I need to make certain changes in the behavior of some of the ionic components.
It was easy enough with Ionic 3 and angular components, but now that we're migrating to Ionic 4, I'm finding it more challenging to alter the default web components in #ionic/core.
I have created a new stencil components project and added the npm package for #ionic/core. I tired extending the datetime component and found that the web components cannot have super classes.
So I copied over the entire folder for the datetime component from the Ionic source to my project and changed only the folder name and the class name. So it's MyDatetime class in my-datetime folder.
Trying npm run build on the project, it fails with a whole bunch of sass errors.
Here's how they look like:
[ ERROR ] sass error: src/components/my-datetime/datetime.ios.scss:1:9
Can't find stylesheet to import.
L1: #import "./datetime";
[ ERROR ] sass error: node_modules/#ionic/core/dist/collection/components/tab-bar/tab-bar.ios.scss:207:14
expected selector.
[ ERROR ] sass error: node_modules/#ionic/core/dist/collection/components/item/item.ios.scss:207:14
expected selector.
L207: // .label-ios + ion-textarea .native-textarea,
L208: // .label-ios + .input + .cloned-input {
The imported sass file that it says it cannot find (./datetime) is of course existing in the same folder.
Could someone please hint on what I'm doing wrong here.
Related
I'm converting a project that was built using Create React App to use ParcelJS as a bundler instead. Strangely, a dependency that I imported during development (#twilio/voice-sdk) works fine in the CRA version of the application, but I get the following error when I try to invoke the constructor in the Parcel version:
TypeError: (this._options.AudioHelper || audiohelper_1.default) is not a constructor
The package is identical between both (#v2.1.1, the latest). I'm importing using ESM syntax, so:
import { Device } from '#twilio/voice-sdk'
I trying using CommonJS syntax (require) and it still didn't work. I've dug into the compiled code, and that seems to be the issue. I imagine there are a lot of differences, but one that I've noticed is here:
On the left is the code compiled by Create React App, which does seem to be exporting something more substantial than on the left - is the export just an empty object? If so, it's no wonder I'm getting a constructor error.
Unfortunately, no amount of googling and SO sleuthing has clarified what I could do to make ParcelJS transpile this dependency properly, if that's the issue. I've tried to make the babel config for ParcelJS match CRA more closely by adding the following to a babel.config.json
{
"plugins": [
"#babel/plugin-transform-modules-commonjs"
]
}
But no luck. Any ideas from where to go from here, or is it time to switch to Webpack?
It looks like Twilio package has a problem when using Parcel 2: https://github.com/twilio/twilio-voice.js/issues/101
I'm working with Xcode 11.3 on macOS Catalina 10.15.6.
I have an existing Xcode project which builds an app for iOS. I am interested in reusing some of the classes in an interactive session with the swift command line interpreter. The classes I want to work with are Core Data classes which are autogenerated from an Xcode data model and also some classes I've written which work with the Core Data classes. The app has UI screens and makes use of UIKit but I'm not trying to use any of those classes; I'm hoping that I can either compile those classes and then not refer to them, or somehow tell Swift Package Manager to ignore those classes altogether.
What I think I would like to do is to export a Package.swift for the existing Xcode project, such that swift build at the command line would be able to compile all of the project classes, or, failing that, at least the non-UI classes, and then swift run --repl would be able to load the classes via import.
I see a menu item in Xcode to create a new Swift package, but not to export an existing project. Is there a way to export an existing project?
There are no a menu command or utility to convert application to a static library, dynamic framework or swift package since they are different types of projects with different settings etc.
If you want to export a part of your project as a swift package you should make next steps manually:
1. Create Package.swift file in the root of your project
import PackageDescription
let package = Package(
name: “MyLib”,
products: [
.library(name: "MyLib", targets: ["MyLib"])
],
targets: [
.target(name: "MyLib"),
],
...
)
2. Make folder with subfolder ./Sources/MyLib under the projects’s root.
By default swift package structure requires to put all your sources files under Sources/LibraryName folder but you can change it below.
NOTE: you can simplify first two steps by using swift package init and it creates Package.swift, Sources and Test folders etc.
3. Include source files
a) Move the needed files to share from their current locations to MyLib folder.
For instance:
./Classes/MyEntity.swift -> ./Sources/MyLib/MyEntity.swift
Also you have to update locations of the moved files in your Xcode project to leave it compilable.
b) Use path, sources and exclude to point needed source files to your package from their current locations:
.target(name: "MyLib", path: "Classes"),
NOTE: Don't forget to make your classes public to access to them after import your package:
public class MyEntity {
...
}
After all you will have two working projects - old XCode's one and new Swift package.
4. REPL
Now you can use command line interpreter with your swift package:
swift run --repl
import MyLib
let entity = MyEntity()
...
We'd like to be able to add custom functionality to polymer build and polymer serve by configuring custom babel plugins.
For example, since polymer-cli uses babel internally, we would add a babel.config.js file to our workspace/project-root, e.g.:
module.exports = function (api) {
api.cache(true);
const presets = [ ];
const plugins = [
"#babel/plugin-proposal-optional-chaining"
];
return {
presets,
plugins
};
}
...and then we could serve or build our project with support for optional-chaining, etc This would allow us to do all sorts of things by writing additional babel plugins to handle stuff like minification inside template HTML strings...
