Using struct from a module inside another module in Julia - import

I have found similar questions on SO but none of them seem to give an answer that works for my case.
I have a few modules, in one of them I create a mutable struct which I want to be able to use in the others. All files are at the same level:
file_module_A.jl
file_module_B.jl
file_module_C.jl
In file_module_A.jl:
module A
mutable struct MyType
variable
end
end
In file_module_B.jl:
module B
# I need to import MyType here
end
In file_module_C.jl:
module C
# I need to import MyType here
end
I have tried the followings without success:
Using directly: using .A doesn't work
I can't use: include("./file_module_A.jl") in both B and C because when they interact between each other I get the error can't convert from Main.B.A to Main.C.A since include includes a copy of the whole code
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!

You need to use using ..A. using .A means to look for A in the current module (B in the example below), and you need an extra . to step up one module level, to Main if you run the example in the REPL:
module A
mutable struct MyType
variable
end
end
module B
using ..A: MyType
end

Related

Using unittest with own matlab toolbox

I inherited a code base in matlab, which I like to put under unittest with the matlab.unittest framework.
To make the code base more robust against arbitrary addpath of my users, I have put most of the code into +folders like a toolbox. So the general layout is:
+folder1/file1.m
+folder1/runtestsuite.m
+folder1/unittest_data/file1_testdata.mat
+folder1/+folder2/file2.m
+folder1/+folder2/unittest_data/file2_testdata.mat
...
and updated all internal references with the correct import statements.
Now, I like to add a unittest for file1.m. However if I put a file in +folder1/file1_test.m file1.m seems not to be visible.
Here is my example code of file1_test.m
classdef file1_test < matlab.unittest.TestCase
properties
path
end
methods(TestMethodSetup)
function setunittestdatapath(testCase)
p = mfilename('fullpath');
[directory,~,~]=fileparts(p);
testCase.path = fullfile(directory,'unittest_data');
end
end
methods (Test)
function file1_input(testCase)
%import folder1.file1
testdata = load(fullfile(testCase.path),'file1_testdata.mat');
result = file1(testdata.input);
testCase.verifyEqual(result, testdata.output);
end
end
end
If I uncomment the import statement the unittest works fine. So currently I have to add all import statements to each individual test, which I like to avoid. Is there a more elegant way for doing something like this?
I tried importing it at the beginning of the file, although matlab complains "Parse error at CLASSDEF: usage might be invalid MATLAB syntax." this also works. So what is the correct and most pragmatically way for doing something like this?
import statements only apply to the local scope of where they are used so if you want a function to be able to not use the full-qualified name, then you'll have to add the import statement to each function separately.
The import list scope is defined as follows:
Script invoked from the MATLAB® command prompt — Scope is the base MATLAB workspace.
Function, including nested and local function — Scope is the function and the function does not share the import list of the parent function. If the import list is needed in a MATLAB function or script and in any local functions, you must call the import function for each function.
For unit tests though, I would argue that it is probably best to use the fully-qualified function name every time (rather than relying on import) so that it's clear to the user what you're testing.
result = folder1.file1(testdata.input)
Currently import statements in MATLAB have function scope as mentioned in the answer by Suever.
However, I often use local functions as a workaround to mimic a file level import:
classdef file1_test < matlab.unittest.TestCase
properties
path
end
methods(TestMethodSetup)
function setunittestdatapath(testCase)
p = mfilename('fullpath');
[directory,~,~]=fileparts(p);
testCase.path = fullfile(directory,'unittest_data');
end
end
methods (Test)
function file1_input(testCase)
%import folder1.file1
testdata = load(fullfile(testCase.path),'file1_testdata.mat');
result = file1(testdata.input);
testCase.verifyThat(result, IsEqualTo(testdata.output));
end
end
end
% Include file level "import" functions below
function f = file1(varargin)
f = folder1.file1(varargin{:});
end
function c = IsEqualTo(varargin)
c = matlab.unittest.constraints.IsEqualTo(varargin{:});
end
Note in this example I "imported" both your source code as well as some of the test framework source code in order to use the literate form of verifyEqual using verifyThat. Note this is the same functional behavior, but in general there exists more functionality with the constraints than with the qualification methods so this may be helpful to you at some point.

