I usually use a segue to pass some data between 2 ViewControllers. But now I have a 2D array (About 40Meg of data and in the future it may go to over 100Meg. It's a .json file). I read a few articles that tell all the different ways. But most ways (if not all) will make a copy of that data, and that takes time (in the launch screen it's acceptable but not when switching of ViewControllers). What method would you recommend? Putting my huge array as a global works fine, but it is frowned by many.
class ArrayWapper {
var array: [[Int]] = [[]] // Set your array .
}
And send an instance from that class to the second UIViewController
as, #vacawama mentioned since its class it will pass the reference rather than a value copy of that array.
So in the second UIViewController you would have a variable of ArrayWapper class type, instead of simply [[Int]] array.
Related
I'm new to and starting to look at swift.
is it possible to store and retrieve data in swift without having to use NSObject?
here I what I'm trying to achieve. I have a set of 4 ViewControllers.
On the first ViewController I want to record a name.
In my last ViewController I want to read that name.
I tried to store it in a simple model as shown:
class infoModel
{
var m_name : String
init(_name: String) {
self.m_name = _name
}
func getName() -> String {
return m_name
}
}
when I call getName from my fourth View its null?
I know its possible to pass data in segue or use NSUserDefaults, but I'm curious if its possible for the model object to retain the value?
Thank you in advance for your time
I think this is general programming rule for objected oriented languages.
As long as you have reference to the same object, you will have the object with the same data. And its up to you how you pass this data between other objects; using delegates or just assigning some variable, etc.
Also there are ways how to save data which allows you to save data somewhere else and then retrieve them. To saving small amount of data you can use in Swift UserDefaults, but for bigger amount of data you should work with some database (e.g. Realm, CoreData).
trying a few things out in Swift. I’m trying to get some things that seem muddled to me straightened out - mostly to do with how I deal with variables and referencing them in a project.
What I am trying to do is keep a variable (based on a struct) defined in ViewController accessed and updated from various other functions within an application.
So, a brief outline of the code I have is here. I actually wrote a smaller app to test my ideas out before applying them to something more complex.
I started in XCode with a Swift document based application for Mac OSX.
In ViewController.swift I have:
import Cocoa
class ViewController: NSViewController {
var myText = "Hello, some text"
#IBOutlet weak var textView1: NSTextField!
#IBAction func Button1(_ sender: Any) {
myText = "This is button 1 clicked"
myText = setText( thisText: &myText )
textView1.stringValue = myText
}
#IBAction func Button2(_ sender: Any) {
print("Button 2")
myText = "This is button 2 clicked"
textView1.stringValue = myText
}
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
textView1.stringValue = myText
}
override func viewDidAppear() {
let document = self.view.window?.windowController?.document as! Document
}
override var representedObject: Any? {
didSet {
// Update the view, if already loaded.
}
}
}
In SetText.swift, I have this:
import Foundation
func setText( thisText: inout String) -> String {
thisText = "Function"
return thisText
}
I liked the idea of sending variables to the Set Text function and then returning it, but thinking about it more makes me think that actually this could end up like a proverbial bowl of spaghetti with functions calling functions and who know what else. So I was thinking that something like this would probably make more sense:
import Foundation
func setText( thisText: inout String) {
let vc = ViewController()
// Read the variable from View Controller
var myTextHere = vc.myText
myTextHere = myTextHere + " More text"
// Set the variable in ViewController here
vc.myText = myTextHere
}
From my reading around on this subject, if I call ViewController(), it will create anew instance of the view (is that right, or am I misreading?). That’s already happened, so what I need is to reference the ViewController that called the function setText, or rather that owns that particular instance of code. As I’m thinking about a document based application, I’d obviously want to keep all instances of myText with each document’s ViewController.
My aim is to create something a bit more complex, using a variable based on a Struct to keep everything together. So:
myCard.image // holds a bitmap image
myCard.size // holds the size of the image
And so on. being able to access it in the form of ViewController().myCard to both read and write to is what I am thinking I need to do.
What I don’t want to do is use global variables.
Thanks.
