PostgreSQL 10 Logical Replication - is it possible to clone tables? - postgresql

I have two DB instances with postgresql 10.
First instance working with wal_level = logical, have ALL TABLE publisher. Second - have subscription to the publisher, described above.
All data from the Master DB tables are successfully sending to the replica.
There is only one issue for me - when my App add a new table on Master - I need to add the same table to the replica (and run REFRESH PUBLICATION).
My question - is there a way for replica DB to create new tables automatically?

Schema changes aren't replicated. You can see that in the documentation, at Postgresql 10 Logical Replication: Subscription
The way I handle this is to make all schema changes through a script, and to write the script so that it executes the change commands twice: once on the primary database, and once on the replica.

Related

Replicate postgres database to Redshift - Ongoing replication

I have several postgres databases which need to be replicated as-is to a single aws redshift.
We have currently set up DMS services to the same. However, we keep encountering issues such as source database full, large column issues and most importantly the issue in DMS when new columns with defaults are added on postgres databases(This does not replicate with ongoing replication)
So, are there any other ways that we can set up this ongoing replication?

Postgres and multiple locations of data storage

Postgres and the default location for its storage is at my C-drive. I would like to restore a backup to another database but to access it via the same Postgres server instance - the issue is that the size of the DB is too big to be restore on the same c-drive ...would it be possible to tell Postgres that the second database should be restore and placed on another location/drive (while still remaining the first one)? Like database1 at my C-drive and database2 at my D-drive?
Otherwise the second best solution would be to install 2 separate Postgres instances - but that also seems a bit overkill?
That should be entirely achievable, if you've used the postgres pg_dump command.
The pg_dump command does not create the database, so you create it yourself first. Use CREATE TABLESPACE to specify the location.
CREATE TABLESPACE secondspace LOCATION 'D:\postgresdata';
CREATE DATABASE seconddb TABLESPACE secondspace;
This creates an empty database on the D: drive.
Then the standard restore from a pg_dump should work:
psql seconddb < dumpfile
Replication
Sounds like you need database replication.
There are several ways to do this with Postgres, one built-in, and other approaches using add-on libraries.
Built-in replication feature
The built-in replication feature is likely to suit your needs. See the manual. In this approach, you have an instance of Postgres running on your primary server, doing reads and writes of your data. On a second server, an entirely separate computer, you run another instance of Postgres known as the replica. You first set up the replica by doing a full backup of your database on the first server, and restore to the second server.
Next you configure the replication feature. The replica needs to know it is playing the role of a replica rather than a regular database server. And the primary server needs to know the replica exists, so that every database change, every insert, modification, and deletion, can be communicated.
WAL
This communication happens via WAL files.
The Write-Ahead Log (WAL) feature in Postgres is where the database writes all changes first to the WAL, and only after that is complete, then writes to the actual database. In case of crash, power outage, or other failure, the database upon restarting can detect a transaction left incomplete. If incomplete, the transaction is rolled back, and the database server can try again by seeing the "To-Do" list of work listed in the WAL.
Every so often the current WAL is closed, with a new WAL file created to take over the work. With replication enabled, the closed WAL file is copied to the replica. The replica then incorporates that WAL file, to follow the same "To-Do" list of changes as written in that WAL file. So all changes are made to the replica database exactly as they were made to the primary database. Your replica is an exact match to the primary, except for a slight lag in time. The replica is always just one WAL file behind the progress of the primary.
In times of trouble, the replica serves as a warm stand-by. You can shutdown the primary, then tell the replica that it is now the primary. You can even configure the replica to be a hot stand-by, meaning it will automatically take-over when the primary seems to have failed. There are pros and cons to hot stand-by.
Offload read-only queries
As a bonus feature, the replica can be used for read-only queries. If your database is heavily used, you can offload some of the work burden from your primary to the replica. Any queries that do not require the absolute latest information can be shifted by connecting to the replica rather than the original. For example, a quarterly sales report likely does not need the latest data stored in the active WAL file that has not yet arrived on the replica.
Physical replication means all databases are copied
Caveat: This built-in replication feature is physical replication. This means all the changes to the entire Postgres installation (formally known as a cluster, not to be confused with a hardware cluster) is copied to the replica. If you use one Postgres server to server multiple databases, all those databases must be replicated – you cannot pick and choose which get copied over. There may be alternative replication features in the future related to logical replication.
More to learn
I am being brief here. The topics of replication, high-availability, and disaster-recovery are broad and complex, too much for an Answer on Stack Overflow.
Tip: This kind of Question might have been better asked on the sister site, DBA.StackExchange.com.

Postgres master / slave based on table

Currently I have 1 postgres instance which is starting to receive too much load and want create a cluster of 2 postgres nodes.
From reading the documentation for postgres and pgpool, it seems like I can only write to a master and read from a slave or run parallel queries.
What I'm looking for is a simple replication of a database but with master/slave based on which table is being updated. Is this possible? Am i missing it somewhere in the documentation?
e.g.
update users will be executed on server1 and replicated to server2
update big_table will be executed on server2 and replicated back to server1
What you are looking for is called MASTER/MASTER replication. This is supported natively (without PgPool) since 9.5. Note, that it's an "eventually consistent" architecture, so your application should be aware of possible temporary differences between the two servers.
See PG documentation for more details and setup instructions.

Backup specific tables in AWS RDS Postgres Instance

I have two databases on Amazon RDS, both Postgres. Database 1 and 2
I need to restore an instance from a snapshot of Database 1 for my Staging environment. (Database 2 is my current Staging DB).
However, I want the data from a few of the tables in Database 2 to overwrite the tables in the newly restored snapshot. What is the best way to do this?
When restoring RDS from a Snapshot, a new database instance is created. If you only wish to copy a portion of the snapshot:
Restore the snapshot to a new (temporary) database
Connect to the new database and dump the desired tables using pg_dump
Connect to your staging server and restore the tables using pg_restore (most probably deleting any matching existing tables first)
Delete the temporary database
pg_dump actually outputs SQL commands that are then used to recreate tables and restore data. Look at the content of a dump to understand how the restore process actually works.
I hope this still works for someone else.
With my team we faced a similar issue. We also had 2 Postgres databases and we also just needed to backup some tables from db1 to db2.
What we did is to use a lambda function using Python (from AWS lambda ofc) that connected to both databases and validates if db1.table1 has the same data as db2.table1, if not, then the lambda function should write the missing data from db1.table1 into db2.table1. The approach of using lambda was because we wanted to automate the process due to the main db (let's say db1) is constantly being updated. In addition, it allowed us to only backup our desired tables (let's say 3 tables out of 10), instead of backing up the whole database.
Note: Maybe you want to do these writes using temporary tables to avoid issues with any constraints you have in your tables.

Synchronize two postgresql databases with current data using with bucardo

I try to synchronize two databases using with bucardo. I create master to master replication and it works fine. However rows inserted before replication can not synchronize. I don't want dump one db to the other. How can I do that? Thanks for help.