Loopback 3 get relation from embedded model - mongodb

I'm using loopback 3 to build a backend with mongoDB.
So i have 3 models: Object, Attachment and AwsS3.
Object has a relation Embeds2Many to Attachment.
Attachment has a relation Many2One to AwsS3.
Objects look like that in mongoDB
[
{
"fieldA": "valueA1",
"attachments": [
{
"id": 1,
"awsS3Id": "1234"
},
{
"id": 2,
"awsS3Id": "1235"
}
]
},
{
"fieldA": "valueA2",
"attachments": [
{
"id": 4,
"awsS3Id": "1236"
},
{
"id": 5,
"awsS3Id": "1237"
}
]
}
]
AwsS3 looks like that in mongoDB
[
{
"id": "1",
"url": "abc.com/1"
},
{
"id": "2",
"url": "abc.com/2"
}
]
The question is: how can i get Objects included Attachment and AwsS3.url over the RestAPI?
I have try with the include and scope filter. But it didn't work. It look like, that this function is not implemented in loopback3, right? Here is what i tried over the GET request:
{
"filter": {
"include": {
"relation": "Attachment",
"scope": {
"include": {
"relation": "awsS3",
}
}
}
}
}
With this request i only got the Objects with Attachments without anything from AwsS3.
UPDATE for the relation definitons
The relation from Object to Attachment:
"Attachment": {
"type": "embedsMany",
"model": "Attachment",
"property": "attachments",
"options": {
"validate": true,
"forceId": false
}
},
The relation from Attachment to AwsS3
in attachment.json
"relations": {
"awsS3": {
"type": "belongsTo",
"model": "AwsS3",
"foreignKey": ""
}
}
in AwsS3.json
"relations": {
"attachments": {
"type": "hasMany",
"model": "Attachment",
"foreignKey": ""
}
}

Try this filter:
{ "filter": { "include": ["awsS3", "attachments"]}}}}

Related

What is the reason fo this difference in Facebook messages webhook JSON scheme?

I'm reading the Facebook Send API and events docs, and I'm surprised to see some examples define the message at the top level of the JSON object hierarchy (here for "text message")
{
"sender":{
"id":"<PSID>"
},
"recipient":{
"id":"<PAGE_ID>"
},
"timestamp":1458692752478,
"message":{
"mid":"mid.1457764197618:41d102a3e1ae206a38",
"text":"hello, world!",
"quick_reply": {
"payload": "<DEVELOPER_DEFINED_PAYLOAD>"
}
}
}
While others examples have a different object structure:
{
"id": "682498302938465",
"time": 1518479195594,
"messaging": [
{
"sender": {
"id": "<PSID>"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "<PAGE_ID>"
},
"timestamp": 1518479195308,
"message": {
"mid": "mid.$cAAJdkrCd2ORnva8ErFhjGm0X_Q_c",
"attachments": [
{
"type": "<image|video|audio|file>",
"payload": {
"url": "<ATTACHMENT_URL>"
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
Here is seems like the object is the first example is instead contained in a messaging array. I can't find either what id corresponds to in this second example : there is no table detailing the fields on why the hierarchy is different here.
Finally, there is another example with a different structure:
{
"object": "page",
"entry": [
{
"id": "<PAGE_ID>",
"time": 1583173667623,
"messaging": [
{
"sender": {
"id": "<PSID>"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "<PAGE_ID>"
},
"timestamp": 1583173666767,
"message": {
"mid": "m_toDnmD...",
"text": "This is where I want to go: https:\/\/youtu.be\/bbo_fZAjIhg",
"attachments": [
{
"type": "fallback",
"payload": {
"url": "<ATTACHMENT_URL >",
"title": "TAHITI - Heaven on Earth"
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
Are these differences documented elsewhere? Why do they exist in the first place? Why is messaging an array? Can it contain multiple messages at once?

