Free Radius upgrade Issues - upgrade

I recently upgraded my Free Radius code from 2.0 to 3.x build. I am looking for some of the APIs supported by older Free Radius versions. I am looking for APIs ldap_pairget(). Can you please let me know what APIs should be used in place of ldap_pairget. ALso these function include pairmake(), pairadd(), pairdelete() APIs which are not available in newe Free Radius Code.
Thanks

In v3.0.x theres a concept of "tmpls" (templates) and maps. Templates describe a data source or sink, and maps describe how to move data from one tmpl to another. There are still the low level pair move functions.
Pair allocation fr_pair_alloc.
Assigning value from string fr_pair_value_from_str.
Add a pair to a list fr_pair_add.
Replace an existing pair in a list fr_pair_replace.
Delete a pair by its protocol number fr_pair_delete_by_num.
The equivalent function to ldap_pairget in v3.0.x is fr_ldap_map_do, but it's not designed to be used by external callers. It'll work, but it's a lot of effort to feed it the structures it expects.
In general, if you have user configurable mappings you should call map_to_request, and pass it the callback it needs to get values for the pairs being created.

Related

How to include car ferries in OSMnx graphs

Is it possible to have OSMnx (great tool BTW) include car ferries when building a graph? Failing that, what would be the most direct way to build such a graph? The problem isn't just that the ferry routes themselves aren't present but, without the ferries, islands that are in reality reachable by car aren't included in the road network.
I have tried using osmnx.settings.useful_tags_way to no avail. Using 'route'='ferry' in overpass-api returns what I would like to include in the graph so I have been editing the OSMnx downloads.py file trying to alter the overpass-api call directly.
Thanks!
First pass (hacky)
I've came up with fairly hacky partial solution by editing osmnx's downloads.py file and replacing the line (originally around line 350):
query_str = f"{overpass_settings};(way{osm_filter}(poly:'{polygon_coord_str}');>;);out;"
with:
osm_filter2 = f'["route"="ferry"]'
query_str = f"{overpass_settings};(way{osm_filter}(poly:'{polygon_coord_str}');>;way{osm_filter2}(poly:'{polygon_coord_str}');>;);out;"
The query string format took some trial and error. If this, or something like it, turns out to be the best approach, I'll try to make it more broadly applicable (add "ferry" to the predefined filter list rather than hardcoded, pass a list of filters, etc).
Much Better
I found that building separate graphs and unioning them using networkx.union or networkx.disjoint_union did not give usable results. So I have added a multiple filter capability to my version of the osmnx downloads.py file. I also added some additional network type options. So it's now possible to pass, for instance, "ferry" as a network_type for the osmnx.graph_from_* functions:
network_type = "ferry"
I can also now pass multiple network types using a pipe delimiter:
network_type = "drive|ferry"
to get a graph that is the union of the two. When doing this, I found that it's useful to create a second ferry-only graph and use that as a reference to update the tags in the combined network graph. It is also better to load non-simplified graphs at first and and simplify it/them yourself after this step.
Still experimenting
Still having some issues with non-connectedness - now in the ferry-only network. Car ferries at isolated crossings than don't share a harbor with a through-ferry are not included in the ferries-only graphs and therefore the tags of their counterparts in the combined network aren't getting updated as needed. The ferries in the combined network (network_type = "drive|ferry") are all present and connected correctly and therefore their respective islands are now on the road network - which is great. But, because their tags aren't being updated, these isolated ferries are getting default highway speeds (and I'm doing travel time analysis). I can use work around this using:
if not 'highway' in edge[3]:
but, for a robust solution, I think we want to be able to tag them explicitly.
I'd still love to hear what other think.

scala for mapbox vector tiles - getting an 'id' field into the Features written to vector tiles

