S3AbortableInputStream: Not all bytes were read from the S3ObjectInputStream - scala

I am getting this warning when doing s3 GET Object request
WARN S3AbortableInputStream: Not all bytes were read from the
S3ObjectInputStream, aborting HTTP connection. This is likely an error
and may result in sub-optimal behavior. Request only the bytes you
need via a ranged GET or drain the input stream after use
I looked at AmazonS3: Getting warning: S3AbortableInputStream:Not all bytes were read from the S3ObjectInputStream, aborting HTTP connection
I do not have a clear understanding of what needs to be done.
Below is the code snippet I am using
try {
s3obj = s3Client.getObject(s3Bucket, objectSummary.getKey)
val name = s3obj.getKey.substring(dirPath.length + 1)
val filename = name.replace(".xml", "")
endpoints += base_url + filename
} catch {
case e#(_: IOException |_ : JSONException | _: Exception) =>
println(e)
} finally {
if (s3obj != null)
s3obj.close()
}

Basically what it does is, if S3 client tries to close an InputStream without consuming it fully after reading N bytes, it gives the warning message because they need to close the HttpRequest and the underlying http connection with removing the connection from the connection pool.
This could happen when:
Web application reads data from S3 initially and S3 DataStore normally caches the data in local file system and while this is happening, if web visitor disconnects the HTTP connection, and so if Tomcat indicates it, then the http processing thread will be halted and as a result, the InputStream will be closed.
Please refer the following link:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/RetrievingObjectUsingJava.html

If you add
s3obj.abort()
to your exception block, it should resolve the issue. It would look like this:
} catch {
case e#(_: IOException |_ : JSONException | _: Exception) =>
println(e)
if (s3obj != null) {
s3obj.abort()
}
} finally {
if (s3obj != null)
s3obj.close()
}
It is a complexity of the AWS SDK in that it wants to avoid the normal close() operations to short cut streaming lots of data when it is not necessary.

Related

Why can not I read bytes from the TcpClient in C#?

Why can not I read bytes from the TcpClient in C#?
Here is the error I am getting:
Unable to read data from the transport connection: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine.
Here is how I start my TcpClient:
public static async void Start()
{
TcpListener server = null;
try
{
server = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Loopback, 13000);
server.Start();
var client = await server.AcceptTcpClientAsync();
var stream = client.GetStream();
var bytes = Convert.FromBase64String("ABCD");
await stream.WriteAsync(bytes, 0, bytes.Length);
client.Close();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw;
}
finally
{
if(server != null)
{
server.Stop();
}
}
}
Here is how I run a request to the TcpClient:
try {
var response = (new HttpClient()).GetByteArrayAsync("http://localhost:13000").Result;
return Convert.ToBase64String(response);
} catch(Exception e) {
throw;
}
The return Convert.ToBase64String(response); line is never reached. While I see the quoted above error message inside the Exception e if I hit a breakpoint on the throw line.
Also, during debug the Start() method completes just fine. I.e. it starts, then wait for a request, gets a request, writes to the TclClient and at the end runs the server.Stop(); command.
I am expecting my code to work, because I took it and modified from the official documentation over here.
I tried to check out a few resources which would tackle my exception, but none of them did help.
E.g. I tried to use the question.
First answer tells nothing useful actually, but just plays around with words and at the end states that one can do nothing about the exception (please, correct me if I am missing a point in the answer).
And the second answer tells an impossible in my case problem. Because, I am sure there is nothing running on the 13000 port.
Your client code is using HttpClient, which sends an HTTP request and expects an HTTP response. But your server is not an HTTP server, it is just a plain TCP server, so the client is likely to fail and forcibly close the connection when it doesn't receive a properly formatted HTTP response.
The "official documentation" whose example you modified is not using HttpClient at all, it is using TcpClient instead.
If you want to use HttpClient in your client, then you should use HttpListener instead of TcpListener in your server.

