What I want to achieve is this:
Subscribe multiple consumers to a single topic
Each message should be processed by only one consumer
No consumer should be idle as long as the topic has unprocessed messages
As far as I understand I can get the first two points by defining multiple partitions for that topic, at least one partition per consumer. But that doesn't satisfy my 3rd requirement.
Assume I created a topic with 3 partitions and subscribe 3 consumers (same group id). Then a producer pushes a bulk of 300 messages which are equally distributed to all three partitions. So each partition contains 100 messages and consumers start to process. For whatever reasons one consumer takes longer and at some point when 2 consumers have already processed all messages of their partitions, the 3rd consumer still has several messages left to process.
In that scenario the 2 fast consumers would fall idle while the 3rd one is still processing messages.
What I have in mind is something like a topic with only one partition and all consumers subscribed share the same offset index. Then, whenever a consumer is idle it will fetch the next message from the topic that hasn't been processed by any of the consumers yet. I know that Kafka cannot have multiple consumers of the same group on one partition. It's just to explain my intentions.
Is there a way to configure my topology to meet my requirements?
When I have 1000 of web server and all are interested in messages from a topic. I am thinking of writing a specific data to a particular partition of a topic and 1000+ servers are interest in the data in that particular partition. How good is to implement assign instead of subscribe. How scalable is this approach is. can I assign 1000+ consumer to read data from a particular partition.
In Kafka, every consumer belongs to a consumer group. When a Kafka producer sends a message to a particular group, the records of a partition are being delivered to a single consumer.
If the number of partitions is greater than the number of consumers, then some consumers will consume data from more than one partition. On the other hand, if the number of consumers is greater than the number of partitions, some consumers will be inactive as they will receive no data.
You cannot have multiple consumers -within the same consumer group- consuming data from a single partition. Therefore, in order to consume data from the same partition using N consumers, you'd need to create N distinct consumer groups too.
Note that partitioning enhances the parallelism within a Kafka cluster. If you create thousands of consumers to consume data from only one partition, I suspect that you will lose some level of parallelism.
Subscribe vs Assign
Subscribe makes use of the consumer group; Kafka coordinator sends assignment to a consumer and the partitions of the topics subscribed to, will be distributed to the instances within that group.
Assign forces assignment to a list of topics.
1. Consuming concurrently on the same topic and same partition
Suppose I have 100 partitions for a given topic (e.g. Purchases), I can easily consume these 100 partitions (e.g. Electronics, Clothing, and etc...) in parallel using a consumer group with 100 consumers in it.
However, that is assigning one consumer to each subset of the total data on Purchases. What if I want just want to consume one subset of data with 100 consumers concurrently? For example, for all of my consumers, they just want to know Electronics partition of the Purchases topic.
Is there way they can consume this partition concurrently?
In general I just want all my consumers to receive the same data set concurrently.
From the information I've gathered, it seems to me that consumers CANNOT consume from replicas: Consuming from a replica
Can I produce the same data to multiple topics, like Purchase-1[Electronics] and Purchase-2[Electronics] so then I can consume them concurrently? Is this a recommended approach?
2. Producing concurrently on the same topic and same partition
When multiple producers are producing to the same topic and same partition, since we can only write to the partition leader and replicas are only there for fault-tolerance, does this mean there isn't any concurrency? (i.e. each commit must wait in line.)
If those 100 consumers belong to different consumer groups, they can consume from the same topic and partition simultaneously. In that case, you need to make sure each consumer is able to handle the load from the 100 partitions.
Producers can produce to the same topic partition at the same time, but the actual order of messages written to the partition is determined by the partition leader.
If you want to consumer from a single partition in parallel, use something like Parallel Consumer (PC).
By using PC, you can process all your keys in parallel, regardless of how long it takes, and you can be as concurrent as you wish.
PC directly solves for this, by sub partitioning the input partitions by key and processing each key in parallel.
It also tracks per record acknowledgement. Check out Parallel Consumer on GitHub (it's open source BTW, and I'm the author).
