I have a table GroupsTable that can be described through a MWE as follows.
GroupID MemberID
1 42
2 42
2 43
3 42
3 43
3 44
I am then given another table MemberTable that contain some rows with MemberID. For example:
MemberID
42
43
The query I need is one that finds the matching GroupID that has exactly the MemberID from the second table, no more no less. I believe the following code is working, but it is terribly slow, so is there a better way to find the answer?
select c.GroupID from (
select g.GroupID
from GroupTable g
join MemberTable m on m.MemberID = g.MemberID
group by g.GroupID
having count(*) = (select count(*) from MemberTable)
) c
left join GroupTable x on x.GroupID = c.GroupID
and x.MemberID not in (select MemberID from MemberTable)
where x.GroupID is null
Sample data:
create table MemberTable (
MemberID int
)
insert into MemberTable
values
(42),
(43);
create table GroupTable (
GroupID int,
MemberID int
);
insert into GroupTable
values
(1, 42), -- only one member
(2, 42), -- both members
(2, 43),
(3, 42), -- one member too many
(3, 43),
(3, 44),
(4, 40), -- two irrelevant members
(4, 41);
There is a fiddle available here: https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=sqlserver_2017&fiddle=ad818a306600286433634fa83c3628a0
You can use a combination of left join, group by, having, and count distinct, like this:
DECLARE #Count int;
SELECT #Count = COUNT(*) FROM MemberTable;
SELECT GroupID
FROM GroupTable As G
LEFT JOIN MemberTable As M
ON G.MemberID = M.MemberID
GROUP BY GroupID
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT G.MemberID) = #Count
AND COUNT(DISTINCT M.MemberID) = #Count
The left join ensures you'll get all the records for each group id.
The count of distinct of the groups member ids ensures you will only get the group ids that does not have have member ids that doesn't appear in the members table.
The count distinct of the members table ensures you will not get groups that happen to have the same number of member ids as the members table.
Update
After testing with temp tables on my own environment, I've confirmed my suspicion that the performance killer is the count(distinct). I've changed my query to get rid of it and now it seems to be almost twice as fast as the query in the question:
DECLARE #Count int;
SELECT #Count = COUNT(*) FROM MemberTable;
SELECT GroupID
FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT GroupID, MemberID
FROM GroupTable
) As G
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT DISTINCT MemberID
FROM MemberTable
) As M
ON G.MemberID = M.MemberID
GROUP BY GroupID
HAVING COUNT(G.MemberID) = #Count
AND COUNT(M.MemberID) = #Count;
Note that if the MemberTable is known to always have distinct MemberID values you can get rid of the second derived table and simply left join the first derived table to the MemberTable directly.
Related
I'm trying to make a query with a SELECT statement in a JOIN but couldn't get it to work.
The tables I have are below :
CREATE TABLE check_result
(id int,
check_result_id int,
id_relation int);
INSERT INTO check_result
values(1, 12, 1), (2,9, 1),(3,13, 3);
CREATE TABLE relation
(id int,
name VARCHAR(20),
id_group int);
INSERT INTO relation
values(1, 'pietje', 1), (2,'klaasje', 1),(3,'Harry', 3);
CREATE TABLE groups
(id int,
name VARCHAR(20),
id_sub int);
INSERT INTO groups
values(1, 'support_worker 1',2),(2, 'support_worker 2',2),(3, 'support_worker 2',3);
The query I have thus far is something like :
SELECT R.name , G.name
FROM check_result CR
LEFT JOIN relation R ON R.id = CR.id_relation
LEFT JOIN groups G ON R.id_group = (SELECT id_sub
FROM groups
WHERE name = 'support_worker 2'
AND id_sub = R.id_group )
In the end I was hoping for 3 records in the results but instead there are 6, with the correct results from groups.
Is there somebody who can show me what I'm doing wrong?
With that dataset and without your expected results it is hard to give you a solid answer.
SELECT R.name , G.name
FROM check_result CR
LEFT JOIN relation R ON R.id = CR.id_relation
LEFT JOIN groups G ON G.id_sub = R.id_group and G.name = 'support_worker 2'
You mentioned wanting all 3 results, but your sub select was causing duplicate records to appear.
Is it not a case as the above of not needing to rely on the sub select and simply adding more conditions onto your left join?
