I need to find the current partition key of a Service Fabric Stateful Service at run time.
I have looked in the ICodePackageActivationContext and the StatefulServiceContext but can't seem to see this information anywhere.
Edit:
As LoekD pointed out in his answer this information is available from within the StatefulService class. Just to be explicitly clear, here is how I accessed:
var info = (Int64RangePartitionInformation) this.Partition.PartitionInfo;
var highKey = info.HighKey;
var lowKey = info.LowKey;
From within the service itself, you can use the Partition.PartitionInfo property.
Related
I am writing a Golang application using Dgraph for persisting objects. From the documentation, I can infer that a new UID and hence a new node is created everytime I mutate an object/run the code.
Is there a way to update the same node data instead for creating a new node?
I tried changing the UID to use "_:name" for the UID field but even this creates a new node everytime the application is run. I wish to be able to update the existing node if it is already present in the DB instead of creating a new node for it.
Unfortunately the docs aren't very beginner friendly yet :/
To modify / mutate existing data you have to run a set operation and supply a rdf-triple like <uid> <predicate> "value" / <objectYouWantToModify> <attributeYouWantToModify> "quotedStringValue". If it is not an attribute but an edge, the value has to be another <uid>.
The full mutation would be for example
{
set {
<0x2> <name> "modified-name" .
}
}
The . terminates the sequence and there is an optional fourth parameter you can use to also assign a label.
Check https://www.w3.org/TR/n-quads/ for further details.
I am going to register interests in ALL_KEYS for my Pivotal GemFire client via Spring Data GemFire, but I find that ClientRegionFactoryBean has one method.
org.springframework.data.gemfire.client.ClientRegionFactoryBean.setInterests(Interest<MyRegionPojo>[] interests)
In this case, I only can set the exact keys, but I want to register interests for all keys. My key is not a simple class like String, or Long, but a complex object MyRegionPojo.
Please help if any method to implement so like GemFire API region.registerInterest("ALL_KEYS");
You problem statement is a bit vague but I assume/suspect you are configuring your Spring (Data GemFire) (SDG) application using Spring JavaConfig?
However, I will quickly add that this is not unlike how you would register interests in all keys using SDG's XML namespace, as shown here.
The JavaConfig approach is similar, but clearly based on "strongly-typed arguments", namely 1 or more sub-type instances of the o.s.d.g.client.Interest class to the o.s.d.g.client.ClientRegionFactoryBean.setInterests(:Interest<K>[]) method.
By way of example, you might do the following...
#Bean("Example")
public ClientRegionFactoryBean<?, ?> exampleRegion(GemFireCache gemfireCache) {
ClientRegionFactoryBean<MyRegionKey, MyRegionValue> exampleRegion =
new ClientRegionFactoryBean<>();
RegexInterest regexInterest = new RegexInterest();
regexInterest.setKey(".*");
exampleRegion.setCache(gemfireCache);
exampleRegion.setShortcut(ClientRegionShortcut.PROXY);
exampleRegion.setInterests(new Interest[] { regexInterest });
exampleRegion.setKeyConstraint(MyRegionKey.class);
exampleRegion.setValueConstraint(MyRegionValue.class);
return exampleRegion;
}
NOTE: updated the example above to reflect the proper way to register (Regex) interests based on SDG 1.9 or earlier. Keep in mind that the `o.s.d.g.client.RegexInterest.getRegex() delegates to getKey() therefore you can set the Regular Expression using setKey(:String) as I have shown above.
Notice the o.s.d.g.client.RegexInterest sub-type registration, which is effectively the same as register interests in "ALL_KEYS", as described here as well.
Hope this helps!
-John
I want Administrators to enable/disable logging at runtime by changing the enabled property of the LogEnabledFilter in the config.
There are several threads on SO that explain workarounds, but I want it this way.
I tried to change the Logging Enabled Filter like this:
private static void FileConfigurationSourceChanged(object sender, ConfigurationSourceChangedEventArgs e)
{
var fcs = sender as FileConfigurationSource;
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("----------- FileConfigurationSourceChanged called --------");
LoggingSettings currentLogSettings = e.ConfigurationSource.GetSection("loggingConfiguration") as LoggingSettings;
var fdtl = currentLogSettings.TraceListeners.Where(tld => tld is FormattedDatabaseTraceListenerData).FirstOrDefault();
var currentLogFileFilter = currentLogSettings.LogFilters.Where(lfd => { return lfd.Name == "Logging Enabled Filter"; }).FirstOrDefault();
var filterNewValue = (bool)currentLogFileFilter.ElementInformation.Properties["enabled"].Value;
var runtimeFilter = Logger.Writer.GetFilter<LogEnabledFilter>("Logging Enabled Filter");
runtimeFilter.Enabled = filterNewValue;
var test = Logger.Writer.IsLoggingEnabled();
}
But test reveals always the initially loaded config value, it does not change.