I'm having a hard time seeing much correlation between the title of your question and the body of your question. In fact, I'm not even entirely sure that there's a question being asked. That said, I'll try to address the questions you appear to be asking (re-written how I think they're intended):
When you initialize a new view controller, does it create a new view?
Yes. There is a view property for every view controller, and it's not a shared component or a singleton or anything else like that. There is one main view for every view controller. It's almost certainly composed of dozens of other subviews, but there is one view that is the view for every view controller.
Is there a way to get metadata about the state of a view controller from outside, preferably in the form of a struct?
Absolutely. First, you'd need to define that Card struct. I'd recommend doing it in the same file as the view controller itself. You can define it outside of the view controller, or if you want stricter coupling and namespacing, you can do it inside the view controller. Just be aware that doing that latter would mean that the type name, when referenced outside the view controller, would be ViewController.Card rather than just Card.
Then you'd want to create either a computed property (var card: Card) or a method (func card() -> Card) on your view controller which builds and returns one of those based on the state. It sounds like you're already leaning toward the property approach.
Note: I would absolutely advise against having one that is a normal get/set property because then you'd have to constantly update it and modify it. The best thing to do is have a computed property which builds it on the fly. So when the property is called, it reaches into all your components to get the info you want (like image sizes, strings, etc) and then packages up and hands off the Card metadata struct. Doing it on-demand like this eliminates unnecessary complexity and consolidates the metadata logic into one place.
Some dangerous things in your code example:
I can't think of a good reason to implement viewDidAppear() but not call super.viewDidAppear(). Unless you have an enormously compelling reason to leave that out (I honestly can't think of a single one), do not do so.
I don't see any good reason for your first implementation of your setText(thisText:) method. The way you use it in your Button1(_ sender: Any) IBAction functionally does absolutely nothing. That method in general is screwy for several reasons: it's got an upper-case method name, sets the textView text by trying to assign to stringValue for some super strange reason, and does in three lines what could be done in one:
textView1.text = "This is button 1 clicked"
The second implementation of setText(thisText:) makes even less sense than the previous. The two biggest problems being 1) that you don't even use the thisText argument passed in, and 2) your method, which is called 'set text' is creating a whole new view controller every single time it gets called? That's a huge violation of "doing what it says on the tin." Methods should have a single responsibility and shouldn't do anything beyond that responsibility. I'd never in a million years look at a method called setText and think "I'll bet this initializes a view controller." Never.
I see this question has already been downvoted a bit (not by me), and I'd like to take a moment to coach you in using Stack Overflow: Ask clear, concise, specific questions about clear, concise, specific topics. As I said at the top of my answer, there doesn't appear to be a question anywhere in your post. I had to kind of make some up that I inferred from what you wrote.
Remember: coding isn't just wiggling your fingers while you think about an app. If you're doing the hard work of good engineering, you'll likely spend a ratio of about 10:1 (or more!) of staring at your screen to actually typing any code. Every time you write a line of code, you should be asking yourself, "Why am I writing this line of code? Is this necessary? Am I reinventing the wheel?)
Good luck!
Say I have a class which has an Array of object Photo:
class PhotoManager {
fileprivate var _photos: [Photo] = []
var photos: [Photo] {
return _photos
}
}
I read one article which says the following:
By default in Swift class instances are passed by reference and
structs passed by value. Swift’s built-in data types like Array and
Dictionary, are implemented as structs.
Meaning that the above getter returns a copy of [Photo] array.
Then, that same article tries to make the getter thread-safe by refactoring the code to:
fileprivate let concurrentPhotoQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "com.raywenderlich.GooglyPuff.photoQueue",
attributes: .concurrent)
fileprivate var _photos: [Photo] = []
var photos: [Photo] {
var photosCopy: [Photo]!
concurrentPhotoQueue.sync {
photosCopy = self._photos
}
return photosCopy
}
The above code explictly make a copy of self._photos in getter.
My questions are:
If by default swift already return an copy (pass by value) like the article said in the first place, why the article copy again to photosCopy to make it thread-safe? I feel myself do not fully understand these two parts mentioned in that article.
Does Swift3 really pass by value by default for Array instance like the article says?
