I want to write LINQ query to compare two arrays. I want the query to be translated to the following query:
SELECT id, name
FROM persons
WHERE '{"dance", "acting", "games"}' && (hobbies);
That condition work in that way:
'{"dance"}' && '{"dance", "acting", "games"}'; -- true
'{"dance","singins"}' && '{"dance", "acting", "games"}'; -- true
'{"singins"}' && '{"dance", "acting", "games"}'; -- false
I wrote this query:
List<string> arr = new List<string>(){ "dance", "acting", "games" };
var query = (from p in _context.Persons
where arr.Any(kw => p.hobbies.Contains(kw))
select new
{
id = p.id,
name = p.name
}).ToList();
The translated query is:
SELECT p."id" AS id, p."name" AS name
FROM dataBase."Persons" AS p
It can understand that the filter performs in the server. so the query brings all the data from DB and filtered on the server. This causes to performance problems and not pass Load-Testing.
I need a query that will not only do the job but will also be translated to the above query with '&&'.
Is there any way in LINQ to execute this query?
Thanks
If your database looks similar like I am predicting this could be a solution. Some more code though but I think this should be executed as a SQL IN statement:
List<string> arr = new List<string>(){ "dance", "acting", "games" };
var matches = from hobby_person in _context.Hobbies_Persons
join person in _context.Persons on person.Id equals hobby_person.PersonId
join hobby in _context.Hobbies on hobby.Id equals hobby_person.HobbyId
where arr.Contains(hobby.Name)
select new
{
id = p.id,
name = p.name
}).ToList();
Related
I have a condition where joining table have a condition. Let's say I have a table called Mapper Student Teacher where Mapper table have a column named AcNoId which contains a id from both table Student and Teacher. The table structure is
Mapper
Student
Teacher
TestOption is a enum and is defined as a
public enum TestOption
{
Teacher = 1,
Student = 2
}
Now I have a condition where if TestOption is a type of Student it should perform a join with Student table and if is a type of Teacher it should perform a join with Teacher table
This is how I have tried so far
(from m in _context.Mapper
where m.TestOption == TestOption.Student
join s in _context.Student
on m.AcNoId equals s.Id into tempStudent
from st in tempStudent.DefaultIfEmpty()
where m.TestOption == TestOption.Teacher
join t in _context.Teacher
on m.AcNoId equals t.Id into tempTeacher
from ta in tempTeacher.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
Type = m.TestOption.ToString(),
Student = st.StudentName ?? string.Empty,
Teacher = ta.TeacherName ?? string.Empty
}).ToList();
Instead of conditional join this query perform a following query on SQL Profiler
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT [m].[TestOption], COALESCE([s].[StudentName], #__Empty_0) AS [Student], COALESCE([t].[TeacherName], #__Empty_1) AS [Teacher]
FROM [Mapper] AS [m]
LEFT JOIN [Student] AS [s] ON [m].[AcNoId] = [s].[Id]
LEFT JOIN [Teacher] AS [t] ON [m].[AcNoId] = [t].[Id]
WHERE ([m].[TestOption] = 2) AND ([m].[TestOption] = 1)',N'#__Empty_0 nvarchar(4000),#__Empty_1 nvarchar(4000)',#__Empty_0=N'',#__Empty_1=N''
How can I do this????
You can use the below code, with no need to use join or where statements on _context.Mapper:
(from m in _context.Mapper
select new
{
Type = m.TestOption.ToString(),
Student = _context.Student
.FirstOrDefault(s =>
m.TestOption == TestOption.Student &&
s.Id == m.AcNoId) ?? string.Empty,
Teacher = _context.Teacher
.FirstOrDefault(t =>
m.TestOption == TestOption.Teacher &&
t.Id == m.AcNoId) ?? string.Empty,
})
.ToList();
Actually ,I want to extract generic data from EF table without using models but unfortunately two columns with same name from different database crashed...
Here is the query
var query = (from jbct in entities.Table1.AsEnumerable()
join p in entities.Table2.AsEnumerable() on jbct.perid equals p.id
select new
{
jbct.id,
p.id
}).ToList();
try use a dynamic name
var query = (from jbct in entities.Table1.AsEnumerable()
join p in entities.Table2.AsEnumerable() on jbct.perid equals p.id
select new
{
Id1 = jbct.id,
Id2 = p.id
}).ToList();
Now I've found now my solution to usie dictionary class
Dictionary with object as value
var query = (from jbct in entities.Table1.AsEnumerable() join p in entities.Table2.AsEnumerable() on jbct.perid equals p.id select new Dictionary<String, Object>
{
{"jbct_id", jbct.id},
{"p_id", p.id}}
).ToList();
Thanks
Need help in converting below SQL nested query to a LINQ query?
