I keep getting an unexpected select error as well as an unexpected ON error in rows 61 AND 64 in my snowsql statement.
Not sure why if anyone can help that would be great. I've added the portion of my snowsql statement below.
I'm trying to use a select statement within a where clause is there a way to do this?
AS select
t1.sunday_date,
t1.sunday_year_month,
t1.sunday_month,
t1.dc,
t1.source_sku,
t1.Product_Family,
t1.Product_type,
t1.Product_Subtype,
t1.Material,
t1.Color,
t1.Size,
t1.EOL_Date,
t1.NPI_Date,
t1.period_start,
t1.period_month,
IIF( t4.period_start < t1.sunday_date, iif(ISNULL(ta.actual_quantity), 0, ta.actual_quantity),
IIF(ISNULL(tfc.SOPFCSTOVERRIDE ), iif(ISNULL(tf.Period_Start), 0, tf.dc_forecast) , tfc.SOPFCSTOVERRIDE
)) AS forecast_updated,
iif(ISNULL(tf.Period_Start),t4.period_start,tf.Period_Start) AS period_start_forecast,
iif(ISNULL(ti.VALUATED_UNRESTRICTED_USE_STOCK), 0, ti.VALUATED_UNRESTRICTED_USE_STOCK) AS inventory_quantity,
iif(ISNULL(ti.HCI_DS_KEYFIGURE_QUANTITY), 0, ti.HCI_DS_KEYFIGURE_QUANTITY) AS in_transit_quantity,
iif(ISNULL(ti.planned_quantity), 0, ti.planned_quantity) AS inbound_quantity,
iif(ISNULL(tbac.backlog_ecomm ), 0, tbac.backlog_ecomm) + iif(ISNULL(tbac_sap.backlog_sap_open), 0, tbac_sap.backlog_sap_open) AS backlog_quantity,
iif(ISNULL(ta.actual_quantity), 0, ta.actual_quantity) AS actual_quantity,
iif(ISNULL(tso.open_orders), 0, tso.open_orders) AS open_orders,
iif(ISNULL(tf.Period_Start), 0, tf.dc_forecast) AS forecast,
tfc.SOPFCSTOVERRIDE AS forecast_consumption,
iif(ISNULL(tpc.SHIP_DATE), 0, tpc.SHIP_DATE) AS production_current_week,
iif(ISNULL(tpc.SHIP_DATE), 0, tpc.SHIP_DATE) AS production_next_week,
NOW() AS updated_timestamp
FROM ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
SELECT
e.sunday_date,
e.sunday_month,
e.sunday_year_month,
d.dc,
c.SOURCE_SKU,
c.Product_Family,
c.Product_Type,
c.Product_Subtype,
c.Material,
c.Color,
c.Size,
c.EOL_Date,
c.NPI_Date,
b.period_start,
b.period_month
FROM
(SELECT sunday_date, sunday_month, sunday_year_month FROM bas_report_date) AS e,
(SELECT distinct Week_Date AS period_start, DateSerial('445_Year','445_Month',1) AS period_month from inv_bas_445_Month_Alignment) AS b,
(SELECT source_sku AS source_sku, Product_Family, Product_Type, Product_Subtype, Material, Color, Size, EOL_Date, NPI_Date from inv_vw_product_dev ) AS c,
(SELECT dc AS dc FROM inv_bas_dc_site_lookup) AS d
WHERE b.period_start >=
( select
MIN(mt.Reference_Date )
FROM BAS_report_date tr
INNER JOIN inv_bas_445_Month_Alignment mt ON tr.sunday_month = DateSerial(mt.'445_Year',mt.'445_Month,1')
)
AND b.period_start <= DateAdd("ww", 26,e.sunday_date)
) t1
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT
MATERIAL_NUMBER,
CINT(LOCATION_NUMBER) AS Int_Location_ID,
HCI_DS_KEYFIGURE_DATE,
HCI_DS_KEYFIGURE_QUANTITY,
PLANNED_QUANTITY,
VALUATED_UNRESTRICTED_USE_STOCK
FROM inv_vw_ibp_transit_inventorry_dev
) ti
You can replace the DateSerial() function
(which is from VBA / MS Access / Excel from the Microsoft universe)
with DATE_FROM_PARTS().