Could someone please clarify it for me? Thanks!
I'll address your questions in reverse:
Does Swift3 really pass by value by default for Array instance like the article says?
Simple Answer: Yes
But I'm guessing that is not what your concern is when asking "Does Swift3 really pass by value". Swift behaves as if the array is copied in its entirety but behind the scenes it optimises the operation and the whole array is not copied until, and if, it needs to be. Swift uses an optimisation known as copy-on-write (COW).
However for the Swift programmer how the copy is done is not so important as the semantics of the operation - which is that after an assignment/copy the two arrays are independent and mutating one does not effect the other.
If by default swift already return an copy (pass by value) like the article said in the first place, why the article copy again to photosCopy to make it thread-safe? I feel myself do not fully understand these two parts mentioned in that article.
What this code is doing is insuring that the copy is done in a thread-safe way.
An array is not a trivial value, it is implemented as multi-field struct and some of those fields reference other structs and/or objects - this is needed to support an arrays ability to grow in size, etc.
In a multi-threaded system one thread could try to copy the array while another thread is trying to change the array. If these are allowed to happen at the same time then things easily can go wrong, e.g. the array could change while the copy is in progress, resulting in an invalid copy - part old value, part new value.
Swift per se is not thread safe; and in particular it will not prevent an array from being changed while a copy is being performed. The code you have addresses this by using a GCD queue so that during any alteration to the array by one thread all other writes or reads to the array in any other thread are blocked until the alteration is complete.
You might also be concerned that their are multiple copies going on here, self._photos to photoCopy, then photoCopy to the return value. While semantically this is what happens in practice there will probably only be one complex copy (and that will be thread safe) as the Swift system will optimise.
HTH
1) In code example what you provided will be returned copy of _photos.
As wrote in article:
The getter for this property is termed a read method as it’s reading
the mutable array. The caller gets a copy of the array and is protected
against mutating the original array inappropriately.
that's mean what you can access to _photos from outside of class, but you can't change them from there. Values of photos could be changed only inside class what make this array protected from it accidental changing.
2)Yes, Array is a value-type struct and it will be passed by value. You can easily check it in Playground
let arrayA = [1, 2, 3]
var arrayB = arrayA
arrayB[1] = 4 //change second value of arrayB
print(arrayA) //but arrayA didn't change
UPD #1
In article they have method func addPhoto(_ photo: Photo) what add new photo to _photos array what makes access to this property not thread-safe. That's mean what value of _photos could be changed on few thread in same time what will lead to issues.
They fixed it by writing photos on concurrentQueue with .barrier what make it thread-safely, _photos array will changed once per time
func addPhoto(_ photo: Photo) {
concurrentPhotoQueue.async(flags: .barrier) { // 1
self._photos.append(photo) // 2
DispatchQueue.main.async { // 3
self.postContentAddedNotification()
}
}
}
Now for ensure thread safety you need to read of _photos array on same queue. That's only reason why they refactored read method
I am developing an iPhone application in it I am having around 15 arrays and 15 more array which has value in it corresponding to the value in array e.g. NSArray *XYZ = {a,b,c,d} and array NSArray *ABC = {w,x,y,z} such that value 'a' corresponds to 'x' .Can comebody tell me what is the best way to follow MVC in this scenario like I have to make function (returning array) for each array in another class or should I make class for every array.
I would write all your business logic as classes with those arrays in a MODEL file, access those classes from the CONTROLLER file. And then once you have all your data, access from the CONTROLLER the VIEW file to output. Inside the MODEL write functions for those arrays so that you can reuse them, if they vary they may need own functions. This is a helpful link: http://php-html.net/tutorials/model-view-controller-in-php/ and those videos give you a taste of the logic behind MVC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFQk8WGK1-Q&feature=bf_prev&list=UU9-GXsmQQ-N4h8ZsKI8CSkw
I have one array.
I want that array to retain its value between function calls of from single class function.
I have function that is called every time page is loaded.
This function displays all the data stored in array right from application launches.
Thanks in advance.
You can store your array in appDelegate class. Or I think it will be better to make some class to store shared data and make an instance of this class in your appDelegate.