I would like to ask you about some assistance:
Entrypoint to cluster for http/https is NGINX: quay.io/kubernetes-ingress-controller/nginx-ingress-controller:0.25.0 running as deamonset
I want to achieve 2 things:
preserve source IP of client
direct traffic to nginx replica on
current server (so if request is sent to server A, listed as
externalIP address, nginx on node A should handle it)
Questions:
How is it possible?
Is it possible without nodeport? Control plane can be started with custom --service-node-port-range so I can add nodeport for 80
and 443, but it looks a little bit like a hack (after reading about
nodeport intended usage)
I was considering using metallb, but layer2 configuration will cause bottleneck (high traffic on cluster). I am not sure if BGP will solve this problem.
Kubernetes v15
Bare-metal
Ubuntu 18.04
Docker (18.9) and WeaveNet (2.6)
You can preserve the source IP of client by using externalTrafficPolicy set to local, this will proxy requests to local endpoints. This is explained on Source IP for Services with Type=NodePort.
Can should also have a look at Using Source IP.
In case of MetalLB:
MetalLB respects the service’s externalTrafficPolicy option, and implements two different announcement modes depending on what policy you select. If you’re familiar with Google Cloud’s Kubernetes load balancers, you can probably skip this section: MetalLB’s behaviors and tradeoffs are identical.
“Local” traffic policy
With the Local traffic policy, nodes will only attract traffic if they are running one or more of the service’s pods locally. The BGP routers will load-balance incoming traffic only across those nodes that are currently hosting the service. On each node, the traffic is forwarded only to local pods by kube-proxy, there is no “horizontal” traffic flow between nodes.
This policy provides the most efficient flow of traffic to your service. Furthermore, because kube-proxy doesn’t need to send traffic between cluster nodes, your pods can see the real source IP address of incoming connections.
The downside of this policy is that it treats each cluster node as one “unit” of load-balancing, regardless of how many of the service’s pods are running on that node. This may result in traffic imbalances to your pods.
For example, if your service has 2 pods running on node A and one pod running on node B, the Local traffic policy will send 50% of the service’s traffic to each node. Node A will split the traffic it receives evenly between its two pods, so the final per-pod load distribution is 25% for each of node A’s pods, and 50% for node B’s pod. In contrast, if you used the Cluster traffic policy, each pod would receive 33% of the overall traffic.
In general, when using the Local traffic policy, it’s recommended to finely control the mapping of your pods to nodes, for example using node anti-affinity, so that an even traffic split across nodes translates to an even traffic split across pods.
You need to take for the account the limitations of BGP routing protocol for MetalLB.
Please also have a look at this blog post Using MetalLb with Kind.
Related
Can someone tell me why the service hop won't become a single point of failure?
In Kubernete Service, I see an hop of Service between the client and Pods:
I guess all service's (let's say there are 5000 of services and each service has 3 Pods) routing info are stored in the IPTable of each node?
Kubernetes services connect a set of pods to an abstracted service name and IP address. Services provide discovery and routing between pods.
It depends upon the CNI which you are using and what type of network it will use. Every network plugin has a different approach for how a Pod IP address is assigned (IPAM), how iptables rules and cross-node networking are configured, and how routing information is exchanged between the nodes.
The external IP is perfectly reachable from outside the cluster. It's perfectly reachable from all nodes within the cluster. However, when I try to telnet to the URL from a pod within the cluster that is not on the same node as a pod that is part of the service backend, the connection always times out.
The external IP is reachable by pods that run on the same node as a pod that is part of the service backend.
All pods can perfectly reach the cluster IP of the service.
When I set externalTrafficPolicy to Cluster, the pods are able to reach the external URL regardless of what node they're on.
I am using iptables proxying and kubernetes 1.16
I'm completely at a loss here as to why this is happening. Is someone able to shed some light on this?
From the official doc here,
service.spec.externalTrafficPolicy - denotes if this Service desires to route external traffic to node-local or cluster-wide endpoints. There are two available options: Cluster (default) and Local. Cluster obscures the client source IP and may cause a second hop to another node, but should have good overall load-spreading. Local preserves the client source IP and avoids a second hop for LoadBalancer and NodePort type services, but risks potentially imbalanced traffic spreading.
