I have owncloud version 9.1.8 running on a synology. Now I installed onlyoffice on a local server with a self signed certificat. It is important to know, that the onlyoffice server is running locally in a network. So I cannot access the server like e.g. with lets encrypt, because I only have a local server name and not a public server name. Lets Encrypt therefore cannot verify the server. However if I want (and if you have a solution doing that), I can access the internet using the server.
Now i have the problem, that owncloud delivers me the following error message
"Error while downloading the document file to be converted."
when I want to save the url in the onlyoffice configuration in owncloud. I guess the problem is, that I am using a self signed certificat. Do you know what I can do? Google does not really help me.
"Error while downloading the document file to be converted."
means that DocumentServer cannot validate your storage's self-signed certificate (OC in your case)
There are 2 possible workarounds:
1) Change "rejectUnauthorized" to false in the /etc/onlyoffice/documentserver/default.json config file
2) Change the default Node.js CAstore:
Edit the files:
/etc/supervisor/conf.d/onlyoffice-documentserver-converter.conf
/etc/supervisor/conf.d/onlyoffice-documentserver-docservice.conf
Add a flag --use-openssl-ca to the parameters in this line
Then you need to add your certificate to the the default CA store and restart ONLYOFFICE services:
supervisorctl restart all
Related
Been trying to figure out how to do this for awhile. Essentially, Vault does not have a secure option for its REST calls. I want to make these rest calls encrypted from as close between point a and b as possible. My thoughts have been the following:
Use an SSH tunnel
Use a TLS tunnel like Stunnel
I currently have Vault in a Docker container, so that’s something else to mention. Has anyone encountered this situation, and how did you deal with it?
UPDATE: So, using the Python API (HVAC), I am getting the following error:
requests.exceptions.SSLError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='0.0.0.0',
port=8200): Max retries exceeded with url: /v1/secret (Caused by
SSLError(SSLError("bad handshake: Error([('SSL routines', 'ssl3_get_record',
'wrong version number')],)",),))
Using the following commands:
import os
import hvac
client = hvac.Client(url='https://0.0.0.0:8200', token='my-token-here')
Vault has TLS enabled by default, thus all your REST calls are encrypted already. If you are having trouble using https, have a look at the documentation of VAULT_CACERT and VAULT_CAPATH environment variables.
from vault's documentation.
VAULT_CACERT
Path to a PEM-encoded CA certificate file on the local disk. This file
is used to verify the Vault server's SSL certificate. This environment
variable takes precedence over VAULT_CAPATH.
VAULT_CAPATH Path to a directory of PEM-encoded CA certificate files
on the local disk. These certificates are used to verify the Vault
server's SSL certificate.
You can use tools like tcpdump or wireshark to make sure that your requests are indeed encrypted.
To elaborate for Vault running in a container, you need to create a configuration file for Vault that contains something similar to this this (Chef/Ruby code):
config_content = %(
"storage": {
...
},
"default_lease_ttl": "768h",
"max_lease_ttl": "8766h",
"listener": [
{"tcp": {
"address": "0.0.0.0:8200",
"tls_disable": 0,
"tls_cert_file": "/vault/certs/my-cert-combined.pem",
"tls_key_file": "/vault/certs/my-cert.key"
}}],
"log_level": "info"
)
Especially the listener portion. Make your backend storage whatever you want to use (not the Dev default of in-memory!).
Note you will need to get a valid certificate and its private key also in the volume bound into the container.
Store this configuration file in a directory that gets bound inside the container to the path /vault/config. I use /var/vault/config on my host. For example (more Ruby/Chef):
docker_container 'vault' do
container_name 'vault'
tag 'latest'
port '8200:8200'
cap_add ['IPC_LOCK']
restart_policy 'always'
volumes ['/var/vault:/vault']
command 'vault server -config /vault/config'
action :run_if_missing
end
That command tells Vault to look in /vault/config and it should find your config file there, with a .json extension. Note it is important to have the config file listener->tcp->address be 0.0.0.0, rather than 127.0.0.1, because Vault will not resolve external accesses properly.
Then Vault will startup with TLS encryption on all transactions. Define VAULT_ADDR to have https://your-host.com:8200 and away you go.
In my case, I've been testing it on my local environment. So instead of calling the secured https: https://localhost:8200, I called regular http: http://localhost:8200.
This solved the error.
