I am trying to have a struct that starts an event loop, listens for TCP connections and calls a callback for each connection.
(The callback will be handed some prepossessed data from the socket. In my example below I just hand it the IP address of the connection but in my real code I will parse the contents that I receive with serde into a struct and pass that into the callback. I hope that doesn't invalidate the following "not working example").
My Cargo.toml:
[package]
name = "lifetime-problem"
version = "0.1.0"
edition = "2018"
[dependencies]
tokio-tcp = "0.1.3"
tokio = "0.1.14"
[[bin]]
name = "lifetime-problem"
path = "main.rs"
and main.rs:
use tokio::prelude::*;
struct Test {
printer: Option<Box<Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + Sync>>,
}
impl Test {
pub fn start(&mut self) -> Result<(), Box<std::error::Error>> {
let addr = "127.0.0.1:4242".parse::<std::net::SocketAddr>()?;
let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(&addr)?;
let server = listener
.incoming()
.map_err(|e| eprintln!("failed to accept socket; error = {:?}", e))
.for_each(move |socket: tokio::net::TcpStream| {
let address = socket.peer_addr().expect("");
match self.printer {
Some(callback) => { callback(address); }
None => { println!("{}", address); }
}
Ok(())
});
tokio::run(server);
Ok(())
}
}
fn main() {
let mut x = Test{ printer: None };
x.start();
}
I have tried several things starting from this code (which is adopted directly from the Tokio example).
If I use the code like posted above I get:
error[E0277]: (dyn std::ops::Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + std::marker::Sync + 'static) cannot be sent between threads safely
for the line 24 (tokio::run(server)).
If I add the Send trait on the Fn in the printer field XOR if I remove the move in the closure in the for_each call I get another error instead:
error[E0495]: cannot infer an appropriate lifetime due to conflicting requirements
which points me to the closure that apparently cannot outlive the start method where it is defined but tokio::run seems to have conflicting requirements for it.
Do you know if I am addressing the callback pattern in totally the wrong way or if there is just some minor error in my code?
First things first:
Compiler will translate Box<Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + Sync> to Box<Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + Sync + 'static> unless the lifetime is explicitly specified.
Let's have a look at the errors:
error[E0277]: (dyn std::ops::Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + std::marker::Sync + 'static) cannot be sent between threads safely
This is self-explanatory. You are trying to move &mut T to another thread, but cannot, because T here is not Send. To send &mut T to another thread T too needs to be of type Send.
Here is the minimal code that will give the same error:
use std::fmt::Debug;
fn func<T> (i:&'static mut T) where T: Debug {
std::thread::spawn(move || {
println!("{:?}", i);
});
}
If I make T above to also be of type Send, the error goes away.
But in your case when you add the Send trait, it gives lifetime error. Why?
&mut self has some lifetime greater than the function start() set by the caller, but there's no guarantee that its 'static. You move this reference into the closure which is passed to the thread and can potentially outlive the scope it is closing over, leading to a dangling reference.
Here's a minimal version, that would give the same error.
use std::fmt::Debug;
fn func<'a, T:'a> (i:&'a mut T) where T: Debug + Sync + Send {
std::thread::spawn(move || {
println!("{:?}", i);
});
}
Sync is not really required here as it is &mut T. Changing &mut T to &T (retaining Sync), will also result into the same error. The onus here is on references and not mutability. So you see, there is some lifetime 'a and it is moved into a closure (given to a thread), which means the closure now contains a reference (disjoint from the main context). So now, what is 'a and how long will it live from the closure's perspective that is invoked from another thread? Not inferable! As a result, the compiler complains saying cannot infer an appropriate lifetime due to conflicting requirements.
