I'm currently trying to use exiftool on Windows command prompt to read meta data from multiple files, then output to a single text file.
The exact command I last tried looked like this:
exiftool.exe -FileName -GPSPosition -CreateDate -d "%m:%d:%Y %H:%M:%S" -c "%d° %d' %.2f"\" -charset UTF-8 -ext jpg -w _Coordinate_Date.txt S:\Nick\Test\
When I run this, I get 7 individual text files with the content for one corresponding file in each of them. However, I simply want to output all of it to one single text file. Any help is greatly appreciated
The -w (textout) option can only be used to write multiple files. It is not meant to be used to output to a single file. As per the docs on -w:
It is not possible to specify a simple filename as an argument -- creating a single output file from multiple source files is typically done by shell redirection
Which is what you're doing with the >> ./output.txt part of your command. The -w _Coordinate_Date.txt isn't doing anything and I would think throw an Invalid TAG name: "w _Coordinate_Date.txt" error if quoted together like that as it gets treated as a single arugment. The -w option requires two arguments, the -w and either an extension or a format string.
I actually figured it out, if you wrap the entire -w _Coordinate_Date.txt command in quotations and append it to a file, you can throw all of the output into one text file.
i.e. "-w _Coordinate_Date.txt >> ./output.txt"
Related
I'm working with a command line utility that requires passing the name of a file to write output to, e.g.
foo -o output.txt
The only thing it writes to stdout is a message that indicates that it ran successfully. I'd like to be able to pipe everything that is written to output.txt to another command line utility. My motivation is that output.txt will end up being a 40 GB file that I don't need to keep, and I'd rather pipe the streams than work on massive files in a stepwise manner.
Is there any way in this scenario to pipe the real output (i.e. output.txt) to another command? Can I somehow magically pass stdout as the file argument?
Solution 1: Using process substitution
The most convenient way of doing this is by using process substitution. In bash the syntax looks as follows:
foo -o >(other_command)
(Note that this is a bashism. There's similar solutions for other shells, but bottom line is that it's not portable.)
Solution 2: Using named pipes explicitly
You can do the above explicitly / manually as follows:
Create a named pipe using the mkfifo command.
mkfifo my_buf
Launch your other command with that file as input
other_command < my_buf
Execute foo and let it write it's output to my_buf
foo -o my_buf
Solution 3: Using /dev/stdout
You can also use the device file /dev/stdout as follows
foo -o /dev/stdout | other_command
Named pipes work fine, but you have a nicer, more direct syntax available via bash process substitution that has the added benefit of not using a permanent named pipe that must later be deleted (process substitution uses temporary named pipes behind the scenes):
foo -o >(other command)
Also, should you want to pipe the output to your command and also save the output to a file, you can do this:
foo -o >(tee output.txt) | other command
For the sake of making stackoverflow happy let me write a long enough sentence because my proposed solution is only 18 characters long instead of the required 30+
foo -o /dev/stdout
You could use the magic of UNIX and create a named pipe :)
Create the pipe
$ mknod -p mypipe
Start the process that reads from the pipe
$ second-process < mypipe
Start the process, that writes into the pipe
$ foo -o mypipe
foo -o <(cat)
if for some reason you don't have permission to write to /dev/stdout
I use /dev/tty as the output filename, equivalent to using /dev/nul/ when you want to output nothing at all. Then | and you are done.
I am trying to concatenate two video files using ffmpeg, and I am receiving an error.
ffmpeg -f concat -safe 0 -i list.txt -c copy concat.mp4
And the error output I receive is....
[concat # 0x7ff922000000] Line 1: unknown keyword '43.mp4'
list.txt: Invalid data found when processing input
It looks like that the file names in the list have to be specially formatted to look like:
file '/path/to/file1.wav'
with a word file included. I spent a lot of time trying to guess why ffmpeg encountered an error trying to read the file names. It didn't matter if they were in the list or in the command line. So only after I utilized a command
for f in *.wav; do echo "file '$f'" >> mylist.txt; done
to make list from ffmpeg's manual I had success. The only difference was an additional word file.
Here you can read it yourself: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate#demuxer
I am using JasperStarter to create pdf from several jrprint files and then print it using JasperStarter functtions.
