Good day to all!
There is such a code
var userRoles = context.UserRoles.Where(ur => ur.UserId == id);
if (userRoles.Any())
{
context.UserRoles.RemoveRange(userRoles);
}
var userCars = context.UserCars.Where(uc => uc.UserId == id);
It is necessary to get rid of the extra SELECT code before deleting:
context.UserRoles.RemoveRange (userRoles);
How to do it better?
If RemoveRange loops through the incoming collection, then for each record in the UserCars collection, a separate query will be executed into the database, which is bad. The sample should be within the same request:
var userCars = context.UserCars.Where (uc => uc.UserId == id);
How to do it better?
Sincerely, Mikhail
if i understand right you want to perform the select and the delete in one query
i think this should help you Entity Framework Plus
Batch Delete
Related
I want to fetch the candidate and the work exp where it is not deleted. I am using repository pattern in my c# app mvc.
Kind of having trouble filtering the record and its related child entities
I have list of candidates which have collection of workexp kind of throws error saying cannot build expression from the body.
I tried putting out anonymous object but error still persist, but if I use a VM or DTO for returning the data the query works.
It's like EF doesn't like newing up of the existing entity within its current context.
var candidate = dbcontext.candidate
.where(c=>c.candiate.ID == id).include(c=>c.WorkExperience)
.select(e=>new candidate
{
WorkExperience = e.WorkExperience.where(k=>k.isdeleted==false).tolist()
});
Is there any workaround for this?
You cannot call ToList in the expression that is traslated to SQL. Alternatively, you can start you query from selecting from WorkExperience table. I'm not aware of the structure of your database, but something like this might work:
var candidate = dbcontext.WorkExperience
.Include(exp => exp.Candidate)
.Where(exp => exp.isdeleted == false && exp.Candidate.ID == id)
.GroupBy(exp => exp.Candidate)
.ToArray() //query actually gets executed and return grouped data from the DB
.Select(groped => new {
Candidate = grouped.Key,
Experience = grouped.ToArray()
});
var candidate =
from(dbcontext.candidate.Include(c=>c.WorkExperience)
where(c=>c.candiate.ID == id)
select c).ToList().Select(cand => new candidate{WorkExperience = cand.WorkExperience.where(k=>k.isdeleted==false).tolist()});
I'm using EF4. Having 2 entities:
Person { Name }
Hobbys { Person.Name, IsCoolHobby }
1 Person can have several hobbys.
I now have
IQueryable<Person> p;
p = container.PersonSet.Include("Hobbys").AsQueryable();
p = p.Where(x => x ?????);
List<Person> tmp = p.ToList();
How can i return only those Persons who have cool hobbys (IsCoolHobby == true)? I tried join but i was not able to load them into the list (select can only return Person, Hobby or new Type - but how to map them to entity objects again?)
Thanks
How can i return only those Persons who have cool hobbys (IsCoolHobby
== true)?
List<Person> tmp = container.PersonSet.Include("Hobbys")
.Where(p => p.Hobbys.Any(h => h.IsCoolHobby))
.ToList();
This will load the people who have at least one cool hobby but the Hobbys collection for those people will always contain all hobbys, also the uncool hobbys.
Edit
Unfortunately filtering and sorting children during eager loading (Include) is currently not supported. There is a request on the EF feature suggestion page for this feature. The request has status "Under review", so there is a little hope that it might get implemented in the future. (Probably far future: At least the first docs about EF 5 (beta) on MSDN say explicitly that eager loading with filtering/sorting is still not implemented.)
For now there are only two workarounds. The first is to use a projection:
var projectedData = container.PersonSet
.Where(p => p.Hobbys.Any(h => h.IsCoolHobby))
.Select(p => new
{
Person = p,
CoolHobbys = p.Hobbys.Where(h => h.IsCoolHobby)
})
.ToList();
The result is a collection of anonymous objects which contain a user who has cool hobbys and a collection of those cool hobbys. If you don't disable change tracking (by using the NoTracking option for the query) the person's hobbys collection should be filled with the result automatically.
