Please differentiate Kafka Leader(Broker) and Partition leader. Partition leader can be present in follower as well. When we send the message to Kafka broker, it will directly send the message to leader and follower based on partition?
From https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#intro_distribution
Each partition has one server which acts as the "leader" and zero or more servers which act as "followers". The leader handles all read and write requests for the partition while the followers passively replicate the leader.
[edit]
From https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#design_replicamanagment
It is also important to optimize the leadership election process as that is the critical window of unavailability. A naive implementation of leader election would end up running an election per partition for all partitions a node hosted when that node failed. Instead, we elect one of the brokers as the "controller". This controller detects failures at the broker level and is responsible for changing the leader of all affected partitions in a failed broker. The result is that we are able to batch together many of the required leadership change notifications which makes the election process far cheaper and faster for a large number of partitions. If the controller fails, one of the surviving brokers will become the new controller.
The broker writes messages to only partition leader of topic those messages replicated to follower partitions.
If leader partition fail follower partition will replace the leader partition.
What is kafka controller?
A. The Kafka controller is brain of the Kafka cluster:
Broker leader is called kafka controller.
one of the brokers serves as the active controller there can be only one controller at a time. if u find 2 controllers that is a glitch.
controller monitors the liveliness of the brokers and acts on broker failures i.e. if a broker dies, then controller divides up leadership of its topic partitions to the remaining brokers in the cluster.
also responsible for electing topic partition leaders.
zookeeper elect one of the broker as controller.
broker controller will elect one of the partition as leader.
When the Zookeeper doesn't receive heartbeat messages from the Controller, Zookeeper elects one of the available brokers as new controller.
Related
I'm new to Kafka and I want to ask a question.
If there are 3 Kafka brokers(kafka1, kafka2, kafka3)(they are in same Kafka Cluster)
and topic=test(replication=2)
kafka1 has leader partition and kafka2 has follower partition.
If producer sends data to kafka3, then how do data stored in kafka1 and Kafka2?
I heard that, if producer sends data to kafka3, then the zookeeper finds the broker who has the leader partition and returns the broker's dns or IP address.
And then, producer will resend to the broker with metadata.
Is it right? or if it's wrong, plz tell me how it works.
Thanks a lot!
Every kafka topic partition has its own leader. So if you have 2 partitions , kafka would assign leader for each partition. They might end up being same kafka nodes or they might be different.
When producer connects to kafka cluster, it gets to know about the the partition leaders. All writes must go through corresponding partition leader, which is responsible to keep track of in-sync replicas.
All consumers only talk to corresponding partition leaders to get data.
If partition leader goes down , one of the replicas become leader and all producers and consumers are notified about this change
I had a set up of 3 Node Zookeeper and 3 Broker Cluster when one of my brokers goes down in Cluster, the producer is not giving any Error but, consumers will throw an error saying that...
Marking coordinator Dead for the group... Discovered coordinator for
the group.
According to my knowledge if any one Broker available across the cluster I should not be stopped consuming messages.
But, as of now Server.1, server.2, server.3 if my server.2 goes down my all consumers stops consuming messages.
What are the exact parameters to set to achieve failover of producers and as well as consumers?
if my server.2 goes down my all consumers stops consuming messages.
For starters, you disable unclear leader election in the brokers, and create your topics with --replication-factor=3 and a configuration of min.insync.replicas=2.
To ensure that a producer has at least two durable writes (as set by the in-sync replcicas), then set acks=all
Then, if any broker fails, and assuming a leader election does not have any error, a producer and consumer should seemlessly re-connect to the new leader TopicPartitions.
I understand producer/consumers need to talk to brokers to know leader for partition. Brokers talk to zk to tell they joined the cluster.
Is it true that
Brokers know who is the leader for a given partition from zk
zk detects broker left/died. Then it re-elects leader and sends new leader info to all brokers
Question:
why do we need brokers to communicate with each other? Is it just
so tehy can move partitions around or do they also query metadata from each other. If so what would be example of metadata exchange
Producers/ consumers request metadata from one of the brokers ( as each one of them caches it) and that is how they know who is the leader for a partition.