Jmeter - Force close a socket/wait until message recieved

I am opening a socket in jmeter (using groovy in JSR223 Sampler), and storing the message in a jmeter variable. This is the below code:
SocketAddress inetSocketAddress = new InetSocketAddress(InetAddress.getByName("localhost"),4801);
def server = new ServerSocket()
server.bind(inetSocketAddress)
while(!vars.get("caseId"))) {
server.accept { socket ->
log.info('Someone is connected')
socket.withStreams { input, output ->
InputStreamReader isReader = new InputStreamReader(input);
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(isReader);
StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
String str;
while((str = reader.readLine())!= null){
sb.append(str);
}
String finalStr = sb.toString()
String caseId = finalStr.split("<caseId>")[1].split("</caseId>")[0]
vars.put("caseId", caseId)
}
log.info("Connection processed")
}
}
if(vars.get("caseId"))
{
try
{
server.close();
vars.put("socketClose",true);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
log.info("Error in closing the socket: " + e.getMessage());
}
}
Now, there is some time delay between the first loop is executed and the message being recieved from the port. It doesnt receive the message immediately, and hence while loop is executed again. And then message is received and it sets caseId. It goes on to close the socket, because caseId is set. And that is throwing the error, because socket is still waiting for the message. So is there a way, to wait until socket has recieved all the messages, so i could properly close it?
Or just force close the socket, and Jmeter wont throw any exception?
Or when i execute next component, say IF controller in Jmeter, it waits until variable socketClose is set true? In that way, instead of while loops inside JSR223 sampler, i could use multiple If Controllers in Jmeter thread.
This is how ServerSocket.close() function works
public void close()
throws IOException
Closes this socket. Any thread currently blocked in accept() will throw a SocketException.
I don't think there is a way "to wait until socket has recieved all the messages" because Socket is dump as a rock and it can either listen for connections or shut down.
Maybe you might be interested in setSoTimeout() function?
Also this line:
vars.put("socketClose",true)
is very suspicious, I think you need to change it either to:
vars.put("socketClose", "true")
or to
vars.putObject("socketClose",true)
as JMeterVariables.put() function can accept only a String, see Top 8 JMeter Java Classes You Should Be Using with Groovy article for more details.

Httpclient throws Timeout waiting for connection from pool exception

Now am working on an exception for our uploading image service, the scenario below:
We have a web page, user from all over the world can upload their images to our server, the image normally keep about 3MB. Now we held a promotion, so the images number uploading to our server is extremely huge, which, however caused the server throws the exception as "org.apache.http.conn.ConnectionPoolTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for connection from pool".
We use apache httpclient as the core uploading middleware, its version is 4.5.*, we correctly handled the response by using the method mentioned in this article.
The code like below:
if (returnType != StorageHttpResponse.class && response != null) {
EntityUtils.consumeQuietly(response.getEntity());
httpRequest.abort();
}
Also, the max connection pool for the service is 128 and the max connection time out is 50000 ms. We upload the images by using stream mode, not directly upload the image file.
So here, I correctly handled the response entity by consuming it in finally code block, but I still can't stop the service throw connection pool timeout exception.
Any other stuffs that I need to add to my service? Do I really using redis to make a queue to user's uploading requests and post handling?
Whole code here:
public <T> T excute(Request request, Class<T> returnType) {
Preconditions.checkState(!isShutDown, "JSSHttpClient is destory!");
HttpRequestBase httpRequest = new HttpRequestBuild(this.credential).build(request);
HttpResponse response = null;
try {
response = this.client.execute(httpRequest);
if (errorHandler.hasError(request, response)) {
int statusCode = response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode();
log.warn("Unexpected response," + request + " http code [" + statusCode + "]");
errorHandler.handleError(response);
}
if (returnType != null && returnType != StorageHttpResponse.class) {
return JsonMessageConverter.read(returnType, response);
}
if (returnType == StorageHttpResponse.class) {
return (T) new StorageHttpResponse(response);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
Throwables.propagate(e);
} finally {
if (returnType != StorageHttpResponse.class && response != null) {
EntityUtils.consumeQuietly(response.getEntity());
httpRequest.abort();
}
}
return null;
}
you can set the parameters in either properties or yml file like below.
http:
pool:
size: 100
sockettimeout: 20000
defaultMaxPerRoute: 200
maxPerRoutes:
-
scheme: http
host: localhost
port: 8080
maxPerRoute: 100
-
scheme: https
host: {{URL}}
port: -1
maxPerRoute: 200
Finally, we solved this not by using code. Because we all know if the response not consumed directly, the connection of a request will not released. So in our code, we offen consume the response first.
We solved this problem not by using better code but slightly modify some parameters like maxconnectionpoolsize, maxconnectionperroute and maxconnectiontimeout based on our business scenario. Then running it and all seems ok now. Hope this helps you.

