Disable similar results from list.js - list.js

I use list.js, but it displays also similar results. For example I am typing Mar..., website displays also mur, car, man and etc. How can I disable them?
It is demo from codepen:
<p class="codepen" data-height="265" data-theme-id="0" data-default-tab="html,result" data-user="javve" data-slug-hash="isInl" style="height: 265px; box-sizing: border-box; display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; border: 2px solid; margin: 1em 0; padding: 1em;" data-pen-title="List.js - Fuzzy search">
<span>See the Pen <a href="https://codepen.io/javve/pen/isInl/">
List.js - Fuzzy search</a> by Jonny Strömberg (#javve)
on CodePen.</span>
</p>
<script async src="https://static.codepen.io/assets/embed/ei.js"></script>

You are using fuzzy-search, if you change <input type="text" class="fuzzy-search" /> to <input type="text" class="search" /> it works.
check it Codepen

Related

I completed a project but when I send the file in email when i attach the files the images do not appear how do i fix it it so they appear?

<style >
em.quote{
text-align: center;
justify-content: center;
margin-top: 515px;
margin-left: 550px;
}
.row {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
padding: 0 4px;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
}
/* Create four equal columns that sits next to each other */
.column {
flex: 25%;
max-width: 25%;
padding: 0 4px;
}
.column img {
margin-top: 8px;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 100%;
}
/* Responsive layout - makes a two column-layout instead of four columns */
#media screen and (max-width: 800px) {
.column {
flex: 50%;
max-width: 50%;
}
}
/* Responsive layout - makes the two columns stack on top of each other instead of next to each other */
#media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
.column {
flex: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}}
#main{
text-align: center;
border-style: solid;
background-color: #b48eaeff;
}
p.info{
font-family: sans-serif;
}
p.link{
text-align: center;
}
#image{
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
max-width: 100%
}
</style>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content ="width=device-width,initial-scale=1">
<html>
<head>
<div id="main">
<h1 id="title"> Dr.Norman Borlaug</h1>
</div>
<div id="img-div">
<div id="img-caption" alt=" A gallery of images of Norman Borlaug">
<div class="row" class=“img-responsive”>
<div class="column">
<img src="img/normanwithpeople.png" alt="Norman Borlaug having a conversion with colleuges">
<img src="img/norman-borlaug.png" alt="Norman Borlaug in a field smiling" id ="image">
<img src="img/normanholdingnobelpize.png" alt=" Norman Borlaug holding the Nobel Peace Prize">
</div>
<div class="column">
<img src="img/normanatconference.png" alt="Norman Borlaug at a confrence">
<img src="img/normanwithjimmy.png" alt="Norman_Borlaug with former President Jimmy Carter">
<img src="img/normaninmexico.jpg" alt=" A painting of Norman Borlaug in a field in Mexico">
</div>
<div class="column">
<img src="img/norman.png" alt="Norman Borlaug and his wife">
<img src="img/normangetsaward.png" alt="Norman Borlaug receives an award from president George W Bush">
<img src="img/normanatscience.png" alt=" Norman Borlaug at a agricultural science and technology ">
</div>
</div>
<p class="important">
<em class="quote">Fathered a revolution that saved billons of lives</em>
</p>
</head>
<div id="tribute-info">
<p class="info">Norman Ernest Borlaug (March 25, 1914 – September 12, 2009) was an American agronomist who led initiatives worldwide that contributed to the extensive increases in agricultural production termed the Green Revolution. Borlaug was awarded multiple honors for his work, including the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Congressional Gold Medal.
Borlaug received his B.S. in forestry in 1937 and Ph.D. in plant pathology and genetics from the University of Minnesota in 1942. He took up an agricultural research position with CIMMYT in Mexico, where he developed semi-dwarf, high-yield, disease-resistant wheat varieties. During the mid-20th century, Borlaug led the introduction of these high-yielding varieties combined with modern agricultural production techniques to Mexico, Pakistan, and India. As a result, Mexico became a net exporter of wheat by 1963. Between 1965 and 1970, wheat yields nearly doubled in Pakistan and India, greatly improving the food security in those nations.
Borlaug was often called "the father of the Green Revolution", and is credited with saving over a billion people worldwide from starvation. According to Jan Douglas, executive assistant to the president of the World Food Prize Foundation, the source of this number is Gregg Easterbrook's 1997 article "Forgotten Benefactor of Humanity." The article states that the "form of agriculture that Borlaug preaches may have prevented a billion deaths." He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 in recognition of his contributions to world peace through increasing food supply.</p></div>
</body>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug" target="_blank" id="tribute-link"> <p class="link"> Learn More About Norman Borlaug<p>
</html>
This the code for the project but how do I display the images so anyone can see currently can see it since i have the images in a folder together but nobody else can I sent as an attached file to a friend it popped up for the most part but the images don't display on mobile or when i forward it to someone else / to the public as well.
Your images have a relative path--they need a full (absolute) path.
So change this: src="img/normanwithpeople.png"
To this: src="https://www.server.com/path/to/img/normanwithpeople.png"

