I have an application pod which will be deployed on k8s cluster
But as Kubernetes scheduler decides on which node this pod needs to run
Now I want to add taint to the node dynamically where my application pod is running with NOschedule so that no new pods will be scheduled on this node
I know that we can use kubectl taint node with NOschedule if I know the node name but I want to achieve this dynamically based on which node this application pod is running
The reason why I want to do this is this is critical application pod which shouldn’t have down time and for good reasons I have only 1 pod for this application across the cluster
Please suggest
In addition to #Rico answer.
You can use feature called node affinity, this is still a beta but some functionality is already implemented.
You should add a label to your node, for example test-node-affinity: test. Once this is done you can Add the nodeAffinity of field affinity in the PodSpec.
spec:
...
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: test-node-affinity
operator: In
values:
- test
This will mean the POD will look for a node with key test-node-affinity and value test and will be deployed there.
I recommend reading this blog Taints and tolerations, pod and node affinities demystified by Toader Sebastian.
Also familiarise yourself with Taints and Tolerations from Kubernetes docs.
You can get the node where your pod is running with something like this:
$ kubectl get pod myapp-pod -o=jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}'
Then you can taint it:
$ kubectl taint nodes <node-name-from-above> key=value:NoSchedule
or the whole thing in one command:
$ kubectl taint nodes $(kubectl get pod myapp-pod -o=jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}') key=value:NoSchedule
Related
I have a Kubernetes cluster, and running 3 nodes. But I want to run my app on only two nodes. So I want to ask, Can I run other pods (Kubernetes extensions) in the Kubernetes cluster only on a single node?
node = Only Kubernetes pods
node = my app
node = my app
Yes, you can run the application POD on only two nodes and other extension Kubernetes POD on a single node.
When you say Kubernetes extension POD by that consider some external third-party PODs like Nginx ingress controller and other not default system POD like kube-proxy, kubelet, etc those should require to run each available node.
Option 1
You can use the Node affinity to schedule PODs on specific nodes.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: with-node-affinity
spec:
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: topology.kubernetes.io/hostname
operator: In
values:
- node-1
- node-2
containers:
- name: with-node-affinity
image: nginx
Option 2
You can use the taint & toleration to schedule the PODs on specific nodes.
Certain kube-system pods like kube-proxy, the CNI pods (cilium/flannel) and other daemonSet must run on each of the worker node, you can not stop them. If that is not the case for you, a node can be taint to noSchedule using below command.
kubectl taint nodes type=<a_node_label>:NoSchedule
The further enhancement you can explore https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/
we would like to merge 2 kubernetes cluster because we need to establish a communication between the pods and it should also be cheaper.
Cluster 1 should stay intact and cluster 2 will be deleted. The pods in cluster 2 have very high requirements for resources and we would like to create node pool dedicated to these pods.
So the idea is to label the new nodes and also label the pods that were part of cluster 2 before to enforce that they run on these nodes.
What I cannot find an answer for is the following question: How can I ensure that no other pod is scheduled to run on the new node pool without having to redeploy all pods and assigning labels to them?
There are 2 problems you have to solve:
Stop cluster 1 pods from running on cluster 2 nodes
Stop cluster 2 pods from running on cluster 1 nodes
Given your question, it looks like you can make changes to cluster 2 deployments, but don't want to update existing cluster 1 deployments.
The solution to problem 1 is to use taints and tolerations. You can taint your cluster 2 nodes to stop all pods from being scheduled there then add tolerations to your cluster 2 deployments to allow them to ignore this taint. This means that cluster 1 pods cannot be deployed to cluster 2 nodes and problem 1 is solved.
You add a taint like this:
kubectl taint nodes node1 key1=value1:NoSchedule-
and tolerate it in your cluster 2 pod/deployment spec like this:
tolerations:
- key: "key1"
operator: "Equal"
value: "value1"
effect: "NoSchedule"
Problem 2 cannot be solved the same way because you don't want to change deployments for cluster 1 pods. This is a shame because taints are the easiest solution to this. If you could make that change, then you'd simply add a taint to cluster 1 nodes and tolerate it only in cluster 1 deployments.
Given these constraints, the solution is to use node affinity. You'd need to use the requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution form to ensure that the rules are always followed. The rules themselves can be as simple as a node selector based on labels. A shorter version of the example from the linked docs:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: with-node-affinity
spec:
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: a-node-label-key
operator: In
values:
- a-node-label-value
containers:
- name: with-node-affinity
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause:2.0
So I have this problem, and try to implement podAffinity to solve it.
I have 3 nodes and want to deploy 2 pods on the same node. In the Deployment YAML files I have service:git under metadata.labels, and the following is the affinity setting:
affinity:
podAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
- labelSelector:
matchExpressions:
- key: service
operator: In
values:
- git
topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
But the pods failed to deploy, I got the following error:
0/3 nodes are available: 3 node(s) didn't match pod affinity rules, 3 node(s) didn't match pod affinity/anti-affinity.
Are there any problems with my configuration?
If not, I guess maybe it is because when the first pod is deployed, the system will try to find a node that contains a pod with the label service: git and fail (because it is the first one), and another pod also fail because of the same reason. Is this correct?
But then how to solve the problem (without resorting to workarounds)?