Regarding "is it true that" section:
Brokers know who is the leader for the given partition thanks to zk and one of them. To be more precise, one of them decides who will be a leader. That broker is called controller. The first broker that connects to zookeeper becomes a controller and his role is to decide which broker will be a leader and which ones will be replicas and to inform them about it. Controller itself is not excluded from this process. It is a broker like any other with this special responsibilities of choosing leaders and replicas
zk indeed detects when a broker dies/ leaves but it doesn't reelect leader. It is controller responsibility. When one of the brokers leaves a cluster, controller gets information from zk and it starts reassignment
About your question - brokers do communicate with each other ( replicas are reading the messages from leaders, controller is informing other brokers about changes), but they do not exchange metadata among themselves - they write metadata to a zookeeper
A Broker is a Kafka server that runs in a Kafka Cluster
"A Kafka cluster is made up of multiple Kafka Brokers. Each Kafka Broker has a unique ID (number). Kafka Brokers contain topic log partitions. Connecting to one broker bootstraps a client to the entire Kafka cluster"
Each broker holds a number of partitions and each of these partitions can be either a leader or a replica for a topic. All writes and reads to a topic go through the leader and the leader coordinates updating replicas with new data. If a leader fails, a replica takes over as the new leader.
a question troubled me a long time. I know the leader election exists in zookeeper. Suppose we have a Kafka cluster connected with Zookeeper ensemble .
So my understanding is like, there is a zookeeper leader in Ensemble, and there are some "partition leaders" in Kafka cluster as well. And Kafka partition leader are elected through Zookeeper API. Is it right ?
Another question, Is master/worker basically same as leader/follower ?
Zookeeper leader election has nothing to to with Kafka partition leader election, vice versa.
Kafka partition leader elect by Controller, Controller is the Broker who registers
first in Zookeeper's path /Controller/2,2 is broker.id.
When a broker crash down, the leader partition (or leader replica) in this broker will be switched by Controller and Controller will choose one replica in ISR be the partition leader.
If this partition offline (all replica not available), this partition cannot be used for write or read. If you set unclean.leader.election.enable=true, then the first available replica will be elected as partition leader, no matter it's in ISR or not.
So some messages maybe lost.
Kafka and Zookeeper use leader/follower, not master/worker
Partition leader election in Kafka is not done through zookeeper API, actually, the first replica in alive assign replicas will be elected as the leader for each partition.
As for the master/worker things, as I know, many open sources have already replaced the old terminology with leader/replica or primary/replica, so basically, they are the same.
I'm a bit confused on the Topic partitioning in Apache Kafka. So I'm charting down a simple use case and I would like to know what happens in different scenarios. So here it is:
I have a Topic T that has 4 partitions TP1, TP2, TP4 and TP4.
Assume that I have 8 messages M1 to M8. Now when my producer sends these messages to the topic T, how will they be received by the Kafka broker under the following scenarios:
Scenario 1: There is only one kafka broker instance that has Topic T with the afore mentioned partitions.
Scenario 2: There are two kafka broker instances with each node having same Topic T with the afore mentioned partitions.
Now assuming that kafka broker instance 1 goes down, how will the consumers react? I'm assuming that my consumer was reading from broker instance 1.
I'll answer your questions by walking you through partition replication, because you need to learn about replication to understand the answer.
A single broker is considered the "leader" for a given partition. All produces and consumes occur with the leader. Replicas of the partition are replicated to a configurable amount of other brokers. The leader handles replicating a produce to the other replicas. Other replicas that are caught up to the leader are called "in-sync replicas." You can configure what "caught up" means.
A message is only made available to consumers when it has been committed to all in-sync replicas.
If the leader for a given partition fails, the Kafka coordinator will elect a new leader from the list of in-sync replicas and consumers will begin consuming from this new leader. Consumers will have a few milliseconds of added latency while the new leader is elected. A new coordinator will also be elected automatically if the coordinator fails (this adds more latency, too).
If the topic is configured with no replicas, then when the leader of a given partition fails, consumers can't consume from that partition until the broker that was the leader is brought back online. Or, if it is never brought back online, the data previously produced to that partition will be lost forever.
To answer your question directly:
Scenario 1: if replication is configured for the topic, and there exists an in-sync replica for each partition, a new leader will be elected, and consumers will only experience a few milliseconds of latency because of the failure.
Scenario 2: now that you understand replication, I believe you'll see that this scenario is Scenario 1 with a replication factor of 2.
You may also be interested to learn about acks in the producer.
In the producer, you can configure acks such that the produce is acknowledged when:
the message is put on the producer's socket buffer (acks=0)
the message is written to the log of the lead broker (acks=1)
the message is written to the log of the lead broker, and replicated to all other in-sync replicas (acks=all)
Further, you can configure the minimum number of in-sync replicas required to commit a produce. Then, in the event when not enough in-sync replicas exist given this configuration, the produce will fail. You can build your producer to handle this failure in different ways: buffer, retry, do nothing, block, etc.