I'm writing MapBox vector tiles using geotrellis vectorpipe.
see here for the basic flow: https://geotrellis.github.io/vectorpipe/usage.html
Typically GeoJson Features can have an id field, so that Features can be rolled up into FeatureCollections. I need to make use of this field, but vectorpipe doesn't (natively) have this capability.
This is the Feature type used, and you can see it only has space for 1) a Geometry and 2) a data object D (which ends up populating properties in the output). There is no spot for an id.
https://geotrellis.github.io/scaladocs/latest/index.html#geotrellis.vector.Feature
Upstream there's a method called writeFeatureJsonWithID() that does let you inject an id field into a Feature when writing GeoJson.
https://github.com/locationtech/geotrellis/blob/master/vector/src/main/scala/geotrellis/vector/io/json/FeatureFormats.scala#L41-L49
My question is this:
I have worked through the vectorpipe code (https://github.com/geotrellis/vectorpipe), and I can't figure out if/where the data ever exists as GeoJson in a way where I can override and inject the id, maybe using the writeFeatureJsonWithID() or something I write explicitly. A lot of conversions are implicit, but it also may never explicitly sit as json.
Any ideas for how to get an id field in the final GeoJson written to vector tiles?
EDIT
Right now I think the trick is going to be finding a way to override .unfeature() method here:
https://github.com/locationtech/geotrellis/blob/master/vectortile/src/main/scala/geotrellis/vectortile/Layer.scala
The problem is that the internal.vector_tile.Tile is private, so I can construct it without forking the project.
Ended up having to fork geotrellis, hard-code a metadata => id function in Layer.unfeature() and compile locally to include in my project. Not ideal, but it works fine.
Also opened an issue here: https://github.com/locationtech/geotrellis/issues/2884

OPAL-Regarding implementing construct call graph in OPAL

In Paper [A Software Product Line for Static Analyses(2014)], there is an illustration related constructing call graph(Listing7).
In this example, Line14 is related to construct call graph. while i check the src code and API, what i could find is DefaultCHACallGraphDomain.scala which has no implementation of construct call graph.
As my purpose is using OPAL to construct call graph. Is there any demo or documents help me understanding existing CallGraphDomain in OPAL? currently, i can only find some class declaration.
I'll be really appreciated if anyone can give me some suggestions related this topic.
Thanks in advance.
Jiang
The interface that was shown in the paper doesn't exist anymore, so you can totally forget about it.
The default interface to get a CallGraph class is provided by the Project object you retrieve when you load the bytecode a Java project.
A general code Example:
val project = ... // a java project
val computedCallGraph = project.get(/* Some call graph key */)
val callGraph = computedCallGraph.callGraph // the final call graph interface.
The computed call graph contains several things. It contains the entry points, unresolved method calls, exceptions when something went wrong at the construction time and the actual call graph.
OPAL provides you several call graph algorithms, you can retrieve each by passing the corresponding call graph key to the Project's get method.
Currently, the following two keys are available and can be passed to Project.get (more information is available in the documentation of this classes):
CHACallGraphKey
VTACallGraphKey
Analysis mode - Library vs Application
To construct a valid call graph for a software project it depends on the project kind which analysis mode to chose. While applications provide complete information (except incomplete projects, class loading and so on), software libraries are intended to be used by other projects. However, those two different scenarios have to be kept in mind, when construction call graphs. More details can be found here: org.opalj.AnalysisModes
OPAL offers the following analysis modes:
DesktopApplication (safe for application call graphs)
LibraryWithClosePackagesAssumption (safe for call graphs that are used for security-insensitive analyses)
LibraryWithOpenPackagesAssumption (very conservative/safe for security analyses)
The analysis mode can be either configured in OPAL's config file or set as project setting at runtime. You can find the config file in the Common project under /src/main/resources/reference.conf.
All of those analysis modes are supported by the the CHACallGraphKey while VTACallGraphKey only supports applications so far.
NOTE: The interface may change in upcoming versions again.

How to pass heatPorts.T to DynamicPipe flowModel?

