Swift UITextField target-actions as closure, problem with not removing target-actions - swift

I have such code a little modified from code of Eric Armstrong
Adding a closure as target to a UIButton
But there is the problem with both codes. Those from Eric does remove all target-actions on
func removeTarget(for controlEvent: UIControl.Event = .touchUpInside)
And modified code on the other hand do not remove target-actions at all. Of course it is caused by if condition, but it also means that there are no targets stored properly in Storable property.
extension UIControl: ExtensionPropertyStorable {
class Property: PropertyProvider {
static var property = NSMutableDictionary()
static func makeProperty() -> NSMutableDictionary? {
return NSMutableDictionary()
}
}
func addTarget(for controlEvent: UIControl.Event = .touchUpInside, target: #escaping (_ sender: Any) ->()) {
let key = String(describing: controlEvent)
let target = Target(target: target)
addTarget(target, action: target.action, for: controlEvent)
property[key] = target
}
func removeTarget(for controlEvent: UIControl.Event = .touchUpInside) {
let key = String(describing: controlEvent)
if let target = property[key] as? Target {
removeTarget(target, action: target.action, for: controlEvent)
property[key] = nil
}
}
}
// Wrapper class for the selector
class Target {
private let t: (_ sender: Any) -> ()
init(target t: #escaping (_ sender: Any) -> ()) { self.t = t }
#objc private func s(_ sender: Any) { t(sender) }
public var action: Selector {
return #selector(s(_:))
}
}
// Protocols with associatedtypes so we can hide the objc_ code
protocol PropertyProvider {
associatedtype PropertyType: Any
static var property: PropertyType { get set }
static func makeProperty() -> PropertyType?
}
extension PropertyProvider {
static func makeProperty() -> PropertyType? {
return nil
}
}
protocol ExtensionPropertyStorable: class {
associatedtype Property: PropertyProvider
}
// Extension to make the property default and available
extension ExtensionPropertyStorable {
typealias Storable = Property.PropertyType
var property: Storable {
get {
let key = String(describing: type(of: Storable.self))
guard let obj = objc_getAssociatedObject(self, key) as? Storable else {
if let property = Property.makeProperty() {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, key, property, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN)
}
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, key) as? Storable ?? Property.property
}
return obj
}
set {
let key = String(describing: type(of: Storable.self))
return objc_setAssociatedObject(self, key, newValue, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN) }
}
}
My aim is to precisely register target-actions with closures and remove them without removing all other target-actions added to given UITextField via #selector. Now I can have removed ALL or NONE of target-actions while using this approach for closure-style target actions.
UPDATE
Based on Eric Armstrong answer i have implemented my version.
But what I have experienced in version proposed by Eric was that when adding target actions to TextField on TableView list while cells appear and then removing this target actions from Text Fields while cells diseappear the previous code seems to remove all target actions on removeTarget(for:) exection. So when in other place in code like UITableViewCell I have added additional target action on totaly different target (UITableViewCell object, not this custom Target() objects) while cells was disappearing and then again appearing on screen and removeTarget(for) was executed then this other (external as I call them target actions) also was removed and never called again.
I consider that some problem was usage of [String: Target] dictionary which is value type and it was used in case of property getter in objc_getAssociatedObject where there was
objc_getAssociatedObject(self, key) as? Storable ?? Property.property
So as I understand it then there wasn't objc object for given key and Storable was nil and nil-coalescing operator was called and static value type Property.property return aka [String : Dictionary]
So it was returned by copy and Target object was stored in this copied object which wasn't permanently stored and accessed in removeTarget(for:) always as nil. So nil was passed to UIControl.removetTarget() and all target actions was always cleared!.
I have tried simple replacing [String: Target] Swift dictionary with NSMutableDictionary which is a reference type so I assume it can be stored. But this simple replacement for static variable and just returning it via nil-coalesing operator caused as I assume that there as only one such storage for Target objects and then while scrolling Table View each removeForTarget() has somehow remove all target actions from all UITextFields not only from current.
I also consider usage of String(describing: type(of: Storable.self)) as being wrong as it will be always the same for given Storable type.