One additional thing worth mentioning - as I have little knowledge on what you database structure is but if Groups has an Id that is being references in R.id_group then you should join that and not Id_sub which would change your code to be:
SELECT R.name , G.name
FROM check_result CR
LEFT JOIN relation R ON R.id = CR.id_relation
LEFT JOIN groups G ON G.id = R.id_group and G.name = 'support_worker 2'
Giving the same result in the limited data.
SQL Fiddle
I would like to check across multiple tables that the same keys / same number of keys are present in each of the tables.
Currently I have created a solution that checks the count of keys per individual table, checks the count of keys when all tables are merged together, then compares.
This solution works but I wonder if there is a more optimal solution...
Example solution as it stands:
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS num_ids FROM table_a;
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS num_ids FROM table_b;
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS num_ids FROM table_c;
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT a.variable) AS num_ids
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT VARIABLE FROM table_a) a
INNER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT VARIABLE FROM table_b) b ON a.variable = b.variable
INNER JOIN (SELECT DISTINCT VARIABLE FROM table_c) c ON a.variable = c.variable;
UPDATE:
The difficultly that I'm facing putting this together in one query is that any of the tables might not be unique on the VARIABLE that I am looking to check, so I've had to use distinct before merging to avoid expanding the join
Since we are only counting, I think there is no need in joining the tables on the variable column. A UNION should be enough.
We still have to use DISTINCT to ignore/suppress duplicates, which often means extra sort.
An index on variable should help for getting counts for separate tables, but it will not help for getting the count of the combined table.
Here is an example for comparing two tables:
WITH
CTE_A
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountA
FROM TableA
)
,CTE_B
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountB
FROM TableB
)
,CTE_AB
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountAB
FROM
(
SELECT variable
FROM TableA
UNION ALL
-- sic! use ALL here to avoid sort when merging two tables
-- there should be only one distinct sort for the outer `COUNT`
SELECT variable
FROM TableB
) AS AB
)
SELECT
CASE WHEN CountA = CountAB AND CountB = CountAB
THEN 'same' ELSE 'different' END AS ResultAB
FROM
CTE_A
CROSS JOIN CTE_B
CROSS JOIN CTE_AB
;
Three tables:
WITH
CTE_A
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountA
FROM TableA
)
,CTE_B
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountB
FROM TableB
)
,CTE_C
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountC
FROM TableC
)
,CTE_ABC
AS
(
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT variable) AS CountABC
FROM
(
SELECT variable
FROM TableA
UNION ALL
-- sic! use ALL here to avoid sort when merging two tables
-- there should be only one distinct sort for the outer `COUNT`
SELECT variable
FROM TableB
UNION ALL
-- sic! use ALL here to avoid sort when merging two tables
-- there should be only one distinct sort for the outer `COUNT`
SELECT variable
FROM TableC
) AS AB
)
SELECT
CASE WHEN CountA = CountABC AND CountB = CountABC AND CountC = CountABC
THEN 'same' ELSE 'different' END AS ResultABC
FROM
CTE_A
CROSS JOIN CTE_B
CROSS JOIN CTE_C
CROSS JOIN CTE_ABC
;
I deliberately chose CTE, because as far as I know Postgres materializes CTE and in our case each CTE will have only one row.
Using array_agg with order by is even better variant, if it is available on redshift. You'll still need to use DISTINCT, but you don't have to merge all tables together.
WITH
CTE_A
AS
(
SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT variable ORDER BY variable) AS A
FROM TableA
)
,CTE_B
AS
(
SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT variable ORDER BY variable) AS B
FROM TableB
)
,CTE_C
AS
(
SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT variable ORDER BY variable) AS C
FROM TableC
)
SELECT
CASE WHEN A = B AND B = C
THEN 'same' ELSE 'different' END AS ResultABC
FROM
CTE_A
CROSS JOIN CTE_B
CROSS JOIN CTE_C
;
Well, here is probably the nastiest piece of SQL I could build for you :) I will forever deny that I wrote this and that my stackoverflow account was hacked ;)
SELECT
'All OK'
WHERE
( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT id) FROM table_a ) = ( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT id) FROM table_b )
AND ( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT id) FROM table_b ) = ( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT id) FROM table_c )
By the way, this won't optimise the query - it's still doing three queries (but I guess it's better than 4?).