Spring cloud performance tunning

I'm doing a performance test against a Spring Cloud application. When number of concurrent users exceeds 150, it starts to give "Forwarding error"
{"timestamp":1458685370986,"status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error","exception":"com.netflix.zuul.exception.ZuulException","message":"Forwarding error"}
Which parameter I should adjust to get rid of the error?
You should post your logs for the error, without that we can only guess what the exact error is. As Forwarding error reported by ZuulExcetption is a generic error.
See this link for the RibbonRoutingFilter.forward() method which actually reports this error. I'm adding the code here for the backup.
private HttpResponse forward(RestClient restClient, String service, Verb verb, String uri, Boolean retryable,
MultiValueMap<String, String> headers, MultiValueMap<String, String> params,
InputStream requestEntity) throws Exception {
Map<String, Object> info = this.helper.debug(verb.verb(), uri, headers, params,
requestEntity);
RibbonCommand command = new RibbonCommand(service, restClient, verb, uri, retryable,
headers, params, requestEntity);
try {
HttpResponse response = command.execute();
this.helper.appendDebug(info, response.getStatus(),
revertHeaders(response.getHeaders()));
return response;
}
catch (HystrixRuntimeException ex) {
info.put("status", "500");
if (ex.getFallbackException() != null
&& ex.getFallbackException().getCause() != null
&& ex.getFallbackException().getCause() instanceof ClientException) {
ClientException cause = (ClientException) ex.getFallbackException()
.getCause();
throw new ZuulException(cause, "Forwarding error", 500, cause
.getErrorType().toString());
}
throw new ZuulException(ex, "Forwarding error", 500, ex.getFailureType()
.toString());
}
}
As you can see that only viable place where the error can be generated is in command.execute(), where command is an instance of HystrixCommand. Here is a link for the execute() method in HystrixCommand.
Below is the code for backup.
public R execute() {
try {
return queue().get();
} catch (Exception e) {
throw decomposeException(e);
}
}
Here the queue() is a Future instance
Most common error that can occur with the Future is a timeout exception. Since here Future instance queue() is not bound by any timetout value, it can go on waiting for ever.
However most of the time API which make use of Future have a thread monitoring the time they take and they interrupt it after a certain period of time. Same is done by Ribbon.
If yours indeed is a timeout issue then an easy solution is to increase Ribbon timeout value by using following property.
ribbon.ReadTimeout=10000
//or
<client-name>.ribbon.ReadTimeout=10000
Time out majorly can occur if the tomcat server which hosts the service which is proxied by the Zuul has too much load. It's whole thread pool is exhausted thus resulting in the next requests having to wait for long time.
This can probably be alleviated by change the number of threads that your service tomcat has by using following property.
server.tomcat.max-threads=0
By default it's set to 0, which leaves it to the embedded server's default. In tomcat's case it's 200. See the reference maxThreads property in tomcat.
Note: To increase the thread pool size we have to make sure that the machine has that capacity to provide resources if that many threads were to be in execution simultaneously.