The second option is to use "explicit" loading with CreateSourceQuery:
List<Person> tmp = container.PersonSet
.Where(p => p.Hobbys.Any(h => h.IsCoolHobby))
.ToList();
foreach (var person in tmp)
{
person.Hobbys.Attach(person.Hobbys.CreateSourceQuery()
.Where(h => h.IsCoolHobby).ToList());
}
Two things to note here:
CreateSourceQuery is only available on EntityCollections, i.e. if you are using EntityObject derived entities. It's not available for POCO entities in EF 4.0. (EF >= 4.1/DbContext has the option for explicit loading also for POCOs -> Query() method.)
The above code represents 1+N roundtrips to the database: The first for the person collection without the hobbys and then one additional query per person to load the cool hobbys.
I need to filter a dealer based on id and the uncomplete checkins
Initially, it returned the dealer based only on id:
// TODO: limit checkins to those that are not complete
return this.ObjectContext.Dealers
.Include("Groups")
.Include("Groups.Items")
.Include("Groups.Items.Observations")
.Include("Groups.Items.Recommendations")
.Include("Checkins")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections.InspectionItems")
.Where(d => d.DealerId == id)
.FirstOrDefault();
As you can see the requirement is to limit the checkins.
Here's what I did:
var query = from d in this.ObjectContext.Dealers
.Include("Groups")
.Include("Groups.Items")
.Include("Groups.Items.Observations")
.Include("Groups.Items.Recommendations")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections.InspectionItems")
.Where(d => d.DealerId == id)
select new
{
Dealer = d,
Groups = from g in d.Groups
select new
{
Items = from i in g.Items
select new
{
Group = i.Group,
Observations = i.Observations,
Recommendations = i.Recommendations
}
},
Checkins = from c in d.Checkins
where c.Complete == true
select new
{
Inspections = from i in c.Inspections
select new
{
InspectionItems = i.InspectionItems
}
}
};
var dealer = query.ToArray().Select(o => o.Dealer).First();
return dealer;
It works.
However, I am not convinced I am doing the right thing.
What is the best way to accomplish what I did? A stored procedure maybe?
I am not sure I even have to use Include clause anymore
Thank you.
If you want to load filtered relations with single query you indeed have to execute such projection but you don't need those calls to Include. Once you are building projections includes are not use - you have returned data under your control.
Stored procedure will help you only if you fall back to plain ADO.NET because stored procedures executed through Entity framework are not able to fill related entities (only flattened structures).
Automatic fixupu mentioned by #Andreas requires multiple database queries and as I know it works only if lazy loading is disabled because proxied object somehow doesn't have information about fixup and it still has its internal flags for each relation as not loaded so when you access them for the first time they still execute additional query.
Maybe you can make use of the relation fixup mechanism in the EF ObjectContexts. When you do multiple queries in the same context for entities, that are related by associations, these are resolved.
Assuming your association between Dealers and Checkins is 1:n with navigation properties on each side, you could do like:
var dealer = yourContext.Dealers
.Where(p => p.DealerId == id)
.FirstOrDefault();
if(dealer != null)
{
yourContext.Checkins
.Where(c => c.Complete && c.DealerId == dealer.DealerId)
.ToList();
I have not tested this by now, but since EF recognises that the Checkins, it inserts into the context by the second query belong to the dealer from the first query, corresponding references are created.
#Andreas H:
Awesome, thank you a lot.
I had to adjust your suggestion like this and it worked:
var dealer = this.ObjectContext.Dealers
.Include("Groups")
.Include("Groups.Items")
.Include("Groups.Items.Observations")
.Include("Groups.Items.Recommendations")
.Where(p => p.DealerId == id).