Ok, I think I finally solved this issue
The main problem was usage of AssociatedKey! it needs to be done like below
https://stackoverflow.com/a/48731142/4415642
So I ended up with such code:
import UIKit
/**
* Swift 4.2 for UIControl and UIGestureRecognizer,
* and and remove targets through swift extension
* stored property paradigm.
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/52796515/4415642
**/
extension UIControl: ExtensionPropertyStorable {
class Property: PropertyProvider {
static var property = NSMutableDictionary()
static func makeProperty() -> NSMutableDictionary? {
return NSMutableDictionary()
}
}
func addTarget(for controlEvent: UIControl.Event = .touchUpInside, target: #escaping (_ sender: Any) ->()) {
let key = String(describing: controlEvent)
let target = Target(target: target)
addTarget(target, action: target.action, for: controlEvent)
property[key] = target
print("ADDED \(ObjectIdentifier(target)), \(target.action)")
}
func removeTarget(for controlEvent: UIControl.Event = .touchUpInside) {
let key = String(describing: controlEvent)
if let target = property[key] as? Target {
print("REMOVE \(ObjectIdentifier(target)), \(target.action)")
removeTarget(target, action: target.action, for: controlEvent)
property[key] = nil
}
}
}
extension UIGestureRecognizer: ExtensionPropertyStorable {
class Property: PropertyProvider {
static var property: Target?
}
func addTarget(target: #escaping (Any) -> ()) {
let target = Target(target: target)
addTarget(target, action: target.action)
property = target
}
func removeTarget() {
let target = property
removeTarget(target, action: target?.action)
property = nil
}
}
// Wrapper class for the selector
class Target {
private let t: (_ sender: Any) -> ()
init(target t: #escaping (_ sender: Any) -> ()) { self.t = t }
#objc private func s(_ sender: Any) { t(sender) }
public var action: Selector {
return #selector(s(_:))
}
deinit {
print("Deinit target: \(ObjectIdentifier(self))")
}
}
// Protocols with associatedtypes so we can hide the objc_ code
protocol PropertyProvider {
associatedtype PropertyType: Any
static var property: PropertyType { get set }
static func makeProperty() -> PropertyType?
}
extension PropertyProvider {
static func makeProperty() -> PropertyType? {
return nil
}
}
protocol ExtensionPropertyStorable: class {
associatedtype Property: PropertyProvider
}
// Extension to make the property default and available
extension ExtensionPropertyStorable {
typealias Storable = Property.PropertyType
var property: Storable {
get {
guard let obj = objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedKeys.property) as? Storable else {
if let property = Property.makeProperty() {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedKeys.property, property, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC)
}
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedKeys.property) as? Storable ?? Property.property
}
return obj
}
set {
return objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedKeys.property, newValue, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC) }
}
}
private struct AssociatedKeys {
static var property = "AssociatedKeys.property"
}

Related

delete boolean value at specific point in set

In my swift code below the goal is to delete the first item in the core data boolean attribute. My code is not working below but its close to what I used to successfully fetch a boolean value. I don't really know what to add. There is a base class and a helper class.
class ViewController: UIViewController {
func deleteBool(imageNo:Int) {
// first check the array bounds
let info = helpBool.shareInstance.fetchBool()
if info.count > imageNo {
}
}
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
deleteBool(imageNo: 1)}}
HELPER CLASS
class helpBool: UIViewController{
static let shareInstance = helpBool()
let context = (UIApplication.shared.delegate as! AppDelegate).persistentContainer.viewContext
func deleteBool(_ boolean: Bool) {
let imageInstance = OnOff(context: context)
imageInstance.bool = boolean
do {
try context.delete()
print("text is saved")
} catch {
print(error.localizedDescription)
}
}

How do I using Generic as parameter and return specific object without casting?