If we tweak the code a bit to;
impl Test {
pub fn start(&'static mut self) -> Result<(), Box<std::error::Error>> {
let addr = "127.0.0.1:4242".parse::<std::net::SocketAddr>()?;
let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(&addr)?;
let server = listener
.incoming()
.map_err(|e| eprintln!("failed to accept socket; error = {:?}", e))
.for_each(move |socket: tokio::net::TcpStream| {
let address = socket.peer_addr().expect("");
match &self.printer {
Some(callback) => { callback(address); }
None => { println!("{}", address); }
}
Ok(())
});
tokio::run(server);
Ok(())
}
}
it will compile fine. There's a guarantee there that self has a 'static lifetime. Please note that in the match statement we need to pass &self.printer, as you cannot move out of a borrowed context.
However, this expects Test to be declared static and that too a mutable one, which is generally not the best way, if you have other options.
Another way is; if it's ok for you to pass Test by value to start() and then further move it into for_each(), the code would look like this:
use tokio::prelude::*;
struct Test {
printer: Option<Box<Fn(std::net::SocketAddr) + Send>>,
}
impl Test {
pub fn start(mut self) -> Result<(), Box<std::error::Error>> {
let addr = "127.0.0.1:4242".parse::<std::net::SocketAddr>()?;
let listener = tokio::net::TcpListener::bind(&addr)?;
let server = listener
.incoming()
.map_err(|e| eprintln!("failed to accept socket; error = {:?}", e))
.for_each(move |socket: tokio::net::TcpStream| {
let address = socket.peer_addr().expect("");
match &self.printer {
Some(callback) => {
callback(address);
}
None => {
println!("{}", address);
}
}
Ok(())
});
tokio::run(server);
Ok(())
}
}
fn main() {
let mut x = Test { printer: None };
x.start();
}
Related
I've viewed so many stack overflows, but can't get my head around how to fix this.
Here are my deps:
[dependencies]
mongodb = { version = "2.3.1"}
tokio = "1.22.0"
twilio-openapi = "1.0.0"
async-trait = "0.1.58"
futures = "0.3.25"
I've created this async_trait repository trait for implementing various data access repositories:
use std::pin::Pin;
use async_trait::async_trait;
use futures::Future;
use mongodb::{bson::Document, error::Error, options::FindOneOptions, Client};
pub mod notification_settings;
#[async_trait]
pub trait Repository<'a> {
fn with_client(client: &'a mut &Client) -> Self;
async fn find_one<'b>(
self,
filter: Document,
find_one_options: FindOneOptions,
) -> Pin<Box<(dyn Future<Output = Result<Option<Document>, Error>> + Send + 'b)>>;
}
It seems like async_trait sort of requires returning a Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = X> + Send + 'b)>> Where you can specify a certain lifetime on the borrow. I'm not sure exactly why or if there are ways around this, but again still learning this.
And then here is my struct implementing the trait:
use std::{marker::Send, pin::Pin};
use async_trait::async_trait;
use futures::Future;
use mongodb::{bson::Document, error::Error, options::FindOneOptions, Client};
pub struct NotificationSettingsRepository<'a> {
pub(crate) client: &'a Client,
}
#[async_trait]
impl<'a> super::Repository<'a> for NotificationSettingsRepository<'a> {
fn with_client(client: &'a mut &Client) -> Self {
NotificationSettingsRepository { client: client }
}
async fn find_one<'b>(
self,
filter: Document,
find_one_options: FindOneOptions,
) -> Pin<Box<(dyn Future<Output = Result<Option<Document>, Error>> + Send + 'b)>> {
let collection = self
.client
.database("Occasionally")
.collection::<Document>("NotificationSettings");
let document = collection.find_one(filter, find_one_options);
Box::pin(async { document.await })
}
}
Problem is on collection.find_one(filter, find_one_options); I get an error about:
`collection` does not live long enough
borrowed value does not live long enoughrustcClick for full compiler diagnostic
notification_settings.rs(30, 5): `collection` dropped here while still borrowed
notification_settings.rs(17, 23): lifetime `'b` defined here
notification_settings.rs(21, 10): type annotation requires that `collection` is borrowed for `'b`
This makes some sense because the definition of find_one looks like this:
find_one(&self, filter: impl Into<Option<Document>>, options: impl Into<Option<FindOneOptions>>) -> Result<Option<T>>
So it is borrowing the collection via &self
I've tried a few things like adding an async { } wrapper on the Future of find_one. But I'm not sure what I'm doing there. Please help and thank you!
