Error Code: 1193. Unknown system variable 'action' - triggers

delimiter //
drop trigger if exists tr_overdue
//
create trigger tr_overdue
-- type of trigger, etc
after update on invoice
for each row
begin
if status = 'overdue' then
insert into alerts values(new.message_date,new.origin,new.message);
SET action = 'update',
message_date = NOW(),
origin=old.campaignno, message = 'invoice with number ' + old.invoiceno + ' is now overdue';
end if;
end

CREATE TRIGGER tr_overdue AFTER UPDATE ON Invoice FOR EACH ROW IF STATUS = 'overdue' THEN INSERT INTO alerts(columns1, column2,...) VALUES(new.message_date,new.origin,new.message);
I'm unsure if the columns you're updating in the SET statement also belong in Invoice, but if they do, then they should be included into the INSERT statement and that should fix the problem.

Related

Ingres stored procedure to delete multiple records from table

I am creating a SP in Ingres to delete multiple records from single table by comma separated id's, but it is not working. Though when I execute it in a separate query (without storedprocedure) then it is deleting records.
create procedure sptest
(
In Ids varchar(300)
)
AS
BEGIN
Delete from "ingres".mytable where request_id IN (:Ids);
END
Requested rows should be deleted from table
The input is a varchar so in effect what you have in the delete statement is something like:
delete from mytable where request_id in ('1,2,3,4');
Inside a database procedure you can't run "execute immediate", so you can't build a delete string without the quotes and execute it dynamically (though this might be an option to you if your calling program has "execute immediate" available).
To process the IN list within a database procedure I think you'll need to loop through the input string and delete for each value...
eg:
set session authorization ingres;
drop table if exists mytable;
create table mytable(request_id integer);
insert into mytable values(1),(2),(5),(10);
drop procedure if exists sptest;
create procedure sptest
(
In Ids varchar(300)
)
AS
declare msg = varchar(300) not null;
eno = integer not null;
rc = integer not null;
pos = integer not null;
n = varchar(300);
BEGIN
while (length(:Ids) > 0)
do
pos = locate(:Ids, ',');
n = left(:Ids, :pos-1);
Ids = shift(:Ids, -1 * pos);
msg = 'Removing ' + :n;
message :msg;
Delete from "ingres".mytable where request_id = integer(:n);
select iierrornumber, iirowcount into :eno, :rc;
msg = 'Error number '+varchar(:eno) + ' rowcount ' + varchar(:rc);
message :msg;
endwhile;
END;
execute procedure sptest('1,5,10');
select * from mytable;

How to update same line than insert/update in plpgsql without reaching max_stack_depth

My problem is I reach the limit of the stack. And the message error says “You should increase max_stack_depth” and shows me the line that I use to update another column.
I encounter this error after an update request (code below).
I know my problem may look like others questions but none of them explain why I reach this error.
What I want to do is simple and I've done it many times, but here I'm missing something.
I want: if there is an update on the table support_fh pull a trigger. I expect this trigger to do:
if the new values of the update request are section= 'DISTRIBUTION' and modulo= '6' and fabricant = 'NEXANS' and capacite = 12 then set diametre = '12.5' (code below).
Of course it is the line of diametre from the same line than update request.
Futhermore I know I should use the character varying type instead of the integer type, but I was asked to so it like that.
My trigger function:
create or replace function maj_diam() returns trigger
as
$$
Declare fab_loc character varying;
Declare section_loc character varying;
Declare capa_loc character varying;
Declare modulo_loc character varying;
BEGIN
Select fabricant into fab_loc from support_fh where id = new.id;
Select section into section_loc from support_fh where id = new.id;
Select capcite into capa_loc from support_fh where id = new.id;
Select modulo into modulo_loc from support_fh where id = new.id;
if fab_loc = 'NEXANS' and section_loc = 'DISTRIBUTION'
and capa_loc = '12' and modulo_loc = '6' then
update support_fh set diametre = '12.2' where id = new.id;
endif;
return new;
end;
$$;
My trigger :
create trigger maj_diam
After update on support_fh
for each row
execute procedure maj_diam();
My update request to test my trigger :
update support_fh set fabricant = 'NEXANS', section = 'DISTRIBUTION', capacite = '12', modulo = '6'
where id = 11827;
I want to learn from this, so, if possible, explain to me what I'm doing wrong here, or if my approach is lacking insight.
You get that problem because the update in the trigger will launch the trigger again, causing an infinite loop. No value of max_stack_depth is big enough for that (and increasing that value too much is dangerous anyway).
Instead of what you are doing, you should create a BEFORE trigger and modify the NEW value that are about to be inserted:
IF NEW.fab_loc = 'NEXANS' AND NEW.section_loc = 'DISTRIBUTION'
AND NEW.capa_loc = '12' AND NEW.modulo_loc = '6'
THEN
NEW.diametre := '12.2';
END IF;
If you want to change columns in a row that is updated (or inserted), don't use UPDATE in the trigger function. Declare the trigger as BEFORE UPDATE, then simply assign the new values.
You also don't need four select statements to read four columns from the same table.
But as you are only accessing columns from the same row that was updated, you don't even need a SELECT at all.
So your trigger function can be simplified to:
create or replace function maj_diam() returns trigger
as
$$
BEGIN
if new.fabricant = 'NEXANS'
and new.section = 'DISTRIBUTION'
and new.capcite = '12'
and new.modulo = '6'
then
new.diametre := '12.2';
end if;
return new;
end;
$$;
Assuming that capcite, modulo and diametre are actually numbers, you shouldn't compare them with varchar values. So the above code should probably be: new.diametre := 12.2; or new.capcite = 12.
And the trigger definition needs to be changed to:
create trigger maj_diam
BEFORE update on support_fh
for each row
execute procedure maj_diam();