In the implementation of a flow models that function with Modelica Standard Library DynamicPipe (or a similar model that builds from PartialTwoPortFlow) there are examples of flow models that take place in an environment with heat transfer that requires wall properties (e.g., heatPorts.T and/or heatPorts.Q_flow) in order to calculate the pressure drop.
For example, a pressure drop model may need to calculate a new visocisty or Prandtl number based on the medium pressure and the wall temperature to capture cooling/heating effects, etc.
The heat transfer model obtains properties of the medium via passing the "states" however there is no existing connection in DynamicPipe or PartialTwoPortFlow that goes the other way.
I've tried numerous variations of ideas and have had no success, including creating a new PartialTwoPortFlow that contains all the heat transfer calls that exist in DynamicPipe.
I hesitate to post this question as I am surprised I am having so much difficulty with this and would not be surprised to find a straight forward solution. Nevertheless I need this ability and curious if others have already solved this issue as I am running short on ideas.
So my questions is:
What is a proper/efficient means of passing the heatPorts.T values to the flowModel?
For those familiar with the MSL Fluids library and more specifically the Pipe models provided, this answer should (hopefully) make sense.
Aside:
It seems the dynamic pipe could be improved a little bit by not restricting the heat transfer area to the perimeter x lengths and instead introduce a parameter (e.g., heatTransferArea) that would permit the user to define it and default to perimeter x lengths. See below
parameter SI.Area heatTransferArea = perimeter*lengths "Total heat transfer area";
HeatTransfer heatTransfer(
...
final surfaceAreas=heatTransferArea , //perimeter*lengths <- replaced
...
End Aside:
In order to communicate heatPorts.T to the flowModel and to not have errors when I checked each of the models I had to do the following:
Make an "input" in the flowModel for Ts_w. Not parameter (take a look at how mediums.state is passed)! Might have to do some finagling with it like "diameters" (see DetailedPipeFlow) to make it be used how you think it's going to be used.
Duplicate PartialTwoPortFlow and add the final Ts_w = Ts_wFM to flowModel. Additionally define the variable SI.Temperature[nFM+1] Ts_wFM in PartialTwoPortFlow and establish definitions similar to statesFM in the equation section.
This will require adding a HeatPorts model to be added.
Duplicate DynamicPipe and change the extension to the new PartialTwoPortFlow. Set use_HeatTransfer to true (as I've set it up this has to be true now for this to work which isn't ideal but manageable). Might be good to make it a final parameter so it can't be changed.
Don't forget to connect heatPorts to the heatports added in step 2.
I believe that this capture a quick version of how I was able to get the wall temperature passed to the flowModel. Perhaps there is a more elegant way but I though this was pretty serviceable. I now simply have one more Partial model and one more pipe model called PartialTwoPort_wTemp and GenericDynamicPipe (I also incorporated my surfaceArea correction in the new pipe).

how to run the example of uima-text-segmenter?

I want to call the API of uima-text-segmenter https://code.google.com/p/uima-text-segmenter/source/browse/trunk/INSTALL?r=22 to run an example.
But I don`t know how to call the API...
the readme said,
With the DocumentAnalyzer, run the following descriptor
`desc/textSegmenter/wst-snowball-C99-JTextTilingAAE.xml` by taking the
uima-examples data as input.
Could anyone give me some code which could be run directly in main func for example?
Thanks a lot!
Long answer:
The link describes how you would set up the application from within the Eclipse UIMA environment. This sort of set-up is typically targeted at subject matter specialists with little or no coding experience. It allows them to work (relatively fast) with UIMA in a declarative way: all data structures and analysis engines (computing blocks within UIMA) are declared in xml (with a GUI on top of it), after which the framework takes care of the rest. In this scenario, you would typically run a UIMA pipeline using a run configuration from within Eclipse (or the included UIMA pipeline runner application). Luckily, UIMA allows you to do exactly the same from code, but I would recommend using UIMAFit (http://uima.apache.org/d/uimafit-current/tools.uimafit.book.html#d5e137) for this purpose instead of of UIMA, as it bundles lots of useful things and coding shortcuts.
Short answer:
Using UIMAFit, you can call Factory methods that create CollectionReader (read input), AnalysisEngine (process input) and Consumer objects (write/do other stuff) from (third-party provided) XML files. Use these methods to construct your pipeline and the SimplePipeline class to run it. To extract the data you need, you would manipulate the CAS object (containing your data) in a Consumer object, possibly with a callback. You could also do this in a Analysis Engine object. I recommend using DKPro's FeaturePathFactory (https://code.google.com/p/dkpro-core-asl/source/browse/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core-asl/trunk/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core.api.featurepath-asl/src/main/java/de/tudarmstadt/ukp/dkpro/core/api/featurepath/FeaturePathFactory.java?spec=svn1811&r=1811) to quickly access the feature you are after.
Code examples:
http://uima.apache.org/d/uimafit-current/tools.uimafit.book.html#d5e137 contains examples, but they all go in the opposite direction (class objects are used in the factory methods, instead of XML files - XML is generated from these classes). Take a look at the UIMAFit API to find the method you need, AnalysisEngineDescription from XML for example: http://uima.apache.org/d/uimafit-current/api/org/apache/uima/fit/factory/AnalysisEngineFactory.html#createEngineDescriptionFromPath-java.lang.String-java.lang.Object...-