Does function can return specific object, when I input a specific class.
My problem:
I don't know how to return a object. take a look following code and thanks
class MyViewControler {
}
class MySplitViewController: NSSplitViewControler {
override func viewDidLoad() {
/*
* get specific object
*/
let vc = viewController(for: MyViewControler.self)
}
}
extension NSSplitViewController {
public func viewController<T>(for anClass: T) -> T.object {
guard let tClass = anClass as? AnyClass else { return nil }
var vc: NSViewController?
if let idx = self.splitViewItems.index(where: { $0.viewController.classForCoder == tClass} ) {
vc = self.splitViewItems[idx].viewController
}
}
/*
* I don't know how to return a specific object
*/
return vc
}
The signature of a method taking a type and returning an
(optional) instance of that type would be:
public func viewController<T>(for aClass: T.Type) -> T?
or, if you want to restrict it to subclasses of NSViewController:
public func viewController<T: NSViewController>(for aClass: T.Type) -> T?
The implementation can be simplified with optional binding:
extension NSSplitViewController {
public func viewController<T: NSViewController>(for aClass: T.Type) -> T? {
for item in self.splitViewItems {
if let vc = item.viewController as? T {
return vc
}
}
return nil
}
}
Or as a "one-liner":
extension NSSplitViewController {
public func viewController<T: NSViewController>(for aClass: T.Type) -> T? {
return self.splitViewItems.lazy.flatMap { $0.viewController as? T }.first
}
}

Swift find superview of given class with generics

I guess I'm struggling with generics. I want to create simple UIView extension to find recursively a superview of class passed in the function param. I want the function to return optional containing obviously either nil, or object visible as instance of provided class.
extension UIView {
func superviewOfClass<T>(ofClass: T.Type) -> T? {
var currentView: UIView? = self
while currentView != nil {
if currentView is T {
break
} else {
currentView = currentView?.superview
}
}
return currentView as? T
}
}
Any help much appreciated.
Swift 3/4
This is a more concise way:
extension UIView {
func superview<T>(of type: T.Type) -> T? {
return superview as? T ?? superview.compactMap { $0.superview(of: type) }
}
func subview<T>(of type: T.Type) -> T? {
return subviews.compactMap { $0 as? T ?? $0.subview(of: type) }.first
}
}
Usage:
let tableView = someView.superview(of: UITableView.self)
let tableView = someView.subview(of: UITableView.self)
No need to pass in the type of the class you want (at least in Swift 4.1)…
extension UIView {
func firstSubview<T: UIView>() -> T? {
return subviews.compactMap { $0 as? T ?? $0.firstSubview() as? T }.first
}
}
I'm using this.
// Lookup view ancestry for any `UIScrollView`.
if let scrollView = view.searchViewAnchestors(for: UIScrollView.self) {
print("Found scrollView: \(scrollView)")
}
Extension is really a single statement.
extension UIView {
func searchViewAnchestors<ViewType: UIView>(for viewType: ViewType.Type) -> ViewType? {
if let matchingView = self.superview as? ViewType {
return matchingView
} else {
return superview?.searchViewAnchestors(for: viewType)
}
}
}
With this alternative implementation below, you can actually let the call site determine what type to look for, but I found it somewhat unconventional.
extension UIView {
func searchInViewAnchestors<ViewType: UIView>() -> ViewType? {
if let matchingView = self.superview as? ViewType {
return matchingView
} else {
return superview?.searchInViewAnchestors()
}
}
}
You can call it like this.
if let scrollView: UIScrollView = view.searchInViewAnchestors() {
print("Found scrollView: \(scrollView)")
}

