I am designing a form in AEM designer 6.3 where are 3 digital Signature fields in sequence 1,2,3. Initially when form loads, fields 2 and 3 are locked. 2 gets unlocked only when field is digitally signed. In similar manner 3 gets unlocked only after 2 gets signed.
Am not able to lock signature fields. I have tried with following codes:
field.access = "protected"
field.readonly = true
At initialization of form, lock the field 2 and 3 with
field2.access = "readOnly"
field3.access = "readOnly"
In postsign event of Field1, unlock field 2 with following code
field2.access = "open"
Repeat the same for feild 2.
Related
We are receiving fix messages from WebICE exchange in a text file and our application is reading and parsing them line by line using QuickFixJ. We noticed that in some messages the repeating group fields are not being parsed and upon validating with data dictionary getting error.
quickfix.FieldException: Out of order repeating group members, field=326
For example in the sample file data-test.csv the first 2 rows parsed successfully but third one fails with the above error message.
Upon investigation I found , in first 2 rows tag 326 comes after tag 9133 but in the third row it comes before that and hence fails in validation. If I adjust data dictionary as per the third one it succeeds but ofcourse the first one starts failing.
This is happening only for few messages for most of the other fix messages are getting validated and parsed quite fine. This is part of the migration project from existing C# application using QuickFix/N to our scala application using QuickFix/J. And its been working fine at the source end (with QuickFIx/N). Is there any difference in both the libraries QuickFIx/J and QuickFIx/N in terms of dealing with group fields ?
To help recreate the issue , I have shared the data file having 3 fix messages as explained above.
Data file : data-test.csv
Data dictionary : ICE-FIX42.xml
Here is the test code snippet
val dd: DataDictionary = new DataDictionary("ICE-FIX42.xml")
val mfile = new File("data-test.csv")
for (line <- Source.fromFile(mfile).getLines) {
val message = new quickfix.Message(line,dd)
dd.setCheckUnorderedGroupFields(true)
dd.validate(message)
val noOfunderlyings= message.getInt(711)
println("Number of Underlyings "+noOfunderlyings)
for(i <- 1 to noOfunderlyings ) {
val FixGroup: Group = message.getGroup(i, 711)
println("UnderlyingSecurityID : " + FixGroup.getString(311))
}
}
Request to fellow SO users , If you can help me with this.
Many Thanks
You should use setCheckUnorderedGroupFields(false) to disable the validation of the ordering in repeating groups. However, this is only a workaround.
I would suggest to approach your counterparty about this because especially in repeating groups the field order is required to follow the message definition, i.e. the order in the data dictionary.
FIX TagValue encoding spec
Field sequence within a repeating group
...
Fields within repeating groups must be specified in the order that the fields are specified in the message definition.
can somehow unchecked checkboxes be included when I have a form with a dynamic number of checkboxes (name='golyPenalta[]') and in submit I get them using $form->getHttpData($form::DATA_TEXT, "golyPenalta[]"); ? Only the ones that have been checked are placed in the field and have their own order, so I do not know which penalty belongs to which goal:
golyCas => array (3)
0 => "55" (2)
1 => "60" (2)
2 => "70" (2)
golyPenalta => array (2)
0 => "on" (2)
1 => "on" (2) // <- this should be part of third goal so index should be 2
I already tried to do it with $form->getHttpData($form::DATA_TEXT | $form::DATA_KEYS, "golyPenalta[]"); but with no luck. The dump above is from the dump of $form in attribute httpData.
Unfortunately no, unchecked checkboxes aren't even sent in POST data in http. You have to define the elements in nette and then use $form->getValues() to have them included. If you add them just on the client side, the server has no chance to know they exist.
I eventually made it with specific key in input name name='golyPenalta[key]' when I create dynamic numbers of this field. It can be done either way by Nette form name='golyPenalta[{key}]' or I create it by JavaScript in for loop when I get the number of fields I have to create like this name='golyPenalta[$i]'.
In form submit I use $form->getHttpData($form::DATA_TEXT | $form::DATA_KEYS, "golyPenalta[]") to persist these keys.
I want to build kind of an automatic system to update some race results for a championship. I have an automated spreadsheet were all the results are shown but it takes me a lot to update all of them so I was wondering if it would be possible to make a form in order to update them more easily.
In the form I will enter the driver name and the number o points he won on a race. The championship has 4 races each month so yea, my question is if you guys know a way to update an existing data (stored in a spreadsheet) using a form. Lets say that in the first race, the driver 'X' won 10 points. I will insert this data in a form and then call it from the spreadsheet to show it up, that's right. The problem comes when I want to update the second race results and so on. If the driver 'X' gets on the second race 12 points, is there a way to update the previous 10 points of that driver and put 22 points instead? Or can I add the second race result to the first one automatically? I mean, if I insert on the form the second race results can it look for the driver 'X' entry and add this points to the ones that it previously had. Dunno if it's possible or not.
Maybe I can do it in another way. Any help will be much appreciated!
Thanks.
Maybe I missed something in your question but I don't really understand Harold's answer...
Here is a code that does strictly what you asked for, it counts the total cumulative value of 4 numbers entered in a form and shows it on a Spreadsheet.
I called the 4 questions "race number 1", "race number 2" ... and the result comes on row 2 so you can setup headers.