I want to create one single pdf file with all the .jrprint files.
If I give command like:
jasperstarter pr a.jprint b.jprint -f pdf -o rep
It does not recognise the files after the first input file.
Can we create one single output file with many input jasper/jrprint files?
Please help.
Thanks,
Oshin
Looking at the documentation, this is not possible:
The command process (pr)
The command process is for processing a report.
In direct comparison to the command for compiling:
The command compile (cp)
The command compile is for compiling one report or all reports in a directory.
In command prompt - How do I export all the content of the screen to a text file(basically a copy command, just not by using right-clicking and the clipboard)
This command works, but only for the commands you executed, not the actual output as well
doskey /HISTORY > history.txt
If you want to append a file instead of constantly making a new one/deleting the old one's content, use double > marks. A single > mark will overwrite all the file's content.
Overwrite file
MyCommand.exe>file.txt
^This will open file.txt if it already exists and overwrite the data, or create a new file and fill it with your output
Append file from its end-point
MyCommand.exe>>file.txt
^This will append file.txt from its current end of file if it already exists, or create a new file and fill it with your output.
Update #1 (advanced):
My batch-fu has improved over time, so here's some minor updates.
If you want to differentiate between error output and normal output for a program that correctly uses Standard streams, STDOUT/STDERR, you can do this with minor changes to the syntax. I'll just use > for overwriting for these examples, but they work perfectly fine with >> for append, in regards to file-piping output re-direction.
The 1 before the >> or > is the flag for STDOUT. If you need to actually output the number one or two before the re-direction symbols, this can lead to strange, unintuitive errors if you don't know about this mechanism. That's especially relevant when outputting a single result number into a file. 2 before the re-direction symbols is for STDERR.
Now that you know that you have more than one stream available, this is a good time to show the benefits of outputting to nul. Now, outputting to nul works the same way conceptually as outputting to a file. You don't see the content in your console. Instead of it going to file or your console output, it goes into the void.
STDERR to file and suppress STDOUT
MyCommand.exe 1>nul 2>errors.txt
STDERR to file to only log errors. Will keep STDOUT in console
MyCommand.exe 2>errors.txt
STDOUT to file and suppress STDERR
MyCommand.exe 1>file.txt 2>nul
STDOUT only to file. Will keep STDERR in console
MyCommand.exe 1>file.txt
STDOUT to one file and STDERR to another file
MyCommand.exe 1>stdout.txt 2>errors.txt
The only caveat I have here is that it can create a 0-byte file for an unused stream if one of the streams never gets used. Basically, if no errors occurred, you might end up with a 0-byte errors.txt file.
Update #2
I started noticing weird behavior when writing console apps that wrote directly to STDERR, and realized that if I wanted my error output to go to the same file when using basic piping, I either had to combine streams 1 and 2 or just use STDOUT. The problem with that problem is I didn't know about the correct way to combine streams, which is this:
%command% > outputfile 2>&1
Therefore, if you want all STDOUT and STDERR piped into the same stream, make sure to use that like so:
MyCommand.exe > file.txt 2>&1
The redirector actually defaults to 1> or 1>>, even if you don't explicitly use 1 in front of it if you don't use a number in front of it, and the 2>&1 combines the streams.
Update #3 (simple)
Null for Everything
If you want to completely suppress STDOUT and STDERR you can do it this way. As a warning not all text pipes use STDOUT and STDERR but it will work for a vast majority of use cases.
STD* to null
MyCommand.exe>nul 2>&1
Copying a CMD or Powershell session's command output
If all you want is the command output from a CMD or Powershell session that you just finished up, or any other shell for that matter you can usually just select that console from that session, CTRL + A to select all content, then CTRL + C to copy the content. Then you can do whatever you like with the copied content while it's in your clipboard.
Just see this page
in cmd type:
Command | clip
Then open a *.Txt file and Paste. That's it. Done.
If you are looking for each command separately
To export all the output of the command prompt in text files. Simply follow the following syntax.
C:> [syntax] >file.txt
The above command will create result of syntax in file.txt. Where new file.txt will be created on the current folder that you are in.
For example,
C:Result> dir >file.txt
To copy the whole session, Try this:
Copy & Paste a command session as follows:
1.) At the end of your session, click the upper left corner to display the menu.