Calling imported module functions directly in elixir

I have just started learning Elixir and I am unable to figure out how import works in Elixir.
When I import a module into another module using import I am unable to call the imported function by using the module in which it is imported.
But I am able to call function of imported module inside function in the module which it was imported.
defmodule A do
def func do
IO.puts("func called")
end
end
defmodule B do
import A
end
A.func # o/p: "func called"
B.func # (UndefinedFunctionError) undefined function: B.func/0
defmodule B do
import A
def func2 do
func
end
end
B.func2 # o/p "func called"
I am unable to figure out why B.func not works while I was able to call func from func2. Is there some kind of theory that I am missing. Coming from the Ruby background this behaviour looks odd to me. Please can anybody help me out or point me to some good resource to read.
import does not really import anything in the way many other languages do. All it does is makes the imported module's exported functions accessible from the current namespace. To quote the docs
We use import whenever we want to easily access functions or macros from other modules without using the fully-qualified name.
If you want A.func and B.func to point to the same function you have a couple options. The first is simple - make a wrapper function:
defmodule B do
def func do
A.func
end
end
If you want some more complex inheritance type stuff you can look into creating a __using__ macro with defoverridable and super

Inheriting command a file lib argparser

Good afternoon
I wonder how I can inherit commands from a file that created the commands using the lib argparser.
To make it easy to understand, I will put examples:
File 1: (The house of the project may not have anything useless)
import file2
code here
File 2: (containing the argparser values)
import argparse
class file2():
def function():
argumentos = argparse.ArgumentParser(description = 'My Program')
argumentos.add_argument('-command')
argumentos_recebe = argumentos.parse_args()
I would like to invez to call the file 2 I called the file using one of two commands.
example:
arquivo1.py -command
Instead of ..
arquivo2.py -command
I think this is possible using class most like to find out how!
When you import file1 from file1.py, you can then refer to its contents as attributes on the file1 module object. So, your file1 code can be something like:
import file2
object = file2.file2() # create an instance of the class
object.function() # call the function to parse the arguments
Now, this won't quite work as written with the file2 contents you showed, because your function method doesn't take a self argument. You may not actually need a class (unlike Java, you don't need to pack all of your functions into classes all the time in Python). If that's the case, you can move function to the top level of the module and drop the object parts of the my code. Then just call file2.function() and it will do the parsing. Note that you might want to return something from the function that's doing the parsing, if you need to access the results in the rest of your code in file1.

MATLAB: modify import list of other scopes dynamically?

So, is there a way in MATLAB to modify the import list of a scope different from the current one? That is, I would like to be able to do this:
function import_mypackage()
evalin('caller', 'import mypackage.*');
end
This doesn't work. No error is produced when calling import_mypackage, but the namespace contained in mypackage is not imported, i.e:
function foo()
import_mypackage;
g(); % Wanted mypackage.g() but got: Undefined function or variable 'g()'
end
I know that you can modify dynamically the import list of the current scope either using eval or by passing a variable to import(). However, I cannot find any way to modify the import list of other scopes. Is there any way?
EDIT: Rody Oldenhuis found in his answer a strange behavior of function import. He suggested that evalin actually modifies the import list of the caller but that such list is cleared once you return from import_mypackage. However, I think that what is happening is that import expressions always evaluate in the current worspace. See:
function import_mypackage()
evalin('caller', 'L = import(''mypackage.foo'');');
foo; % It works! So the import happened in this workspace
end
Modified from Rody's response:
function foo()
import mypackage.f;
import_mypackage;
L
import
end
will print:
L =
'mypackage.foo'
ans =
'mypackage.f'
indicating the L was set to the import list of import_mypackage scope but that it never really cleared the import list of foo().
EDIT: #RodyOldenhuis
The reason why I want to mess around with the import list of the caller scope is that I want to define an "aliased" version of import(). Such alias_import() would allow the user to define package aliases so that:
alias_import my_toolbox
may be equivalent to:
import my_toolbox_v1.*
or to:
import my_toolbox_v2.*
that is, I want to be able to maintain several versions of a toolbox and control dynamically the version that is being imported. This is useful for comparing results between different my_toolbox versions or whenever you want to ensure that certain my_toolbox version will be used. All without having to go to the code and manually change import directives in hundreds of functions whenever I am upgrading to a new version of my_toolbox. Of course there is the alternative of making this in an indirect way, like:
import(alias_import('my_toolbox'))
so that alias_import will not perform the actual importing but simply will produce the input to the built-in import. This is perfectly fine but a bit more verbose and that is why I would have liked alias_import to modify the caller's import list. But after seeing the weird behavior of evalin() I think I rather leave things like they are now.
It seems you have stumbled upon some odd behavior (I'm not using the workd "bug" until I'm sure this is not what Mathworks intended :).
It seems that
function import_mypackage()
evalin('caller', 'import mypackage.*');
end
function foo()
import_mypackage;
g();
end
does not work, but
function import_mypackage()
evalin('caller', 'L = import mypackage.*');
end
function foo()
import_mypackage;
L
import
end
shows
L =
'mypackage.*'
ans =
Empty cell array: 0-by-1
which implies that the import list in the caller (foo) is cleared when the function import_mypackage goes out of scope.
I'd say this is at least unwanted behaviour, and I'd say this is a case for a bug report.
As a work-around, use something like
function L = import_mypackage()
L = import('mypackage.*');
end
function foo()
L = import_mypackage;
import(L{:});
% do stuff with pacakge contents
...
end
which I think is advisable over evalin anyway.