In PostgreSQL, whenever I execute an API URL with secure connection with query
like below
select *
from http_get('https://url......');
I get an error
SSL certificate problem: unable to get local issuer certificate
For this I have already placed a SSL folder in my azure database installation file at following path
C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.6\ssl\certs
What should I do to get rid of this? Is there any SSL extension available, or do I require configuration changes or any other effort?
Please let me know the possible solutions for it.
A few questions...
First, are you using this contrib module: https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http ?
Is the server that serves https://url....... using a self-signed (or invalid) certificate?
If the answer to those two questions is "yes" then you may not be able to use that contrib module without some modification. I'm not sure how limited your access is to PostgreSQL in Azure, but if you can install your own C-based contrib modules there is some hope...
pgsql-http only exposes certain CURLOPTs (see: https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http#curl-options) values which are settable with http_set_curlopt()
For endpoints using self-signed certificates, I expect the CURLOPT you'll want to include support for to ignore SSL errors is CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER
If there are other issues like SSL/TLS protocol or cipher mismatches, there are other CURLOPTs that can be patched-in, but those also are not available without customization of the contrib module.
I don't think anything in your
C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.6\ssl\certs
folder has any effect on the http_get() functionality.
If you don't want to get your hands dirty compiling and installing custom contrib modules, you can create an issue on the github page of the maintainer and see if it gets picked up.
You might also take a peek at https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http#why-this-is-a-bad-idea because the author of the module makes several very good points to consider.
I am new to this OPC-UA world and Eclipse Milo.
I do not understand how the security works here,
Discussing about client-example provided by eclipse-milo
I see few properties of security being used to connect to the OPCUA Server:
SecurityPolicy,
MessageSecurityMode,
clientCertificate,
clientKeyPair,
setIdentityProvider,
How the above configurations are linked with each other?
I was trying to run client-examples -> BrowseNodeExample.
This example internally runs the ExampleServer.
ExampleServer is configured to run with Anonymous and UsernamePassword Provider. It is also bound to accept SecurityPolicy.None, Basic128Rsa15, Basic256, Basic256Sha256 with MessageSecurityMode as SignandEncrypt except for SecurityPolicy.None where MessageSecurityMode is None too.
The problem is with AnonymousProvider I could connect to the server with all SecurtiyPolicy and MessageSecurityMode pair mentioned above (without client certificates provided).
But I could not do the same for UsernameProvider, For UsernameProvider only SecurityPolicy MessageSecurityMode pair with None runs successfully.
All others pairs throw security checks failed exception (when certificate provided) else user access denied (when client certificate not provided). How to make this work?
Lastly, It would be really nice if someone could point me to proper User documentation for Eclipse Milo. Since I could not see any documentation except examples codes, and they are not documented.
SecurityPolicy and MessageSecurityMode go hand-in-hand. The security policy dictates the set of algorithms that will be used for signatures and encryption, if any. The message security mode determines whether the messages will be signed, signed and encrypted, or neither in the case where no security is used.
clientCertificate and clientKeyPair must be configured if you plan to use security. You can't use encryption or signatures if you don't have a certificate and private key, after all.
IdentityProvider used to provide the credentials that identify the user of the session, if any.
When the ExampleServer starts up it logs that its using a temporary security directory, something like this: security temp dir: /var/folders/z5/n2r_tpbn5wd_2kf6jh5kn9_40000gn/T/security. When a client connects using any kind of security its certificate is not initially trusted by the server, resulting in the Bad_SecurityChecksFailed errors you're seeing. Inside this directory you'll find a folder rejected where rejected client certificates are stored. If you move the certificate(s) to the trusted folder the client should then be able to connect using security.
Server: Windows Server 2012
Cold Fusion: 9,0,1,274733
Update-Level: hf901-00011.jar
Running on java version: 1.7.0_79
Java home points to the right path.
All certificates (for live and sandbox) are imported into the keystore of this JDK 1.7.0_79. I've tested it and renaming the cacerts file results in an error when connecting to the live API.
Testing the cacerts file using the keytool shows that the apropriate certificates are properly imported.
A little order app provides payment using PayPal.
First step is a connection to PayPal using the method "setExpressCheckout".
The connection to the live API using NVP at URL https://api-3t.paypal.com/nvp works and delivers the token URL-string.