i-check checkbox in fooTable Header <th> not working

In FooTable 3.1.4 I want to use a pretified i-Check checkbox for a checkAll functionality in the Header of the table.
This is the HTML without i-Check:
<th data-type="html" data-sortable="false"
data-filterable="false" style="display: table-cell;"
class="footable-last-visible">Choose
<input name="check_all" class="all" type="checkbox">
</th>
When we run this script without i-Checks it runs fine. However - applying i-Checks makes the prettified checkbox unclickable - We are unable to check / uncheck.
This is the HTML with i-Check applied:
<th class="footable-last-visible" data-type="html" data-sortable="false"
data-filterable="false" style="display: table-cell;">Kies
<div class="icheckbox_square-green" style="position: relative;">
<input type="checkbox" name="check_all" class="all"
style="position: absolute; opacity: 0;">
<ins style="position: absolute; top: 0%; left: 0%; display: block; width: 100%; height: 100%; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; border: 0px none; opacity: 0;"
class="iCheck-helper">
</ins>
</div>
</th>
So it seems FooTable does not accept the i-Checks modified HTML in the head of the table. I did find a (closed) Github Issue post addressing the problem :
"the issue was that the sorting component worked off of a click on the
entire TH element and had a call to e.preventDefault() in the handler.
This was basically killing the default click behavior of elements
placed within the header element. I've since removed this limitation
and it will be released in the next version shortly."
But this post does not clarify as of which version of FooTable this problem is solved.
Or did I make a mistake in the code ..... So - any input much appreciated.
your script must be:
//first
$('.table').footable();
//after
$('#checkall').on('ifChecked ifUnchecked',function(evant){
if(evant.type == 'ifChecked')
$('.check').iCheck('check');
else
$('.check').iCheck('uncheck');
});

How is this form built?

I'm trying to figure out how a form like this is constructed/styled (CSS? Javascript?):
It can be found at the very bottom of http://www.masterdynamic.com/
I want to say it's made through some sort of Javascript library, but could be totally wrong. I tried inspecting with Chrome Dev Tools, but couldn't really get a clear idea. Not really sure where to start with styling something like this (or even what to search for, all efforts have brought me to normal forms).
Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Here is the HTML and CSS:
<input type="text" name="email" placeholder="Enter Email"
dir="auto" aria-label="Email " title="" autocomplete="off">
form input[type=text] {
width: 80%;
color: #b1aca1;
padding: 10px 10px 10px 0;
font-family: blenderthin,Verdana,sans-serif;
font-weight: lighter;
font-size: 3rem;
border: 0;
background-color: transparent;
outline: 0;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: bottom;
}