Upserting multiple entities to context broker

Is there a way to upsert multiple enitites to the Context Broker v2 in a single http-request like submitting an array in the request?
I have something like this in mind:
[POST] /v2/entities/?options=upsert
[
{
id: 'urn:ngsi-ld:xyz:123',
type: 'xyz',
...
},
{
id: 'urn:ngsi-ld:xyz:456',
type: 'xyz',
...
},
...
]
Yes, using POST /v2/update with append action type. For instance (example taken from NGSIv2 API walkthrough):
POST /v2/op/update
{
"actionType": "append",
"entities": [
{
"type": "Room",
"id": "Room3",
"temperature": {
"value": 21.2,
"type": "Float"
},
"pressure": {
"value": 722,
"type": "Integer"
}
},
{
"type": "Room",
"id": "Room4",
"temperature": {
"value": 31.8,
"type": "Float"
},
"pressure": {
"value": 712,
"type": "Integer"
}
}
]
}
That will update Room3 and Room4 entities if they previously exist or create them if they don't previously exist.

Strongloop order by related data

I'm trying to order a request by relational data but I can't get it working:
Model 1:
{
"name": "model1",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"properties": {
"prop1": "string"
},
"relations": {
"model1": {
"type": "belongsTo",
"model": "model2",
"foreignKey": "model2"
}
}
}
Model 2:
{
"name": "model2",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"properties": {
"prop2": "string"
}
}
The REST API request filter I'm trying is this:
{
"include": [
{
"relation": "model2",
"scope": {
"order": "model2.prop2 ASC"
}
}
]
}
I don't get an error but the list is still unordered.
Any hints?

Domino 9.x calendar service create meeting

I have been following this guide to work on Domino 9.0.1
Domino Calendar services
I am using JSON and the POST command works but creates an appointment, what I want to do is create a meeting. I have tried setting other fields like event['x-lotus-appttype'].data or event.AppointmentType = 3 but I still get an appointment.
JSON I am sending
{
"events": [
{
"summary":"Meeting 1",
"location":"Location 1",
"start": {
"date":"2013-12-01",
"time":"13:00:00",
"utc":true
},
"end": {
"date":"2013-12-01",
"time":"14:00:00",
"utc":true
}
}
]
}
What is the correct JSON format to create a meeting ?
Take a look at the following documentation: Event with attendees represented in JSON format
EXAMPLE 4. Event with attendees and time zone array:
{
"x-lotus-charset": {
"data": "UTF-8"
},
"timezones": [
{
"tzid": "Eastern",
"standard": {
"start": {
"date": "1950-11-05",
"time": "02:00:00"
},
"offsetFrom": "-0400",
"offsetTo": "-0500",
"recurrenceRule": "FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0"
},
"daylight": {
"start": {
"date": "1950-03-12",
"time": "02:00:00"
},
"offsetFrom": "-0500",
"offsetTo": "-0400",
"recurrenceRule": "FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0"
}
}
],
"events": [
{
"href": "/mail/dlawson.nsf/api/calendar/events/DB7E0BAC21EC322A85257BD200756E26-Lotus_Notes_Generated",
"id": "DB7E0BAC21EC322A85257BD200756E26-Lotus_Notes_Generated",
"summary": "Staff meeting",
"location": "Ray's office",
"description": "Please email your status update 24 hours before the meeting.",
"start": {
"date": "2013-09-12",
"time": "09:00:00",
"tzid": "Eastern"
},
"end": {
"date": "2013-09-12",
"time": "10:00:00",
"tzid": "Eastern"
},
"class": "public",
"transparency": "opaque",
"sequence": 0,
"last-modified": "20130825T212457Z",
"attendees": [
{
"role": "chair",
"status": "accepted",
"rsvp": false,
"displayName": "Duke Lawson/Peaks",
"email": "DukeLawson#swg.usma.ibm.com"
},
{
"role": "req-participant",
"status": "needs-action",
"rsvp": true,
"displayName": "Dean Melnyk/Peaks",
"email": "DeanMelnyk#swg.usma.ibm.com"
},
{
"role": "req-participant",
"status": "needs-action",
"rsvp": true,
"displayName": "Raymond Chan/Peaks",
"email": "RaymondChan#swg.usma.ibm.com"
}
],
"organizer": {
"displayName": "Duke Lawson/Peaks",
"email": "DukeLawson#swg.usma.ibm.com"
},
"x-lotus-broadcast": {
"data": "FALSE"
},
"x-lotus-notesversion": {
"data": "2"
},
"x-lotus-appttype": {
"data": "3"
}
}
]
}
I hope this can help :)

How can I use CloudKit web services to query based on a reference field?