The connection to the sandbox API using NVP at URL https://api-3t.sandbox.paypal.com/nvp fails with the error response:
I/O Exception: peer not authenticated
Connection Failure
Unable to determine MIME type of file.
Connection Failure. Status code unavailable.
Calling the URL https://api-3t.sandbox.paypal.com/nvp from the server works.
Test 1
imported the sandbox certificate for api-3t.sandbox.paypal.com
restart CF service
connection test failed with the same error
Test 2
renamed the cacerts file to cacerts.bak
copied the cacerts file from jre1.8.0_31\lib\security to the 1.7.0_79\lib\security
there is no specific PayPal cert in the cacerts file
restart the CF service
connection to live API works
connection to sandbox api fails with the same error
The weird thing is that the connection to the live api works without importing the specific certificate into the keystore when using the 1.8xx cacerts file.
I can't figure out why the connection to the sandbox fails. Maybe I can get new hints here?
If there are more informations needed please let me know. Thank you in advance.
Problem solved!
Scott Jibben (see his comment above) mentioned that the PayPal sandbox may already decline TLS1 connections in order to the upcoming change to do so in the PayPal live API.
This is absolutely right. But while in CF11 this isn't a problem because CF11 and its JRE are already using TLSv1.2, CF8-10 are using the default protocol of their JRE.
If not, one can force CF to use TLSv1.2 with the JVM argument
-Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.2
Short:
CF8-10 are using TLSv1 while running with JDK1.70_79 and below no matter what the JVM startup argument -Dhttps.protocols was set to.
This is because the default protocol of these Java versions is TLSv1 and CF8-10 are simply ignoring the JVM startup argument -Dhttps.protocols and always use the JDK's default protocol.
This has changed with CF11 therefore it works fine with it.
Read detailed informations in a post from Wil Genovese at:
https://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2014/12/8/Preventing-SSLv3-Fallback-in-ColdFusion
What I did
I've installed the JDK1.8.0_144 and set up Cold Fusion 9 to use this one. Since then the connection to the PayPal sandbox API at api-3t.sandbox.paypal.com works pretty well.
Hope this may help others with this old and by now a little odd CF9.
I am trying to install a certificate on my local machine (Win Server 2003) with the X509Certificate2 class in a C# test console application. When I install the certificate with the following code, everything is fine:
var serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore = new X509Store(StoreName.Root, StoreLocation.LocalMachine);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
cert = new X509Certificate2(certificatePath);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Add(cert);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Close();
Problem is, that the private key of the certificate is not persisted, when installed without the X509KeyStorageFlags.PersistKeySet. So I tried to instanciate the certificate like this (the private key has no password, so I pass in an empty string):
var serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore = new X509Store(StoreName.Root, StoreLocation.LocalMachine);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
cert = new X509Certificate2(certificatePath, "", X509KeyStorageFlags.PersistKeySet);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Add(cert);
serviceRuntimeMachineCertificateStore.Close();
But trying to instanciate the certificate throws a System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException "Failed to load certificate: The specified network password is not correct.", even though the private key has no password.
If I import the certificate in the Microsoft Management Console without specifying a password it works great.
Does anybody know how to do this programmatically?
If you try to create an instance of X509Certificate2 with an empty password on Windows XP or Windows 2003, the "Failed to load certificate: The specified network password is not correct." exception will be thrown.
If you can, try to create a certificate with a password which is not empty. Then everything should be fine.
Hopefully this will help somebody (and to expand on uGeeen's answer:
User "S C" points out the following requirement for certificate passwords on Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.
0 < password.Length < 32
I have seen conflicting reports on whether 32 is allowed. I can confirm that I was using a 32 character password (an MD5 hash), and truncating it to 30 characters fixed the issue.
are you doing it from worker process or some other impersonated process? it may be just that the identity your process uses is initialized WITHOUT loading the identity user's profile, what seems to result with no access to the user's cerificate store.
i've had similar problem when loading a x509 cert with private keys from within ASP.Net/IIS proces, and turning on profile-loading for worker processed did the trick
In case anybody has a similar problem: I managed to install the certificate and persist the private key in another fashion. I found the WinHttpCertCfg command line tool that you can get from here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winhttp/http/winhttpcertcfg_exe__a_certificate_configuration_tool.asp
I then call this command line tool programmatically to install the certificate. This site gave me a hint on how to use it: weblogs.asp.net/hernandl/archive/2005/02/09/…
Cheers, Chris