UPDATE: In light of your use-case below: NEW sql fiddle http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/a0403/1
SELECT DISTINCT
tbl_a.a_count,
tbl_b.b_count,
tbl_c.c_count
FROM
( SELECT COUNT(id) a_count, array_agg(id order by id) ids FROM table_a) tbl_a,
( SELECT COUNT(id) b_count, array_agg(id order by id) ids FROM table_b) tbl_b,
( SELECT COUNT(id) c_count, array_agg(id order by id) ids FROM table_c) tbl_c
WHERE
tbl_a.ids = tbl_b.ids
AND tbl_b.ids = tbl_c.ids
The above query will only return if all tables have the same number of rows, ensuring that the IDS are also the same.
I would like to know how to write a postgres subquery so that the following table example will output what I need.
id parent_id postdate
1 -1 2015-03-10
2 1 2015-03-11 (child level 1)
3 1 2015-03-12 (child level 1)
4 3 2015-03-13 (child level 2)
5 -1 2015-03-14
6 -1 2015-03-15
7 6 2015-03-16 (child level 1)
If I want to sort all the root ids by child level 1 with a count of children(s) from the parent, the output would be something like this
id count date
6 2 2015-03-15
1 4 2015-03-10
5 1 2015-03-14
The output is sorted by postdate based on the root's child. The 'date' being outputted is the date of the root's postdate. Even though id#5 has a more recent postdate, the rootid#6's child (id#7) has the most recent postdate because it is being sorted by child's postdate. id#5 doesnt have any children so it just gets placed at the end, sorted by date. The 'count' is the number children(child level 1), grandchildren(child level 2) and itself (root). For instance, id #2,#3,#4 all belong to id#1 so for id#1, the count would be 4.
My current subquery thus far:
SELECT p1.id,count(p1.id),p1.postdate
FROM mytable p1
LEFT JOIN mytable c1 ON c1.parent_id = p1.id AND p1.parent_id = -1
LEFT JOIN mytable c2 ON c2.parent_id = c1.id AND p1.parent_id = -1
GROUP BY p1.id,c1.postdate,p1.postdate
ORDER by c1.postdate DESC,p1.postdate DESC
create table mytable ( id serial primary key, parent_id int references mytable, postdate date );
create index mytable_parent_id_idx on mytable (parent_id);
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (1, null, '2015-03-10');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (2, 1, '2015-03-11');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (3, 1, '2015-03-12');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (4, 3, '2015-03-13');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (5, null, '2015-03-14');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (6, null, '2015-03-15');
insert into mytable (id, parent_id, postdate) values (7, 6, '2015-03-16');
with recursive recu as (
select id as parent, id as root, null::date as child_postdate
from mytable
where parent_id is null
union all
select r.parent, mytable.id, mytable.postdate
from recu r
join mytable
on parent_id = r.root
)
select m.id, c.cnt, m.postdate, c.max_child_date
from mytable m
join ( select parent, count(*) as cnt, max(child_postdate) as max_child_date
from recu
group by parent
) c on c.parent = m.id
order by c.max_child_date desc nulls last, m.postdate desc;
You'll need a recursive query to count the elements in the subtrees:
WITH RECURSIVE opa AS (
SELECT id AS par
, id AS moi
FROM the_tree
WHERE parent_id IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT o.par AS par
, t.id AS moi
FROM opa o
JOIN the_tree t ON t.parent_id = o.moi
)
SELECT t.id
, c.cnt
, t.postdate
FROM the_tree t
JOIN ( SELECT par, COUNT(*) AS cnt
FROM opa o
GROUP BY par
) c ON c.par = t.id
ORDER BY t.id
;
UPDATE (it appears the OP also wants the maxdate per tree)
-- The same, but also select the postdate
-- --------------------------------------
WITH RECURSIVE opa AS (
SELECT id AS par
, id AS moi
, postdate AS postdate
FROM the_tree
WHERE parent_id IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT o.par AS par
, t.id AS moi
-- , GREATEST(o.postdate,t.postdate) AS postdate
, t.postdate AS postdate
FROM opa o
JOIN the_tree t ON t.parent_id = o.moi
)
SELECT t.id
, c.cnt
, t.postdate
, c.maxdate
FROM the_tree t
JOIN ( SELECT par, COUNT(*) AS cnt
, MAX(o.postdate) AS maxdate -- and obtain the max()
FROM opa o
GROUP BY par
) c ON c.par = t.id
ORDER BY c.maxdate, t.id
;
After looking at everyone's code, I created the subquery I needed. I can use PHP to vary the 'case when' code depending on the user's sort selection. For instance, the code below will sort the root nodes based on child level 1's postdate.