If you have less consumers than partitions, does that simply mean you will not consume all the messages on a given topic?
In a cloud environment, how are you suppose to keep track how many consumers are running and how many are pointing to a given topic#partition?
What if you have multiple consumers on a given topic#partition? I guess the consumer has to somehow keep track of what messages it has already processed in case of duplicates?
In fact, each consumer belongs to a consumer group. When Kafka cluster sends data to a consumer group, all records of a partition will be sent to a single consumer in the group.
If there're more paritions than consumers in a group, some consumers will consume data from more than one partition. If there're more consumers in a group than paritions, some consumers will get no data. If you add new consumer instances to the group, they will take over some partitons from old members. If you remove a consumer from the group (or the consumer dies), its partition will be reassigned to other member.
Now let's take a look at your questions:
If you have less consumers than partitions, does that simply mean you will not consume all the messages on a given topic?
NO. Some consumers in the same consumer group will consume data from more than one partition.
In a cloud environment, how are you suppose to keep track how many consumers are running and how many are pointing to a given topic#partition?
Kafka will take care of it. If new consumers join the group, or old consumers dies, Kafka will do reblance.
What if you have multiple consumers on a given topic#partition?
You CANNOT have multiple consumers (in a consumer group) to consume data from a single parition. However, if there're more than one consumer group, the same partition can be consumed by one (and only one) consumer in each consumer group.
1) No that means you will one consumer handling more than one consumer.
2) Kafka never assigns same partition to more than one consumer because that will violate order guarantee within a partition.
3) You could implement ConsumerRebalanceListener, in your client code that gets called whenever partitions are assigned or revoked from consumer.
You might want to take a look at this article specically "Assigning partitions to consumers" part. In that i have a sample where you create topic with 3 partitions and then a consumer with ConsumerRebalanceListener telling you which consumer is handling which partition. Now you could play around with it by starting 1 or more consumers and see what happens. The sample code is in github
http://www.javaworld.com/article/3066873/big-data/big-data-messaging-with-kafka-part-2.html
I read kafka document, still don't know how consume one topic parallel?
Suppose:
I have one topic like "something happened" (don't split this topic), and I have many customers that want to consume it.
So what should I do, so that multiple customers can consume it parallel? Should I use partitioning and customer groups?
I have one idea about this, but I'm not sure whether is it right.
Make many partitions about the same topic, and make one partition to one customer, so one producer must produce the same to these partitions, and every customer in the different customer group, is it right?
Using partitions is the way of being able to parallelize the consumption of a topic. Let´s say you have 10 partitions for your topic, then you can have 10 consumers in the same consumer group reading one partition each. If you have less consumers than partitions, then they would be responsible for more than one partition each. If you have more consumers than partitions, then there would be consumers who would not get any partition assigned to them and have nothing to do except being available to replace another consumer who has died.
Each topic in Kafka can be organized into many partitions. Partition allows for parallel consumption increasing throughput.
Producer publishes the message to a topic using the Kafka producer client library which balances the messages across the available partitions using a Partitioner. The broker to which the producer connects to takes care of sending the message to the broker which is the leader of that partition using the partition owner information in zookeeper. Consumers use Kafka’s High-level consumer library (which handles broker leader changes, managing offset info in zookeeper and figuring out partition owner info etc implicitly) to consume messages from partitions in streams; each stream may be mapped to a few partitions depending on how the consumer chooses to create the message streams.
For example, if there are 10 partitions for a topic and 3 consumer instances (C1,C2,C3 started in that order) all belonging to the same Consumer Group, we can have different consumption models that allow read parallelism as below
Each consumer uses a single stream.
In this model, when C1 starts all 10 partitions of the topic are mapped to the same stream and C1 starts consuming from that stream. When C2 starts, Kafka rebalances the partitions between the two streams. So, each stream will be assigned to 5 partitions(depending on the rebalance algorithm it might also be 4 vs 6) and each consumer consumes from its stream. Similarly, when C3 starts, the partitions are again rebalanced between the 3 streams. Note that in this model, when consuming from a stream assigned to more than one partition, the order of messages will be jumbled between partitions.
