I am learning kubernetes by playing with minikube.
This is my pod deployment file which is fine.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-deployment
spec:
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
component: web
template:
metadata:
labels:
component: web
spec:
containers:
- name: myapp
image: myid/myimage
I am exposing the above pods using NodePort. I am able to access using minikube IP at port 30002.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: my-ip-service
spec:
type: NodePort
externalIPs:
- 192.168.99.100
selector:
component: web
ports:
- port: 3000
nodePort: 30002
targetPort: 8080
Now i would like to use ingress to access the application at port 80 which will forward the request the ip-service at port 3000. It does NOT work
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: test-ingress
spec:
backend:
serviceName: my-ip-service
servicePort: 3000
If i try to access to ingress, address is blank.
NAME HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
test-ingress * 80 41m
How to use ingress with minikube? Or how to bind the minikube ip with ingress service - so that the app can be exposed outside without using nodeport
You can get your minikube node's IP address with:
minikube ip
The ingress' IP address will not populate in minikube because minikube lacks a load balancer. If you'd like something that behaves like a load balancer for your minikube cluster, https://github.com/knative/serving/blob/master/docs/creating-a-kubernetes-cluster.md#loadbalancer-support-in-minikube suggests running the following commands to patch your cluster:
sudo ip route add $(cat ~/.minikube/profiles/minikube/config.json | jq -r ".KubernetesConfig.ServiceCIDR") via $(minikube ip)
kubectl run minikube-lb-patch --replicas=1 --image=elsonrodriguez/minikube-lb-patch:0.1 --namespace=kube-system
I think you are missing the ingress controller resource on minikube itself. There are many possible ways to create an ingress-controller resource on K8s , but i think for you the best way to start on minikube is to follow this documentation.
Don't forget to read about Ingress in general once you get this working.
Related
I have the following template, with a deployment, a service and an Ingress. I ran minikube addons enable ingress locally to add an ingress controller before.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: fastapi
labels:
app: fastapi
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: fastapi
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: fastapi
spec:
containers:
- name: fastapi
image: datamastery/fastapi
ports:
- containerPort: 3000
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: fastapi-service
spec:
selector:
app: fastapi
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 5000
targetPort: 3000
nodePort: 30002
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: dashboard-ingress
namespace: kubernetes-dashboard
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "nginx"
spec:
rules:
- host: datamastery.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Exact
backend:
service:
name: fastapi-service
port:
number: 3000
When I run kubectl get servicesI get:
fastapi-service LoadBalancer 10.108.5.228 <pending> 5000:30002/TCP 5d22h
I my etc/hosts/ file I added the following:
10.108.5.228 datamastery.com
Normally I would expect now to be able to open my service in the browser, but nothing happens. What did I do wrong? Did I miss something in the template? Is the IP wrong? Something in the hosts file?
Thank you!
fastapi-service LoadBalancer 10.108.5.228 5000:30002/TCP 5d22h
10.108.5.228 is an address within your SDN. Only members of your SDN can reach this address, it is unlikely your workstation would have a route sending this trafic to one of your Kubernetes nodes.
<pending> means your cluster is not integrated with a cloud provider with LoadBalancer capabilities. When in doubt: you should use ClusterIP as your service type. LoadBalancer only makes sense in specific cases. While setting a nodePort as you did is also not required (would make sense with a NodePort service, which is as well useful in few use cases, though should not be used otherwise).
You did create an Ingress. If you have an Ingress Controller, you want to connect to that ip/port. The Host header would tell your ingress controller where to route this, within your SDN.
I believe what you are doing here is trying to combine two different things.
NodePort is only sufficient if you have only one node OR you really control where your service pods getting deployed. Otherwise it is not suitable to use the node IP to access services.
To overcome this issue we usually use ingress as a service proxy. Incoming traffic will be routed to the correct service pods depending on the URL and port. Ingress also manages the SSL termination. So basically this is your first "load balancer" as ingress assigned traffic to services across nodes and pods.
In production environment you deploy the ingress controller with the type: Loadbalancer in the kube-system namespace, example for Nginx-ingress:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx-ingress
namespace: kube-system
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: ingress-nginx
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: ingress-nginx
spec:
type: LoadBalancer
ports:
- port: 80
name: http
targetPort: 80
- port: 443
name: https
targetPort: 443
selector:
app.kubernetes.io/name: ingress-nginx
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: ingress-nginx
This would spin up a cloud load balancer of your provider and link it to the ingress service in your cluster. So basically now you would have a real load balancer in place balancing traffic between your nodes and ingress routes them to your services and services to your pods.