I thought, that when changing the value in the config the changes will be propagated automatically to the runtime configuration. But this isn't the case!
Setting it programmatically as shown in the code above, doesn't work either.
It's time to rebuild Enterprise Library or shut it down.
You are right that the code you posted does not work. That code is using a config file (FileConfigurationSource) as the method to configure Enterprise Library.
Let's dig a bit deeper and see if programmatic configuration will work.
We will use the Fluent API since it is the preferred method for programmatic configuration:
var builder = new ConfigurationSourceBuilder();
builder.ConfigureLogging()
.WithOptions
.DoNotRevertImpersonation()
.FilterEnableOrDisable("EnableOrDisable").Enable()
.LogToCategoryNamed("General")
.WithOptions.SetAsDefaultCategory()
.SendTo.FlatFile("FlatFile")
.ToFile(#"fluent.log");
var configSource = new DictionaryConfigurationSource();
builder.UpdateConfigurationWithReplace(configSource);
var defaultWriter = new LogWriterFactory(configSource).Create();
defaultWriter.Write("Test1", "General");
var filter = defaultWriter.GetFilter<LogEnabledFilter>();
filter.Enabled = false;
defaultWriter.Write("Test2", "General");
If you try this code the filter will not be updated -- so another failure.
Let's try to use the "old school" programmatic configuration by using the classes directly:
var flatFileTraceListener = new FlatFileTraceListener(
#"program.log",
"----------------------------------------",
"----------------------------------------"
);
LogEnabledFilter enabledFilter = new LogEnabledFilter("Logging Enabled Filter", true);
// Build Configuration
var config = new LoggingConfiguration();
config.AddLogSource("General", SourceLevels.All, true)
.AddTraceListener(flatFileTraceListener);
config.Filters.Add(enabledFilter);
LogWriter defaultWriter = new LogWriter(config);
defaultWriter.Write("Test1", "General");
var filter = defaultWriter.GetFilter<LogEnabledFilter>();
filter.Enabled = false;
defaultWriter.Write("Test2", "General");
Success! The second ("Test2") message was not logged.
So, what is going on here? If we instantiate the filter ourselves and add it to the configuration it works but when relying on the Enterprise Library configuration the filter value is not updated.
This leads to a hypothesis: when using Enterprise Library configuration new filter instances are being returned each time which is why changing the value has no effect on the internal instance being used by Enterprise Library.
If we dig into the Enterprise Library code we (eventually) hit on LoggingSettings class and the BuildLogWriter method. This is used to create the LogWriter. Here's where the filters are created:
var filters = this.LogFilters.Select(tfd => tfd.BuildFilter());
So this line is using the configured LogFilterData and calling the BuildFilter method to instantiate the applicable filter. In this case the BuildFilter method of the configuration class LogEnabledFilterData BuildFilter method returns an instance of the LogEnabledFilter:
return new LogEnabledFilter(this.Name, this.Enabled);
The issue with this code is that this.LogFilters.Select returns a lazy evaluated enumeration that creates LogFilters and this enumeration is passed into the LogWriter to be used for all filter manipulation. Every time the filters are referenced the enumeration is evaluated and a new Filter instance is created! This confirms the original hypothesis.
To make it explicit: every time LogWriter.Write() is called a new LogEnabledFilter is created based on the original configuration. When the filters are queried by calling GetFilter() a new LogEnabledFilter is created based on the original configuration. Any changes to the object returned by GetFilter() have no affect on the internal configuration since it's a new object instance and, anyway, internally Enterprise Library will create another new instance on the next Write() call anyway.
Firstly, this is just plain wrong but it is also inefficient to create new objects on every call to Write() which could be invoked many times..
An easy fix for this issue is to evaluate the LogFilters enumeration by calling ToList():
var filters = this.LogFilters.Select(tfd => tfd.BuildFilter()).ToList();
This evaluates the enumeration only once ensuring that only one filter instance is created. Then the GetFilter() and update filter value approach posted in the question will work.
Update:
Randy Levy provided a fix in his answer above.
Implement the fix and recompile the enterprise library.