DATE_FROM_PARTS() also supports the non-obvious functionality of DateSerial():
DateSerial(2020, 1, 1 - 1) gets you New Year's Eve - the day before New Year's Day
DATE_FROM_PARTS(2020, 1 - 1, 1 - 1) is the month before the day before New Year's Day
DATE_FROM_PARTS(y, m + 1, 0) is End Of Month (EOM).
etc., etc.
Related
I am a newbie here.
I am using PostgreSQL to manipulate lots of data in my specific field of research. Unfortunately, I am encountering a problem that is not allowing me to continue my analysis. I tried to simplify my problem to clearly illustrate it.
Let's suppose I have a table called "Buyers" with those data:
table_buyers
The buyers can make ONLY ONE purchase in each store or none. There are three stores and there a table for each one. Just like below:
table_store1
table_store2
table_store3
To create the tables, I am using the following code:
CREATE TABLE public.buyer
(
ID integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
name text NOT NULL,
phone text NOT NULL
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
;
CREATE TABLE public.Store1
(
ID_buyer integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
total_order numeric NOT NULL,
total_itens integer NOT NULL
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
;
CREATE TABLE public.Store2
(
ID_buyer integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
total_order numeric NOT NULL,
total_itens integer NOT NULL
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
;
CREATE TABLE public.Store3
(
ID_buyer integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
total_order numeric NOT NULL,
total_itens integer NOT NULL
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
)
;
To add the information on the tables, I am using the following code:
INSERT INTO buyer (ID, name, phone) VALUES
(1, 'Alex', 88888888),
(2, 'Igor', 77777777),
(3, 'Mike', 66666666);
INSERT INTO Store1 (ID_buyer, total_order, total_itens) VALUES
(1, 87.45, 8),
(2, 14.00, 3),
(3, 12.40, 4);
INSERT INTO Store2 (ID_buyer, total_order, total_itens) VALUES
(1, 785.12, 7),
(2, 9874.21, 25);
INSERT INTO Store3 (ID_buyer, total_order, total_itens) VALUES
(2, 45.87, 1);
As all the tables are interconnected by buyer's ID, I wish I could have a query that generates an output just like this:
desired output table.
Please, note that if the buyer did not buy anything in a store, I must print '0'.
I know this is an easy task, but unfortunately, I have been failing on accomplish it.
Using the 'AND' logical operator, I tried the following code to accomplish this task:
SELECT
buyer.id,
buyer.name,
store1.total_order,
store2.total_order,
store3.total_order
FROM
public.buyer,
public.store1,
public.store2,
public.store3
WHERE
buyer.id = store1.id_buyer AND
buyer.id = store2.id_buyer AND
buyer.id = store3.id_buyer;
But, obviously, it just returned 'Igor' as this was the only buyer that have bought items on all three stores (print screen).
Then, I tried the 'OR' logical operator, just like the following code:
SELECT
buyer.id,
buyer.name,
store1.total_order,
store2.total_order,
store3.total_order
FROM
public.buyer,
public.store1,
public.store2,
public.store3
WHERE
buyer.id = store1.id_buyer OR
buyer.id = store2.id_buyer OR
buyer.id = store3.id_buyer;
But then, it returns 12 lines with wrong values (print screen).
Clearly, my mistake is about not considering that 'Buyers' don't have to on all three stores on my code. I just can't correct it on my own, can you please help me?
I appreciate a lot for an answer that can light up my way. Thanks a lot!
Tips about how I can search for this issue are very welcome as well!