Trying to make server with actix-web & mongodb in rust. Getting error
the trait std::convert::From<mongodb::error::Error> is not implemented for std::io::Error
here is my code
use actix_web::{web, App, HttpRequest, HttpServer, Responder};
use mongodb::{options::ClientOptions, Client};
async fn greet(req: HttpRequest) -> impl Responder {
let name = req.match_info().get("name").unwrap_or("World");
format!("Hello {}!", &name)
}
#[actix_rt::main]
async fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
// Parse a connection string into an options struct.
let mut client_options = ClientOptions::parse("mongodb://localhost:27017")?;
// Manually set an option.
client_options.app_name = Some("My App".to_string());
// Get a handle to the deployment.
let client = Client::with_options(client_options)?;
// List the names of the databases in that deployment.
for db_name in client.list_database_names(None)? {
println!("{}", db_name);
}
HttpServer::new(|| {
App::new()
.route("/", web::get().to(greet))
.route("/{name}", web::get().to(greet))
})
.bind("127.0.0.1:8000")?
.run()
.await
}
Did I missed anything?
It means that one of the functions you are calling with a ? at the end can return a mongodb::error::Error. But the signature of the main is a std::io::Result<()>, wich is an implied Result<(), std::io::Error>. The only error type it can accept is a io::Error, not a mongodb::Error.
It looks like all the functions you are escaping might return this mongodb::error::Error, so you can try to change the main signature to such a result: Result<(). mongodb::error::Error>.
But I would recommend you do proper error handling on those potential errors, as this is your main(). Change those ? to .expect("Some error message"); at least. The program will still crash, but it will crash in a way that is meaningful to you.
I have an application that should use a shared connection pool for all requests. I observe that at seemingly-random times, requests fail with the error type "Closed". I have isolated this behavior into the following example:
use lazy_static::lazy_static;
use bb8_postgres::bb8::Pool;
use bb8_postgres::PostgresConnectionManager;
use bb8_postgres::tokio_postgres::{NoTls, Client};
lazy_static! {
static ref CONNECTION_POOL: Pool<PostgresConnectionManager<NoTls>> = {
let manager = PostgresConnectionManager::new_from_stringlike("dbname=demodb host=localhost user=postgres", NoTls).unwrap();
Pool::builder().build_unchecked(manager)
};
}
fn main() {
println!("Hello, world!");
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod test {
use super::*;
#[tokio::test]
async fn much_insert_traffic() {
much_traffic("INSERT INTO foo(a,b) VALUES (1, 2) RETURNING id").await
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn much_select_traffic() {
much_traffic("SELECT MAX(id) FROM foo").await
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn much_update_traffic() {
much_traffic("UPDATE foo SET a = 81 WHERE id = 1919 RETURNING b").await;
}
async fn much_traffic(stmt: &str) {
let c = CONNECTION_POOL.get().await.expect("Get a connection");
let client = &*c;
for i in 0..10000i32 {
let res = client.query_opt(stmt, &[]).await.expect(&format!("Perform repeat {} of {} ok", i, stmt));
}
}
}
When executing the tests, >50% one of the tests will fail in a later iteration with output similar to the following:
Perform repeat 8782 of UPDATE foo SET a = 81 WHERE id = 1919 RETURNING b ok: Error { kind: Closed, cause: None }
thread 'test::much_update_traffic' panicked at 'Perform repeat 8782 of UPDATE foo SET a = 81 WHERE
id = 1919 RETURNING b ok: Error { kind: Closed, cause: None }', src\main.rs:44:23
Turns out, the problem is completely predicated on the [tokio::test] annotation starting up a distinct runtime whenever a test is executed. The lazy static is initialized with one of these runtimes, and as soon as that runtime shuts down, the pool is destroyed. The other tests (with different runtimes) can use the value as long as the spawning test still runs, but are met with an invalid state once it has shut down.