Then select.. Edit -> Select all
2.) Again, click the upper left corner to display the menu.
Then select.. Edit -> Copy
3.) Open your favorite text editor and use Ctrl+V or your normal
Paste operation to paste in the text.
If your batch file is not interactive and you don't need to see it run then this should work.
#echo off
call file.bat >textfile.txt 2>&1
Otherwise use a tee filter. There are many, some not NT compatible. SFK the Swiss Army Knife has a tee feature and is still being developed. Maybe that will work for you.
How about this:
<command> > <filename.txt> & <filename.txt>
Example:
ipconfig /all > network.txt & network.txt
This will give the results in Notepad instead of the command prompt.
From command prompt Run as Administrator. Example below is to print a list of Services running on your PC run the command below:
net start > c:\netstart.txt
You should see a copy of the text file you just exported with a listing all the PC services running at the root of your C:\ drive.
If you want to output ALL verbosity, not just stdout. But also any printf statements made by the program, any warnings, infos, etc, you have to add 2>&1 at the end of the command line.
In your case, the command will be
Program.exe > file.txt 2>&1
I'm trying to do use the sed command in a shell script where I want to remove lines that read STARTremoveThisComment and lines that read removeThisCommentEND.
I'm able to do it when I copy it to a new file using
sed 's/STARTremoveThisComment//' > test
But how do I do this by using the same file as input and output?
sed -i (or the extended version, --in-place) will automate the process normally done with less advanced implementations, that of sending output to temporary file, then renaming that back to the original.
The -i is for in-place editing, and you can also provide a backup suffix for keeping a copy of the original:
sed -i.bak fileToChange
sed --in-place=.bak fileToChange
Both of those will keep the original file in fileToChange.bak.
Keep in mind that in-place editing may not be available in all sed implementations but it is in GNU sed which should be available on all variants of Linux, as per your tags.
If you're using a more primitive implementation, you can use something like:
cp oldfile oldfile.bak && sed 'whatever' oldfile >newfile && mv newfile oldfile
You can use the flag -i for in-place editing and the -e for specifying normal script expression:
sed -i -e 's/pattern_to_search/text_to_replace/' file.txt
To delete lines that match a certain pattern you can use the simpler syntax. Notice the d flag:
sed -i '/pattern_to_search/d' file.txt
You really should not use sed for that. This question seems to come up ridiculously often, and it seems very strange that it does since the general solution is so trivial. It seems bizarre that people want to know how to do it in sed, and in python, and in ruby, etc. If you want to have a filter operate on an input and overwrite it, use the following simple script:
#!/bin/sh -e
in=${1?No input file specified}
mv $in ${bak=.$in.bak}
shift
"$#" < $bak > $in
Put that in your path in an executable file name inline, and then the problem is solved in general. For example:
inline input-file sed -e s/foo/bar/g
Now, if you want to add logic to keep multiple backups, or if you have some options to change the backup naming scheme, or whatever, you fix it in one place. What's the command line option to get 1-up counters on the backup file when processing a file in-place with perl? What about with ruby? Is the option different for gnu-sed? How does awk handle it? The whole friggin' point of unix is that tools do one thing only. Handling logic for backup files is a second thing, and needs to be factored out. If you are implementing a tool, do not add logic to create backup files. Tell your users to use a 2nd tool for that. Integration is bad. Modularity is good. That is the unix way.
Notice that this script has several problems. The permissions/mode of the input file may be changed, for example. I'm sure there are innumerable other issues. However, by putting the backup logic in a wrapper script, you localize all of these issues and don't have to worry that sed overwrites the files and changes mode, while python keeps the file in place and does not change the inode (I made up those two cases, the point being that not all tools will use the same logic, while the wrapper script will.)
As far as I know it is not possible to use the same file for input and output. Though one solution is make a shell script which will save it to another file, delete the old input and rename the output to the input file name.
sed -e s/try/this/g input.file > output.file;mv output.file input.file
I suggest using sponge
sponge reads standard input and writes it out to the specified file.
Unlike a shell redirect, sponge soaks up all its input before writing
the output file. This allows constructing pipelines that read from and
write to the same file.
cat test | sed 's/STARTremoveThisComment//' | sponge test