I am using BizTalk Server SB-Messaging adapter to retreive messages from Azure Service Bus Queue. I have successfully managed to send message to queue myself (using same adapter), and retreive message from queue and do further processing.
Problem arises when a 3rd party software supplier is sending messages to the queue, and for BizTalk Server to retreive and process message. I then receive the following additional "header"-information and control characters in the beginning of the message:
In text: #ACKstringBShttp://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/?$SOH
Seems like there is some sort of enveloped message, including headers to handle ACKnowledgement of the message to the queue.
SB-Messaging adapter gave following initial error message:
"The WCF service host at address has faulted and as a result no
more messages can be received on the corresponding receive location.
To fix the issue, BizTalk Server will automatically attempt to restart
the service host."
And, another error message:
"No Disassemble stage components can recognize the data."
Did anyone hit this problem before, and, what can be the cause of the problem? Can character encoding be a possible cause of this problem?
Here comes the feedback!
Turned out 3rd party software supplier had a setting to send message as stream, instead of string. Turns out it is a .Net application using BrokeredMessage object. Using string makes message serialized, and meta-data is added to the message. Using stream, no such serialization takes place, and message is kept untouched.
So, problem was using string and automatic serialization when sending to Service Bus Queue.
I have legacy Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging clients sending BrokeredMessage Xml content as <string> and I want to receive using the latest Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus library and Message type.
Using Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.Body) I get a unusable string prefaced with
#\u0006string\b3http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/��#
My approach is to explicitly use XmlDictionaryReader binary deserialization to undo the hidden serialization magic from the legacy library
private static string GetMessageBodyHandlingLegacyBrokeredMessage(Message message)
{
string str = null;
if (message.ContentType == null)
{
using (var reader = XmlDictionaryReader.CreateBinaryReader(
new MemoryStream(message.Body),
null,
XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas.Max))
{
var doc = new XmlDocument();
doc.Load(reader);
str = doc.InnerText;
}
}
else
throw new NotImplementedException("Unhandled Service Bus ContentType " + message.ContentType);
return str;
}
References
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-bus-messaging/service-bus-messages-payloads#payload-serialization
https://carlos.mendible.com/2016/07/17/step-by-step-net-core-azure-service-bus-and-amqp/
Related
I'm new in mirth so sorry if my question may seems naive.
I've a mirth channel that recives hl7 messages, and this is fine, also I've some filters and transformers both in Source and Destination.
When all is fine at the end of destination I send an ACK with a message, for this for this purpose I've made this function in code Templates:
function getAck(success, detailMessage, statusMessage) {
if (!detailMessage)
detailMessage = success ? "Operation completed successfully" : "Some error occours";
if(!statusMessage)
statusMessage = detailMessage;
if (success) {
ack = ACKGenerator.generateAckResponse(connectorMessage.getRawData(), "AA", detailMessage);
resp = new Response(com.mirth.connect.userutil.Status.SENT, ack, statusMessage);
} else {
ack = ACKGenerator.generateAckResponse(connectorMessage.getRawData(), "AE", detailMessage);
resp = new Response(com.mirth.connect.userutil.Status.ERROR, ack, statusMessage, detailMessage);
}
return resp;
}
So I use ACKGenerator.generateAckResponse for creating an Ack and Response for send response at client. This work but only in destination and that's my problem.
If I get an error before destination (e.g. in filters, transformer, ...) I don't be able to stop execution and send an NACK with an explaination of the error and this is what I would like to do.
Am I wrong doing things in this way?
You can store a Response in the responseMap in any filters or transformers. Once you define a key in the responseMap, it should be available as a selection in the response drop down on the source tab of your channel (instead of picking a destination.)
Your current connector should stop processing a message with an ERROR status if you manually throw an exception after setting the desired value in the responseMap. If you are in a filter, you could also filter the message instead of throwing the exception.
If you are worried about an uncaught exception, you could initialize the responseMap variable with an "Unknown Error" message at the first point in the channel where your custom code is defined that affects messages directly (likely the source filter from your description, but could possibly be the pre-processor or attachment handler if you use those.) The expectation is that this would be replaced with a more descriptive error or a success if the message makes it all the way through to the end, but the channel will always have something to return.
There are filter and transformer in the "Source" tab. If your expecting an error there or on other destinations, you could try:
Adding a try-catch code block in your filter and transformer.
Use your custom code template function in your filter and transformer to catch the error or issue.
Create a separate channel that will receive the ACK/NACK which will be responsible in forwarding that message to the client.
In your try-catch code block or custom code template, use the method router.routeMessageByChannelId to forward the ACK/NACK to the other channel (step 3).
Note: You'll need to disable the default response in your original channel since you have the other channel that'll forward the ACK/NACK. You'll also need to consider if the client's machine expects a valid ACK/NACK immediately when they sent the HL7 message, depends on their setup.
I am using a FIX protocol to communicate with one of our counterparties. I have used Camel with Spring to build my communication routes.
I have a requirement where in my counterparty is expecting an ACK for every request it sends to me.
For example:
TradeCaptureRequestAck in response to TradeCaptureRequest
AllocationReportAck in response to AllocationReport
Confirmation_Ack in response to Confirmation
They are expecting a response irrespective of what happens at our end (even if something fails or exception occurs).