with recursive cte as (
select id as parent, id as root, null::timestamp as child_postdate,0 as depth
from mytable
where parent_id = -1
union all
select r.parent, mytable.id, mytable.postdate,depth+1
from cte r
join mytable
on parent_id = r.root
)
select m.id, c.cnt, m.postdate
from ssf.dtb_021 m
join ( select parent, count(*) as cnt, max(child_postdate) as max_child_date,depth
from cte
group by parent,depth
) c on c.parent = m.id
order by
case
when depth=2 then 1
when depth=1 then 2
else 0
end DESC,
c.max_child_date desc nulls last, m.postdate desc;
select
p.id,
(1+c.n) as parent_post_plus_number_of_subposts,
p.postdate
from
table as p
inner join
(
select
parent_id, count(*) as n, max(postdate) as _postdate
from table
group by parent_id
) as c
on p.id = c.parent_id
where p.parent_id = -1
order by c._postdate desc
Have a very large table (over 200 million rows)
sID int, wordID int (PK sID, wordID)
Want to find the sID's that have the exact same wordID's (and no extras)
For a sID with over 100 wordID the chance of an exact match goes down so willing to limit it to 100
(but would like to go to 1000)
If this was school and sID were classes and wordID were students.
Then I want to find classes that have the exact same students.
sID, wordID
1, 1
1, 2
1, 3
2, 2
2, 3
3, 1
3, 4
5, 1
5, 2
6, 2
6, 3
7, 1
7, 2
8, 1
8, 1
sID 6 and 2 have the exact same wordID's
sID 5, 7, and 8 have the exact same wordID's
This is what I have so far
I would like to eliminate the two delete #temp3_sID1_sID2 and take care of that in the insert above
But I will try any ideas
It is not like you can easily create a table with 200 million rows to test with
drop table #temp_sID_wordCount
drop table #temp_count_wordID_sID
drop table #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount
drop table #temp3_sID1_sID2
drop table #temp3_sID1_sID2_keep
create table #temp_sID_wordCount (sID int primary key, ccount int not null)
create table #temp_count_wordID_sID (ccount int not null, wordID int not null, sID int not null, primary key (ccount, wordID, sID))
create table #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount (wordID int not null, sID int not null, primary key(wordID, sID))
create table #temp3_sID1_sID2_keep (sID1 int not null, sID2 int not null, primary key(sID1, sID2))
create table #temp3_sID1_sID2 (sID1 int not null, sID2 int not null, primary key(sID1, sID2))
insert into #temp_sID_wordCount
select sID, count(*) as ccount
FROM [FTSindexWordOnce] with (nolock)
group by sID
order by sID;
select count(*) from #temp_sID_wordCount where ccount <= 100; -- 701,966
truncate table #temp_count_wordID_sID
insert into #temp_count_wordID_sID
select #temp_sID_wordCount.ccount, [FTSindexWordOnce].wordID, [FTSindexWordOnce].sID
from #temp_sID_wordCount
join [FTSindexWordOnce] with (nolock)
on [FTSindexWordOnce].sID = #temp_sID_wordCount.sID
and ccount >= 1 and ccount <= 10
order by #temp_sID_wordCount.ccount, [FTSindexWordOnce].wordID, [FTSindexWordOnce].sID;
select count(*) from #temp_sID_wordCount; -- 34,860,090
truncate table #temp3_sID1_sID2_keep
declare cur cursor for
select top 10 ccount from #temp_count_wordID_sID group by ccount order by ccount
open cur
declare #count int, #sIDcur int
fetch next from cur into #count
while (##FETCH_STATUS = 0)
begin
--print (#count)
--select count(*), #count from #temp_sID_wordCount where #temp_sID_wordCount.ccount = #count
truncate table #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount
truncate table #temp3_sID1_sID2
-- wordID and sID for that unique word count
-- they can only be exact if they have the same word count
insert into #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount
select #temp_count_wordID_sID.wordID
, #temp_count_wordID_sID.sID
from #temp_count_wordID_sID
where #temp_count_wordID_sID.ccount = #count
order by #temp_count_wordID_sID.wordID, #temp_count_wordID_sID.sID
-- select count(*) from #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount
-- this has some duplicates
-- sID1 is the group
insert into #temp3_sID1_sID2
select w1.sID, w2.sID
from #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount as w1 with (nolock)
join #temp3_wordID_sID_forThatCount as w2 with (nolock)
on w1.wordID = w2.wordID
and w1.sID <= w2.sID
group by w1.sID, w2.sID
having count(*) = #count
order by w1.sID, w2.sID
-- get rid of the goups of 1
delete #temp3_sID1_sID2
where sID1 in (select sID1 from #temp3_sID1_sID2 group by sID1 having count(*) = 1)
-- get rid of the double dips
delete #temp3_sID1_sID2
where #temp3_sID1_sID2.sID1 in
(select distinct s1del.sID1 -- these are the double dips
from #temp3_sID1_sID2 as s1base with (nolock)
join #temp3_sID1_sID2 as s1del with (nolock)
on s1del.sID1 > s1base.sID1
and s1Del.sID1 = s1base.sID2)
insert into #temp3_sID1_sID2_keep
select #temp3_sID1_sID2.sID1
, #temp3_sID1_sID2.sID2
from #temp3_sID1_sID2 with (nolock)
order by #temp3_sID1_sID2.sID1, #temp3_sID1_sID2.sID2
fetch next from cur into #count
end
close cur
deallocate cur
select *
FROM #temp3_sID1_sID2_keep with (nolock)
order by 1,2
So, as I see, the task is to find equal subsets.