Multiple jQuery Pop-up Forms: Connect a href to <form> divs for user input

I'm working on a digital textbook feature that would allow the student to click a link to open up a simple div form for them to input their answer to that specific question. The pop-up form is just simple HTML/CSS with some jQuery UI to hide, show, and make it draggable. Here's the twist. I've got multiple questions that each need to be attached to a unique div. No problem, I thought. I'll just set each a href to link back to a unique ID that I've assigned within the DIV. Problem is, I can't seem to target the proper DIV with its corresponding a href. Instead the same set of questions appear no matter which link is clicked. This seems super simple and I'm probably overcomplicating it. What can I do here?
HTML:
<div id="draggable" class="messagepop pop">
<form method="post" id="new_message" action="/answers">
<p><label for="body">What type of person is Carsten?</label><textarea rows="15" name="body" id="body" cols="55"></textarea></p>
<p><label for="body">How do you know?</label><textarea rows="15" name="body" id="body" cols="55"></textarea></p>
<p><center><input type="submit" value="Submit" name="commit" id="message_submit"/> or <a id="hide" href="#">Cancel</a></center></p>
</form>
</div>
<div id="draggable" class="messagepop pop">
<form method="post" id="new_message" action="/answers">
<p><label for="body">What can you learn about an active volcano from the photograph?</label><textarea rows="15" name="body" id="body" cols="55"></textarea></p>
<p><center><input type="submit" value="Submit" name="commit" id="message_submit"/> or <a id="hide" href="#">Cancel</a></center></p>
</form>
</div>
Draw Conclusions What kind of person is Carsten? How do you know?
Use Text Features What can you learn about an active volcano from the photograph?
Where the first a href needs to open the first div and the second a href opens the second div, etc., etc.
CSS:
.messagepop {
overflow-y: auto;
overflow-x: hidden;
cursor:default;
display:none;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
text-align:left;
width:394px;
height: 335px;
z-index:50;
padding: 25px 25px 20px;
background-color: #fff;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
-moz-border-radius: 4px 4px 4px 4px;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
-webkit-border-radius: 4px 4px 4px 4px;
border-color: #E5E5E5 #DBDBDB #D2D2D2;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;}
JS:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.show').click(function() {
if ( !$(this).next('div').is(':visible') ) {
$(".messagepop").slideFadeToggle();
$(this).next('div').slideFadeToggle();
}
});
$('.hide').click(function() {
$(this).parent().slideFadeToggle();});
$.fn.slideFadeToggle = function(easing, callback) {
return this.animate({ opacity: 'toggle', height: 'toggle' }, "fast", easing, callback);};
$(function() {
$("#draggable").draggable();});
Thank you for your advice and for ironing out my poorly written method. It seems you've got it working.
I've since discovered a jQuery Mobile solution that is much easier than what I was trying to pull together.
For future viewers, it would simply look like this.
Draw Conclusions
Use Text Features
<div data-role="popup" id="popup1" class="ui-content" data-position-to="window">
Close
<p>What kind of person is Carsten?</p>
<input type="text"/>
<p>How do you know?</p>
<textarea></textarea>
</div>
<div data-role="popup" id="popup2" class="ui-content" data-position-to="window">
Close
<p>What can you learn about an active <mark><b>volcano</b></mark> from the photograph?</p>
<textarea></textarea>
</div>
The logic here makes a lot more sense to me and there's the added benefit of ensuring it will work properly on mobile devices. Then if you want to make it draggable, just drop in:
<script>
$(function() {
$(".ui-content").draggable();
});
</script>
And then if you want it to be draggable on mobile (remember, jQuery UI isn't natively supported on mobile), you'll have to call up a hack of sorts. I like Touch Punch.
You may run into issues with form inputs when using Draggable combined with Touch Punch, but that's a story for another thread.
Here is a demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ebNsz/
I've set id:s for the question-div:s and target them with the 'href' attribute in the 'a' elements. Not sure what you wanted to do with the 'slideFadeToggle' function, so i used 'fadeToggle' instead.
HTML:
<div id="q1" class="messagepop">
<form method="" id="form1" action="/answers">
<label for="answer1">What type of person is Carsten?</label><textarea name="answer1" class="answer"></textarea>
<label for="answer2">How do you know?</label><textarea name="answer2" class="answer"></textarea>
<div>
<input type="submit" value="Submit" name="submit" /> or <a class="close" href="">Cancel</a>
</div>
</form>
</div>
<div id="q2" class="messagepop">
<form method="" id="form2" action="/answers">
<label for="answer1">What can you learn about an active volcano from the photograph?</label><textarea name="answer1" class="answer"></textarea>
<div>
<input type="submit" value="Submit" name="submit" /> or <a class="close" href="">Cancel</a>
</div>
</form>
</div>
<p>Draw Conclusions What kind of person is Carsten? How do you know?</p>
<p>Use Text Features What can you learn about an active volcano from the photograph?</p>
jQuery: (jsFiddle doesn't support .draggable(), so i commented out the first line and added the second.)
$(function() {
/* $("div.messagepop").draggable().hide();*/
$("div.messagepop").hide();
$("a.toggle").click(function(e)
{
e.preventDefault();
var targetpop = $(this).attr('href');
$(targetpop).siblings("div.messagepop").fadeOut();
$(targetpop).fadeToggle();
});
$("a.close").click(function(e)
{
e.preventDefault();
$(this).closest("div.messagepop").fadeToggle();
});
});
CSS:
.messagepop {
position: absolute;
top: 20%;
left: 50%;
z-index: 50;
margin-left: -197px;
text-align: center;
width: 394px;
height: 335px;
padding: 25px 25px 20px;
background-color: #fff;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
-moz-border-radius: 4px;
-webkit-border-radius: 4px;
border-radius: 4px;
border-color: #E5E5E5 #DBDBDB #D2D2D2;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
}
label {
display: block;
}
textarea {
width: 75%;
height: 5em;
margin: 0 0 1em 0;
}