I striped out any non numeric character so you can type responses more freely, only numbers will be retained.
form here and SS here (raw results in sheet1 and count in Sheet2)
script goes in spreadsheet and is triggered by an onFormSubmit trigger.
function onFormSubmit(e) {
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Sheet2');
var responses = []
responses[0] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 1'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[1] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 2'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[2] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 3'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[3] = Number(e.namedValues['race number 4'].toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
var totals = sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).getValues();
for(var n in responses){
totals[0][n]+=responses[n];
}
sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).setValues(totals);
}
edit : I changed the code to allow you to change easily the number of responses... range will update automatically.
EDIT 2 : a version that accepts empty responses using an "if" condition on result:
function onFormSubmit(e) {
var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Sheet2');
var responses = []
responses[0] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 1']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 1']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[1] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 2']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 2']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[2] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 3']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 3']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
responses[3] = Number((e.namedValues['race number 4']==null ? 0 :e.namedValues['race number 4']).toString().replace(/\D/g,''));
var totals = sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).getValues();
for(var n in responses){
totals[0][n]+=responses[n];
}
sh.getRange(2,1,1,responses.length).setValues(totals);
}
I believe you can found everything you want here.
It's a form url, when you answer this form you'll have the url of the spreadsheet where the data are stored. One of the information stored is the url to modify your response, if you follow the link it will open the form again and update the spreadsheet in consequence. the code to do this trick is in the second sheet of the spreadsheet.
It's a google apps script code that need to be associated within the form and triggered with an onFormSubmit trigger.
It may be too late now. I believe we need a few things (I have not tried it)
A unique key to map each submitted response, such as User's ID or email.
Two Google Forms:
a. To request the unique key
b. To retrieve relevant data with that unique key
Create a pre-filled URL (See http://www.cagrimmett.com/til/2016/07/07/autofill-google-forms.html)
Open the URL from your form (See Google Apps Script to open a URL)
I'm building a form with Yii that updates two models at once.
The form takes the inputs for each model as $modelA and $modelB and then handles them separately as described here http://www.yiiframework.com/wiki/19/how-to-use-a-single-form-to-collect-data-for-two-or-more-models/
This is all good. The difference I have to the example is that $modelA (documents) has to be saved and its ID retrieved and then $modelB has to be saved including the ID from $model A as they are related.
There's an additional twist that $modelB has a file which needs to be saved.
My action code is as follows:
if(isset($_POST['Documents'], $_POST['DocumentVersions']))
{
$modelA->attributes=$_POST['Documents'];
$modelB->attributes=$_POST['DocumentVersions'];
$valid=$modelA->validate();
$valid=$modelB->validate() && $valid;
if($valid)
{
$modelA->save(false); // don't validate as we validated above.
$newdoc = $modelA->primaryKey; // get the ID of the document just created
$modelB->document_id = $newdoc; // set the Document_id of the DocumentVersions to be $newdoc
// todo: set the filename to some long hash
$modelB->file=CUploadedFile::getInstance($modelB,'file');
// finish set filename
$modelB->save(false);
if($modelB->save()) {
$modelB->file->saveAs(Yii::getPathOfAlias('webroot').'/uploads/'.$modelB->file);
}
$this->redirect(array('projects/myprojects','id'=>$_POST['project_id']));
}
}
ELSE {
$this->render('create',array(
'modelA'=>$modelA,
'modelB'=>$modelB,
'parent'=>$id,
'userid'=>$userid,
'categories'=>$categoriesList
));
}
You can see that I push the new values for 'file' and 'document_id' into $modelB. What this all works no problem, but... each time I push one of these values into $modelB I seem to get an new instance of $modelA. So the net result, I get 3 new documents, and 1 new version. The new version is all linked up correctly, but the other two documents are just straight duplicates.
I've tested removing the $modelB update steps, and sure enough, for each one removed a copy of $modelA is removed (or at least the resulting database entry).
I've no idea how to prevent this.
UPDATE....
As I put in a comment below, further testing shows the number of instances of $modelA depends on how many times the form has been submitted. Even if other pages/views are accessed in the meantime, if the form is resubmitted within a short period of time, each time I get an extra entry in the database. If this was due to some form of persistence, then I'd expect to get an extra copy of the PREVIOUS model, not multiples of the current one. So I suspect something in the way its saving, like there is some counter that's incrementing, but I've no idea where to look for this, or how to zero it each time.
Some help would be much appreciated.
thanks
JMB
OK, I had Ajax validation set to true. This was calling the create action and inserting entries. I don't fully get this, or how I could use ajax validation if I really wanted to without this effect, but... at least the two model insert with relationship works.
Thanks for the comments.
cheers
JMB
I'm trying to input an error check for my form. I have the user entering the name and I would like a prompt to inform them if they are attempting to use a Name already in the records.
Example: the Person table has 3 records with FNames being: Jeff, Kyle, Darren.
If on the add person form in the Fname Box Kyle is entered, the after update event will notify the user that this name has been claimed and null the field. Where as if Greg was enter no notifications will occur.
I just don't know how to compare a text field value to values in a filtered query list, and Google searches have other loosely related links in the way.
Thank you for help!
If all fnames must be unique, add a unique index to the table. This will prevent duplicates being entered. The form error property will allow you to provide a custom error.
You can also check if the name exists in the Before Update event of the control.
In this example, the control and field are both called AText. Generally, you should rename controls so they are not the same as fields.
Private Sub AText_BeforeUpdate(Cancel As Integer)
Dim IsOk As Boolean
''One of the very few places where the .Text property is used
sLookUp = Me.AText.Text
IsOk = IsNull(DLookup("Atext", "Table1", "Atext='" & sLookUp & "'"))
If Not IsOk Then
MsgBox "Found!"
Cancel = True
End If
End Sub