I am using EF6 to read and write rules for some validation to an SQLite DB. Code First approach. I successfully wrote the rules out to DB. As I tried to read them now, the complex rules which contain child rules seem to have empty lists of child rules, despite database mirroring that correctly. What is wrong there?
The class hierarchy is:
abstract Rule - abstract class with "Validate" method.
abstract ComplexRule: Rule - a rule which can have child rules
SuperRule, OrRule, AndRule : ComplexRule implementations
BasicRule: Rule - direct implmentation which does some pattern matching.
The Table as written out in DB is so:
RuleId,Condition,Value,Mode,Discriminator,ComplexRule_RuleId
1,,,,SuperRule,
2,*USA*,*PATT1*,1,BasicRule,1
3,*CHN*,*PATT2*,1,BasicRule,1
Reading code looks like this:
using (var db = new RuleModel())
{
var q = db.Rules.OfType<SuperRule>).FirstOrDefault();
}
it results in a SuperRule which Children are empty. The db.Rules contains all 3 rules, but there's no association between BasicRule and SuperRule.
The RuleModel (DbContext) looks like this:
public class RuleModel : DbContext
{
public RuleModel() : base("name=RuleModel")
{
}
public virtual DbSet<Rule> Rules { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
var sqliteConnectionInitializer = new SqliteCreateDatabaseIfNotExists<RuleModel>(modelBuilder);
Database.SetInitializer(sqliteConnectionInitializer);
}
}
The Rules look like this:
public abstract class Rule
{
[Key]
public int RuleId { get; set; }
public abstract RuleResult Match(Mapping m);
}
public abstract class ComplexRule: Rule
{
public IList<Rule> ChildRules { set; get; }
public ComplexRule()
{
ChildRules = new List<Rule>();
}
}
public class OrRule : ComplexRule
{
public override RuleResult Match(Mapping m)
{
// Some logics
}
public OrRule() : base() { }
}
public class SuperRule: OrRule
{
public override RuleResult Match(Mapping m)
{
//some logics
}
public SuperRule() : base()
{
}
}
public class BasicRule : Rule
{
public string Condition { set; get; }
public string Value { set; get; }
public RuleMode Mode { set; get; }
public BasicRule(string condition, string value, RuleMode mode = RuleMode.MODE_ANYWHERE)
{
Condition = condition;
Value = value;
Mode = mode;
}
public BasicRule() { }
public override RuleResult Match(Mapping m)
{
// logics
}
}
Related
I have a CatalogDbContext class.
I want to use Bogus library to seed fake data into the database that my unit tests will use.
The example provided in bogus's github repo makes use of the HasData method of the CatalogDbContext class to seed data into the tables.
However, I will not want this HasData method to be executed from the API - meaning, the HasData method should only be run if the DBContext is created from the Unit Tests.
Kindly advise how to achieve this?.
using Bogus;
using Catalog.Api.Database.Entities;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
namespace Catalog.Api.Database
{
public class CatalogDbContext : DbContext
{
public CatalogDbContext(DbContextOptions<CatalogDbContext> options) : base(options)
{
}
public DbSet<CatalogItem> CatalogItems { get; set; }
public DbSet<CatalogBrand> CatalogBrands { get; set; }
public DbSet<CatalogType> CatalogTypes { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
builder.ApplyConfiguration(new CatalogBrandEntityTypeConfiguration());
builder.ApplyConfiguration(new CatalogTypeEntityTypeConfiguration());
builder.ApplyConfiguration(new CatalogItemEntityTypeConfiguration());
FakeData.Init(10);
builder.Entity<CatalogItem>().HasData(FakeData.CatalogItems);
}
}
internal class FakeData
{
public static List<CatalogItem> CatalogItems = new List<CatalogItem>();
public static void Init(int count)
{
var id = 1;
var catalogItemFaker = new Faker<CatalogItem>()
.RuleFor(ci => ci.Id, _ => id++)
.RuleFor(ci => ci.Name, f => f.Commerce.ProductName());
}
}
}
I want to implement something similar to lazy loading, but don't understand how to implement that. I want to force entity framework core include navigation property for all queries for type which implements my interface
public interface IMustHaveOrganisation
{
Guid OrganisationId { get; set; }
Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class MyEntity : IMustHaveOrganisation {
public Guid OrganisationId { get; set; }
public virtual Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
Without lazy loading I need to add .Include(x=>x.Organisation) to each query literally , and I can't use implementation of lazy loading provided by Microsoft. I need kind of custom implementation of that with loading just one property.
Or even force DbContext somehow to Include that property, it also fine for me.
How can I achieve that?
You can make this work by rewriting the expression tree, before it gets translated by EF Core.
