Error received while deploying code to Pixhawk4 from Simulink - simulink

I am trying to run an example Simulink model provided by Mathworks, but while deploying the model to the Pixhawk flight controller, I am receiving the following error:
Error(s) encountered while building "px4demo_uORBReadWrite":
### Failed to generate all binary outputs.
Caused by:
Validation error(s):
### Validating other build tools ...
Unable to locate build tool "GNU PX4 Archiver": echo
I have followed all the steps to configure the hardware properly, except the last part where I was not able to receive the accelerometer data too. The error received while testing the connection at that time was:
Error reading data from the serial port. Operation timed out before requested data was received.
Can someone explain why I am having this issue?
Thanks

Related

Kogito Kafka messages - Message Trigger information is not complete TriggerMetaData

has someone has ever encounter this error when using Kogito (with quarkus) to send Kafka messages from a flow (bpmn2 file) throwing an "Intermediate Message" from the intermediate events?
[ERROR] com.package.xxxxxx.whenRunTestSupermarketSuccess Time elapsed: 0.006 s
<<< ERROR!
java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException: io.quarkus.builder.BuildException: Build failure: Build failed due to errors
[error]: Build step org.kie.kogito.quarkus.common.deployment.KogitoAssetsProcessor#generateSources
threw an exception: org.kie.kogito.codegen.process.ProcessCodegenException: Error while elaborating
process id = "supermarketFlow", packageName = "com.package.xxxxxx": Message Trigger information is
not complete TriggerMetaData [name=cartCreated, type=ProduceMessage, dataType=String, modelRef=null, ownerId=1]
at org.kie.kogito.codegen.process.ProcessCodegen.internalGenerate(ProcessCodegen.java:325)
at org.kie.kogito.codegen.core.AbstractGenerator.generate(AbstractGenerator.java:69)
I can sense modelRef=null could be the issue but as far as I've seen in the official documentation, is not mention. I suppose I should give it a value on the bpmn file but I don't where.
I'm trying to send Kafka messages after running some logic, for the moment no one consuming the messages.
May be the issue is related to this thread?
BPMN 2.0, kogito, triggering signal or message from another process

MATLAB / dSPACE (GmbH) Memory Alignment Error

My DS1005 multi-board dSPACE system recently had its companion PC upgraded to MATLAB r2019b and ControlDesk 7.1. Since upgrading, I have been unable to get a Simulink model to compile, with the MATLAB diagnostic window issuing the following error:
LOADING APPLICATION "Debug_Local.sdf" ...
PLATFORM: ds1005
*** ERROR: Memory alignment error (double word alignment required).
Could not download real-time application: C:\Experiments\MATLAB Files\ENME303_DS1005\Debug_Local\debug_local.ppc.
An error occurred while loading the application.
DsErrorHandling: Panic! Format string 'The Clib Wrapper is not initialized.' for code 0x2711 starts with invalid character 'T'. Expecting '%'!
LOADING FAILED (1)
*** Stopped RTI build procedure for model: Debug_Local.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error:The call to rti1005_make_rtw_hook, during the after_make hook generated the following error:
*** Stopped RTI build procedure
The build process will terminate as a result.
Caused by:
*** Stopped RTI build procedure
Note that the model builds without error - it is when downloading to the DS1005 that the problem occurs. The Simulink model "Debug_Local" consists of a DS2001 A/D block, memory store with write, and that is all.
Prior to software upgrade, the multi-board system performed flawlessly, so the problem is likely a software configuration issue rather a hardware problem. I have read dSPACE FAQ 239, which describes a procedure for determining the cause of memory errors, but due to the fact that my Simulink model is the simplest possible, its suggestions do not seem relevant here.
Searching the web for help, there is mention of a memory alignment option in MATLAB, but only for a toolbox, rather than for the MATLAB core product.

Vivado: [XSIM 43-3294] Signal EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION received

I'm getting the following error when I run the simulation.
ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'launch_simulation' failed due to earlier errors.
This project worked fine, but after reinstalling the same Vivado version, I keep getting errors when running the simulation. I have searched and searched several times and places, there are many who end up with this error, but got different suggestions. I honestly do not know what this error means.
The simulation referred me to the behav folder to open the elaborate log for more information about the error.
Here it is:
Vivado Simulator 2017.1
Copyright 1986-1999, 2001-2016 Xilinx, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Running: C:/Xilinx2017v1/Vivado/2017.1/bin/unwrapped/win64.o/xelab.exe -wto 89ab4d8a8bd74d6d87079040762eb149 --debug typical --relax --mt 2 -L xil_defaultlib -L lib_cdc_v1_0_2 -L proc_sys_reset_v5_0_11 -L fit_timer_v2_0_8 -L secureip -L xpm --snapshot design_1_wrapper_behav xil_defaultlib.design_1_wrapper -log elaborate.log
Using 2 slave threads.
Starting static elaboration
Completed static elaboration
Starting simulation data flow analysis
ERROR: [XSIM 43-3294] Signal EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION received.
What could the error 'Signal EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION received' mean?
Someone who have tips and advices?
Are you using VHDL 2008 and trying to access a lower level signal in you test bench?
something like
alias CTL_empty is <<signal Inst_VMUX_Top.Inst_Switch_IF.CTL_empty : std_logic>>;
When I try to make decisions based on CTL_empty, my simulation fails