select P.ProductId, P.Name, C.Name, I.Image
from Product P
join ProductImage I on P.ProductId = I.ProductId
join ProductCategory C on P.Category = C.CategoryId
where P.ProductId in (select distinct ProductId
from ProductVariantMapping M
where M.GUID in (select top 3 V.Guid
from [Order] O
join Inventory V on V.InventoryId = O.InventoryId
group by O.InventoryId, V.Guid
order by Sum(O.Quantity) desc))
Below is my attempt in converting to LINQ query :
var a = (from product in ekartEntities.Products
join productImage in ekartEntities.ProductImages
on product.ProductId equals productImage.ProductId
join category in ekartEntities.ProductCategories
on product.Category equals category.CategoryId
where product.ProductId
select new ProductDTO()
{
ProductId = product.ProductId,
Name = product.Name,
Category = category.Name,
Image = productImage.Image
}).ToList();
what is the equivalent of "IN" when converting to LINQ .
I got the solution for 'IN' clause.
But how do I use sum(Quantity) in order by after grouping?
I am new to Entity Framework. Can anyone help me?
In LINQ, you will need to use the "contains()" method to generate the 'IN' You need to put a list in the Contains method. If sends a query, that query will be repeated for completions and this will lead to performance loss.
Sample:
var sampleList = (from order ekartEntities.Order
join inventory in ekartEntities.Inventory on order.InventoryId equals inventory.InventoryId
select order).toList();
var query = (from product in ekartEntities.Products
join productImage in ekartEntities.ProductImages
on product.ProductId equals productImage.ProductId
join category in ekartEntities.ProductCategories
on product.Category equals category.CategoryId
where sampleList.Contains(product.ProductId)
select new ProductDTO()
{
ProductId = product.ProductId,
Name = product.Name,
Category = category.Name,
Image = productImage.Image
}).ToList();
Do not apply ToList() in the first query
I made some test.
Test 1 (with my own data):
var phIds = new List<string>
{
//List of Ids
};
using (var db = new ApplicationDbContext())
{
var studentsId = db.Relations
.Where(x => phIds.Contains(x.RelationId))
.Select(x => x.Id)
.Distinct(); //IQueryable here
var studentsQuery = from p in db.Students
where studentsId.Contains(p.Id)
select p;
var students= studentsQuery .ToList();
}
The generated query looks like :
SELECT
[Extent1].[Id] AS [Id],
[...]
FROM [dbo].[Students] AS [Extent1]
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT
1 AS [C1]
FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT
[Extent2].[StudentId] AS [StudentId]
FROM [dbo].[Relations] AS [Extent2]
WHERE ([Extent2].[RelationId] IN (N'ccd31c3d-dfa3-4b40-...', N'd2cb05a2-ece3-4060-...'))
) AS [Distinct1]
WHERE [Distinct1].[StudentId] = [Extent1].[Id]
)
The query looks exactly like I wanted
However, if you add the ToList() in the first query to get the ids, you no longer have an IQueryable but a list.
Test 2 : wrong (I added ToList):
var phIds = new List<string>
{
//List of Ids
};
using (var db = new ApplicationDbContext())
{
var studentsId = db.Relations
.Where(x => phIds.Contains(x.RelationId))
.Select(x => x.Id)
.Distinct().ToList(); // No longer IQueryable but a list of 3000 int
var studentsQuery = from p in db.Students
where studentsId .Contains(p.Id)
select p;
var students= studentsQuery .ToList();
}
The generated query is ugly:
SELECT
[Extent1].[Id] AS [Id],
[...]
FROM [dbo].[Patients] AS [Extent1]
WHERE [Extent1].[Id] IN (611661, 611662, 611663, 611664,....
//more than 3000 ids here
)
I have an entity set called Entities which has a field Name and a field Version. I wish to return the object having the highest version for the selected Name.
SQL wise I'd go
Select *
from table
where name = 'name' and version = (select max(version)
from table
where name = 'name')
Or something similar. Not sure how to achieve that with EF. I'm trying to use CreateQuery<> with a textual representation of the query if that helps.