To make this work in a way, where you don't have to specify anything additional in the query, you can hook into the very beginning of the query pipeline and inject the Include() call as needed.
This can be done, by specifying a custom IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory implementation.
The following fully working console project demonstrates this approach:
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
namespace IssueConsoleTemplate
{
public class Organisation
{
public int OrganisationId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public interface IMustHaveOrganisation
{
int OrganisationId { get; set; }
Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class MyEntity : IMustHaveOrganisation
{
public int MyEntityId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int OrganisationId { get; set; }
public virtual Organisation Organisation { get; set; }
}
public class CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory : IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory
{
private readonly QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies _dependencies;
private readonly RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies _relationalDependencies;
public CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory(
QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies dependencies,
RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies relationalDependencies)
{
_dependencies = dependencies;
_relationalDependencies = relationalDependencies;
}
public virtual QueryTranslationPreprocessor Create(QueryCompilationContext queryCompilationContext)
=> new CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor(_dependencies, _relationalDependencies, queryCompilationContext);
}
public class CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor : RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessor
{
public CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessor(
QueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies dependencies,
RelationalQueryTranslationPreprocessorDependencies relationalDependencies,
QueryCompilationContext queryCompilationContext)
: base(dependencies, relationalDependencies, queryCompilationContext)
{
}
public override Expression Process(Expression query)
{
query = new DependenciesIncludingExpressionVisitor().Visit(query);
return base.Process(query);
}
}
public class DependenciesIncludingExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
protected override Expression VisitConstant(ConstantExpression node)
{
// Call Include("Organisation"), if SomeEntity in a
// DbSet<SomeEntity> implements IMustHaveOrganisation.
if (node.Type.IsGenericType &&
node.Type.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Query.Internal.EntityQueryable<>) &&
node.Type.GenericTypeArguments.Length == 1 &&
typeof(IMustHaveOrganisation).IsAssignableFrom(node.Type.GenericTypeArguments[0]))
{
return Expression.Call(
typeof(EntityFrameworkQueryableExtensions),
nameof(EntityFrameworkQueryableExtensions.Include),
new[] {node.Type.GenericTypeArguments[0]},
base.VisitConstant(node),
Expression.Constant(nameof(IMustHaveOrganisation.Organisation)));
}
return base.VisitConstant(node);
}
}
public class Context : DbContext
{
public DbSet<MyEntity> MyEntities { get; set; }
public DbSet<Organisation> Organisations { get; set; }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
// Register the custom IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory implementation.
// Since this is a console program, we need to create our own
// ServiceCollection for this.
// In an ASP.NET Core application, the AddSingleton call can just be added to
// the general service configuration method.
var serviceProvider = new ServiceCollection()
.AddEntityFrameworkSqlServer()
.AddSingleton<IQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory, CustomQueryTranslationPreprocessorFactory>()
.AddScoped(
s => LoggerFactory.Create(
b => b
.AddConsole()
.AddFilter(level => level >= LogLevel.Information)))
.BuildServiceProvider();
optionsBuilder
.UseInternalServiceProvider(serviceProvider) // <-- use our ServiceProvider
.UseSqlServer(#"Data Source=.\MSSQL14;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=62849896")
.EnableSensitiveDataLogging()
.EnableDetailedErrors();
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<MyEntity>(
entity =>
{
entity.HasData(
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 1, Name = "First Entity", OrganisationId = 1 },
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 2, Name = "Second Entity", OrganisationId = 1 },
new MyEntity {MyEntityId = 3, Name = "Third Entity", OrganisationId = 2 });
});
modelBuilder.Entity<Organisation>(
entity =>
{
entity.HasData(
new Organisation {OrganisationId = 1, Name = "First Organisation"},
new Organisation {OrganisationId = 2, Name = "Second Organisation"});
});
}
}
internal static class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
using var context = new Context();
context.Database.EnsureDeleted();
context.Database.EnsureCreated();
var myEntitiesWithOrganisations = context.MyEntities
.OrderBy(i => i.MyEntityId)
.ToList();
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations.Count == 3);
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations[0].Name == "First Entity");
Debug.Assert(myEntitiesWithOrganisations[0].Organisation.Name == "First Organisation");
}
}
}
Even though no explicit Include() is being made in the query in Main(), the following SQL is being generated, that does join and retrieve the Organisation entities:
SELECT [m].[MyEntityId], [m].[Name], [m].[OrganisationId], [o].[OrganisationId], [o].[Name]
FROM [MyEntities] AS [m]
INNER JOIN [Organisations] AS [o] ON [m].[OrganisationId] = [o].[OrganisationId]
ORDER BY [m].[MyEntityId]
I m new in .net core 2.1
I m working with .net core 2.1 with code first approach
issue is when I create a new object dbcontext class then give error see below line
dbcontextstudent db=new dbcontextstudent(); //here give an red line
appsettings.json
},
"ConnectionStrings": {
"sqlserverconn": "Server=DEVISSHAHID; Database=studdbs; User id=xxxx;Password=xxxxx;"
},
Startup.cs
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
//connection string
services.AddDbContext<DbContext>(options => options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("sqlserverconn")));
student.cs
namespace WebApplication1.Models
{
public class student
{
[Key]
public int studid { get; set; }
public string studname { get; set; }
public string studsalary { get; set; }
public int studage { get; set; }
}
}
dbcontextstudent.cs
namespace WebApplication1.Models
{
public class dbcontextstudent : DbContext
{
public dbcontextstudent(DbContextOptions<dbcontextstudent> options) : base(options)
{
}
public DbSet<student> stud { get; set; }
}
}
HomeController.cs
I m not understood the above intellisense
I write the code as per intellisense but still give an error I know error is clear but not solved
which place doing I m wrong?
