Why my website emails go to SPAM box HOTMAIL - email

We have a small company, we send sometimes few emails.
All these emails are considered as safe emails by all emails provider, only HOTMAIL.
How can i know the reason why HOTMAIL consider our emails as SPAM ?
Understand our Outlook / Hotmail / Office365 Deliverability Issues with X-Forefront-Antispam-Report ?
You can find bellow an exemple of an email classified by HOTMAIL as SPAM :
Received: from HE1EUR04HT080.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
(2603:10b6:a03:100::41) by BYAPR17MB2341.namprd17.prod.outlook.com with HTTPS
via BYAPR08CA0028.NAMPRD08.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:35:04 +0000
Received: from HE1EUR04FT013.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.26.59) by HE1EUR04HT080.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.26.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1404.13; Wed, 5 Dec
2018 10:35:03 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is xx.xxx.xx.xx)
smtp.mailfrom=xxxxxxxxxx.com; hotmail.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
header.d=xxxxxxxxxx.com;hotmail.com; dmarc=temperror action=none
header.from=xxxxxxxxxx.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xxxxxxxxxx.com designates
xx.xxx.xx.xx as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=xx.xxx.xx.xx; helo=xxxxxxxxxx.com;
Received: from xxxxxxxxxx.com (xx.xxx.xx.xx) by
HE1EUR04FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.26.126) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.20.1404.13 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:35:01 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:AB1002FDAF6A587890EE7D690A8B7C0533694AA27CC8CD5DD9887E9B10F6A6AA;UpperCasedChecksum:2C9C5779BC7CA07579C2ABCCDCC6DC4EF6E1F5707AEA3F3E3B8FB9DB8A5964FE;SizeAsReceived:1060;Count:12
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP])
by xxxxxxxxxx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3042C13B6
for <prenom.nom#hotmail.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:35:01 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:35:00 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--=_RainLoop_184_159261189.1544006100"
From: xxxx.xxxx#xxxxxxxxxx.com
Message-ID: <1d5dbc12b0ad9f393b60bdcf281453d4#xxxxxxxxxx.com>
Reply-To: xxxx.xxxx#yahoo.fr
Subject: Mail de test
To: "prenom nom" <prenom.nom#hotmail.com>
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results-Original: auth=pass smtp.auth=xxxx.xxxx#xxxxxxxxxx.com
smtp.mailfrom=xxxx.xxxx#xxxxxxxxxx.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xxxxxxxxxx.com;
s=dkim; t=1544006101;
h=from:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type;
bh=rUWyfwQa5tHrCBIwEq0ehhhrOAC/x3JYLLdxQgyDPyI=;
b=fevC4RxDsG9+KynrDFzJZtm/NreksALp7vHODFCUspUglru5PsIM0ta0JUCaNpAldMCbpo
Fp7dWa84dYFBnh85l9oV9HFpzHTgCzk/v63Hjw5ggxJJq41e46mlgr3wbdJjb8gDNcE4gc