Each consumer uses more than one stream
(say C1 uses 3, C2 uses 3 and C3 uses 4). In this model, when C1 starts, all the 10 partitions are assigned to the 3 streams and C1 can consume from the 3 streams concurrently using multiple threads. When C2 starts, the partitions are rebalanced between the 6 streams and similarly when C3 starts, the partitions are rebalanced between the 10 streams. Each consumer can consume concurrently from multiple streams. Note that the number of streams and partitions here are equal. In case the number of streams exceed the partitions, some streams will not get any messages as they will not be assigned any partitions.
Just to add the list of answers, Confluent has a library to do this for you, like Rapids. The project is here:
https://github.com/confluentinc/parallel-consumer
It's open source.
Note: I'm the author.
#Lundahl did all the didactic, I'll give you a pratical sample.
Create a topic for some meaning, e.g. news_events with the parallelism your consumers will need (partitions), you can calc that using the time to process one message, the number of messages you will have and the time you want to have all the messages processed.
Let's create consumers for that topic, you wan't to read the news and your sister or brother also, each one on your time, then every one needs a consumer group id, this way kafka will know that threads a,b,c are for one consumer group and the d,e,c are for the second consumer group, every consumer group will receive the same messages, process it at their time and won't affect each other.
A message will come at one or other partition, never at two, by default Kafka makes round robin to choose the partition, remember, all consumers groups can connect and read data from all the same partitions
I would suggest you to use rapids-kafka-client, a library which do that parallelism stuff for you, choose the number of threads equal the number of partitions you have, choose a consumer group, and see the magic happen.
public static void main(String[] args){
ConsumerConfig.<String, String>builder()
.prop(KEY_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringDeserializer.class.getName())
.prop(VALUE_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringDeserializer.class.getName())
.prop(GROUP_ID_CONFIG, "news-app")
.topics("news_events")
.consumers(7)
.callback((ctx, record) -> {
System.out.printf("status=consumed, value=%s%n", record.value());
})
.build()
.consume()
.waitFor();
}
You can read more about consumer groups, topics and partitions here
I assume what you want is parallel consumption between customers in a publish/subscribe fashion.
Beside that, you can also have parallel consumption within a single customer in order to scale the consumer application.
Parallel consumption between customers
If by "customers" you mean different organizations which are interested in consuming topic's messages independently, all you need is consumer groups.
This is a simple publish/subscribe pattern where each customer runs its own application and read all topic's messages without interfering with others.
Each customer application can be seen as a consumer group, made up by one or more Kafka consumers (whether running on a single node or spread across a cluster), all of them sharing the consumer group's identifier.
You achieve this goal regardless of partitions. In case topic is partitioned, you don't need to worry about writing the same message to all partitions. Remember that in Kafka messages are durable, a message read by a Kafka consumer is not deleted and is available to be read by other Kafka consumers from a different consumer group (until it expires). Furthermore, partitions are not meant to work like this, they help scale storage of data (at a certain point all topic's data wouldn't fit into just one node) and scale consumer applications as you can see below.
Parallel consumption within single customer
You can further parallelize, or better to say, scale the consumption of messages within a consumer group with, in fact, Kafka consumers.
Imagine topic is huge, producers write into it with an high rate, and consumer group has only one consumer: this poor consumer may struggle to keep up with the message arrival rate, especially if message processing is time-consuming too.
That's the case where you need partitions and more consumers in your consumer group, so that Kafka will assign partitions to consumers to distribute reading load among them.
How partition assignment works has been already explained in other answers here, but basically for a given consumer group:
each topic's partition is assigned exclusively to one consumer,
a consumer might get assigned more partitions
if consumers are more than topic's partitions, some of them will stay idle as they won't get assigned any partition to consume from.
Remember that message ordering in Kafka is guaranteed only at partition level, so if you have many partitions and ordering matters, you need to choose the right message key to partition data according to your requirements.
For example if you want messages be ordered by device, a device_id would be your key that guarantees messages of the same device will be written to the same partition.