You will have to pass your DbContext type to the AddDbContext method in ConfigureServices method like this:
services.AddDbContext<dbcontextstudent>(options => options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("sqlserverconn")));
After that, you have registered the dbcontextstudent class in dependency injection.
You shouldn't create the instance of dbcontextstudent on your own like you did:
dbcontextstudent db=new dbcontextstudent();
Instead you can inject it though the constructor of your controller like this:
public HomeController : Controller
{
private readonly dbcontextstudent _db;
public HomeController(dbcontextstudent db)
{
_db = db;
}
... and then you can use the _db variable in your post action
}
When using Entity Framework 5 Code First, with Table Per Hierarchy.
This combined with a Repository and Unit of Work (tried several implementations).
I'm having the following error:
(34,10) : error 3032: Problem in mapping fragments starting at lines 19, 34:EntityTypes T, T are being mapped to the same rows in table T. Mapping conditions can be used to distinguish the rows that these types are mapped to.
I have resolved this issue using the following guide:
Entity Framework 4.3 - TPH mapping and migration error
This works when using a general look-up of all records, then no errors.
When using the DBSet<T>.Find(id), I receive the above error message.
When using DBSet<T>.Where(t => t.id == id) all works fine.
Please does anyone have the solution for this problem?
public class TDataContext : DbContext
{
// Models
public abstract class BaseTrackable
{
public DateTime DateModified { get; set; }
}
public abstract class ParentClass : BaseTrackable
{
public int ParentId { get; set; }
public string ParentString { get; set; }
}
public class Foo : ParentClass
{
public string FooString { get; set; }
}
public class Bar : ParentClass
{
public string BarString { get; set; }
}
// Configuration
public class ParentConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<ParentClass>
{
public ParentConfiguration()
{
ToTable("Parent");
}
}
public class FooConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Foo>
{
public FooConfiguration()
{
Map(m => m.Requires("FooIndicator").HasValue(true));
}
}
public class BarConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Bar>
{
public BarConfiguration()
{
Map(m => m.Requires("BarIndicator").HasValue(true));
}
}
public DbSet<ParentClass> Parent { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Configurations
.Add(new ParentConfiguration())
.Add(new FooConfiguration())
.Add(new BarConfiguration());
}
}
public class Controller
{
TDataContext _context = new TDataContext();
// Repository function
public T GetById<T>(object id) where T : class
{
var dbset = _context.Set<T>();
return dbset.Find(id);
}
public IQueryable<TDataContext.Foo> GetFiltered(Expression<Func<TDataContext.Foo, bool>> filter)
{
var dbset = _context.Set<TDataContext.Foo>();
return dbset.Where(filter);
}
// Final call
// Which fails..
public TDataContext.Foo Get(int id)
{
return this.GetById<TDataContext.Foo>(id);
}
// This works...
public TDataContext.Foo GetWhere(int id)
{
return this.GetFiltered(f => f.ParentId == id).FirstOrDefault();
}
}
Found something that solves my problem partially...