AV9BATZpIZH8OKpXgtOk53N+laqJRZg=
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 12
Return-Path: xxxx.xxxx#xxxxxxxxxx.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTime: 05 Dec 2018 10:35:01.9575
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationStartTimeReason: OriginalSubmit
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationInterval: 2:00:00:00.0000000
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-ExpirationIntervalReason: OriginalSubmit
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 4730759b-0399-41af-5552-08d65a9d5017
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;HE1EUR04FT013;1:f6d7toPjHds79kfjb8F8a92RxuOXFF60QrueiBIAci0rI6sqqY48Bzu8uaNPzyL+FT+X9g/kG7bzmFi2V3HyDeZeMuGeuUuP9oSB16V/YB9PGJWjCgb0fJhRv68sm8lk
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource:
HE1EUR04FT013.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-UserLastLogonTime: 12/5/2018 10:31:45 AM
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 4730759b-0399-41af-5552-08d65a9d5017
X-Microsoft-Antispam:
BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390098)(5000110)(711020)(4605076)(610169)(650170)(651021)(8291501071);SRVR:HE1EUR04HT080;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;HE1EUR04HT080;3:DybF6SUpFveGAxx8na3Ize3Nkt11joOtHTmP4K19riue2nfmCDbAyWtEYCFb39NFLsV0PICKRCZizik1veZYKZZAcyTwiQmwBg5eXjW0fGglhIgvt9/rQ5isFDOhdIvBHmH3ibQzaj7ZwH7Iir5xLlUh6KuQjK4wqbZ70xNx7L9xtCkl1KIZn9nyqt1CvAT8C1eCok0fU+ox4kGY8NzL87N2fRqer12pTDSEatEWoGcBosOnaKKbfJQZ8xn3738k09JlzAajuEghTgVNfAM3qpJyVk3ZD4FWpYcStFs23qSty17srM/Tayf11c8uB46uix5Y7KnAXa9rNRUfMONZBA==;25:/SJAdxq4u4Qs1hsqopWz0P0KJHrriehmS29nQXtMgNdyC/cclr2pHh4viLne8HpxsTcz6FrSKBu+mJqB84LON4ctSh+BHbxE3WmdWSndOZn+1S4dDARLgb+uzcn/JbOCCaYuIG98V+QZ8fbqqyYkamo9JsOmiGCMTQIDAQD/cJrgvbrRUfSu6gkYhzYAn4vP2SwFf5pxMZ4WrWMmc0bNrPEUOSvG6VFM5JlGO2Os6dlpTbb6TTRv2l7y9BfvANVnXEwB53LOCclUNVKFf6+2fz9bKKw+VIy5/swsy2z+h8n/WPKoqM92Mpdnoq6LFItoTKRqWwQDqvv2F3nO0OKQmA==;31:dOrm256zuEt/hE/ekHqoTmIFEXc3zHxEZayzOO42bqB36gH75boqRurWRKHauLRLvCYkTvXymjaXQsUJKVXs80ws5rCMaT7QiwMplBdg0VWdDFZvwjh/tt2Nex/4a7uaO8g5M9D8rS0CXCrpSVzTp+Jga6sxIzEMgtq3OlmJIhulvmOsoSld1HvPcOGpXMeRZZD2PsotmP2Tn9ElHF5AmGU4ViCtza4/J9FB+E4A2W0=
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HE1EUR04HT080:
X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true
X-Sender-IP: xx.xxx.xx.xx
X-SID-PRA: xxxx.xxxx#xxxxxxxxxx.COM
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test:
BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(444111751)(6300000075)(1201097)(52401380)(52601095)(52505095)(52406095)(52305095)(52206095)(88860335)(82015058);SRVR:HE1EUR04HT080;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1EUR04HT080;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;HE1EUR04HT080;4:bokg6rTSYvxEH9tWbCTyUYr0q5d15BPnt3b/6NKV1aU47utLwxgQ3Uen6CF95MioWJ7vvtnrkzk/fZP/MnWwvPlt2LRJsAvjCcM+DhRB4Xe2oCPUZzR/2mfZz5VsEfraEDaZ8s4GsoKPIKsJ4B6Y9xz+xUec4kc3cmIHh5SEfv+