I have two actions:
/**
* #Rest\Get("/items/{itemId}")
*/
public function getAction(UuidInterface $id): View
And
/**
* #Rest\Get("/items/available")
*/
public function getAvailableAction() : View
The thing is that when I'm trying to call getAvailableAction by a link items/available, the getAction is being called. I guess it interprets the word available as an {itemId} somewhy.
How should I solve it?
You guessed right. Just define a proper requirement:
/**
* #Rest\Get("/items/{itemId}", requirements={"itemId" = "\d+"})
*/
If your itemId is an UUID, change the number regex from \d+ to [a-fA-F0-9]{8}-[a-fA-F0-9]{4}-[a-fA-F0-9]{4}-[a-fA-F0-9]{4}-[a-fA-F0-9]{12} or a simplified [a-fA-F0-9\-]{36}.
Don't forget to clear the cache.
Related
I try to extend the tx_news extension with the field imageright.
For that I found this tutorial: https://docs.typo3.org/typo3cms/extensions/news/2.2.1/Main/Tutorial/ExtendingNews/Index.html
The first step is to use extension_builder to add the field. As I already have a extension in where I want to implement the extension I do not want to use the extension_builder (also I tried it with a new extension and extend the news-model did not work - I have no clue how to do it right). However this are the steps I did:
In my extension my_template I added the folders and file: Classes/Domain/Model/News.php:
class MyTemplate_Domain_Model_News extends Tx_News_Domain_Model_News {
/**
* #var bool
*/
protected $imageright;
/**
* Returns the imageright
*
* #return bool $imageright
*/
public function getImageright() {
return $this->imageright;
}
/**
* Sets the sort
*
* #param bool $imageright
* #return void
*/
public function setImageright($imageright)
{
$this->imageright = $imageright;
}
}
?>
/Ressources/Private/extend-news.txt:
Domain/Model/News
Created the field imageright as tinyint in the table tx_news_domain_model_news (and added it to the SQL file)
I knew I have to create a TCA file in /Configuration/TCA/, but I have no clue how this should look like or what name it needs to have. I think this is the last step I need to make this working.
Also note the extension my_template was just a template, so before my changes there where no Classes and no TCA files.
Solution is to use this tutorial: http://www.lukasjakob.com/extend-a-typo3-extbase-model-with-custom-field/
*How to Document following function in JSDoc JS-Toolkit *
I want to document try and help method in this main function
but i did not figure it out how to do that.
/** Sample doc
* #class
* #constructor
* #name Sample
*/
var main=function(){
this.value="";
/** help function
* #param {String} Name
*/
this.help=function(name){
console.log('help me'+name);
}
/** help function
* #param {String} Name
*/
this.try=function(name){
console.log('try me'+name);
}
}
I just struggled with this for several hours. I tried:
#member
#augments
#method
#this
From the examples and tutorials I found, member functions and variables should appear in the output simply by having /** description/* comments above them, but I found that was not the case. Like you, I'm using standard JavaScript constructors, where this should be able to be inferred automatically due to the #constructor being in place. Maybe there's some wrinkle I'm not seeing.
In the end, I found two tags that worked for me, #name and#memberof. They both allow you to specify the object that the property is a member of. Using #name in this way is undocumented (at least, I didn't see it anywhere), but very straightforward. You'll also need to use #function.
Here's an example with the #name tag:
/** help function
* #name Sample.try
* #function
* #param {String} Name
*/
this.try=function(name){
console.log('try me'+name);
};
And here's an example with the #memberof tag:
/** help function
* #memberof Sample
* #function
* #param {String} Name
*/
this.try=function(name){
console.log('try me'+name);
};
As you can see the output is almost the same. The only difference that I see is that #memberof includes this. in the method name. For that reason I've settled on using #name.
The remaining issue is that the functions are per-instance, not <static>.
Hope this helps!
I have a Sphinx search engine running on MySQL protocol and I use Phalcon\Db\Adapter\Pdo\Mysql to connect to it. Sphinx tables are implemented as models.
When I try to select (using SpinxQL) I, obviously, get an error when database adapter attempts to extract table metadata running queries against tables which are not supported and not present respectively in SpinxQL. There is a workaround in the documentation showing how to manually assign metadata... But being to lazy by nature I want to try to automate metadata generation.