Ok. I doubt that this is the final answer for you, but its a start
SELECT
buyer.id,
buyer.name,
COALESCE( gb_store1.total_orders, 0 ) as store1_total,
COALESCE( gb_store2.total_orders, 0 ) as store2_total,
COALESCE( gb_store3.total_orders, 0 ) as store3_total
FROM
public.buyer,
LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT ID_buyer,
SUM( total_orders ) as total_orders,
SUM( total_itens ) as total_itens
FROM public.store1
GROUP BY ID_buyer ) gb_store1 ON gb_store1.id_buyer = buyer.id ,
LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT ID_buyer,
SUM( total_orders ) as total_orders,
SUM( total_itens ) as total_itens
FROM public.store2
GROUP BY ID_buyer ) gb_store2 ON gb_store2.id_buyer = buyer.id ,
LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT ID_buyer,
SUM( total_orders ) as total_orders,
SUM( total_itens ) as total_itens
FROM public.store3
GROUP BY ID_buyer ) gb_store3 ON gb_store3.id_buyer = buyer.id ;
So, this query has a couple elements should focus on. The subselects/groupby allow you to total within your subtables by ID_buyer. The LEFT OUTER JOIN make its so your query can still return a result, even if a subselect finds no matching record. Finally, the COALESCE allows you to return 0 when one of your totals is NULL (because the subselect found no match).
Hope this helps.
I came across some legacy hql. This query is taking around 150 ms . As you can see the code is quite complex and almost unreadable not to mention the performance issue.
select distinct pub.id, ret.sector.id, ret.poiSector.id, ret.id, man.id, 0
from Publisher pub
left join pub.retailer ret
left join pub.manufacturer man
where (
pub.id in (
select publisher_id from Store AS s
where s.lat >= 52.297382 and s.lat <= 52.746616 and s.lng >= 13.047624 and s.lng <= 13.785276
group by 1
having min( sqrt( pow(111.3*(s.lat - 52.522), 2) + pow(67.7*(s.lng - 13.416), 2) ) ) is null or min( sqrt( pow(111.3*(s.lat - 52.522), 2) + pow(67.7*(s.lng - 13.416), 2) ) ) < 25
)
or
(man is not null)
)
and (ret is null or ret.hidden is false)
group by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
I am planning to break up the code segments as well as trying to modify this to increase performance . My question is how can I break this in an efficient way ? will this help in some way ? I dont have full visibility of the system so this are the information I can give you for now .
SELECT
OUT.EMP_ID,
OUT.DT_TM "DateTimeOut",
IN.DT_TM "DateTimeIn",
cast(timestampdiff( 4, char(timestamp(IN.DT_TM) - timestamp(OUT.DT_TM))) as decimal(30,1))/60 "Duration Out"
FROM (
select
e1.EMP_ID,
e1.DT_TM
from
hr.timeout e1
WHERE
month(e1.DT_TM)=09
and year(e1.DT_TM)=2016
AND e1.CD='OUT'
) OUT
LEFT JOIN (
select
e2.EMP_ID,
e2.DT_TM
from
hr.timeout e2
WHERE
month(e2.dt_tm)=09
and year(e2.dt_tm)=2016
AND e2.CD='IN'
) IN
on out.EMP_ID=in.EMP_ID
Trying to get the closest DateTimeIn match with the DateTimeOut.
Currently it repeats the same DateTimeOut and DateTimeIn multiple times.
I think its normal because your table dont have constraint unique on emp_id, dt_tm and cd. But if you want unique result try this :
With Period as (
select e1.EMP_ID, e1.DT_TM from hr.timeout e1
WHERE month(e1.DT_TM)=09 and year(e1.DT_TM)=2016
)
Select distinct OUT.EMP_ID, IN.DT_TM as DateTimeIn, OUT.DT_TM as DateTimeOut,
TIMESTAMPDIFF(2 , CAST(timestamp(IN.DT_TM) - timestamp(ifnull(OUT.DT_TM, current date)) AS CHAR(22)) ) as DurationSecond
from Period in left outer join Period out
on out.EMP_ID=in.EMP_ID and out.CD='OUT' and in.CD='IN'
order by 1, 2, 3
Like you can see, i use timestampdiff with '2' like first parameter for second (you divided by 60), i use ifnull because you do a left outer join (out.DT_TM can be null) and i do a distinct for unique result
Could anyone explain what the exclude_nodata_value argument to ST_DumpValues does?