The service could be either node-local or cluster-wide endpoints. When you define the externalTrafficPolicy as Local, it means node-local. So, other nodes are not able to reach it.
So, you will need to set the externalTrafficPolicy as Cluster instead.
I have bare metal Kubernetes cluster with haproxy ingress controller (daemon set) on external ip. Is it possible to restrict kube-proxy to route to local haproxy ingress pod?
To be more specific, I have 2 pods of haproxy ingress controller and use one external ip for them. As per my understanding, kube-proxy will be routing in round-robin to the pods. I didn't find any way to restrict this particular behaviour.
Set externalTrafficPolicy: Local in the NodePort Service.
This will make it so that traffic going to a node X will only go to the pod in node X. If there is no pod in node X the traffic will be dropped (but this should not be an issue since you're using a DaemonSet).
Another benefit is that this preserves the true source IP that haproxy sees. Without externalTrafficPolicy, it is possible that haproxy sees the source IP of another node instead of the original one, since nodes can proxy traffic.
More info here
Can someone help me understand about the IP address I see for cluster IP when I list services.
what is cluster IP (not the service type, but the real IP)?
how it is used?
where does it come from?
can I define the range for cluster IP (like we do for pod network)?
Good question to start learning something new (also for me):
Your concerns are related to kube-proxy by default in K8s cluster it's working in iptables mode.
Every node in a Kubernetes cluster runs a kube-proxy. Kube-proxy is responsible for implementing a form of virtual IP for Services.
In this mode, kube-proxy watches the Kubernetes control plane for the addition and removal of Service and Endpoint objects. For each Service, it installs iptables rules, which capture traffic to the Service’s clusterIP and port, and redirect that traffic to one of the Service’s backend sets. For each Endpoint object, it installs iptables rules which select a backend Pod.
Node components kube-proxy:
kube-proxy is a network proxy that runs on each node in your cluster, implementing part of the Kubernetes Service concept.
kube-proxy maintains network rules on nodes. These network rules allow network communication to your Pods from network sessions inside or outside of your cluster.
kube-proxy uses the operating system packet filtering layer if there is one and it’s available. Otherwise, kube-proxy forwards the traffic itself.
As described here:
Due to these iptables rules, whenever a packet is destined for a service IP, it’s DNATed (DNAT=Destination Network Address Translation), meaning the destination IP is changed from service IP to one of the endpoints pod IP chosen at random by iptables. This makes sure the load is evenly distributed among the backend pods.
When this DNAT happens, this info is stored in conntrack — the Linux connection tracking table (stores 5-tuple translations iptables has done: protocol, srcIP, srcPort, dstIP, dstPort). This is so that when a reply comes back, it can un-DNAT, meaning change the source IP from the Pod IP to the Service IP. This way, the client is unaware of how the packet flow is handled behind the scenes.
There are also different modes, you can find more information here
During cluster initialization you can use --service-cidr string parameter Default: "10.96.0.0/12"
ClusterIP: The IP address assigned to a Service
Kubernetes assigns a stable, reliable IP address to each newly-created Service (the ClusterIP) from the cluster's pool of available Service IP addresses. Kubernetes also assigns a hostname to the ClusterIP, by adding a DNS entry. The ClusterIP and hostname are unique within the cluster and do not change throughout the lifecycle of the Service. Kubernetes only releases the ClusterIP and hostname if the Service is deleted from the cluster's configuration. You can reach a healthy Pod running your application using either the ClusterIP or the hostname of the Service.
Pod IP: The IP address assigned to a given Pod.
Kubernetes assigns an IP address (the Pod IP) to the virtual network interface in the Pod's network namespace from a range of addresses reserved for Pods on the node. This address range is a subset of the IP address range assigned to the cluster for Pods, which you can configure when you create a cluster.
Resources:
Iptables Mode
Network overview
Understanding Kubernetes Kube-Proxy
Hope this helped
The cluster IP is the address where your service can be reached from inside the cluster. You won't be able to ping from the external network the cluster IP unless you do some kind of SSH tunneling. This IP is auto assigned by k8s and it might be possible to define a range (I'm not sure and I don't see why you need to do so).
