In my project the ask is , we need to establish the dependency between the spec files.
Each spec file is having multiple it block. So if any it block failed, the spec should return failed, and the dependent specfile should not run as part of execution.
Is there any way to establish the dependency between spec file in protractor using jasmine framework?
Tried multiple blogs, but nowhere i found the expected answer.
Related
I am a little confused by the new configuration file netlify.yaml.
I imagined it would be a drop-in replacement for netlify.toml, but without the toml file I get the following error:
No netlify.toml found. This is needed to configure the function settings. For more info: https://github.com/netlify/netlify-lambda#installation
When both of them are present I have
failed during stage 'Reading and parsing configuration files': Multiple potential Netlify configuration files in "/opt/build/repo": netlify.toml, netlify.yaml
I would like to access the “plugins” functionality and I am not certain if it exists on the toml version of the configuration as this doesn’t seem to trigger anything:
[[plugins]]
type = "./.netlify/plugins/xxx"
What would you recommend as the best course of action?
Here is the response I have received on the community forum (https://community.netlify.com/t/netlify-toml-vs-netlify-yaml/6482/2):
We haven’t quite finished implementing the json and yml support, but these are the docs: https://docs.netlify.com/configure-builds/file-based-configuration/#json-and-yaml-configuration-files .
It is definitely not implemented in the private beta for build plugins yet, so you’ll need to stick with toml as the docs advise.
I am working with a Scala project that is being built using Bazel. I would like to generate Scaladocs for this project as part of our deployment process. I am able to generate the docs using the scaladoc command, but I receive a large amount of errors since it is unable to pull in dependencies, such as Apache Spark.
Various functions in my project return or accept DataFrames, and the generated docs simply say that the return type is of Type .
How can I have these dependencies included when I am generating my scaladocs?
I have tried using the doc-external-doc command, but have been unable to make it work, but this might be due to me simply misunderstanding the man page for the command. I tried looking for a Bazel rule to generate the scaladocs, but also came up empty handed.
I have a NancyFX web project using SimpleAuthentication that works fine when self-hosting from the terminal. When I self-host from unit tests (NUnit runner with Xamarin Studio), I receive exception "Failed to reflect on the current domain's Assemblies while searching for plugin" with error message "Could not load file or assembly or one of its dependencies." repeated many times.
Any idea why this would fail? This looks like the code throwing the exception is at https://github.com/SimpleAuthentication/SimpleAuthentication/blob/master/Code/SimpleAuthentication.Core/ReflectionHelpers.cs. I tried a IntPtr.Size measurement to make sure they are running in the same 32/64 bitness in both cases (it is running 32-bit).
UPDATE: Per recommendation, I tried to run some prerelease builds to the same resulting, ending up with these binaries:
./Nancy.1.3-Pre1524/lib/net40/Nancy.dll
./Nancy.Authentication.Forms.1.3-Pre1524/lib/net40/Nancy.Authentication.Forms.dll
./Nancy.FlashMessages.1.0.4.0/lib/net45/Nancy.FlashMessages.dll
./Nancy.FlashMessages.Razor.1.0.4.0/lib/net45/Nancy.FlashMessages.Razor.dll
./Nancy.Hosting.Self.1.3-Pre1524/lib/net40/Nancy.Hosting.Self.dll
./Nancy.SimpleAuthentication.0.3.14/lib/net40/Nancy.SimpleAuthentication.dll
./Nancy.Viewengines.Razor.1.3-Pre1524/BuildProviders/Nancy.ViewEngines.Razor.BuildProviders.dll
./Nancy.Viewengines.Razor.1.3-Pre1524/lib/net40/Nancy.ViewEngines.Razor.dll
UPDATE: Running the ReflectionHelpers.cs code in isolation shows that the only DLL failing to load is MonoDevelop.NUnit. The NUnit dll is unneeded for this part anyhow.
I suppose I should contemplate https://github.com/SimpleAuthentication/SimpleAuthentication/issues/144
I fixed this with GetLoadableTypes from this post from #haacked http://haacked.com/archive/2012/07/23/get-all-types-in-an-assembly.aspx/
And here it's the PR (https://github.com/SimpleAuthentication/SimpleAuthentication/pull/171)
I didn't had the problem with Nunit I had the problem with Microsoft.Owin.Security.DataProtection.DpapiDataProtector that it's not implemented in Mono....
I'm trying to publish a web site.
The publication works perfectly, but when I try to access the address it returns me the following error:
Parser Error Message: Could not load
file or assembly
'Microsoft.Web.Helpers' or one of its
dependencies. This assembly is built
by a runtime newer than the currently
loaded runtime and cannot be loaded.
Source Error:
Line 293:
Line 294:
Line 295: Line 296:
Line
297:
Source File:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Config\web.config
Line: 295
Assembly Load Trace: The following
information can be helpful to
determine why the assembly
'Microsoft.Web.Helpers' could not be
loaded.
WRN: Assembly binding logging is
turned OFF. To enable assembly bind
failure logging, set the registry
value
[HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog]
(DWORD) to 1. Note: There is some
performance penalty associated with
assembly bind failure logging. To turn
this feature off, remove the registry
value
[HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog].
This does not happen when I'm running on the local site.
The application was developed and Sql Server WebMatrix Compac 4
If you read the error message it says "Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Web.Helpers' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded." If you then look at the version of the ASP.NET that this site is attempting to run under, it is ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.4209.
Web Pages and the Web Helpers library need Version 4.0. Make sure the site targets the correct version of ASP.NET.
For missing assemblies a simple solution is to just bundle them with your project.
Go to your project -> references -> find this microsoft web helpers ref -> open the properties panel and set Copy Local to True
Edit: Also try setting assembly binding logging.
I suspect that your web.config is fine and that there is an assembly missing from your deployment.
You probably have to include microsoft.web.helpers in your deployment package or simply copy it to the bin folder.
You might find that there are other assemblies missing but you should be able to pick them off one by one.
There is a previous question Hosting WebMatrix Page
that lists all of the dlls you have to deploy and also suggests using Webdeploy
I have 13 separate but related architecture assemblies, and 13 separate NUnit test assemblies, each one containing all the test fixtures for its matching architecture assembly. I am using NUnit 2.5.2 (latest version currently).
I can run each test assembly separately in the NUnit GUI and all the tests pass. However, when I come to combine them into a single NUnit project file, NUnit insists on applying a single config file to the whole test run. This won't work because each test assembly requires different config. I can't merge them into one "uber-config" file because some of the sections are mutually exclusive. I have tried running each assembly in the project in separate AppDomains, and also separate processes, but in both cases it fails to use the DLL-specific config file, so all the tests crash and burn.
I have done a Google search but so far I have not found any indication that NUnit supports this scenario. Am I right, or have I missed something?
I have tried my hardest to re-architecture the tests so that they could share the same config file, but I've had to admit defeat on that front.
NUnit 2.5 has as setting where you can enable each assembly to run in a separate AppDomain. By doing this, NUnit will load the config for the assembly and not the one for the .nunit project.
For more info, see here:
http://nunit.org/index.php?p=settingsDialog&r=2.5
In the past I've done this with a batch file running each assembly through the nunit console independently. At one point I had something that merged the xml output together. It might be in the CruiseControl.Net code.
I haven't worked on the NUnit project for a while. I only have the older code in my head. But the issue is that you get one config per AppDomain and NUnit loads all the test assemblies into one AppDomain.
You might want to try alternate runners such as Resharper or TestDriven.net