you pass the modified object back to the set function.
In your case, there's no way to give the object back (no setter) and by returning a copy (commonly called 'clone') from the getter, there is no way to modify the object property from outside, because the returned reference reference the newly created independent clone, essentially making the internal object constant.
What you are asking is not possible and only yield the answer "no" if on the other hand you asked about how to achieve that functionality then there would be a few answer possible.
First of all given your code and the problem at hand it is clear that you misunderstand the class scope. You set:
private var readOnlyObj:Object;
As read only while it's really not the object you want to protect, it's its properties. So readOnlyObj should really not even be visible and accessible.
Now that readOnlyObj is private and not accessible, you can put together a simple method to retrieve properties:
public function getProperty(name:String):*
{
if(readOnlyObj[name] != undefined)
{
return readOnlyObj[name];
}
return null;
}
It might also be useful to know how to put together a public setter that cannot be used externally.
Create an internal Boolean variable (only with true package), then internally set that variable to true before setting the property then set it back to false. Since externally that boolean cannot be set you end up with a public setter that cannot be used externally.
internal var allowSetter:Boolean;
public function set whatever(value:*):void
{
if(allowSetter)
{
//set property ect...
allowSetter = false;
}
}
You can't really do this, at least in the way you describe. You can of course make your readOnly object a custom class instance that only has read-only properties, but you can't freeze a dynamic Object instance.
I am new to WF 4.5.
The "GenerateResult" activity will generate a string in the Result property.
I want to assign the Result to the varExternal in the following Assign activity.
How to?
The GeneratedResult activity is defined as below.
public sealed class GenerateResult<TResult> : NativeActivity<TResult>
{
protected override void Execute(NativeActivityContext context)
{
this.Result.Set(context, "Hello, world!");
}
}
Just like you'd do it when programming. You have to hold the result within a variable, then reference that variable elsewhere.
I'm assuming you want to use the result in the WriteLine activity, so you would create a variable within the workflow (look at the bottom of the designer), bind it to the Result property of your GenerateResult activity (it's in the Property grid, so right-click and hit Properties). Then you can reference that variable in the WriteLine activity.
I try to inherit a gobject and, among other things, would like to change the value of a G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY property so the next child class doesn't have to care.
Here's an example to depict this: GtkComboBox has a construct only property called "has-entry" with default value FALSE. In class A I want to change this value to TRUE, so that class B doesn't need to care.
GtkComboBoxClass <-- AClass <-- BClass
"has-entry" FALSE TRUE
The first naive approach was to use g_object_set() in A's instance_init function, but to no avail.
The next idea was to obtain the GParamSpec with g_object_class_find_property() and change the default value with g_param_value_set_default() in A's class_init function. But I suppose this to change the default for all GtkComboBoxClass derived objects.
The best idea I could come up with: If g_object_class_override_property() creates a new GParamSpec I could find this and set its default value in A's class_init function. But documentation doesn't loose a word about this.
So my question: Is this a working, and intended, way of accomplishing this, or is there a better solution?
Tried so far:
g_object_set() in instance init():
no warning on start
no effect
g_object_set() in GObjectClass->constructor():
no warning on start
no effect
warning on exit: invalid cast from GtkCellCiew to GtkEntry
g_object_set() in GObjectClass->constructed():
warning on start: can't be set after construction
Thanks
Stefan
if you want to set a property in a sub-class, and that property is construct-only, then you should use the constructed virtual function to call g_object_set() instead of the init virtual.
properties marked as construct-only will be applied during construction, using their default value, unless specified on the constructor itself — i.e. with g_object_new(). this means that setting a construct-only property inside init() will not suffice, as the value will be set after init() has been called. the constructed() virtual function, on the other hand, is called after the constructor properties have been applied, so it's possible to override the default value there.
Answering this for myself:
A look into gobject source reveals that the properties list given to constructor() contains all G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT and G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY properties and their default or given values.
Modifying these values is undocumented (or at least I couldn't find it), but it works.
Construction time property values have to be modified in this list before chaining up to parents constructor, non construct properties have to be set afterwards. Example code looks like:
static GObject *constructor(GType gtype, guint n_properties, GObjectConstructParam *properties) {
GObject *object;
guint i;
gchar const *name;
GObjectConstructParam *property;
for (i = 0, property = properties; i < n_properties; ++i, ++property) {
name = g_param_spec_get_name(property->pspec);
if (!strcmp(name, "has-entry")) // is G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY
g_value_set_boolean(property->value, TRUE);
}
object = G_OBJECT_CLASS(parent_class)->constructor(gtype, n_properties, properties);
g_object_set(object, "entry-text-column", TEXT_COLUMN, NULL);
return object;
}
By this :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd489442.aspx
but the only diffenet that I make the workflow using a XAML file.
I have a qution: i need to pass the value that I got from the user to another activity.
I tried to make a variable (output for example )and assiged the value, but the another activity see it like empty. may its dead or reset to the default value after the current activity finishs.
I tried to use OutArgument, but it make runtime error at app.run as the following
"The following errors were encountered while processing the workflow tree:
'workflow1': The private implementation of activity '1: workflow1' has the following validation error: Value for a required activity argument 'Out_arg' was not supplied."
And also didn't see it in the next activity like the first case.
[RequiredArgument]
public OutArgument<string> Out_arg { get; set; }
void OnBookmarkCallback(NativeActivityContext context, Bookmark bookmark, object val)
{
Console.WriteLine("im in resume ");
Console.WriteLine("bookmark1 Name is {0}", (string)val);
// for the first option that i tried
output = (string)val;
//then i tried
Out_arg.Set(context, (string)val);
the xmal file:
False
270,2.5
60,75
300,77.5 300,107.5 300,129.5
194.5,129.5
211,61
300,190.5 300,220.5 300,279
200,279
200,22
300,301 300,331 280,331 280,389.5
174.5,389.5
211,61
_ReferenceID0
_ReferenceID1
__ReferenceID2
Can u help me?
Did you create variable in you workflow and assign the Out_arg to it?