CSS selector for a checked radio button's label

Is it possible to apply a css(3) style to a label of a checked radio button?
I have the following markup:
<input type="radio" id="rad" name="radio"/>
<label for="rad">A Label</label>
What I was hoping is that
label:checked { font-weight: bold; }
would do something, but alas it does not (as I expected).
Is there a selector that can achieve this sort of functionality? You may surround with divs etc if that helps, but the best solution would be one that uses the label ''for'' attribute.
It should be noted that I am able to specify browsers for my application, so best of class css3 etc please.
try the + symbol:
It is Adjacent sibling combinator. It combines two sequences of simple selectors having the same parent and the second one must come IMMEDIATELY after the first.
As such:
input[type="radio"]:checked+label{ font-weight: bold; }
//a label that immediately follows an input of type radio that is checked
works very nicely for the following markup:
<input id="rad1" type="radio" name="rad"/><label for="rad1">Radio 1</label>
<input id="rad2" type="radio" name="rad"/><label for="rad2">Radio 2</label>
... and it will work for any structure, with or without divs etc as long as the label follows the radio input.
Example:
input[type="radio"]:checked+label { font-weight: bold; }
<input id="rad1" type="radio" name="rad"/><label for="rad1">Radio 1</label>
<input id="rad2" type="radio" name="rad"/><label for="rad2">Radio 2</label>
I know this is an old question, but if you would like to have the <input> be a child of <label> instead of having them separate, here is a pure CSS way that you could accomplish it:
:checked + span { font-weight: bold; }
Then just wrap the text with a <span>:
<label>
<input type="radio" name="test" />
<span>Radio number one</span>
</label>
See it on JSFiddle.
I forget where I first saw it mentioned but you can actually embed your labels in a container elsewhere as long as you have the for= attribute set. So, let's check out a sample on SO:
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
background-color: #262626;
color: white;
}
.radio-button {
display: none;
}
#filter {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
.filter-label {
display: inline-block;
border: 4px solid green;
padding: 10px 20px;
font-size: 1.4em;
text-align: center;
cursor: pointer;
}
main {
clear: left;
}
.content {
padding: 3% 10%;
display: none;
}
h1 {
font-size: 2em;
}
.date {
padding: 5px 30px;
font-style: italic;
}
.filter-label:hover {
background-color: #505050;
}
#featured-radio:checked~#filter .featured,
#personal-radio:checked~#filter .personal,
#tech-radio:checked~#filter .tech {
background-color: green;
}
#featured-radio:checked~main .featured {
display: block;
}
#personal-radio:checked~main .personal {
display: block;
}
#tech-radio:checked~main .tech {
display: block;
}
<input type="radio" id="featured-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" checked="checked">
<input type="radio" id="personal-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" value="Personal">
<input type="radio" id="tech-radio" class="radio-button" name="content-filter" value="Tech">
<header id="filter">
<label for="featured-radio" class="filter-label featured" id="feature-label">Featured</label>
<label for="personal-radio" class="filter-label personal" id="personal-label">Personal</label>
<label for="tech-radio" class="filter-label tech" id="tech-label">Tech</label>
</header>
<main>
<article class="content featured tech">
<header>
<h1>Cool Stuff</h1>
<h3 class="date">Today</h3>
</header>
<p>
I'm showing cool stuff in this article!
</p>
</article>
<article class="content personal">
<header>
<h1>Not As Cool</h1>
<h3 class="date">Tuesday</h3>
</header>
<p>
This stuff isn't nearly as cool for some reason :(;
</p>
</article>
<article class="content tech">
<header>
<h1>Cool Tech Article</h1>
<h3 class="date">Last Monday</h3>
</header>
<p>
This article has awesome stuff all over it!
</p>
</article>
<article class="content featured personal">