You are using "requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:" so it will be looking a "running(already)" pod which has a label "service: git" and itseems you do not already have any pod with that label. so following a is a quick workaround where a test pod will be created with label "service: git" . so that podAffinity rule will find a destination node ( that would be the node where this testpod will be running)
kubectl run testpod --image=busybox --labels="service=git" -- sleep infinite
Once above pod is UP .. all the pods in your deployment also should get created.
if not delete the deployment and re-apply it.
If you need a elegant solution then you can consider using "preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution" instead of "requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution"
Update Sept 2022:
The "requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:" is effectively ignored when it is the first pod of the deployment and the pod does in fact get scheduled - otherwise if no pods are there then not even the first one will be able to be deployed. The second pod will then obviously see that first pod running and satisfy the rule and so on. This has been confirmed by testing.
When running a Kubernetes job I've set spec.spec.restartPolicy: OnFailure and spec.backoffLimit: 30. When a pod fails it's sometimes doing so because of a hardware incompatibility (matlab segfault on some hardware). Kubernetes is restarting the pod each time on the same node, having no chance of correcting the problem.
Can I instruct Kubernete to try a different node on restart?
Once Pod is scheduled it cannot be moved to another Node.
The Job controller can create a new Pod if you specify spec.spec.restartPolicy: Never.
There is a chance that this new Pod will be scheduled on different Node.
I did a quick experiment with podAntiAffinity: but it looks like it's ignored by scheduler (makes sense as the previous Pod is in Error state).
BTW: If you can add labels to failing nodes it will be possible to avoid them by using nodeSelector: <label>.
restartPolicy only refers to restarts of the Containers by the Kubelet on the same node.
Setting restartPolicy: OnFailure will prevent the neverending creation of pods because it will just restart the failing one on the same node.
If you want to create new pods on failure with restartPolicy: Never, you can limit them by setting activeDeadlineSeconds However pods also will be recreated on the same node as failed ones. Upon reaching the deadline without success, the job will have status with reason: DeadlineExceeded. No more pods will be created, and existing pods will be deleted.
.spec.backoffLimit is just the number of retries.
The Job controller recreates the failed Pods (associated with the Job) in an exponential delay. And of course, this delay time is set by the Job controller
Take a look: pod-lifecycle.
However as a workaround you may want your Pods to end up on specific nodes which are properly working.
These scenarios are addressed by a number of primitives in Kubernetes:
nodeSelector — This is a simple Pod scheduling feature that allows scheduling a Pod onto a node whose labels match the nodeSelector labels specified
Node Affinity — is the enhanced version of the nodeSelector which offers a more expressive syntax for fine-grained control of how Pods are scheduled to specific nodes.
There are two types of affinity in Kubernetes: node affinity and Pod affinity. Similarly to nodeSelector, node affinity attracts a Pod to certain nodes, the Pod affinity attracts a Pod to certain Pods. In addition to that, Kubernetes supports Pod anti-affinity, which repels a Pod from other Pods.
Here's an example of a pod that uses node affinity:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pod-with-node-affinity
spec:
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: kubernetes.io/e2e-az-name
operator: In
values:
- e2e-az1
- e2e-az2
preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
- weight: 1
preference:
matchExpressions:
- key: another-node-label-key
operator: In
values:
- another-node-label-value
containers:
- name: with-node-affinity
image: k8s.gcr.io/pause:2.0
This node affinity rule says the pod can only be placed on a node with a label whose key is kubernetes.io/e2e-az-name and whose value is either e2e-az1 or e2e-az2. In addition, among nodes that meet that criteria, nodes with a label whose key is another-node-label-key and whose value is another-node-label-value should be preferred.
To label nodes you can use command:
$ kubectl label nodes <your-node-name> key=value
See definition: scheduling-pods.
As another workaround you may taint the specific, not working nodes - taints allow a Node to repel a set of Pods.
See more: taint-nodes-kubernetes.
Taints get a possibility to mark a node as NoSchedule - pods by default cannot be spawned on this node until you will add tolerations to pods which will allow scheduler to create pods on nodes with taints specified in toleration configuration. Command below:
$ kubectl taint nodes example-node key=value:NoSchedule
places a taint on node example-node. The taint has key key, value value, and taint effect NoSchedule. This means that no pod will be able to schedule onto node1 unless it has a matching toleration.
See: node-taint.
I've a requirement where I want to schedule a specific type of pod on a particular node and no other types of pod should get scheduled on that node. For example,
Assuming that I've 3 worker nodes - w1, w2 and w3
I want pods of type(say POD-w2) should always get scheduled on w2 and no other type of pods should get scheduled on w2.
Add a label type=w2 to worker 2.
Use node selector or node affinity to schedule required pods on that node.
For other pods use node anti affinity to prevent other pods getting scheduled on to the worker 2
To exclusively use a node for a specific type of pod, you should taint your node as described here. Then, create a toleration in your deployment/pod definition for the node taint to ensure that only that type of pod can be scheduled on the tainted node.
To achieve this, we have to taint the node as well as affinity by labeling the node. The required pod should tolerate the taint and satisfy the affinity also. By this way pod will get scheduled ONLY on the dedicated node.
example:
kubectl taint nodes <dedicated_node_name> dedicated=myservice:NoSchedule
kubectl label node <dedicated_node_name> dedicated=myservice
then use toleration and affinity in the deployment spec
spec:
affinity:
nodeAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
nodeSelectorTerms:
- matchExpressions:
- key: dedicated
operator: In
values:
- myservice
and
tolerations:
- effect: NoSchedule
key: dedicated
operator: Equal
value: myservice