Error on MySQLi DB Trigger w/ Case Statement

I am working on my first DB trigger and having an issue. The trigger involves a case statement and I am getting the error #1054 - Unknown column 'ORDERTYPECODE' in 'field list'.
The ORDERTYPECODE is a column on the table from which the trigger is called. Do I need to define which table the column belongs too?
Here is my code:
CREATE TRIGGER `StartNewIncOrderProcessing` AFTER INSERT ON `T_ORDERS`
FOR EACH ROW CASE WHEN ORDERTYPECODE = 'INC' THEN
INSERT INTO T_INC_DATA (ORDERID) VALUES ((SELECT MAX(ORDERID) FROM T_ORDERS));
END CASE;
Figured it out.
CREATE TRIGGER `StartNewIncOrderProcessing` AFTER INSERT ON `T_ORDERS`
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
IF NEW.ORDERTYPECODE = 'INC' THEN
INSERT INTO T_INC_DATA (ORDERID)
VALUES ((SELECT MAX(ORDERID) FROM T_ORDERS ));
END IF;
END

postgresql trigger to make name unique

I'm using postgres 9.4; I have a table with a unique index. I would like to mutate the name by adding a suffix to ensure the name is unique.
I have created a "before" trigger which computes a suffix. It works well in autocommit mode. However, if two items with the same name are inserted in the same transaction, they both get the same unique suffix.
What is the best way to accomplish my task? Is there a way to handle it with a trigger, or should I ... hmm... wrap the insert or update in a savepoint and then handle the error?
UPDATE (re comment from #Haleemur Ali ):
I don't think my question depends on the details. The salient point is that I query the subset of the collection over which I want to enforce uniqueness, and
choose a new name... however, it would seem that when the queries are run on two objects identically named in the same transaction, one doesn't see the others' modification to the new value.
But ... just in case... my trigger contains ("type" is fixed parameter to the trigger function):
select find_unique(coalesce(new.name, capitalize(type)),
'vis_operation', 'name', format(
'sheet_id = %s', new.sheet_id )) into new.name;
Where "find_unique" contains:
create or replace function find_unique(
stem text, table_name text, column_name text, where_expr text = null)
returns text language plpgsql as $$
declare
table_nt text = quote_ident(table_name);
column_nt text = quote_ident(column_name);
bstem text = replace(btrim(stem),'''', '''''');
find_re text = quote_literal(format('^%s(( \d+$)|$)', bstem));
xtct_re text = quote_literal(format('^(%s ?)', bstem));
where_ext text = case when where_expr is null then '' else 'and ' || where_expr end;
query_exists text = format(
$Q$ select 1 from %1$s where btrim(%2$s) = %3$s %4$s $Q$,
table_nt, column_nt, quote_literal(bstem), where_ext );
query_max text = format($q$
select max(coalesce(nullif(regexp_replace(%1$s, %4$s, '', 'i'), ''), '0')::int)
from %2$s where %1$s ~* %3$s %5$s
$q$,
column_nt, table_nt, find_re, xtct_re, where_ext );
last int;
i int;
begin
-- if no exact match, use exact
execute query_exists;
get diagnostics i = row_count;
if i = 0 then
return coalesce(bstem, capitalize(right(table_nt,4)));
end if;
-- find stem w/ number, use max plus one.
execute query_max into last;
if last is null then
return coalesce(bstem, capitalize(right(table_nt,4)));
end if;
return format('%s %s', bstem, last + 1);
end;
$$;
A BEFORE trigger sees rows modified by the statement that is currently running. So this should work. See demo below.
However, your design will not work in the presence of concurrency. You have to LOCK TABLE ... IN EXCLUSIVE MODE the table you're updating, otherwise concurrent transactions could get the same suffix. Or, with a UNIQUE constraint present, all but one will error out.
Personally I suggest:
Create a side table with the base names and a counter
When you create an entry, lock the side table in EXCLUSIVE mode. This will serialize all sessions that create entries, which is necessary so that you can:
UPDATE side_table SET counter = counter + 1 WHERE name = $1 RETURNING counter to get the next free ID. If you get zero rows, then instead:
Create a new entry in the side table if the base name being created and the counter set to zero.
Demo showing that BEFORE triggers can see rows inserted in the same statement, though not the row that fired the trigger:
craig=> CREATE TABLE demo(id integer);
CREATE TABLE
craig=> \e
CREATE FUNCTION
craig=> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION demo_tg() RETURNS trigger LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$
DECLARE
row record;
BEGIN
FOR row IN SELECT * FROM demo
LOOP
RAISE NOTICE 'Row is %',row;
END LOOP;
IF tg_op = 'DELETE' THEN
RETURN OLD;
ELSE
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END;
$$;
CREATE FUNCTION
craig=> CREATE TRIGGER demo_tg BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON demo FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE demo_tg();
CREATE TRIGGER
craig=> INSERT INTO demo(id) VALUES (1),(2);
NOTICE: Row is (1)
INSERT 0 2
craig=> INSERT INTO demo(id) VALUES (3),(4);
NOTICE: Row is (1)
NOTICE: Row is (2)
NOTICE: Row is (1)
NOTICE: Row is (2)
NOTICE: Row is (3)
INSERT 0 2
craig=> UPDATE demo SET id = id + 100;
NOTICE: Row is (1)
NOTICE: Row is (2)
NOTICE: Row is (3)
NOTICE: Row is (4)
NOTICE: Row is (2)
NOTICE: Row is (3)
NOTICE: Row is (4)
NOTICE: Row is (101)
NOTICE: Row is (3)
NOTICE: Row is (4)
NOTICE: Row is (101)
NOTICE: Row is (102)
NOTICE: Row is (4)
NOTICE: Row is (101)
NOTICE: Row is (102)
NOTICE: Row is (103)
UPDATE 4
craig=>