I assume that metadata is produced by the database adapter, probably as a result of calling getColumnsList() on the instance following getColumnDefinition() or something else (???). Is this my assumption correct? I want is to extend Phalcon\Db\Adapter\Pdo\Mysql and override those methods to be compatible with Sphinx.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions!
Ok, you need to override at least two methods to make this work, the following class would work:
<?php
class SphinxQlAdapter extends Phalcon\Db\Adapter\Pdo\Mysql implements Phalcon\Db\AdapterInterface
{
/**
* This method checks if a table exists
*
* #param string $table
* #param string $schema
* #return boolean
*/
public function tableExists($table, $schema=null)
{
}
/**
* This method describe the table's columns returning an array of
* Phalcon\Db\Column
*
* #param string $table
* #param string $schema
* #return Phalcon\Db\ColumnInterface[]
*/
public function describeColumns($table, $schema=null)
{
}
}
Then in your connection, you use the new adapter:
$di->set('db', function(){
return new SphinxQlAdapter(
//...
);
});
I use Acceleo in order to generate code with a model I have made. I managed to protect my methods in order to protect them usinig "#generated NOT" in case I need to regenerate my code with Acceleo. The problem is that adding #generated NOT protect all the method content, that is to say the body, the signature and JavaDocs.
The thing is that I only need to keep the method body, or at least the method body and its signature, but I need the doc to be updated. How can I do this ?
Just for information here is an example of a potential generated class :
/*
* #generated
*/
public class ActeurRefEntrepriseServicesImpl implements ActeurRefEntrepriseServices {
#Autowired
HelloWorldService helloWorldService;
/**
* Service which say hello
*
* #param name
* user name
* #return print Hello username
*
* #generated NOT
*/
#Override
public void sayHello(final String name) {
helloWorldService.print(name);
}
}
Baptiste,
The #generated tags use the standard EMF protection rules : "#generated" means that the body of the block for which it is set will be generated, anything else means no re-generation. If you set something as "#generated" in any of your metamodels' generated code, you will see that there, too, the javadoc is preserved whatever the edits you do.
In short, you cannot tell EMF to re-generate anything other than the code itself.
If you need to have the body protected but not the javadoc, you have to shift from the "#generated" protection to Acceleo's [protected] blocks. i.e, change your template from :
[template generatedMethod(methodName : String)]
/**
* Some doc.
* #param param1
* param documentation.
* #generated
*/
[generateSignature(methodName)/] {
[generateBody()/]
}
[/template]
to something using a protected block :
[template generatedMethod(methodName : String)]
/**
* Some doc.
* #param param1
* param documentation.
*/
[protected (methodName)]
[generateSignature(methodName)/] {
[generateBody()/]
}
[/protected]
[/template]
With this paradigm, anything that is outside of the protected area will be regenerated, everything else will remain untouched by a regeneration.
See also the full documentation available from the Acceleo website.
If you absolutely need to use the "#generated" protection method for your model, you will need to tamper with the JMerger API from EMF and alter the launcher Acceleo generated for you in order to use your own merging strategy (see the getGenerationStrategy method from that launcher). Note that this is by no means an easy task.
Can anybody tell me whether its posible to override doctrine2 persistentobject magic getters\setters? i'd like to do the below:-
public function setDob($dob)
{
$this->dob= new \Date($date);
}
however my entity is defined as:-
use Doctrine\Common\Persistence\PersistentObject;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* User
*
* #ORM\Table(name="user")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Ajfit\Repository\User")
* #ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
*/
class User extends \Doctrine\Common\Persistence\PersistentObject
{
/**
* #var date $dob
*
* #ORM\Column(name="dob", type="date")
*/
protected $dob;
}
the public function setDob does not get called when I create the entity using:-
public function getNewRecord() {
return $this->metadata->newInstance();
}
I get the below error:-
Notice:- array to string conversion ...Doctrine\DBAL\Statement.php on line 98
Any help would be much apprieciated.
Thanks
Andrew
__call of PersistentObject#__call will not be called if you defined the setDob method.
What you're doing there is creating a new instance via metadata. What you are doing there is probably assuming that __construct or any setter/getter should be called by the ORM. Doctrine avoids to call any methods on your object when generating it via metadata/hydration (check ClassMetadataInfo#newInstance to see how it is done) as it does only know it's fields.
This allows you to be completely independent from Doctrine's logic.
About the notice, that is a completely different issue coming from Doctrine\DBAL\Statement, which suggests me that you have probably some wrong parameter binding in a query. That should be handled separately.