Mule4 time format - mule-studio

I am facing issue while doing string to time conversion in DataWeave2.0.
I am having string as "1800", my requirement is to convert it into time in HH:MM:SS format. I tried going through Mule docs on DateTime, Time but not able to convert string to Time in required format.

Since it doesn't have a time zone it's a LocalTime so you can try:
"1800" as LocalTime {format: "HHmm"} as String {format: "HH:mm:ss"}

Related

How to convert dd-MM-yyyy HH:mm to millisecond in Angular 6

I want to convert a date which is in dd-MM-yyyy HH:mm format to millisecond.
this.startDate = 02-12-2019 13:15;
that is 2nd dec 2019.
How to convert that to millisecond.
Can anyone please help me.
Date cannot be converted to millisecond but you can get millisecond by using getTime()
yourTime.getTime();
This is a plain javascript function which will give you the time out of date. In case you want to display date in specific format you can use date pipe and I hope i=you know that
{{ yourDate | date: 'mediumTime' }}

Compare String time to Local Server Time

Have a string object with a specific format of date.
Need to check if that dateStr is after the current time on local machine.
Having trouble with conversions and LocalDateTime
String dateStr = "Oct 27 2017 02:29:00 GMT+0000";
public static final String DATE_FORMAT = "MMM dd yyyy HH:mm:ss zzzZ";
I know something is fishy in the below code with the usage of LocalDateTime
public static boolean isFutureDate(String dateStr){
DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern(DATE_FORMAT);
LocalDateTime dateTime = LocalDateTime.parse(dateStr, formatter);
return(dateTime.isAfter(LocalDateTime.now()));
}
Trouble is with timezones and date conversions.
Please help find the right way of checking if a dateStr is after the current local date this in Java 8?
Local… types have no time zone
You are using the wrong type for your data.
The Local… types including LocalDateTime purposely have no concept of time zone or offset-from UTC. As such they not represent a moment on the time line, only rough idea of a range of possible moments. Use LocalDateTime only when the time zone is unknown or irrelevant; never use it for an actual moment in history.
Use OffsetDateDate for values with an offset-from-UTC, a number of hours and minutes.
Use ZonedDateTime for values with an assigned time zone. A time zone such as Asia/Kolkata or America/Montreal is a particular region’s history of past, present, and future changes to its offset-from-UTC. Anomalies such as Daylight Saving Time (DST) mean a change to the offset.
If you know all your inputs are in GMT/UTC, use OffsetDateTime. If the inputs may use time zones, parse as ZonedDateTime objects.
This input data format is terrible. If you have any control, use standard ISO 8601 formats instead when exchanging date-time values as text.
All this has been covered many times already on Stack Exchange. Please search more thoroughly before posting. And search Stack Overflow to learn more. I kept my Answer here brief, as this is a duplicate.
When parsing to a LocalDateTime, you're ignoring the offset (+0000), and I'm not sure if that's what you really want.
In this case, the +0000 offset means the date/time is October 27th 2017 at 02:29 AM in UTC. When you parse to a LocalDateTime, you're ignoring the offset (so it represents only "October 27th 2017 at 02:29 AM", not attached to any timezone) and comparing to your local date/time (or the current date/time in the JVM's default timezone).
If you want to make a comparison that also considers the offset, you can parse it to OffsetDateTime and convert to Instant to compare it with the actual UTC instant, regardless of the timezone.
Also, the month name is in English (I'm assuming it's English, but you can change this accordingly), so you must a java.util.Locale in the formatter (if you don't set a locale, it'll use the JVM default, and it's not guaranteed to always be English):
// parse to OffsetDateTime (use the same formatter)
String dateStr = "Oct 27 2017 02:29:00 GMT+0000";
DateTimeFormatter fmt = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("MMM dd yyyy HH:mm:ss zzzZ", Locale.US);
OffsetDateTime odt = OffsetDateTime.parse(dateStr, fmt);
// compare Instant's
System.out.println(odt.toInstant().isAfter(Instant.now()));
Although it works for you now, keep in mind that the default locale can be changed without notice, even at runtime. If your input has locale-sensitive date (such as month names), it's better to specify it as above.

How to convert a ISO8601 date time string to a simple date time format in XSL version 1.0?

I have a ISO8601 string (e.g. date="2015-07-10T04:31:25") I need to convert this to the format:
July 7, 2015, 4:31:25 PM (EDT)
Even though I can write a template and use substring() to transform the string in the date time format. However I am not sure how to achieve the AM/PM and time zone information?
Working code templates would be highly appreciated. Thanks!
I am not sure how to achieve the AM/PM ...
It can be calculated from the hour component as:
substring('AMPM', 1 + 2*(number($hour) > 11), 2)
Of course, in the given input, where $hour would be "04", the correct result is "AM", not "PM".
... and time zone information?
Your input does not contain any time zone information, so unless you want to hard-code EDT as a string, there is no way to get it.

joda time ISO DateTime formatting

I'm using joda time to format my ISO Date input string, but I'm getting an exception that my ISO Date is malformed:
Invalid format: "2014-06-20T11:41:08+02:00" is malformed at "+02:00"
This is my code:
val formatter: DateTimeFormatter = ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime.withZone(DateTimeZone.getDefault)
val date: DateTime = formatter.parseDateTime("2014-06-20T11:41:08+02:00")
What's wrong here?
The error comment is slightly misleading here, as Joda formatter you derive from ISODateTimeFormat expects the millisecond part of the date/time string to be present, therefore the following will work fine:
val formatter: DateTimeFormatter = ISODateTimeFormat.dateTime().withZone(DateTimeZone.getDefault())
val date: DateTime = formatter.parseDateTime("2014-06-20T11:41:08.0+02:00")
The answer by Radyk is correct.
ISO 8601 Formats Built-In
However, you needn't specify a formatter at all. The DateTime class has a built-in parser for your ISO 8601 compliant format, used automatically by the constructor.
DateTime dateTime = new DateTime( "2014-06-20T11:41:08+02:00", timeZone );
While the second argument is optional, I suggest you assign a DateTimeZone object to be assigned to the DateTime if you know such a time zone. The input string has an offset-from-UTC, but a time zone is more than just an offset. A time zone includes rules for Daylight Saving Time and other anomalies. Use proper time zone names, never 3 or 4 letter codes like EST or IST.
Other Formats
You can apply many other formats:
Built-in ISO 8601 formatters
Built-in localized (short, medium, long, and full formats, Locale-sensitive)
Custom specified by you.
For example, if you want only the date portion without the time-of-day in your String representation, call ISODateTimeFormat.date() to access a built-in formatter.
Example code in Joda-Time 2.8.
String output = ISODateTimeFormat.date().print( dateTime ); // Format: yyyy-MM-dd
Search StackOverflow for hundreds of other Questions and Answers about formatting date-time values.

String can not be converted to a DateTime with ParseExact method

I have a string 7/24/2013 6:05:00 PM and want to convert it to a DateTime object.
I am using
DateTime newDate = DateTime.ParseExact(date,"M/d/yyyy h:mm:ss tt",
System.Globalization.CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
but the newDate object is being 09.07.2013 06:45:00. I want it as it is seen above the string version.
Do you have any idea why it is not converted the format I wanted or any opinion would be great how I can render it as a datetime object.
Thank you
As your date is already in a common format style you should try parsing using the current UI culture, in your case en-US.
E.g.
DateTime.ParseExact(date,"M/d/yyyy h:mm:ss tt", System.Globalization.CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
By using the InvariantCulture the parsing is ignoring all cultural clues whilst parsing your string.
For more information: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd465121.aspx