Swift 2.0: Protocol Extension Class Method returning Self

In order to extend some functionalities of my NSManagedObject subclasses, I have defined a series of protocols:
protocol ManagedObjectFindable {
static func find(format:String, arguments: [AnyObject]?, inContext context:NSManagedObjectContext, entityName:String?) -> Self?
}
protocol UniquelyIdentifiable: ManagedObjectFindable {
var identifier: NSNumber? { get }
static func findWithIdentifier(identifier: Int, inContext context:NSManagedObjectContext) -> Self?
}
So then every NSManagedObject that has identifier in its data model entity can conform to UniquelyIdentifiable.
For that purpose I am utilising Swift 2.0 Protocol Extensions, where:
extension UniquelyIdentifiable {
static func findWithIdentifier(identifier: Int, inContext context:NSManagedObjectContext) -> Self? {
return self.find("identifier == %lld", arguments: [NSNumber(longLong: Int64(identifier))], inContext: context, entityName:nil)
}
}
Where find is defined as:
extension NSManagedObject: ManagedObjectFindable {
/** returns single entity if found, nil otherwise */
class func find(format:String, arguments: [AnyObject]?, inContext context:NSManagedObjectContext, entityName:String? = nil) -> Self? {
let objectEntityName:String
if let name = entityName {
objectEntityName = name
} else {
objectEntityName = String(self)
}
let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest()
fetchRequest.entity = NSEntityDescription.entityForName(objectEntityName, inManagedObjectContext: context)
fetchRequest.fetchLimit = 1
fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: format, argumentArray: arguments)
var persistentEntityº:NSManagedObject?
context.performBlockAndWait {
do {
let fetchResults = try context.executeFetchRequest(fetchRequest)
if (fetchResults.count != 0){
persistentEntityº = fetchResults.first as? NSManagedObject
}
} catch {}
}
if let persistentEntity = persistentEntityº {
return _safeObjectSelfCast(persistentEntity)
} else {
return nil
}
}
}
func _unsafeObjectSelfCast<T>(obj: AnyObject!) -> T { return obj as! T }
func _safeObjectSelfCast<T>(obj: AnyObject) -> T? { return obj as? T }
Now these methods correctly return Self? and compiler is silent on the coding time, however when compiling it gives me that error Method 'findWithIdentifier(_:inContext:)' in non-final class must return 'Self' to conform to protocol 'UniquelyIdentifiable'
Now the thing is that if instead of implementing that method in a protocol extension I would just extend my NSManagedObject subclass, it will go fine, but that kills the purpose of protocol extensions, when you are completely duplicating the same code across dozens of your NSManagedObject subclasses.
Any workaround, or I am really missing something?
Short answer:
Change Self? in extension to the NSManagedObject?.
Long answer: Self in protocol requirement acts as a placeholder for the class that will implement that protocol. So if you have
protocol SomeProtocol {
func returnSomething() -> Self
}
That means that if you implement it on Int, function returnSomething() should return Int, and if you implement it on Double it should return Double.
Since you are implementing UniquelyIdentifiable on NSManagedObject and your protocol has Self? requirement, you should return NSManagedObject?.

Is there a way to set associated objects in Swift?