Here is the answer from Randy Levy:
Yes, you can disable logging by setting the LogEnabledFiter. The main
way to do this would be to manually edit the configuration file --
this is the main intention of that functionality (developers guide
references administrators tweaking this setting). Other similar
approaches to setting the filter are to programmatically modify the
original file-based configuration (which is essentially a
reconfiguration of the block), or reconfigure the block
programmatically (e.g. using the fluent interface). None of the
programmatic approaches are what I would call simple – Randy Levy 39
mins ago
If you try to get the filter and disable it I don't think it has any
affect without a reconfiguration. So the following code still ends up
logging: var enabledFilter = logWriter.GetFilter();
enabledFilter.Enabled = false; logWriter.Write("TEST"); One non-EntLib
approach would just to manage the enable/disable yourself with a bool
property and a helper class. But I think the priority approach is a
pretty straight forward alternative.
Conclusion:
In your custom Logger class implement a IsLoggenabled property and change/check this one at runtime.
This won't work:
var runtimeFilter = Logger.Writer.GetFilter<LogEnabledFilter>("Logging Enabled Filter");
runtimeFilter.Enabled = false/true;
I am looking to open up multiple connections using a netty client bootstrap in order to parse messages coming from multiple sources. The messages all have the same format, however, due to the amount of data that needs to be processed, I must run each connection on separate threads (This is assuming netty creates a thread per client channel, which I couldn't find a reference for - if that's not the case, how would this be achieved?).
This is the code that I use to connect to the data server:
var b = new Bootstrap()
.group(group)
.channel(classOf[NioSocketChannel])
.handler(RawFeedChannelInitializer)
var ch1 = b.clone().connect(host, port).sync().channel();
var ch2 = b.clone().connect(host, port).sync().channel();
The initializer calls RawPacketDecoder, which extends ReplayingDecoder, and is defined here.
The code works well without #Sharable when opening a single connection, but for the purpose of my application I must connect to the same server multiple times.
This results in the runtime error #Sharable annotation is not allowed pointing to my RawPacketDecoder class.
I am not entirely sure on how to get past this issue, short of reimplementing in scala an instantiable class of ReplayingDecoder as my decoder based directly on ByteToMessageDecoder.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Note: I am using netty 4.0.32 Final
I found the solution in this StockExchange answer.
My issue was that I was using an object based ChannelInitializer (singleton), and ReplayingDecoder as well as ByteToMessageDecoder are not sharable.
My initializer was created as a scala object, and therefore a single instance allowed. Changing the initializer to a scala class and instantiating for each bootstrap clone solved the problem. I modified the bootstrap code above as follows:
var b = new Bootstrap()
.group(group)
.channel(classOf[NioSocketChannel])
//.handler(RawFeedChannelInitializer)
var ch1 = b.clone().handler(new RawFeedChannelInitializer()).connect(host, port).sync().channel();
var ch2 = b.clone().handler(new RawFeedChannelInitializer()).connect(host, port).sync().channel();
I am not sure whether this ensures multithreading as wanted but it does allow to split the data access into multiple connections to the feed server.
Edit Update: After performing additional research on the subject, I have determined that netty does in fact create a thread per channel; this was verified by printing to console after the creation of each channel:
println("No. of active threads: " + Thread.activeCount());
The output shows an incremental number as channels are created and associated with their respective threads.
By default NioEventLoopGroup uses 2*Num_CPU_cores threads as defined here:
DEFAULT_EVENT_LOOP_THREADS = Math.max(1, SystemPropertyUtil.getInt(
"io.netty.eventLoopThreads",
Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() * 2));
This value can be overriden to something else by setting
val group = new NioEventLoopGroup(16)
and then using the group to create/setup the bootstrap.
I'm trying to do some logic in my Spring controller where I route to a website node based on the template used in another website node.
I can use LifeTimeJCRSessionUtil.getHierarchyManager("website").getContent("mynodepath").getTemplate() to do this, but I see that the HierarchyManager and Content classes are depreciated.
I looked at the Session class, but I have thus far been unable to figure out how to get the Template id based on the jcrNode.
You can use instead:
javax.jcr.Session jcrSession = LifeTimeJCRSessionUtil.getSession("website");
Node mynode = jcrSession.getNode("/my/node/path");
info.magnolia.cms.core.MetaData metaData = info.magnolia.jcr.util.MetaDataUtil.getMetaData(mynode);
String template = metaData.getTemplate();
Basically, instead of getHierarchyManager("website").getContent("mynodepath") you should use
getSession("website").getNode("/my/node/path").