Thanks
EDIT:
Here's a working version using two queries. Not what I want, seems very inefficient.
var container = new TheModelContainer();
var query = container.CreateQuery<SimpleEntity>(
"SELECT VALUE i FROM SimpleEntities AS i WHERE i.Name = 'Test' ORDER BY i.Version desc");
var entity = query.Execute(MergeOption.OverwriteChanges).FirstOrDefault();
query =
container.CreateQuery<SimpleEntity>(
"SELECT VALUE i FROM SimpleEntities AS i WHERE i.Name = 'Test' AND i.Version =" + entity.Version);
var entity2 = query.Execute(MergeOption.OverwriteChanges);
Console.WriteLine(entity2.GetType().ToString());
Can you try something like this?
using(var container = new TheModelContainer())
{
string maxEntityName = container.Entities.Max(e => e.Name);
Entity maxEntity = container.Entities
.Where(e => e.Name == maxEntityName)
.FirstOrDefault();
}
That would select the maximum value for Name from the Entities set first, and then grab the entity from the entity set that matches that name.
I think from a simplicity point of view, this should be same result but faster as does not require two round trips through EF to sql server, you always want to execute query as few times as possible for latency, as the Id field is primary key and indexed, should be performant
using(var db = new DataContext())
{
var maxEntity = db.Entities.OrderByDecending(x=>x.Id).FirstOrDefault()
}
Should be equivalent of sql query
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM Entities Order By id desc
so to include search term
string predicate = "name";
using(var db = new DataContext())
{
var maxEntity = db.Entities
.Where(x=>x.Name == predicate)
.OrderByDecending(x=>x.Id)
.FirstOrDefault()
}
I think something like this..?
var maxVersion = (from t in table
where t.name == "name"
orderby t.version descending
select t.version).FirstOrDefault();
var star = from t in table
where t.name == "name" &&
t.version == maxVersion
select t;
Or, as one statement:
var star = from t in table
let maxVersion = (
from v in table
where v.name == "name"
orderby v.version descending
select v.version).FirstOrDefault()
where t.name == "name" && t.version == maxVersion
select t;
this is the easiest way to get max
using (MyDBEntities db = new MyDBEntities())
{
var maxReservationID = _db .LD_Customer.Select(r => r.CustomerID).Max();
}
I'm trying to write a query for a database that will left join a table to a look up table and the results will be returned based on a case statement.
In normal SQL the query would look like this:
SELECT chis_id, chis_detail, cilt.mhcatID, cilt.mhtID, 'TheFileName' =
CASE
WHEN cilt.mhcatID IS NOT NULL AND cilt.mhtID IS NOT NULL THEN chis_linked_filename
END
FROM chis
LEFT JOIN cilt on cilt.mhcatID = chis.mhcat_id AND cilt.mhtID = chis.mht_id
WHERE cch_id = 50
chis is the table being queried, cilt is a look-up table and does not contain any foreign key relationships to chis as a result (chis has existing FK's to mht and mhcat tables by the mhtID and mhcatID respectively).
The query will be used to return a list of history updates for a record. If the join to the cilt lookup table is successful this means that the caller of the query will have permission to view the filename of any associated files for the history updates.
Whilst during my research I've found various posts on here relating on how to do case statements and left joins in Linq to Entity queries, I've not been able to work out how to join on two different fields. Is this possible?
You need to join on an anonymous type with matching field names like so:
var query = from x in context.Table1
join y in context.Table2
on new { x.Field1, x.Field2 } equals new { y.Field1, y.Field2 }
select {...};
A full working example using the an extra from instead of a join would look something like this:
var query = from chis in context.Chis
from clit in context.Clit
.Where(x => x.mhcatID = chis.mhcat_id)
.Where(x => x.mhtID = chis.mht_id)
.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
chis.id,
chis.detail,
cilt.mhcatID,
cilt.mhtID,
TheFileName = (cilt.mhcatID != null && cilt.mhtID != null) ? chis.linked_filename : null
};
Based on what Aducci suggested, I used a group join and DefaultIsEmpty() to get the results I wanted. For some reason, I couldn't get DefaultIfEmpty() didn't work correctly on its own and the resulting SQL employed an inner join instead of a left.
Here's the final code I used to get the left join working:
var query = (from chis in context.chis
join cilt in context.cilts on new { MHT = chis.mht_id, MHTCAT = chis.mhcat_id } equals new { MHT = cilt.mhtID, MHTCAT = cilt.mhcatID } into tempCilts
from tempCilt in tempCilts.DefaultIfEmpty()
where chis.cch_id == 50
select new {
chisID = chis.chis_id,
detail = chis.chis_detail,
filename = chis.chis_linked_filename,
TheFileName = (tempCilt.mhcatID != null && tempCilt.mhtID != null ? chis.chis_linked_filename : null),
mhtID = chis.mht_id,
mhtcatID = chis.mhcat_id
}).ToList();