One way I know we can intercept the incoming message via MessageFactory. We can create a custom messagefactory and inject it in while creating QuickFixJComponent bean.
Problem with this approach is at factory level I will just be able to get the message type like TradeCaptureReport, AllocationReport etc. but not the content because factory only creates (and returns) the appropriate Message object. Actual work of populating this message object with incoming message data happens in Session class I guess (not sure about this).
Can someone please tell me if there is a way I can get or intercept the request message as soon as it reaches the route so that I can send the appropriate ACK to counterparty?
i'm new to Netty and intend to create a tcp socket server which reads the info of each client and replies back towards client before processing requests immediately ,i.e. sort of an acknowledgement towards client as and when the message enters overriden channelRead method of ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter class.
Please guide me in the above specified objective.
i'm currently trying the basic netty 4.1.4 echo server example however i wanted server to send back acknowledgement to the client so i updated channelread method as follows :
#Override
public void channelRead(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, Object msg) {
ctx.write(msg);
ChannelFuture cf = ctx.channel().write("FROM SERVER");
System.out.println("Channelfuture is "+cf);
}
and the output obtained was as follows:
Channelfuture is DefaultChannelPromise#3f4ee9dd(failure: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: unsupported message type: String (expected: ByteBuf, FileRegion))
I understand the error that it is expecting bytebuf but how do i achieve it? also, whether this method would be able to send out acknowledgement towards client
You can use String.getBytes(Charset) and Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(byte[]) to convert to ByteBuf.
ChannelFuture cf = ctx.channel()
.write(Unpooled.wrappedBuffer("FROM SERVER".getBytes(CharsetUtil.UTF_8)));
Also note that ctx.channel().write(...); may not be what you want. Consider ctx.write(...); instead. The difference is that if your handler is a ChannelDuplexHandler it would receive a write event when you do channel().write(). Using ctx instead of channel will send the write out from your handlers point in the pipeline instead of from the end of the pipeline, which is usually what you want.
I want to consume msmq service. But unable to send message to queue.
Here is my code.
System.Messaging.MessageQueue msmQ = new System.Messaging.MessageQueue("net.msmq://myServerName/private/MyQueueName");
msg ="<nodeDetails><node>Node1</node></nodeDetails>";//Dummy value. it is XML structure consist of multiple node
msmQ.Send(msg);
It gives me an error on msmQ.Send(msg)
Length cannot be less than zero. Parameter name: length
The following things are installed on my m/c:
Microsoft Message Queue(MSMQ)Server
Window Activation Process
Also when I tried as
bool msmQExits = MessageQueue.Exists("net.msmq://myServerName/private/MyQueueName");
it gives "Path syntax is invalid". I am not able to get anything on it.
I just have a msmq URL net.msmq://myServerName/private/MyQueueName.
How can I consume such URL and send my message to "MyQueueName"?
Change your queue name to this:
var queueName = #"FormatName:DIRECT=HTTP://URLAddressSpecification/net.msmq://myServerName/private/MyQueueName";
And you cannot check if a remote query exists by MessageQueue.Exists method. It will always throw an exception.
You can check these links for more info:
MSMQ FormatName
Checking if a remote query exists
Also, the problem is not with the message you see that length is less than 0. If you go deeper and check the stack trace you’ll see that your queue name has an invalid format. It tries to find FORMAT occurrence inside your queue name, doesn’t find it and Substring() method returns -1 there.
Stacktrace:
at System.String.Substring(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length)
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.ResolveFormatNameFromQueuePath(String queuePath, Boolean throwException)
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.get_FormatName()
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.SendInternal(Object obj, MessageQueueTransaction internalTransaction, MessageQueueTransactionType transactionType)
at System.Messaging.MessageQueue.Send(Object obj)
at MessagingTest.Program.SendMessage(String str, Int32 x) in c:\Users\ivan.yurchenko\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\MSMQTestProjects\MessagingTest\MessagingTest\Program.cs:line 21
at MessagingTest.Program.<Main>b__1() in c:\Users\ivan.yurchenko\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\MSMQTestProjects\MessagingTest\MessagingTest\Program.cs:line 38
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InnerInvoke()
at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
Here is an example for how to consume the service.
It has Wcf Service,Physical MSMQ, and the client project. So you have to have a WCF service to receive the message and msmq to store the message and a client to send the message.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/326909/Creating-a-WCF-Service-with-MSMQ-Communication-and
I am trying to access an NServiceBus service on a work server from a client at home over a VPN connection. The message gets to the service OK but the response queue name has the format
DIRECT=OS:MyHomePCName\private$\MyClientQueueName
The reply message sits in the server's outgoing queue presumably because it can't resolve MyHomePCName. Can I change the response queue name when sending the message to the following format?
DIRECT=TCP:MyHomeIPAddress\private$\MyClientQueueName
Of course I still have the problem of sending the IP address for the VPN connection, but I'm only testing at the moment and don't mind hard coding that in the client for now.
NSB should format it correctly if you put "$queueName#$homeIpAddress". Here is the code it uses:
public static string GetFullPath(string value){
IPAddress ipAddress;
if (IPAddress.TryParse(GetMachineNameFromLogicalName(value), out ipAddress))
{
return (PREFIX_TCP + GetFullPathWithoutPrefix(value));
}
return (PREFIX + GetFullPathWithoutPrefix(value));
}