Commands invalid after 'import_board_preset' command

Currently I am trying to follow the MathWorks tutorial 1 to register a TE0720 with a TE0701-6 carrier board in Matlab. I followed the instructions, designed the block design and exported it as advised. Using the Matlab HDL Workflow Advisor I can follow unitl step 4.1 Create Project. Here, I get the following error message:
invalid command name "CONFIG.PCW_INCLUDE_ACP_TRANS_CHECK"
while executing
"CONFIG.PCW_INCLUDE_ACP_TRANS_CHECK {0} CONFIG.PCW_IOPLL_CTRL_FBDIV {30} CONFIG.PCW_IO_IO_PLL_FREQMHZ {1000.000} CONFIG.PCW_IRQ_F2P_INTR {1} CONFIG..."
(procedure "create_root_design" line 49)
invoked from within
"create_root_design """
(file "vivado_custom_block_design.tcl" line 986)
while executing
"source vivado_custom_block_design.tcl"
(file "vivado_create_prj.tcl" line 15)
This is regarding the exported block design in the corresponding *.tlc file.
After deleting the line mentioned in the error, the error persists, but for the following line. This holds true until I deleted all lines following
CONFIG.PCW_IMPORT_BOARD_PRESET {preset}
It seems to me that once the preset for the board is imported, all following commands are seen as invalid. If I put this line in the end of the list though, I get the error
ERROR [Common 17-69] Command failed: Missing name/value pair in -dict argument.
If I remove this line, I get the error
ERROR [BD 41-1811] The interconnect </axi_interconnect_0> is missing a valid master interface connection
ERROR [Common 17-39] 'validate_bd_design' failed due to earlier errors.
Is there a way to fix this or what is the problem here?
EDIT: I am using Vivado 2017.4 from the Vivado HL WebPACK. Could it be that there is a feature not available in this version for rebuilding the project as MATLAB intends to do?
EDIT 2: I started the complete tutorial fresh from scratch again and now I only get the error
ERROR: [BD 41-1811] The interconnect </axi_interconnect_0> is missing a valid master Interface connection
when going throught the HDL Workflow Advisor. As far as I understand the issue, Vivado searches for something to connect the axi_interconnect to. But isn't this the interface port (DUT) as described later in the tutorial (end of step 2 in Register the custom reference design in HDL Workflow Advisor, where the compiled simulink model should be connected?

IBM BLUEMIX BLOCKCHAIN SDK-DEMO failing

I have been working with HFC SDK for Node.js and it used to work, but since last night I am having some problems.
When running helloblockchain.js only few times works, most time I get this error when it tries to enroll a new user:
E0113 11:56:05.983919636 5288 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484304965.983872199","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484304965.983866102","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
Error: Failed to register and enroll JohnDoe: Error
Other times, the enroll works and the failure appears deploying the chaincode:
Enrolled and registered JohnDoe successfully
Deploying chaincode ...
E0113 12:14:27.341527043 5455 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306067.341430168","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306067.341421859","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
Failed to deploy chaincode: request={"fcn":"init","args":["a","100","b","200"],"chaincodePath":"chaincode","certificatePath":"/certs/peer/cert.pem"}, error={"error":{"code":14,"metadata":{"_internal_repr":{}}},"msg":"Error"}
Or:
Enrolled and registered JohnDoe successfully
Deploying chaincode ...
E0113 12:15:27.448867739 5483 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306127.448692244","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306127.448668047","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
events.js:160
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error
at ClientDuplexStream._emitStatusIfDone (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:189:19)
at ClientDuplexStream._readsDone (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:158:8)
at readCallback (/usr/lib/node_modules/hfc/node_modules/grpc/src/node/src/client.js:217:12)
E0113 12:15:27.563487641 5483 handshake.c:128] Security handshake failed: {"created":"#1484306127.563437122","description":"Handshake read failed","file":"../src/core/lib/security/transport/handshake.c","file_line":237,"referenced_errors":[{"created":"#1484306127.563429661","description":"FD shutdown","file":"../src/core/lib/iomgr/ev_epoll_linux.c","file_line":948}]}
This code worked yesterday, so I don't know what could be happening.
Does anybody know how can I fix it?
Thanks,
Javier.
ibm-bluemix
blockchain
These types of intermittent issues are usually related to GRPC. An initial suggestion is to ensure that you are using at least GRPC version 1.0.0.
If you are using a Mac, then the maximum number of open file descriptors should be checked (using ulimit -n). Sometimes this is initially set to a low value such as 256, so increasing the value could help.
There are a couple of GRPC issues with similar symptoms.
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8732
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8839
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/8382
There is a grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms property that is mentioned in some of these issues. Increasing the value past the 1000 ms level might help reduce the frequency of issues. Below are instructions for how the helloblockchain.js file can be modified to set this property to a higher value.
Open the helloblockchain.js file in the Hyperledger Fabric Client example and find the enrollAndRegisterUsers function.
Add “grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000 to the setMemberServicesUrl call.
chain.setMemberServicesUrl(ca_url, {
pem: cert, "grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000
});
Add “grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000 to the addPeer call.
chain.addPeer("grpcs://" + peers[i].discovery_host + ":" + peers[i].discovery_port,
{pem: cert, "grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms": 5000
});
Note that setting the grpc.initial_reconnect_backoff_ms property may reduce the frequency of issues, but it will not necessarily eliminate all issues.
The connection to the eventhub that is made in the helloblockchain.js file can also be a factor. There is an earlier version of the Hyperledger Fabric Client that does not utilize the eventhub. This earlier version could be tried to determine if this makes a difference. After running git clone https://github.com/IBM-Blockchain/SDK-Demo.git, run git checkout b7d5195 to use this prior level. Before running node helloblockchain.js from a Node.js command window, the git status command can be used to check the code level that is being used.