Coming from Objective-C you can call function objc_setAssociatedObject between 2 objects to have them maintain a reference, which can be handy if at runtime you don't want an object to be destroyed until its reference is removed also. Does Swift have anything similar to this?
Here is a simple but complete example derived from jckarter's answer.
It shows how to add a new property to an existing class. It does it by defining a computed property in an extension block. The computed property is stored as an associated object:
import ObjectiveC
// Declare a global var to produce a unique address as the assoc object handle
private var AssociatedObjectHandle: UInt8 = 0
extension MyClass {
var stringProperty:String {
get {
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedObjectHandle) as! String
}
set {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedObjectHandle, newValue, objc_AssociationPolicy.OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC)
}
}
}
EDIT:
If you need to support getting the value of an uninitialized property and to avoid getting the error unexpectedly found nil while unwrapping an Optional value, you can modify the getter like this:
get {
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedObjectHandle) as? String ?? ""
}
The solution supports all the value types as well, and not only those that are automagically bridged, such as String, Int, Double, etc.
Wrappers
import ObjectiveC
final class Lifted<T> {
let value: T
init(_ x: T) {
value = x
}
}
private func lift<T>(x: T) -> Lifted<T> {
return Lifted(x)
}
func setAssociatedObject<T>(object: AnyObject, value: T, associativeKey: UnsafePointer<Void>, policy: objc_AssociationPolicy) {
if let v: AnyObject = value as? AnyObject {
objc_setAssociatedObject(object, associativeKey, v, policy)
}
else {
objc_setAssociatedObject(object, associativeKey, lift(value), policy)
}
}
func getAssociatedObject<T>(object: AnyObject, associativeKey: UnsafePointer<Void>) -> T? {
if let v = objc_getAssociatedObject(object, associativeKey) as? T {
return v
}
else if let v = objc_getAssociatedObject(object, associativeKey) as? Lifted<T> {
return v.value
}
else {
return nil
}
}
A possible
Class extension (Example of usage)
extension UIView {
private struct AssociatedKey {
static var viewExtension = "viewExtension"
}
var referenceTransform: CGAffineTransform? {
get {
return getAssociatedObject(self, associativeKey: &AssociatedKey.viewExtension)
}
set {
if let value = newValue {
setAssociatedObject(self, value: value, associativeKey: &AssociatedKey.viewExtension, policy: objc_AssociationPolicy.OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC)
}
}
}
}
I wrote a modern wrapper available at https://github.com/b9swift/AssociatedObject
You may be surprised that it even supports Swift structures for free.
Obviously, this only works with Objective-C objects. After fiddling around with this a bit, here's how to make the calls in Swift:
import ObjectiveC
// Define a variable whose address we'll use as key.
// "let" doesn't work here.
var kSomeKey = "s"
…
func someFunc() {
objc_setAssociatedObject(target, &kSomeKey, value, UInt(OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN))
let value : AnyObject! = objc_getAssociatedObject(target, &kSomeKey)
}
Update in Swift 3.0
For example this is a UITextField
import Foundation
import UIKit
import ObjectiveC
// Declare a global var to produce a unique address as the assoc object handle
var AssociatedObjectHandle: UInt8 = 0
extension UITextField
{
var nextTextField:UITextField {
get {
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedObjectHandle) as! UITextField
}
set {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &AssociatedObjectHandle, newValue, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC)
}
}
}
Klaas answer just for Swift 2.1:
import ObjectiveC
let value = NSUUID().UUIDString
var associationKey: UInt8 = 0
objc_setAssociatedObject(parentObject, &associationKey, value, objc_AssociationPolicy.OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN_NONATOMIC)
let fetchedValue = objc_getAssociatedObject(parentObject, &associationKey) as! String
Just add #import <objc/runtime.h> on your brindging header file to access objc_setAssociatedObject under swift code
The above friend has answered your question, but if it is related to closure properties, please note:
```
import UIKit
public extension UICollectionView {
typealias XYRearrangeNewDataBlock = (_ newData: [Any]) -> Void
typealias XYRearrangeOriginaDataBlock = () -> [Any]
// MARK:- associat key
private struct xy_associatedKeys {
static var originalDataBlockKey = "xy_originalDataBlockKey"
static var newDataBlockKey = "xy_newDataBlockKey"
}
private class BlockContainer {
var rearrangeNewDataBlock: XYRearrangeNewDataBlock?
var rearrangeOriginaDataBlock: XYRearrangeOriginaDataBlock?
}
private var newDataBlock: BlockContainer? {
get {
if let newDataBlock = objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &xy_associatedKeys.newDataBlockKey) as? BlockContainer {
return newDataBlock
}
return nil
}
set(newValue) {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, xy_associatedKeys.newDataBlockKey, newValue, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_COPY_NONATOMIC)
}
}
convenience init(collectionVewFlowLayout : UICollectionViewFlowLayout, originalDataBlock: #escaping XYRearrangeOriginaDataBlock, newDataBlock: #escaping XYRearrangeNewDataBlock) {
self.init()
let blockContainer: BlockContainer = BlockContainer()
blockContainer.rearrangeNewDataBlock = newDataBlock
blockContainer.rearrangeOriginaDataBlock = originalDataBlock
self.newDataBlock = blockContainer
}
```
For 2022, now very simple:
// Utils-tags.swift
// Just a "dumb Swift trick" to add a string tag to a view controller.
// For example, with UIDocumentPickerViewController you need to know
// "which button was clicked to launch a picker"
import UIKit
private var _docPicAssociationKey: UInt8 = 0
extension UIDocumentPickerViewController {
public var tag: String {
get {
return objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &_docPicAssociationKey)
as? String ?? ""
}
set(newValue) {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &_docPicAssociationKey,
newValue, .OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN)
}
}
}