I have a question related to Kubernetes networking.
I have a microservice (say numcruncherpod) running in a pod which is serving requests via port 9000, and I have created a corresponding Service of type NodePort (numcrunchersvc) and node port which this service is exposed is 30900.
My cluster has 3 nodes with following IPs:
192.168.201.70,
192.168.201.71
192.168.201.72
I will be routing the traffic to my cluster via reverse proxy (nginx). As I understand in nginx I need to specify IPs of all these cluster nodes to route the traffic to the cluster, is my understanding correct ?
My worry is since nginx won't have knowledge of cluster it might not be a good judge to decide the cluster node to which the traffic should be sent to. So is there a better way to route the traffic to my kubernetes cluster ?
PS: I am not running the cluster on any cloud platform.
This answer is a little late, and a little long, so I ask for forgiveness before I begin. :)
For people not running kubernetes clusters on Cloud Providers there are 4 distinct options for exposing services running inside the cluster to the world outside.
Service of type: NodePort. This is the simplest and default. Kubernetes assigns a random port to your service. Every node in the cluster listens for traffic to this particular port and then forwards that traffic to any one of the pods backing that service. This is usually handled by kube-proxy, which leverages iptables and load balances using a round-robin strategy. Typically since the UX for this setup is not pretty, people often add an external "proxy" server, such as HAProxy, Nginx or httpd to listen to traffic on a single IP and forward it to one of these backends. This is the setup you, OP, described.
A step up from this would be using a Service of type: ExternalIP. This is identical to the NodePort service, except it also gets kubernetes to add an additional rule on all kubernetes nodes that says "All traffic that arrives for destination IP == must also be forwarded to the pods". This basically allows you to specify any arbitrary IP as the "external IP" for the service. As long as traffic destined for that IP reaches one of the nodes in the cluster, it will be routed to the correct pod. Getting that traffic to any of the nodes however, is your responsibility as the cluster administrator. The advantage here is that you no longer have to run an haproxy/nginx setup, if you specify the IP of one of the physical interfaces of one of your nodes (for example one of your master nodes). Additionally you cut down the number of hops by one.
Service of type: LoadBalancer. This service type brings baremetal clusters at parity with cloud providers. A fully functioning loadbalancer provider is able to select IP from a pre-defined pool, automatically assign it to your service and advertise it to the network, assuming it is configured correctly. This is the most "seamless" experience you'll have when it comes to kubernetes networking on baremetal. Most of LoadBalancer provider implementations use BGP to talk and advertise to an upstream L3 router. Metallb and kube-router are the two FOSS projects that fit this niche.
Kubernetes Ingress. If your requirement is limited to L7 applications, such as REST APIs, HTTP microservices etc. You can setup a single Ingress provider (nginx is one such provider) and then configure ingress resources for all your microservices, instead of service resources. You deploy your ingress provider and make sure it has an externally available and routable IP (you can pin it to a master node, and use the physical interface IP for that node for example). The advantage of using ingress over services is that ingress objects understand HTTP mircoservices natively and you can do smarter health checking, routing and management.
Often people combine one of (1), (2), (3) with (4), since the first 3 are L4 (TCP/UDP) and (4) is L7. So things like URL path/Domain based routing, SSL Termination etc is handled by the ingress provider and the IP lifecycle management and routing is taken care of by the service layer.
For your use case, the ideal setup would involve:
A deployment for your microservice, with health endpoints on your pod
An Ingress provider, so that you can tweak/customize your routing/load-balancing as well as use for SSL termination, domain matching etc.
(optional): Use a LoadBalancer provider to front your Ingress provider, so that you don't have to manually configure your Ingress's networking.
Correct. You can route traffic to any or all of the K8 minions. The K8 network layer will forward to the appropriate minion if necessary.
If you are running only a single pod for example, nginx will most likely round-robin the requests. When the requests hit a minion which does not have the pod running on it, the request will be forwarded to the minion that does have the pod running.
If you run 3 pods, one on each minion, the request will be handled by whatever minion gets the request from nginx.
If you run more than one pod on each minion, the requests will be round-robin to each minion, and then round-robin to each pod on that minion.