I have a test that opens and listens to a Unix Domain Socket. The socket is opened and reads data without issues, but it doesn't shutdown gracefully.
This is the error I get when I try to run the test a second time:
thread 'test_1' panicked at 'called Result::unwrap() on an Err
value: Error { repr: Os { code: 48, message: "Address already in use"
} }', ../src/libcore/result.rs:799 note: Run with RUST_BACKTRACE=1
for a backtrace.
The code is available at the Rust playground and there's a Github Gist for it.
use std::io::prelude::*;
use std::thread;
use std::net::Shutdown;
use std::os::unix::net::{UnixStream, UnixListener};
Test Case:
#[test]
fn test_1() {
driver();
assert_eq!("1", "2");
}
Main entry point function
fn driver() {
let listener = UnixListener::bind("/tmp/my_socket.sock").unwrap();
thread::spawn(|| socket_server(listener));
// send a message
busy_work(3);
// try to disconnect the socket
let drop_stream = UnixStream::connect("/tmp/my_socket.sock").unwrap();
let _ = drop_stream.shutdown(Shutdown::Both);
}
Function to send data in intervals
#[allow(unused_variables)]
fn busy_work(threads: i32) {
// Make a vector to hold the children which are spawned.
let mut children = vec![];
for i in 0..threads {
// Spin up another thread
children.push(thread::spawn(|| socket_client()));
}
for child in children {
// Wait for the thread to finish. Returns a result.
let _ = child.join();
}
}
fn socket_client() {
let mut stream = UnixStream::connect("/tmp/my_socket.sock").unwrap();
stream.write_all(b"hello world").unwrap();
}
Function to handle data
fn handle_client(mut stream: UnixStream) {
let mut response = String::new();
stream.read_to_string(&mut response).unwrap();
println!("got response: {:?}", response);
}
Server socket that listens to incoming messages
#[allow(unused_variables)]
fn socket_server(listener: UnixListener) {
// accept connections and process them, spawning a new thread for each one
for stream in listener.incoming() {
match stream {
Ok(mut stream) => {
/* connection succeeded */
let mut response = String::new();
stream.read_to_string(&mut response).unwrap();
if response.is_empty() {
break;
} else {
thread::spawn(|| handle_client(stream));
}
}
Err(err) => {
/* connection failed */
break;
}
}
}
println!("Breaking out of socket_server()");
drop(listener);
}
Please learn to create a minimal reproducible example and then take the time to do so. In this case, there's no need for threads or functions or testing frameworks; running this entire program twice reproduces the error:
use std::os::unix::net::UnixListener;
fn main() {
UnixListener::bind("/tmp/my_socket.sock").unwrap();
}
If you look at the filesystem before and after the test, you will see that the file /tmp/my_socket.sock is not present before the first run and it is present before the second run. Deleting the file allows the program to run to completion again (at which point it recreates the file).
This issue is not unique to Rust:
Note that, once created, this socket file will continue to exist, even after the server exits. If the server subsequently restarts, the file prevents re-binding:
[...]
So, servers should unlink the socket pathname prior to binding it.
You could choose to add some wrapper around the socket that would automatically delete it when it is dropped or create a temporary directory that is cleaned when it is dropped, but I'm not sure how well that would work. You could also create a wrapper function that deletes the file before it opens the socket.