For example, given the following:
WITH
-- Create a raster 4x4 raster, with each value set to 8 and NODATA set to -99.
tbl_1 AS (
SELECT
ST_AddBand(
ST_MakeEmptyRaster(4, 4, 0, 0, 1, -1, 0, 0, 4326),
1, '32BF', 8, -99
) AS rast
),
-- Set the values in rows 1 and 2 to -99.
tbl_2 AS (
SELECT
ST_SetValues(
rast, 1, 1, 1, 4, 2, -99, FALSE
) AS rast FROM tbl_1)
Why does the following select statement return NULLs in the first two rows:
SELECT ST_DumpValues(rast, 1, TRUE) AS cell_values FROM tbl_2;
Like this:
{{NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL},{NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL},{8,8,8,8},{8,8,8,8}}
But the following select statement return -99s?
SELECT ST_DumpValues(rast, 1, FALSE) AS cell_values FROM tbl_2;
Like this:
{{-99,-99,-99,-99},{-99,-99,-99,-99},{8,8,8,8},{8,8,8,8}}
Clearly, with both statements the first two rows really contain -99s. However, in the first case (exclude_nodata_value=TRUE) these values have been masked (but not replaced) by NULLS.
Thanks for any help. The subtle differences between NULL and NODATA within PostGIS have been driving me crazy for several days.
I wish to write a Query for SAP B1 (t-sql) that will list all Income and Expenses Items by total and month by month.
I have successfully written a Query using PIVOT, but I do not want the column headings to be hardcoded like: Jan-11, Feb-11, Mar-11 ... Dec-11.
Rather I want the column headings to be parametrically generated, so that if I input:
--------------------------------------
Query - Selection Criteria
--------------------------------------
Posting Date greater or equal 01.09.10
Posting Date smaller or equal 31.08.11
[OK] [Cancel]
the Query will generate the following columns:
Sep-10, Oct-10, Nov-10, ..... Aug-11
I guess DYNAMIC PIVOT can do the trick.
So, I modified one SQL obtained from another forum to suit my purpose, but it does not work. The error message I get is Incorrect Syntax near 20100901.
Could anybody help me locate my error?
Note: In SAP B1, '[%1]' is an input variable
Here's my query:
/*Section 1*/
DECLARE #listCol VARCHAR(2000)
DECLARE #query VARCHAR(4000)
-------------------------------------
/*Section 2*/
SELECT #listCol =
STUFF(
( SELECT DISTINCT '],[' + CONVERT(VARCHAR, MONTH(T0.RefDate), 102)
FROM JDT1
FOR XML PATH(''))
, 1, 2, '') + ']'
------------------------------------
/*Section 3*/
SET #query = '
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT
T0.Account,
T1.GroupMask,
T1.AcctName,
MONTH(T0.RefDate) as [Month],
(T0.Debit - T0.Credit) as [Amount]
FROM dbo.JDT1 T0
JOIN dbo.OACT T1 ON T0.Account = T1.AcctCode
WHERE
T1.GroupMask IN (4,5,6,7) AND
T0.[Refdate] >= '[%1]' AND
T0.[Refdate] <= '[%2]'
) S
PIVOT
(
Sum(Amount)
FOR [Month] IN ('+#listCol+')
) AS pvt
'
--------------------------------------------
/*Section 4*/
EXECUTE (#query)
I don't know SAP, but a couple of things spring to mind:
It looks like you want #listCol to contain a collection of numbers within square brackets, for example [07],[08],[09].... However, your code appears not to put a [ at the start of this string.
Try replacing the lines
T0.[Refdate] >= '[%1]' AND
T0.[Refdate] <= '[%2]'
with
T0.[Refdate] >= ''[%1]'' AND
T0.[Refdate] <= ''[%2]''
(I also added a space before the AND in the first of these two lines while I was editing your question.)