Unfortunately, this doesn't currently work. polymer-build seems to load the configuration (due to its use of babel/core?), but polymer-analyze doesn't. An error is generated in the build-optimization step performed by polymer-analyze as soon as it encounters optional-chaining syntax in our source:
error: Error: Unable to get document file:///.../somefile.js: This experimental syntax requires enabling the parser plugin:
'optionalChaining' (423:6)
at BuildAnalyzer.<anonymous> (/usr/local/share/.config/yarn/global/node_modules/polymer-build/lib/analyzer.js:342:23)
at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
at fulfilled (/usr/local/share/.config/yarn/global/node_modules/polymer-build/lib/analyzer.js:17:58)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)
polymer serve also generates an error:
Error { SyntaxError: This experimental syntax requires enabling the parser plugin: 'optionalChaining' (423:6)
at Parser.raise (/usr/local/share/.config/yarn/global/node_modules/babylon/lib/index.js:776:15)
at Parser.expectPlugin (/usr/local/share/.config/yarn/global/node_modules/babylon/lib/index.js:2084:18)
...
pos: 13056, loc: Position { line: 423, column: 6 },
missingPlugin: [ 'optionalChaining' ] }
In both cases, I've confirmed that the babel.config.js file is being loaded. But babel is included by several different packages used in polymer-cli, so my suspicion is that in some of them, babel is being used without (babel/core having loaded) configuration info.
Can anyone involved with the polymer project confirm whether I'm correct in identifying the main issue? I'm looking into the possibility of contributing a fix/enhancement if the scope isn't too large.
Thanks.
I think for this you need to write your own custom build. Polymer-cli will provide its tool also for this. Have a look at this example:
https://github.com/PolymerElements/generator-polymer-init-custom-build
For us, this issue was preventing us from using modern JS language features (like optional chaining and the nullish coalescing operator) which have wide support in modern browsers.
The only solution we could come up with was forking the Polymer tools monorepo and adding in support for the appropriate Babel plugins ourselves.
The file in question is /packages/build/src/js-transform.ts. Both serve and build use this file for Babel transforms. We switched to using Rollup for our build process, but we still needed a development server and couldn't get any others to work, so we forked the repo and built our own version of the standalone polyserve package. Would love to some day switch to Modern Web's #web/dev-server.
I'm trying to add OfficeUI fabric components in a blog build using gatsby js.
As soon as I'm importing any component, the site stop to works.
Using develop command, I can see in the browser console : SyntaxError: export declarations may only appear at top level of a module
How to fix this ? (I'm very new to node dev).
Searches I've done suggest problems with babel not using the es2015 preset. However, I double checked, the .babelrc file is mentioning this preset.
Here's the complete operations I've done (on Windows 10 x64 if it matters):
cloned the gatsby-starter-blog-no-styles repo :
gatsby.cmd new someblog https://github.com/noahg/gatsby-starter-blog-no-styles
cd someblog
npm install
drink a coffee (will move to yarn soon)
Check that works
gatsby develop
Opened the browser (http://localhost:8000). Its Ok
added office ui fabric react components
npm install --save office-ui-fabric-react
Restart gatsby develop. Still working
change src/layouts/index.js file to import an office component
import React from 'react'
import Link from 'gatsby-link'
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button'
class Template extends React.Component {
....
And voilà! it stop to works. In the browser console, I see an error : SyntaxError: export declarations may only appear at top level of a module
I put in GH a complete reproduction repository : https://github.com/stevebeauge/repro-gatsbyjs-officeui-error
[Edit] Digging a bit I can see in the generated 'common.js' file the error :
/***/ "./node_modules/office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button.js":
/***/ (function(module, exports) {
export * from './components/Button/index';
//# sourceMappingURL=Button.js.map
/***/ }),
The export here seems to be forbidden, which leads to Babel issue (not found how to solve though)
Recently i stumbled upon the similar error, my solution was to explicitly import from lib-commonjs:
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib-commonjs/Button';
instead of
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button'
Seems to be the error occurs since babel isn't converting office-ui-fabric-react to CommonJS module.
I have built a custom element/web component to load and display Unity generated WebGL content. The web component imports the UnityLoader.js module - and works fine when used within an app served with 'polymer serve'.
However, when I build an app that uses my web component via the Polymer-CLI build process, no errors are given, but when I access a page using my component I always end up with an error from within UnityLoader.js:
"ReferenceError: BabelHelpers is not defined"
If I create the element directly within my app (in other words it is no longer managed by bower) then I can exclude the minification and compilation steps within the build section of my application's polymer.json file and the built version of the app works fine.
"builds": [
{
"preset": "es5-bundled",
"js": {
"compile": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]},
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]}
},
"html": {
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*"]}
}
}
]
I've looked at my application's polymer.json file and I can see that the extraDependecies node contains some dependencies that other web components have placed there:
"extraDependencies": [
"bower_components/webcomponentsjs/*.js",
"!bower_components/webcomponentsjs/gulpfile.js",
"manifest.json",
"bower_components/plastic-image/intersection-observer.js",
"bower_components/ua-parser-js/dist/ua-parser.min.js"
],
I have UnityLoader.js within the extraDependencies of the element's polymer.json but that isn't getting cascaded up to an application that imports/consumes the element - which I guess must be possible as plastic-image and ua-parser-js have done it (I've looked at their bower_components folders and nothing seems obvious - other than the latter is installed as a dependency of the former).
Any ideas on how I can make sure that the UnityLoader.js that my web component uses is not compiled or minified during the build process of an application that consumes it?
I was having a similar issue with firebase-auth.js when making an ES5 build using polymer-cli 1.7.0. There might be a problem when compiling/minifying specific files. I had to roll back to 1.6.0 using npm install -g polymer-cli#1.6.0 to fix the problem.