When adding another indicator to the tables, there is no more error, example:
public class FooConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Foo>
{
public FooConfiguration()
{
Map(m => {
m.Requires("FooIndicator").HasValue(true);
m.Requires("BarIndicator").HasValue<short>(1);
});
}
}
public class BarConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Bar>
{
public BarConfiguration()
{
Map(m => {
m.Requires("BarIndicator").HasValue(true);
m.Requires("FooIndicator").HasValue<short>(0);
});
}
}
Wouldn't be better
public class FooConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Foo>
{
public FooConfiguration()
{
Map(m => m.Requires("Type").HasValue("Foo"));
}
}
public class BarConfiguration : EntityTypeConfiguration<Bar>
{
public BarConfiguration()
{
Map(m => m.Requires("Type").HasValue("Bar");
}
}
In this way FooConfiguration doesn't need to know anything about BarConfiguration and visa versa. I had this issue when migrating from EF 4.3 to 5.0 and I think what has changed was the discriminator database columns are not nullable in EF 5.0. I think it makes much more sense for them to be not nullable and in general it might be better to have only one discrimanotor column for each derived type as opposed to one column per type (as it was in EF 4.3)
-Stan
Getting the following error:
Schema specified is not valid. Errors:
The types in the assembly 'x, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null' cannot be loaded because the assembly contains
the EdmSchemaAttribute, and the closure of types is being loaded by
name. Loading by both name and attribute is not allowed.
What does this error mean exactly?
I'm trying to shoe-horn into my application an EF model from an existing database.
Before this application was based on CodeFirst and using the repository pattern but for the life of me I can't get this working.
Before I had:
public class BaseModelContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<User> Users { get; set; }
public DbSet<Role> Roles { get; set; }
}
But in a EF model-first scenario (one where tables already exist in the db), I had to remove these as it didn't seem to like having a repository pattern on DbSet properties.
So I stripped these out, and the repository can then use repository on the classes already defined on the .designer.cs context class (the EF model). This has the EdmSchemaAttribute set inside the generated code.
So how do I get my repository pattern to work in the model-first scenario? What does the above error mean exactly?
EDIT
Added new code:
public class BaseModelContext : DbContext
{
// public DbSet<Location> Locations { get; set; }
public BaseModelContext(string nameOrConnection)
: base(nameOrConnection)
{
}
public BaseModelContext()
{
}
}
public class VisitoriDataContext : BaseModelContext
{
public VisitoriDataContext()
: base("visitoriDataConnection")
{
}
}
public interface IVisitoriDataContextProvider
{
VisitoriDataContext DataContext { get; }
}
public class VisitoriDataContextProvider : IVisitoriDataContextProvider
{
public VisitoriDataContext DataContext { get; private set; }
public VisitoriDataContextProvider()
{
DataContext = new VisitoriDataContext();
}
}
public class VisitoriRepository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : class
{
protected readonly IVisitoriDataContextProvider _ctx;
public VisitoriRepository(IVisitoriDataContextProvider ctx)
{
_ctx = ctx;
}
public T Get(int id)
{
return _ctx.DataContext.Set<T>().Find(id);
}
}
public interface ILocationRepo : IRepository<Location>
{
IEnumerable<Location> GetSuggestedLocationsByPrefix(string searchPrefix);
}
public class LocationRepo : VisitoriRepository<Location>, ILocationRepo
{
public LocationRepo(IVisitoriDataContextProvider ctx)
: base(ctx)
{
}
public IEnumerable<Location> GetSuggestedLocationsByPrefix(string searchPrefix)
{
return Where(l => l.name.Contains(searchPrefix)).ToList();
}
}
The error means that you cannot combine code first mapping (data annotations and fluent API) and EDMX mapping (with EntityObjects!) for entity with the same name. These two approaches are disjunctive.
The rest of your question is not clear.
Btw. building mapping from existing database is called database first not model first.
Decorate the assembly containing the GILayerModel type with [assembly: EdmSchema] attribute.
In my case, I had a class that derived from an entity (code-first class) in another assembly, and I was adding an instance of this class to the DBContext:
in DBEntities project:
public class GISLayer
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Schema.DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int GISLayerId { get; set; }
[StringLength(200)]
public string LayerName { get; set; }
public List<GISNode> Nodes { get; set; }
}
in the second assembly:
public class GISLayerModel : DBEntities.GISLayer
{
public new List<GISNodeModel> NodesModel { get; set; }
}
and the cause of error:
[WebMethod]
public void SaveGISLayers(GISLayerModel[] layers)
{
using (DBEntities.DBEntities db = new DBEntities.DBEntities())
{
foreach (var l in layers)
{
if (l.GISLayerId > 0)
{
db.GISLayers.Attach(l); //attaching a derived class
db.Entry(l).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
}
else
db.GISLayers.Add(l); //adding a derived class
SaveGISNodes(l.NodesModel.ToArray(), db);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
}
So, I used AutoMapper to copy properties of derived class to a new instance of base class:
DBEntities.GISLayer gl = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<DBEntities.GISLayer>(l);
if (gl.GISLayerId > 0)
{
db.GISLayers.Attach(gl);
db.Entry(gl).State = System.Data.EntityState.Modified;
}
else
db.GISLayers.Add(gl);
That solved the problem.