AXcHtdM1TKdA4usesZy47wEFH2rlFaKJEJxViqyBx/+26SDBbLD9PQP2hUUDWn8YbKAzJz7kR23nsBU5mvnQitvIfh5Bt3+zV2wg1zwahMA==;6:l6ijCjczte/M+2grONf/7pGyIkA1XNf4ID15Esb3yess1e9qhWDPeZwXlbH4hdWZK9DAagKkup3nQoQmaHFWM1UyZrK/yXBDWwbu2CYkI0LYD0/x2bGkNcnFXUuZvjEwhBI276G4Q9s1niDBXrLyCy6nrroKStX+XVdwQJRN+SOmn1nRBk4ve83RRKErll45NODrJ1gs+ohoPuPKKE+WsiHVqPqXc8/tAYQ2+6rDDDuSe1JW8tbwG6GPQTgmTB4VCZCmDHE+OYv/AwUI9E5/tvjDaR+AUGfmxkNEfAGy5FaGIpPyc5ooj2Ccoc78uJ1uSJSG0PaRkC9BpBqzDAyDCUMtNiYKxkmT/BX7G7izvr4YSz3/2IjYroc3BRaBgR1ysgDdJaNQxMdgvdSLf+QT7GAjoPlzHjg5kdbhboJ21LA7FUbD38w9sCeLL/quipitUon1NWPG86s5Sqvk2Dlp0A==;5:Swo0LieNeMdG7TItYBICIBs0+ruylDAdbXBR0mvw8RBGaL8cuIubr/SDBiw8BowyZ1QpMwH8zEyR1DPU0K18Po7sIcdApik4BOkjw3sVVlUr8Q0i6hFhkjWbbhCTcJLzQ2vHbiB9TubWWw5v9b1bNTvzvsYSCsmct8RLj7klb+Y=
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;HE1EUR04HT080;7:/enTEOqI+9/YUuE8ZQ9zGk1y/OeSFzGo3DLWTFNT1Df2M9R68+jdV3s+KWz8wPKd8cpou9+NhTU/Ly60rQh2wB1nSL9Z+W+mqZLXhdfPmN+sIfwIAOXAY74iQZfUMqyY5fDb4d5X13fGQzKO8ZFERQ==
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2018 10:35:01.8638
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4730759b-0399-41af-5552-08d65a9d5017
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg:
c001924d-3e68-4f40-89c2-901a49278da7
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR04HT080
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:02.1382293
X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.1404.009
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;BYAPR17MB2341;27:WzLF8uqdvJVnu4T9cEu69DvAmSYq5iH/pHwrHXwIpXlnvNE4YIOzmmcexyxApqb4mygEC4ri6vNS095zA9lD+HsJyGDlK7UPUWAaQzIxM32oVjRuf6gKM+HN6e0fSZ9Bes900pfhufceV5TD3RyFTczEgE+rYmRxjKWcWr2L9jInBXy0DsJyUbYMGn2F/rGKlTpWFbva4M2R8UtxFB5aqaTfC5eTKsCUJ4q8ICVCPBd2RmPLWm/Kg6eKH4NOhsr0Uwznp24MCk5dl9QfUrec/K4QMsSG3VLtksdTwUe0dJE5QJwo3JSv9hYocobTUxm7l57Gkj5OyKrCdguMjyfYw8P1mDhqW63zg5rCA1rMKNlSrO8fndJ+ISQ0isjRQkHrtKHcKkJu2S35Z6yzu348GbQQoKWiYsqbREclISUnkSXs1FHgGQKwE/3z9RqSQ39cAFx4yl5zDeotk2sRMJANJ48z853v+LFsNVvCik2uVDTcuz8wlBnkWQtFpWrlTBfsUxXlTYvKSqgQfGCLYUIfcQ55A3CBlTCqUpV87rLkV0rLGQzjCuXWORHZplmm6RlETzMDbhqh2yDCce9ZR1iBsOzvvJNVPVW4DZL5odgWAFTYZeH5wm0TqcGgGsG6RCWRPvWo0+8hDf6pA62rZaPQja3HGxGsKwkhfDWXMzEAdwUtRXcDjSrBaghKPmnxokg6Hc+CjPOkGqZQvZnQ4DeyHqxVugL97+ZCfzbRuFv4rxU=
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
abwl:0;wl:0;pcwl:0;kl:0;iwl:0;dwl:0;dkl:0;rwl:0;ucf:0;jmr:0;ex:0;auth:1;dest:J;OFR:SpamFilterAuthJ;ENG:(5062000261)(5061607266)(5061608174)(4900095)(4920089)(6375004)(4950130)(4990090)(9140004);RF:JunkEmail;
X-Message-Info:
qoGN4b5S4yog6nY042nLw3cqoJY/BsdeIdvpFyeEToIfBWdMiTy9ohwkOjOHX/mmYDuIIXAZuntJB/jcvsI8N12HJabUBoRzEX6xvbe2KE26SyeTZwImTZfxGqX28h5yd+X+vl4xYK4JrDiB4OS5lY4EIUJKI6TMjc2520XsSe62AVW/zBal1X8WxWxQRjLLJ2OD1DdMGUwrpwctIvbXmA==
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MjtHRD0yO1NDTD02
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
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