Handle JDBC exception in BIRT API

I have a scheduler job which is based on a standalone RunAndRenderTask. The report design connects to a remote mysql database to fetch data. The scheduler generates a PDF and emails the report as attachment to a set of people. This works as long as the database is available.
But when the database is unavailable, then I can see the error in the logs, but the RunAndRenderTask still generates a PDF report which is blank and useless, and this gets emailed by the scheduler. I need to be able to catch this exception and instead email another set of people who can fix the DB issue. I tried various things but couldn't figure out how to do it.
In the code below, I expect the API to return an exception, and hence print "BirtException" or "Exception", but this code prints "Success" even when there is a JDBC exception.
Any help is appreciated.
Here's the code I have.
IReportEngine engine = null;
IRunAndRenderTask runAndRenderTask = null;
try {
EngineConfig config = new EngineConfig();
config.setEngineHome("birt-runtime-4_4_0/RuntimeEngine");
Platform.startup(config);
IReportEngineFactory factory = (IReportEngineFactory) Platform
.createFactoryObject(IReportEngineFactory.EXTENSION_REPORT_ENGINE_FACTORY);
engine = factory.createReportEngine(config);
IReportRunnable reportRunnable = engine.openReportDesign(DATA_PATH + "sample.rptdesign");
runAndRenderTask = engine.createRunAndRenderTask(reportRunnable);
PDFRenderOption option = new PDFRenderOption();
option.setOutputFileName(DATA_PATH + "output.pdf");
option.setOutputFormat("pdf");
runAndRenderTask.setRenderOption(option);
runAndRenderTask.run();
System.out.println("Success!");
} catch (BirtException e) {
System.out.println("BirtException");
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (Throwable e) {
System.out.println("Exception");
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
if (runAndRenderTask != null) {
runAndRenderTask.close();
}
if (engine != null) {
engine.destroy();
}
Platform.shutdown();
RegistryProviderFactory.releaseDefault();
}
This is the exception stacktrace, which never gets propagated back by RunAndRenderTask.run()
INFO: Loaded JDBC driver class in class path: com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
Jun 26, 2014 9:26:43 PM org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.odaconsumer.ConnectionManager openConnection
SEVERE: Unable to open connection.
org.eclipse.birt.report.data.oda.jdbc.JDBCException: There is an error in get connection, Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server..
at org.eclipse.birt.report.data.oda.jdbc.JDBCDriverManager.doConnect(JDBCDriverManager.java:336)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.data.oda.jdbc.JDBCDriverManager.getConnection(JDBCDriverManager.java:235)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.data.oda.jdbc.Connection.connectByUrl(Connection.java:252)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.data.oda.jdbc.Connection.open(Connection.java:162)
at org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.consumer.helper.OdaConnection.open(OdaConnection.java:250)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.odaconsumer.ConnectionManager.openConnection(ConnectionManager.java:165)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.executor.DataSource.newConnection(DataSource.java:224)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.executor.DataSource.open(DataSource.java:212)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.DataSourceRuntime.openOdiDataSource(DataSourceRuntime.java:217)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.QueryExecutor.openDataSource(QueryExecutor.java:435)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.QueryExecutor.prepareExecution(QueryExecutor.java:322)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.PreparedQuery.doPrepare(PreparedQuery.java:463)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.PreparedDataSourceQuery.produceQueryResults(PreparedDataSourceQuery.java:190)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.PreparedDataSourceQuery.execute(PreparedDataSourceQuery.java:178)
at org.eclipse.birt.data.engine.impl.PreparedOdaDSQuery.execute(PreparedOdaDSQuery.java:178)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.data.adapter.impl.DataRequestSessionImpl.execute(DataRequestSessionImpl.java:637)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.data.dte.DteDataEngine.doExecuteQuery(DteDataEngine.java:152)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.data.dte.AbstractDataEngine.execute(AbstractDataEngine.java:275)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.executor.ExtendedGenerateExecutor.executeQueries(ExtendedGenerateExecutor.java:205)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.executor.ExtendedGenerateExecutor.execute(ExtendedGenerateExecutor.java:65)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.executor.ExtendedItemExecutor.execute(ExtendedItemExecutor.java:62)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.internal.executor.dup.SuppressDuplicateItemExecutor.execute(SuppressDuplicateItemExecutor.java:43)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.internal.executor.wrap.WrappedReportItemExecutor.execute(WrappedReportItemExecutor.java:46)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.internal.executor.l18n.LocalizedReportItemExecutor.execute(LocalizedReportItemExecutor.java:34)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.layout.html.HTMLBlockStackingLM.layoutNodes(HTMLBlockStackingLM.java:65)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.layout.html.HTMLPageLM.layout(HTMLPageLM.java:92)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.layout.html.HTMLReportLayoutEngine.layout(HTMLReportLayoutEngine.java:100)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.api.impl.RunAndRenderTask.doRun(RunAndRenderTask.java:181)
at org.eclipse.birt.report.engine.api.impl.RunAndRenderTask.run(RunAndRenderTask.java:77)
at test.ReportTester.test(ReportTester.java:50)
at test.ReportTester.main(ReportTester.java:19)
In addition to catching BirtException, you should be aware that the way BIRT handles Javascript errors is - by default - browser-like. That is, BIRT tries to continue generating the report.
There are different ways to handle this for production-quality code (where task is a RunAndRenderTask or RunTask or RenderTask):
Use task.setErrorHandlingOption(CANCEL_ON_ERROR) (see BIRT docs). Personally, I have never tried this.
After task.run(...), but before task.close(), call task.getErrors(). If this list is not empty, your code should output these messages and throw an exception.
You need to add catch block that catches EngineException, not JDBC exception.
You can find javadocs at link.