Is self-reference possible in MATLAB?

As noted here, functions in packages, as well as static methods in classes, still need to use a packagename.functionname syntax or import packagename.* for each function (since the imports are part of the function workspace and not global). This means that changing the package/class name later on can become a tedious nuisance.
Is there any way to do something like import this.*, i.e. a package/class name agnostic method to access all functions/static methods in the same package/class?
So... doesn't this require importthis to also be imported? Or is importthis a function you always have in your path?
It seems hardly more complex to just paste an "import this" block with this at the top of each function, and then you don't have to worry about importthis being in your path. I tend to feel that reliance on path is dangerous.
"Import This" block
%% Import own package
[~, pkgdir] = fileparts(fileparts(mfilename('fullpath')));
import([pkgdir(2:end) '.*']);
You can even put it in a try/catch block to make sure it's in a package directory, and decide what to do if it's not.
%% Import own package
try
[~, pkgdir] = fileparts(fileparts(mfilename('fullpath')));
import([pkgdir(2:end)'.*']);
catch err
if ~strcmp(err.identifier,'MATLAB:UndefinedFunction'), rethrow(err); end
end
I recently ran into a similar problem and found the following solution for packages. However it is VERY hacky.
You create a function called import this with an optional argument.
function to_eval = importthis(exclude_list)
if nargin == 0
exclude_list = [];
end
var_name = genvarname('A', exclude_list); %avoid shadowing
to_eval = ['[~,'...
, var_name...
, ']=fileparts(fileparts(mfilename(''fullpath'')));'... %get containing dir
, 'eval([''import '','...
, var_name...
, '(2:end),''.*'']);'... %remove '+'
, 'clear '... %clean up
, var_name
];
end
This function returns a string which can then be evaled that imports the "this" package. So in your package functions you would put the following near the top:
function B = myfunc(A)
eval(importthis);
%function body
end
You can also pass who to importhis, leaving your function's namespace clean.
function B = myfunc(A)
eval(importthis(who));
%function body
end
I can't decide whether I should feel proud or discusted by what I did.
This probably is not a bounty worthy answer but as you do not have any answers I thought I would post it anyway! You can invoke static methods via an instance of the class which you would only need to define once. You can invoke functions via a function handle but this would require one handle per function.
Using these techniques you could define all your static method and function references in one place. Then you would use these references throughout your package. Then if you decided to change the package name at a later point you would only need to update these references which are all stored in one place.
See:
Calling Static Methods
You can also invoke static methods using an instance of the class,
like any method:
obj = MyClass;
value = obj.pi(.001);
function_handle (#)
The following example creates a function handle for the humps function
and assigns it to the variable fhandle.
fhandle = #humps;