Blacklisting of a sending ip or your sending domain could be a probable reason. And it is that Hotmail smtp server has only blacklisted your domain /Ip . Try changing your sending Ip or the domain and see if it lands in the spam or not.

I would start with something like checking my domain's send reputation on a site like Sender Score. That will tell you if you've been blacklisted. Then I would reach out to the Outlook postmaster to see what I can do to fix my errors. I also would really double check how my emails look in Hotmail, user engagement counts in many spam scores, and if the content doesn't look good it, users could be deleting it or marking it as spam.

Related

DMARC behaviour on Gmail

We've configured SPF, DKIM and DMARC records for our domain and they're working fine. Our DMARC reports from Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo also confirm the same.
However, just last week, one of our (Gmail) users brought to our attention a fraudulent email sent from a spoofed email address on our domain.
After looking at the email headers, we realised Gmail didn't initiate a DMARC check at all and the email landed in user's inbox. Gmail had only performed an SPF check which had passed because the check was performed on the envelop FROM header domain.
The email header (with identifying details redacted) looked like the following:
Delivered-To: redacted#gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.167.23 with SMTP id q23csp326872wme;
Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.36.147.1 with SMTP id y1mr22192213itd.34.1487663583976;
Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <redacted#fraudulentdomain.net>
Received: from server2.fraudulentdomain.net (server2.fraudulentdomain.net. [144.X.Y.Z])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i196si19658513ioi.78.2017.02.20.23.53.03
for <redacted#gmail.com>;
Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of redacted#fraudulentdomain.net designates 144.X.Y.Z as permitted sender) client-ip=144.X.Y.Z;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of redacted#fraudulentdomain.net designates 144.X.Y.Z as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=redacted#fraudulentdomain.net
Received: by server2.fraudulentdomain.net (Postfix, from userid 330)
id 385716C165; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:53:03 +0100 (CET)
To: redacted#gmail.com
Subject: Some Subject
From: My Service <spoofed#mydomain.com>,
"MIME-Version:1.0"#server2.fraudulentdomain.net
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-Id: <20170221075303.385716C165#server2.fraudulentdomain.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:53:03 +0100 (CET)
Why did Gmail not initiate a DMARC check and just performed an SPF check? Is it got to do something with the Display FROM header having 2 values?
That's a bug, I reported it to Google, they have fixed it now.

SPF passed, DKIM signed and DMARC added but email goes to spam

I have configured DKIM, SPF and DMARC correct and from the email headers it seems to be working fine but the emails I sent from my SMTP server are marked as spam. Here is my email headers
Received: from SG2APC01HT253.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.163.105.24) by SG2PR03MB1582.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com with HTTPS via
SG2PR06CA0014.APCPRD06.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 02:03:11 +0000
Received: from SG2APC01FT015.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.250.60) by SG2APC01HT253.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
(10.152.251.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2; Tue, 7 Feb
2017 02:03:09 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 191.101.230.42)
smtp.mailfrom=ezpc.com.my; hotmail.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
header.d=ezpc.com.my;hotmail.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none
header.from=ezpc.com.my;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of ezpc.com.my designates
191.101.230.42 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
client-ip=191.101.230.42; helo= mail.ezpc.com.my;
Received: from BAY004-MC1F48.hotmail.com (10.152.250.55) by
SG2APC01FT015.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.181) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2 via Frontend
Transport; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 02:03:06 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:B3C91582F4E1A8BEB3081753A75091AB6E10F9554C8EB64EF3F4DBAEBFBBCCAD;UpperCasedChecksum:FDA1A8FF432113AA359CED44F62CC1B29335E24D01725A791958063140028963;SizeAsReceived:1267;Count:16
Received: from mail.ezpc.com.my ([191.101.230.42]) by BAY004-MC1F48.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23143);
Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:03:04 -0800
Received: by mail.ezpc.com.my (Postfix, from userid 48)
id AB46E2213CB; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:03:03 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.ezpc.com.my AB46E2213CB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ezpc.com.my;
s=default; t=1486432983;
bh=9v0acwudeB20jRA3DCLi3/n8gPxEJUSqP+DRE97Rs/8=;
h=To:Subject:From:Date:From;
b=Pr71KmBKnlBDX6KEY3PNzaRVqj1njANZe4fVyDI/3a+uNDCqE933329nhyoaeyS2U
c5pbo1szpI2lI5Io9AV5q33w/HeIYnsGvstpM9e/mtpBUeNoYk7ajIeJldSyI1kbGv
AtYp7oGy2ltmDcO4nkwqEBRpkPJr3jwcKhY6Ucys=
Any idea on fixing the problem?
Your ip reputation is neutral (which is good but can be improved)
http://www.senderbase.org/lookup/?search_string=191.101.230.42
As long as all those settings are configured correct, then you should use this form from Microsoft!
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/getsupport?oaspworkflow=start_1.0.0.0&wfname=capsub&productkey=edfsmsbl3&locale=en-us&ccsid=636225696037961710

Why are emails sent by my server marked as SPAM?