FirstOrDefault();
if (dealer != null)
{
this.ObjectContext.Checkins
.Include("Inspections")
.Include("Inspections.InspectionItems")
.Where(c => !c.Complete && c.Dealer.DealerId == dealer.DealerId)
.ToList();
}
return dealer;
I still have to use the Include otherwise it won't return the referenced entities.
Note also that Dealer.Groups are unrelated to the Dealer.Checkins.
So if there's no checkins satisfying the condition, Groups still need to be returned.
It's interesting to note that at first, I put the two include for checkins to the dealer
var dealer = this.ObjectContext.Dealers
.Include("Groups")
.Include("Groups.Items")
.Include("Groups.Items.Observations")
.Include("Groups.Items.Recommendations")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections")
.Include("Checkins.Inspections.InspectionItems")
.Where(p => p.DealerId == id).
FirstOrDefault();
if (dealer != null)
{
this.ObjectContext.Checkins
.Where(c => c.Complete && c.DealerId == id)
.ToList();
}
return dealer;
but it returned all the Checkins including those which are not complete.
I don't understand exactly why the latter doesn't work but the former does, how are the entities are resolved. I somehow can intuit that the former returns all data.
Your accepted solution will generate multiple database queries. As Ladislav Mrnka said a projection is the only way to pull your result with one query. The maintance of your code indeed hard. Maybe you could use an IQueryable-Extension that builds the projection dynamically and keep your code clean:
var query = this.ObjectContext.Dealers.SelectIncluding( new List<Expression<Func<T,object>>>>(){
x => x.Groups,
x => x.Groups.Select(y => y.Items),
x => x.Groups.Select(y => y.Items.Select(z => z.Observations)),
x => x.Groups.Select(y => y.Items.Select(z => z.Recommendations)),
x => x.Checkins.Where(y => y.Complete==true),
x => x.Checkins.Select(y => y.Inspections),
x => x.Checkins.Select(y => y.Inspections.Select(z => z.InspectionItems))
});
var dealer = query.First();
return dealer;
You can find the extension at thiscode/DynamicSelectExtensions on github
I've got an EDM with two tables Product and ProductCategory with a many-to-many relationship between both.
What I'm currently trying to do is to build a dynamic query to select the products related to the categories the user has selected through the UI.
In short I should build a query like the following but based one or more categories that I don't know at compile time.
var productQuery = context.Product.Where
(p => p.ProductCategories.Any(c => c.CategoryId == id1 ||
c.CategoryId == id2 || ...));
I've read a lot of things and I'm actually very new to linq so I really don't know where to start.
What is the best approach to do such queries ?
Thank you for your time.
var ids = new [] { id1, id2, // ...
var productQuery = context.Product.Where(
p => p.ProductCategories.Any(c => ids.Contains(c.CategoryId)));
I have a List which hold the PK ID's of a number of objects in a collection that I want to remove. Does anyone know how to write a single query to retrieve these objects?
Eg:
IList<int> objectList; // populated with int Primary key Ids
using (MyEntities context = new MyEntities()){
var result = context.MyObjectCollection.Where(obj=> obj.ID IN objectList);
foreach(var item in result){
context.DeletObject(item);
}
context.SaveChanges();
}
Any help would greatly be appreciated!
var result = context.MyObjectCollection.Where(obj=> objectList.Contains(obj.ID));
Mel's answer doesn't work because in .NET 3.5 SP1 the EF doesn't know how to translate list.Contains(...) into T-SQL. Although this is coming in 4.0.
The workaround is to manually produce a big OR query i.e.
Where(obj => obj.ID == item1 || obj.ID == item2 ....)
Here is a tip I wrote that makes that easy:
Tip 8 - How to write where IN style queries using LINQ to Entities
Hope this helps
Alex James
Entity Framework Team - Read my Entity Framework Tips
http://efe.codeplex.com
this.Devices.Update(o => new Device() { LastOrderRequest = DateTime.Now, Description = "teste" }, o => o.Id == 1);