<header>
<h1>Cool Personal Article</h1>
<h3 class="date">Two Fridays Ago</h3>
</header>
<p>
This article talks about how I got a job at a cool startup because I rock!
</p>
</article>
</main>
Whew. That was a lot for a "sample" but I feel it really drives home the effect and point: we can certainly select a label for a checked input control without it being a sibling. The secret lies in keeping the input tags a child to only what they need to be (in this case - only the body element).
Since the label element doesn't actually utilize the :checked pseudo selector, it doesn't matter that the labels are stored in the header. It does have the added benefit that since the header is a sibling element we can use the ~ generic sibling selector to move from the input[type=radio]:checked DOM element to the header container and then use descendant/child selectors to access the labels themselves, allowing the ability to style them when their respective radio boxes/checkboxes are selected.
Not only can we style the labels, but also style other content that may be descendants of a sibling container relative to all of the inputs. And now for the moment you've all been waiting for, the JSFIDDLE! Go there, play with it, make it work for you, find out why it works, break it, do what you do!
Hopefully that all makes sense and fully answers the question and possibly any follow ups that may crop up.
If your input is a child element of the label and you have more than one labels, you can combine #Mike's trick with Flexbox + order.
label.switchLabel {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
width: 150px;
}
.switchLabel .left { order: 1; }
.switchLabel .switch { order: 2; }
.switchLabel .right { order: 3; }
/* sibling selector ~ */
.switchLabel .switch:not(:checked) ~ span.left { color: lightblue }
.switchLabel .switch:checked ~ span.right { color: lightblue }
/* style the switch */
:root {
--radio-size: 14px;
}
.switchLabel input.switch {
width: var(--radio-size);
height: var(--radio-size);
border-radius: 50%;
border: 1px solid #999999;
box-sizing: border-box;
outline: none;
-webkit-appearance: inherit;
-moz-appearance: inherit;
appearance: inherit;
box-shadow: calc(var(--radio-size) / 2) 0 0 0 gray, calc(var(--radio-size) / 4) 0 0 0 gray;
margin: 0 calc(5px + var(--radio-size) / 2) 0 5px;
}
.switchLabel input.switch:checked {
box-shadow: calc(-1 * var(--radio-size) / 2) 0 0 0 gray, calc(-1 * var(--radio-size) / 4) 0 0 0 gray;
margin: 0 5px 0 calc(5px + var(--radio-size) / 2);
}
<label class="switchLabel">
<input type="checkbox" class="switch" />
<span class="left">Left</span>
<span class="right">Right</span>
</label>
asd
html
<label class="switchLabel">
<input type="checkbox" class="switch"/>
<span class="left">Left</span>
<span class="right">Right</span>
</label>
css
label.switchLabel {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
width: 150px;
}
.switchLabel .left { order: 1; }
.switchLabel .switch { order: 2; }
.switchLabel .right { order: 3; }
/* sibling selector ~ */
.switchLabel .switch:not(:checked) ~ span.left { color: lightblue }
.switchLabel .switch:checked ~ span.right { color: lightblue }
See it on JSFiddle.
note: Sibling selector only works within the same parent. To work around this, you can make the input hidden at top-level using #Nathan Blair hack.
UPDATE:
This only worked for me because our existing generated html was wacky, generating labels along with radios and giving them both checked attribute.
Never mind, and big ups for Brilliand for bringing it up!
If your label is a sibling of a checkbox (which is usually the case), you can use the ~ sibling selector, and a label[for=your_checkbox_id] to address it... or give the label an id if you have multiple labels (like in this example where I use labels for buttons)
Came here looking for the same - but ended up finding my answer in the docs.
a label element with checked attribute can be selected like so:
label[checked] {
...
}
I know it's an old question, but maybe it helps someone out there :)