My website, all written in PHP, has an automatic system to notify users via email. Everything worked perfectly until i moved everything on a new less expensive dedicated server (new IP, also). Now, from the new server, all the emails are sent to the spam folder. Why? What happened? Gmail says it's marked as spam because it violates these guidelines about the sender. Here is the message header of one of the emails
Delivered-To: fontanavideostudios#gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.224.200 with SMTP id re8csp1701580iec;
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 07:30:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.22.5 with SMTP id 5mr1380826qgm.72.1422804619177;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 07:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <noreply#racebooking.net>
Received: from ns362512.ip-91-121-174.eu ([2001:41d0:1:ef28::1])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e3si21772874qaf.113.2015.02.01.07.30.18
for <fontanavideostudios#gmail.com>;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 07:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: noreply#racebooking.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=2001:41d0:1:ef28::1;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=none (google.com: noreply#racebooking.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=noreply#racebooking.net
Received: by ns362512.ip-91-121-174.eu (Postfix, from userid 504)
id DFE0916074; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:28:52 +0100 (CET)
To: fontanavideostudios#gmail.com
Subject: Qualcuno ha commentato il tuo post
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 504:new_notification.php
From: Racebooking <noreply#racebooking.net>
Reply-To: no-reply
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Message-Id: <20150201152852.DFE0916074#ns362512.ip-91-121-174.eu>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:28:52 +0100 (CET)
The domain, racebooking.net, has a good reputation and MX, mail, smtp point to the same ip: 91.121.174.40 which is the same IP of racebooking.net (here is a test)
Any idea?
Check this line in the header:
Received-SPF: none (google.com: noreply#racebooking.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=2001:41d0:1:ef28::1;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=none (google.com: noreply#racebooking.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=noreply#racebooking.net
I think you have not correctly configured the SPF entries in your DNS.
See this Google Products thread about this: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/apps/nvGcYDjONfc
I can see that you have no SPF entries defined for "racebooking.net":
$ dig +short racebooking.net txt
"1|www.racebooking.net"
You need to define an SPF entry like:
"v=spf1 mx a:mail0.racebooking.net -all"
You also need to include any other host from which you might be sending email (ie web applications sending email from #racebooking.net).
More info about what SPF is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework

Outgoing mail is ending up in spam

I have a problem with all the mails sent from my company, often ending up in the recipients spam folder. It's from approximately 5-6 different mail adresses sending from the same mail server. We have a dedicated server that is both hosting out website aswell as managing all mails and so forth.
We usually don't get any error messages when the mails either never arrives, or ends up in the recipients spam folder.
But we received this 1 error message, so i hope you have an idea of what to do to keep our mails out of the spam folders. We might have to hire external developers to take care of the problem, i just want to get an idea of what the problem is, so i know if i can fix it, or tell the developers what to do.
"ANON" is put in, to keep mails involved anonymous. Should i delete anything else?
Error message:
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:mailer-daemon#googlemail.com]
Sendt: 27. september 2013 08:26
Til: support#example.com
Emne: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
ANON#ANON.dk
Technical details of permanent failure:
Message rejected by Google Groups. Please visit
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=188131 to review our Bulk Email Senders Guidelines.
----- Original message -----
X-Received: by 10.14.109.66 with SMTP id r42mr7804640eeg.43.1380263171652;
Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <support#example.com>
Received: from server.example.com ([2a01:4f8:121:267::2])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
o7si4443732eep.48.1969.12.31.16.00.00
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2a01:4f8:121:267::2 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of support#example.com) client-ip=2a01:4f8:121:267::2;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 2a01:4f8:121:267::2 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of support#example.com) smtp.mail=support#example.com;
dkim=neutral (bad format) header.i=#example.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=example.com; s=default;
h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:T
o:From; bh=E5v2ubiy1T/bYA8pEndEZlZwb928MRpgJuoPSy8WsQE=;
b=AbAc/65Y88xmhdGHxUUs3kK/1rOvTH0uEpPAVEN1sv8KNdJvzvRqiO72gqXan0M7wXRVeev6IJ
0iumBwj875irmYAaST9hzm+eIF02whaZDgkzRr2jjJKN9bn11tBmtlTK0JzTGDUMf1Ij+qmI
0iumBwj875irmYAaST9hzm+eIF02whaZDgkzRr2jjJKN9bn11tBmtlTK0JzTGDUMf1Ij+vdF
0iumBwj875irmYAaST9hzm+eIF02whaZDgkzRr2jjJKN9bn11tBmtlTK0JzTGDUMf1Ij+f
64lUpYIyyaqlNUYnaPt28=;
Received: from post.ABCDEFGHIJK.com ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:49696
helo=WIN7UVQT1EBIRO)
by server.example.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <support#example.com>)
id 1VPRUi-0008Dh-Os
for ANON#ANON.dk; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:25:41 +0000
From: "ANON - example.com" <support#example.com>
To: "'XYZ ABC'" <a.bcd#efg.hi>
References: <E1VORD0-0007hu-Jn#server.example.com>
<CACyHzxudCSh+4NOEu-_QR1yQYA=uR0DOrTTcgDsg9KcRLTWDFQ#mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CACyHzxudCSh+4NOEu-_QR1yQYA=uR0DOrTTcgDsg9KcRLTWDFQ#mail.gmail.com>
Subject: SV: example.com: Ordre # 700003820 opdatering
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:25:38 +0200
Message-ID: <00d501cebb4a$637159b0$2a540d10$#example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D6_01CEBB5B.26FF0BB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGYr839QgwXgZ5pAdux+XF0Yh5W4AHfGYRhmjY70GA=
Content-Language: da
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.example.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ANON.dk
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - example.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.example.com: authenticated_id:
support#example.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
I needed to edit the MX records for the domains sending the mails, as the domains and websites were on the same server the mail server couldn't comprehend it.