Postgres concurrency issue

I wrote the following trigger to guarantee that the field 'filesequence' on the insert receives always the maximum value + 1, for one stakeholder.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_filesequence()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS '
DECLARE
lastSequence file.filesequence%TYPE;
BEGIN
IF (NEW.filesequence IS NULL) THEN
PERFORM ''SELECT id FROM stakeholder WHERE id = NEW.stakeholder FOR UPDATE'';
SELECT max(filesequence) INTO lastSequence FROM file WHERE stakeholder = NEW.stakeholder;
IF (lastSequence IS NULL) THEN
lastSequence = 0;
END IF;
lastSequence = lastSequence + 1;
NEW.filesequence = lastSequence;
END IF;
RETURN NEW;
END;
' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
CREATE TRIGGER file_update_filesequence BEFORE INSERT
ON file FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE
update_filesequence();
But I have repeated 'filesequence' on the database:
select id, filesequence, stakeholder from file where stakeholder=5273;
id filesequence stakeholder
6773 5 5273
6774 5 5273
By my undertanding, the SELECT... FOR UPDATE would LOCK two transactions on the same stakeholder, and then the second one would read the new 'filesequence'. But it is not working.
I made some tests on PgAdmin, executing the following:
BEGIN;
select id from stakeholder where id = 5273 FOR UPDATE;
And it realy LOCKED other records being inserted to the same stakeholder. Then it seems that the LOCK is working.
But when I run the application with concurrent uploads, I see then repeating.
Someone could help me in finding what is the issue with my trigger?
Thanks,
Douglas.
Your idea is right. To get an autoincrement based on another field (let's say it designate to a group) you cannot use a sequence, then you have to lock the rows of that group before incrementing it.
The logic of your trigger function does that. But you have a misunderstood about the PERFORM operation. It supposed to be put instead of the SELECT keyword, so it does not receive an string as parameter. It means that when you do:
PERFORM 'SELECT id FROM stakeholder WHERE id = NEW.stakeholder FOR UPDATE';
The PL/pgSQL is actually executing:
SELECT 'SELECT id FROM stakeholder WHERE id = NEW.stakeholder FOR UPDATE';
And ignoring the result.
What you have to do on this line is:
PERFORM id FROM stakeholder WHERE id = NEW.stakeholder FOR UPDATE;
That is it, only change this line and you are done.