Back to your question:
In your config files you try to spin up a service with the type: LoadBalancer. This would skip the ingress part and spin up a second cloud load balancer from your provider dedicated for this single service.
You have to remove the type (and nodePort) to use default ClusterIP for your service.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: fastapi-service
spec:
selector:
app: fastapi
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 3000
targetPort: 3000
In addition you have mentioned a wrong port. Your ingress object points on port 3000. You Service object on port 5000. So we also change this.
With this config your traffic on the FQDN is routed to ingress, to ClusterIP service on port 3000 to your pods.
I have the following topology in my kubernetes cluster:
So, I have 2 Nodes: 1 Master and 1 Worker Node.
Now I created an application with my deployment.yml and my service.yml, using nodePort configuration, see:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: administrativo-service
spec:
type: NodePort
selector:
app: administrativo
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 8080
And this is my service:
Now I need to access this API using my DNS, something like: myapi.localdns, so I followed this steps to install Ingress Controller based on nginx:
https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/deploy/#quick-start
https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/deploy/#bare-metal-clusters
After 1 hour this is POD status in ingress-nginx namespace:
And finally, this is my Ingress yml:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: administrativo-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
spec:
rules:
- host: myapi.localdns
http:
paths:
- pathType: Prefix
path: /
backend:
service:
name: administrativo-service
port:
number: 80
Well, my idea is to create an entry in my company to DNS to point to this DNS myapi.localdns:
but to do it I need the Ingress Address, that don't show in my ingress resource, see:
I solved the problem, using this steps:
First create in my company DNS the CNAMEs pointing to my kubernetes workernode IP.
Reinstall ingress-nginx controller using bare-metal configuration: kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/controller-v1.0.5/deploy/static/provider/baremetal/deploy.yaml.
Change the deploy.yaml to use NodePort before use kubectl apply
Use externalIPS to expose my service in port 80.
I can't access to public IP assigned by MetalLB load Balancer
I created a Kubernetes cluster in Contabo. Its 1 master and 2 workers. Each one has its own public IP.
I did it with kubeadm + flannel. Later I did install MetalLB to use Load Balancing.
I used this manifest for installing nginx:
apiVersion: apps/v1beta2
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: nginx
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: nginx
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1
ports:
- name: http
containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx
spec:
ports:
- name: http
port: 8080
protocol: TCP
targetPort: 80
selector:
app: nginx
type: LoadBalancer
It works, pods are running. I see the external IP adress after:
kubectl get services
From each node/host I can curl to that ip and port and I can get nginx's:
<h1>Welcome to nginx!</h1>
So far, so good. BUT:
What I still miss is to access to that service (nginx) from my computer.
I can try to access to each node (master + 2 slaves) by their IP:PORT and nothing happens. The final goal is to have a domain that access to that service but I can't guess witch IP should I use.
What I'm missing?
Should MetalLB just expose my 3 possible IPs?
Should I add something else on each server as a reverse proxy?
I'm asking this here because all articles/tutorials on baremetal/VPS (non aws,GKE, etc...) do this on a kube on localhost and miss this basic issue.
Thanks.
I am having the very same hardware layout:
a 3-Nodes Kubernetes Cluster - here with the 3 IPs:
| 123.223.149.27
| 22.36.211.68
| 192.77.11.164 |
running on (different) VPS-Providers (connected to a running cluster(via JOIN), of course)
Target: "expose" the nginx via metalLB, so I can access my web-app from outside the cluster via browser via the IP of one of my VPS'
Problem: I do not have a "range of IPs" I could declare for the metallb
Steps done:
create one .yaml file for the Loadbalancer, the kindservicetypeloadbalancer.yaml
create one .yaml file for the ConfigMap, containing the IPs of the 3 nodes, the kindconfigmap.yaml
``
### start of the kindservicetypeloadbalancer.yaml
### for ensuring a unique name: loadbalancer name nginxloady
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginxloady
annotations:
metallb.universe.tf/address-pool: production-public-ips
spec:
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 80
selector:
app: nginx
type: LoadBalancer
``
below, the second .yaml file to be added to the Cluster:
# start of the kindconfigmap.yaml
## info: the "production-public-ips" can be found
## within the annotations-sector of the kind: Service type: loadbalancer / the kindservicetypeloadbalancer.yaml
## as well... ...namespace: metallb-system & protocol: layer2
## note: as you can see, I added a /32 after every of my node-IPs
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
namespace: metallb-system
name: config
data:
config: |
address-pools:
- name: production-public-ips
protocol: layer2
addresses:
- 123.223.149.27/32
- 22.36.211.68/32
- 192.77.11.164/32
``
add the LoadBalancer:
kubectl apply -f kindservicetypeloadbalancer.yaml
add the ConfigMap:
kubectl apply -f kindconfigmap.yaml
Check the status of the namespace ( "n" ) metallb-system:
kubectl describe pods -n metallb-system
PS:
actually it is all there:
https://metallb.universe.tf/installation/
and here:
https://metallb.universe.tf/usage/#requesting-specific-ips
What you are missing is a routing policy
Your external IP addresses must belong to the same network as your nodes or instead of that you can add a route to your external address at your default gateway level and use a static NAT for each address
I am new to k8s
I have a deployment file that goes below
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: jenkins-deployment
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
component: web
template:
metadata:
labels:
component: web
spec:
containers:
- name: jenkins
image: jenkins
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
- containerPort: 50000
My Service File is as following:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: jenkins-svc
spec:
type: ClusterIP
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 8080
name: http
selector:
component: web
My Ingress File is
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: jenkins-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target: /
spec:
rules:
- host: jenkins.xyz.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
backend:
serviceName: jenkins-svc
servicePort: 80
I am using the nginx ingress project and my cluster is created using kubeadm with 3 nodes
nginx ingress
I first ran the mandatory command
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/master/deploy/static/mandatory.yaml
when I tried hitting jenkins.xyz.com it didn't work
when I tried the command
kubectl get ing
the ing resource doesnt get an IP address assigned to it
The ingress resource is nothing but the configuration of a reverse proxy (the Ingress controller).
It is normal that the Ingress doesn't get an IP address assigned.
What you need to do is connect to your ingress controller instance(s).
In order to do so, you need to understand how they're exposed in your cluster.
Considering the YAML you claim you used to get the ingress controller running, there is no sign of exposition to the outside network.
You need at least to define a Service to expose your controller (might be a load balancer if the provider where you put your cluster supports it), you can use HostNetwork: true or a NodePort.
To use the latest option (NodePort) you could apply this YAML:
https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/blob/master/deploy/static/provider/baremetal/service-nodeport.yaml
I suggest you read the Ingress documentation page to get a clearer idea about how all this stuff works.
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/ingress/
In order to access you local Kubernetes Cluster PODs a NodePort needs to be created. The NodePort will publish your service in every node using using its public IP and a port. Then you can access the service using any of the cluster IPs and the assigned port.
Defining a NodePort in Kubernetes:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: nginx-service-np
labels:
name: nginx-service-np
spec:
type: NodePort
ports:
- port: 8082 # Cluster IP, i.e. http://10.103.75.9:8082
targetPort: 8080 # Application port
nodePort: 30000 # (EXTERNAL-IP VirtualBox IPs) i.e. http://192.168.50.11:30000/ http://192.168.50.12:30000/ http://192.168.50.13:30000/
protocol: TCP
name: http
selector:
app: nginx
See a full example with source code at Building a Kubernetes Cluster with Vagrant and Ansible (without Minikube).
The nginx ingress controller can be replaced also with Istio if you want to benefit from a service mesh architecture for:
Load Balance traffic, external o internal
Control failures, retries, routing
Apply limits and monitor network traffic between services
Secure communication
See Installing Istio in Kubernetes under VirtualBox (without Minikube).
I really like the kubernetes Ingress schematics. I currently run ingress-nginx controllers to route traffic into my kubernetes pods.
I would like to use this to also route traffic to 'normal' machines: ie vm's or physical nodes that are not part of my kubernetes infrastructure. Is this possible? How?
In Kubernetes you can define an externalName service in which you define a FQND to an external server.
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
namespace: prod
spec:
type: ExternalName
externalName: my.database.example.com
Then you can use my-service in your nginx rule.
You can create static service and corresponding endpoints for external services which are not k8s and then use k8s service in ingress to route traffic.
Also you see ingress doc to enable custom upstream check
https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/user-guide/nginx-configuration/annotations/#custom-nginx-upstream-checks
In below example just change port/IP according to your need
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
labels:
product: external-service
name: external-service
spec:
ports:
- name: http
port: 80
targetPort: 80
protocol: TCP
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Endpoints
metadata:
labels:
product: external-service
name: external-service
subsets:
- addresses:
- ip: x.x.x.x
- ip: x.x.x.x
- ip: x.x.x.x
ports:
- name: http
port: 80
protocol: TCP
I don't think it's possible, since ingress-nginx get pods info through watch namespace, service, endpoints, ingress resources, then redirect traffic to pods, without these resources specific to kubernetes, ingress-nginx has no way to find the ips that need loadbalance. And ingress-nginx doesn't has health-check method defined, it's up to the kubernetes builtin mechanic to check the health of the running pods.