I've got two CloudKit data objects that look somewhat like this:
Parent Object:
{
"records": [
{
"recordName": "14102C0A-60F2-4457-AC1C-601BC628BF47-184-000000012D225C57",
"recordType": "ParentObject",
"fields": {
"fsYear": {
"value": "2015",
"type": "STRING"
},
"displayOrder": {
"value": 2015221153856287200,
"type": "INT64"
},
"fjpFSGuidForReference": {
"value": "14102C0A-60F2-4457-AC1C-601BC628BF47-184-000000012D225C57",
"type": "STRING"
},
"fsDateSearch": {
"value": "2015221153856287158",
"type": "STRING"
},
},
"recordChangeTag": "id4w7ivn",
"created": {
"timestamp": 1439149087571,
"userRecordName": "_0d26968032e31bbc72c213037b6cb35d",
"deviceID": "A19CD995FDA3093781096AF5D818033A241D65C1BFC3D32EC6C5D6B3B4A9AA6B"
},
"modified": {
"timestamp": 1439149087571,
"userRecordName": "_0d26968032e31bbc72c213037b6cb35d",
"deviceID": "A19CD995FDA3093781096AF5D818033A241D65C1BFC3D32EC6C5D6B3B4A9AA6B"
}
}
],
"total":
}
Child Object:
{
"records": [
{
"recordName": "2015221153856287168",
"recordType": "ChildObject",
"fields": {
"District": {
"value": "002",
"type": "STRING"
},
"ZipCode": {
"value": "12345",
"type": "STRING"
},
"InspecReference": {
"value": {
"recordName": "14102C0A-60F2-4457-AC1C-601BC628BF47-184-000000012D225C57",
"action": "NONE",
"zoneID": {
"zoneName": "_defaultZone"
}
},
"type": "REFERENCE"
},
},
"recordChangeTag": "id4w7lew",
"created": {
"timestamp": 1439149090856,
"userRecordName": "_0d26968032e31bbc72c213037b6cb35d",
"deviceID": "A19CD995FDA3093781096AF5D818033A241D65C1BFC3D32EC6C5D6B3B4A9AA6B"
},
"modified": {
"timestamp": 1439149090856,
"userRecordName": "_0d26968032e31bbc72c213037b6cb35d",
"deviceID": "A19CD995FDA3093781096AF5D818033A241D65C1BFC3D32EC6C5D6B3B4A9AA6B"
}
}
],
"total": 1
}
I'm trying to write a query to directly access the CloudKit web service and return the Child Object based on the reference of the parent object.
My test JSON looks something like this:
{"query":{"recordType":"ChildObject","filterBy":{"fieldName":"InspecReference","fieldValue":{ "value" : "14102C0A-60F2-4457-AC1C-601BC628BF47-184-000000012D225C57", "type" : "string" },"comparator":"EQUALS"}},"zoneID":{"zoneName":"_defaultZone"}}
However, I'm getting the following error from CloudKit:
{"uuid":"33db91f3-b768-4a68-9056-216ecc033e9e","serverErrorCode":"BAD_REQUEST","reason":"BadRequestException:
Unexpected input"}
I'm guessing I have the Record Field Dictionary in the query wrong. However, the documentation isn't clear on what this should look like on a reference object.
You have to re-create the actual object of the reference. In this particular case, the JSON looks like this:
{
"query": {
"recordType": "ChildObject",
"filterBy": {
"fieldName": "InspecReference",
"fieldValue": {
"value": {
"recordName": "14102C0A-60F2-4457-AC1C-601BC628BF47-184-000000012D225C57",
"action": "NONE"
},
"type": "REFERENCE"
},
"comparator": "EQUALS"
}
},
"zoneID": {
"zoneName": "_defaultZone"
}
}