Mail server altering reply-to address?

We have an application sending mail with reply-to addresses in the form of NNN#email.example.com. The mail is sent via Sendgrid and replies are parsed using Sendgrid's Parse API. The problem is some email doesn't get back to us because the reply-to address has been changed to NNN#sendgrid.net. Sendgrid support says they never touch the reply-to and we've confirmed by a Gmail logging account that our application sends mail out correctly. So that leaves me suspecting certain mail servers are switching the domain name with that of the MX host. Our MX records for email.example.com are:
mx3.sendgrid.net 20
mx4.sendgrid.net 20
mx5.sendgrid.net 20
mx.sendgrid.net 10
mx2.sendgrid.net 20
Are there any mail servers or clients that are known to modify reply-to addresses? Or is there any other possible explanation?
Edit Headers from an email send by our app and logged with a Gmail account (sanitized to remove client information):
Delivered-To: logger#company.com
Received: by 10.112.62.41 with SMTP id v9csp143404lbr;
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.51.37 with SMTP id h5mr22717342obo.35.1343733928944;
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <Editors#domain.com>
Received: from o1.email.domain.com (o1.email.domain.com. [208.117.48.105])
by mx.google.com with SMTP id m6si10752851oec.6.2012.07.31.04.25.27;
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of Editors#domain.com designates 208.117.48.105 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.117.48.105;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of Editors#domain.com designates 208.117.48.105 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=Editors#domain.com; dkim=pass header.i=#Domain.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=Domain.com; h=date
:from:reply-to:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=+VZlU9LWGUpMR4neAk/JMo
1DD2E=; b=T3Be3k1Gp+shIGgQZPJ1vtx1kUCRMCRAqRgf8LxVUdvQ1/7YWRKnls
+zrXi6dhJXaLrEyVmt7MyYgxvkVvnJqWYy4tAQABtANQHdLSle4AK1+BY+/m2h4E
fj91rMgQySNbrVV+mhaiE5Q7NxvIa35azUUO0/zRYpluDUt6UBEcQ=
Received: by 10.16.69.117 with SMTP id mf20.27729.5017C0A66
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:25:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from email.domain.com (unknown [10.60.208.17])
by mi15 (SG) with ESMTP id 5017c0a6.202a.a5e396
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:25:26 -0500 (CST)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:25:25 -0400
From: Editors <Editors#domain.com>
Reply-To: 5005#email.domain.com,
Editors <Editors#domain.com>
To: user#example.com
Message-ID: <5017c0a5d4365_e294729d8c86360#app02.manuscripts.domain.com.mail>
Subject: Invitation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sendgrid-EID: lcSu+eeYyj7byVT4rUR8IwFlWv7xwmQ9mjigbpHftFWQeg+HlxpNd7F1nbL2uoqLRAg4sHwj57Rrx78FZhDo2L2DCVfamQm0+wEFzkMnensGOv19JFRIAeDMZY53SVpKMwm4Klqcm6L6s9+UaFtqnRUE3/jexZ6uJAFc5x57JG4=
So you see the reply-to is set properly in these headers, but when the recipient replied we saw the reply-to address change to 5005#sendgrid.net.
We have the exact same issue. I'm no Exhange guru so I can't validate this - but I'm willing to bet the company you are sending mail to has a configuration flag that states to NOT use a 'reply to' command. Our application sends out as ourcompany#appmail.com with the reply to address set to user#mycompany.com. I can test with gmail and yahoo and it works great!
But certain companies we email always come back t the 'ourcompany#appmail.com' address as if there was no reply to set. Think about all the junk mail you get where the reply address is your own email address. I can only imagine MS and Novell have flags to force replies to the actual sender.
Now if we could just get clarification from a real expert as to whether or not this flag is out there.