First we can find pairs of equal subsets:
;with tmp1 as (select sID, cnt = count(wordID) from [Table] group by sID)
select s1.sID, s2.sID
from tmp1 s1
cross join tmp1 s2
cross apply (
select count(1)
from [Table] d1
join [Table] d2 on d2.wordID = d1.wordID
where d1.sID = s1.sID and d2.sID = s2.sID
) c(cnt)
where s1.cnt = s2.cnt
and s1.sID > s2.sID
and s1.cnt = c.cnt
Output is:
sID sID
----------- -----------
6 2
7 5
8 5
8 7
And then pairs can be combined into groups, if necessary:
sID gNum
----------- -----------
2 1
6 1
5 2
7 2
8 2
See details in SqlFiddle sample below.
SqlFiddle Sample
The other approach is to calculate hash function for every subset data:
;with a as (
select distinct sID from [Table]
)
select sID,
hashbytes('sha1', (
select cast(wordID as varchar(10)) + '|'
from [Table]
where sID = a.sID
order by wordID
for xml path('')))
from a
Then subsets can be grouped based on hash value.
SqlFiddle Sample
The last one took less than a minute on my machine for a test data of about 10 million rows (20k sID values up to 1k wordID each). Also you can optimize it by excluding sIDs having no wordID count matches to any other.
I have two tables of records that I need to find all of the matches. The tables are based on different Primary Key identifiers, but the data points are exactly the same. I need a fast query that can show me records that are duplicated from the first table to the second. Here is an example of what I am trying to do:
DECLARE #Table1 TABLE (ID INT, Value INT)
DECLARE #Table2 TABLE (ID INT, Value INT)
INSERT INTO #Table1 VALUES (1, 500)
INSERT INTO #Table1 VALUES (2, 500)
INSERT INTO #Table2 VALUES (3, 500)
INSERT INTO #Table2 VALUES (4, 500)
SELECT MAX(x.T1ID)
,MAX(x.T2ID)
FROM (
SELECT T1ID = t1.ID
,T2ID = 0
,t1.Value
FROM #Table1 t1
UNION ALL
SELECT T1ID = 0
,T2ID = t2.ID
,t2.Value
FROM #Table2 t2
) x
GROUP BY x.Value
HAVING COUNT(*) >= 2
The problem with this code is that it returns record 2 in table 1 correlated to record 4 in table 2. I really need it to return record 1 in table 1 correlated to record 3 in table 2. I tried the following:
SELECT MIN(x.T1ID)
,MIN(x.T2ID)
FROM (
SELECT T1ID = t1.ID
,T2ID = 0
,t1.Value
FROM #Table1 t1
UNION ALL
SELECT T1ID = 0
,T2ID = t2.ID
,t2.Value
FROM #Table2 t2
) x
GROUP BY x.Value
HAVING COUNT(*) >= 2
This code does not work either. It returns 0,0.
Is there a way to return the MIN value greater than 0 for both tables?
Might answer my own question. This seems to work. Are there any reasons why I would not do this?
SELECT MIN(t1.ID)
,MIN(t2.ID)
FROM #Table1 t1
INNER JOIN #Table2 t2 ON t1.Value = t2.Value
GROUP BY t1.Value
If you want to see the records in table1 that have matches in table2 then
select *
from #Table1 T1
where exists (select * from #Table2 T2
where T1.ID=T2.ID
-- you would put the complete join clause that defines a match here
)