Unlinking the socket when it's dropped
use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
struct DeleteOnDrop {
path: PathBuf,
listener: UnixListener,
}
impl DeleteOnDrop {
fn bind(path: impl AsRef<Path>) -> std::io::Result<Self> {
let path = path.as_ref().to_owned();
UnixListener::bind(&path).map(|listener| DeleteOnDrop { path, listener })
}
}
impl Drop for DeleteOnDrop {
fn drop(&mut self) {
// There's no way to return a useful error here
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(&self.path).unwrap();
}
}
You may also want to consider implementing Deref / DerefMut to make this into a smart pointer for sockets:
impl std::ops::Deref for DeleteOnDrop {
type Target = UnixListener;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.listener
}
}
impl std::ops::DerefMut for DeleteOnDrop {
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
&mut self.listener
}
}
Unlinking the socket before it's opened
This is much simpler:
use std::path::Path;
fn bind(path: impl AsRef<Path>) -> std::io::Result<UnixListener> {
let path = path.as_ref();
std::fs::remove_file(path)?;
UnixListener::bind(path)
}
Note that you can combine the two solutions, such that the socket is deleted before creation and when it's dropped.
I think that deleting during creation is a less-optimal solution: if you ever start a second server, you'll prevent the first server from receiving any more connections. It's probably better to error and tell the user instead.
I've got a thread, that maintains a list of sockets, and I'd like to traverse the list, see if there is anything to read, if so - act upon it, if not - move onto the next. The problem is, as soon as I come across the first node, all execution is halted until something comes through on the read.
I'm using std::io::Read::read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize>
From the doc
This function does not provide any guarantees about whether it blocks waiting for data, but if an object needs to block for a read but cannot it will typically signal this via an Err return value.
Digging into the source, the TcpStream Read implementation is
impl Read for TcpStream {
fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> io::Result<usize> { self.0.read(buf) }
}
Which invokes
pub fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> IoResult<uint> {
let fd = self.fd();
let dolock = || self.lock_nonblocking();
let doread = |nb| unsafe {
let flags = if nb {c::MSG_DONTWAIT} else {0};
libc::recv(fd,
buf.as_mut_ptr() as *mut libc::c_void,
buf.len() as wrlen,
flags) as libc::c_int
};
read(fd, self.read_deadline, dolock, doread)
}
And finally, calls read<T, L, R>(fd: sock_t, deadline: u64, mut lock: L, mut read: R)
Where I can see loops over non blocking reads until data has been retrieved or an error has occurred.
Is there a way to force a non-blocking read with TcpStream?
Updated Answer
It should be noted, that as of Rust 1.9.0, std::net::TcpStream has added functionality:
fn set_nonblocking(&self, nonblocking: bool) -> Result<()>
Original Answer
Couldn't exactly get it with TcpStream, and didn't want to pull in a separate lib for IO operations, so I decided to set the file descriptor as Non-blocking before using it, and executing a system call to read/write. Definitely not the safest solution, but less work than implementing a new IO lib, even though MIO looks great.
extern "system" {
fn read(fd: c_int, buffer: *mut c_void, count: size_t) -> ssize_t;
}
pub fn new(user: User, stream: TcpStream) -> Socket {
// First we need to setup the socket as Non-blocking on POSIX
let fd = stream.as_raw_fd();
unsafe {
let ret_value = libc::fcntl(fd,
libc::consts::os::posix01::F_SETFL,
libc::consts::os::extra::O_NONBLOCK);
// Ensure we didnt get an error code
if ret_value < 0 {
panic!("Unable to set fd as non-blocking")
}
}
Socket {
user: user,
stream: stream
}
}
pub fn read(&mut self) {
let count = 512 as size_t;
let mut buffer = [0u8; 512];
let fd = self.stream.as_raw_fd();
let mut num_read = 0 as ssize_t;
unsafe {
let buf_ptr = buffer.as_mut_ptr();
let void_buf_ptr: *mut c_void = mem::transmute(buf_ptr);
num_read = read(fd, void_buf_ptr, count);
if num_read > 0 {
println!("Read: {}", num_read);
}
println!("test");
}
}