I'm getting a Web Push Error Code Status 403, which is driving me nuts, because its telling me to use firebase. What's going on? - progressive-web-apps

I keep getting a WebPush Error (Status Code 403) fro Chrome for a PWA I'm building and the body says that I need to use the VAPID server key from the 'firebase console' but I used nodes Web-Push library to generate the VAPID Keys, whats going on? Do I have to use firebase to build PWAs in Chrome?
Here's the Error Message I'm getting from the browser when I send a push notification:
name: 'WebPushError',
message: 'Received unexpected response code',
statusCode: 403,
headers:
{ 'content-type': 'text/plain; charset=utf-8',
'x-content-type-options': 'nosniff',
'x-frame-options': 'SAMEORIGIN',
'x-xss-protection': '0',
date: 'Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:59:02 GMT',
'content-length': '194',
'alt-svc':
'quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="46,43",h3-Q049=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-Q048=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000',
connection: 'close' },
body:
'the key in the authorization header does not correspond to the sender ID used to subscribe this user. Please ensure
you are using the correct sender ID and server Key from the Firebase console.\n',
endpoint:
'https://fcm.googleapis.com/fcm/send/exXmW3OFOTY:APA91bEKW_vxnvOZohog34pprDH6XvBsxtfnUpBdYY7z_7q4GZGa4wrmtBBg4kTRwLtgy3lNpCs8SMlvOr4nY-Fu_4zUus6zEJh69581Ier14QZxkEEVXyZHKRaZcmHa3zmbZRB4VD7Z
and here's the code that is running my node server:
//Handle imports
const express = require('express')
const cors = require('cors')
const bodyParser = require('body-parser')
const webPush = require('web-push')
const vapidKeys = require('./vapid.json')
const path = require('path')
//Setup application
const app = express()
app.use(cors())
app.use(bodyParser.json())
app.use('/static', express.static(path.join(__dirname,'frontend')))
const port = 8080
//Set up webpush
webPush.setVapidDetails(
'mailto: <email>',
vapidKeys.publicKey,
vapidKeys.privateKey
)
const pushOptions = {
proxy: '<proxy>'
}
//setup Push Notification
const sendNotification = (subscription, dataToSend='') => {
webPush.sendNotification(subscription, dataToSend, pushOptions).catch(error => { console.log('Damn it: ', error.message, '||', error)
})
}
//Server Routes Defined
app.get('/', (req, res) => res.sendFile('index.html', { root: './' }))
//Setup Database Methods
const dummyDb = {subscription: null}
const saveToDatabase = async subscription => {
dummyDb.subscription = subscription
}
//Other Server Routes
app.post('/save-subscription', async (req, res) => {
const subscription = req.body
await saveToDatabase(subscription)
console.log('subscribed!')
res.json({message: 'success'})
})
app.get('/send-notification', (req, res) => {
const subscription = dummyDb.subscription
const message = 'hello world'
sendNotification(subscription, message)
res.json({message: dummyDb.subscription})
})
app.listen(port, () => console.log(`Example app listening on port ${port}!`))

I have node.js express, postgres, angular 8 app.
I had the same problem and I got it working by adding the "gcm_sender_id": in the manifest.webmanifest file (or manifest.json I also used firebase generated public and private keys.
your gcm_sender_id is your project id in google cloud or firebase sender id

Same situation and almost lost my sanity. I tried inserting gcm_sender_id with a Firebase senderId and worked finally. I didn't have a Firebase account, but I was able to create a project in seconds and my senderId was ready to be used in the messaging settings.
But a caveat: After my modification in the manifest.json (in my case) in the root's folder, it was needed to uninstall the current service worker and restart my React project. Then I followed again all steps back by asking permissions and subscribe the user and finally trigger a push notification.
During my heat researches for a solution, I found that gcm_sender_id is also used to send and validate push messages from other browsers. According to Google Web Updates:
For Chrome prior to version 52, Opera Android and the Samsung Browser,
you're also still required to include a 'gcm_sender_id' in your web
app's manifest.json. The API key and sender ID are used to check
whether the server making the requests is actually allowed to send
messages to the receiving user.

Related

POST data to Google Sheet web app from AWS Lambda

CURRENTLY
I have a Google Sheets App Script 'web app'
Script in Goolge Sheets
function doPost(e) {
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
const sheet = ss.getSheetByName("Sheet1");
sheet.getRange("A1").setValue("Hello!")
return "Success!"
}
Google Apps Script Web App Config:
Execute as: Me // or as User. I've tried both.
Who has access: Anyone within MyOrganisation
I want to make a POST request to the above Web App from AWS Lambda.
AWS Lambda .js:
const { GoogleSpreadsheet } = require("google-spreadsheet");
const doc = new GoogleSpreadsheet(
{spreadsheetId}
);
await doc.useServiceAccountAuth({
client_email: process.env.GOOGLE_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_EMAIL,
private_key: process.env.GOOGLE_PRIVATE_KEY.replace(/\\n/g, "\n"),
});
let token = doc["jwtClient"]["credentials"]["access_token"];
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const options = {
host: 'script.google.com',
path: "/macros/s/{myscriptid}/exec", //<-- my web app path!
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Authorization': "Bearer "+ token
}
};
//create the request object with the callback with the result
const req = HTTPS.request(options, (res) => {
resolve(JSON.stringify(res.statusCode));
});
// handle the possible errors
req.on('error', (e) => {
reject(e.message);
});
//do the request
req.write(JSON.stringify(data));
//finish the request
req.end();
});
console.log("response:"+JSON.stringify(response))
GCP Service Account
I have a GCP Service Account, with permission to Google Sheets API, and otherwise unrestricted access.
This Service account has EDIT access to the Google Sheet with the doPost(e) script.
Token Output:
"jwtClient": {
"_events": {},
"_eventsCount": 0,
"transporter": {},
"credentials": {
"access_token": "somelongvalue...............", //<-- what I use
"token_type": "Bearer",
"expiry_date": 1661662492000,
"refresh_token": "jwt-placeholder"
},
"certificateCache": {},
"certificateExpiry": null,
"certificateCacheFormat": "PEM",
"refreshTokenPromises": {},
"eagerRefreshThresholdMillis": 300000,
"forceRefreshOnFailure": false,
"email": "serviceaccount#appspot.gserviceaccount.com",
"key": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nsomelongvalue=\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
"scopes": [
"https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets"
],
"subject": null,
"gtoken": {
"key": "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----\nsomelongvalue=\n-----END PRIVATE KEY-----\n",
"rawToken": {
"access_token": "somelongvalue...............",
"expires_in": 3599,
"token_type": "Bearer"
},
"iss": "serviceaccount#appspot.gserviceaccount.com",
"sub": null,
"scope": "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets",
"expiresAt": 1661662492000
}
}
ISSUE
Current response:
response:"401"
I cannot find any Google documentation on how to setup the headers to authenticate a request (from my service account) to my organisation restricted web app.
When the Web App is open to "Anyone" then it runs fine, but as soon as I restrict to MyOrganisation, I struggle to find a way to authenticate my POST request.
HELP!
How do I set up a POST request to my Google Sheets web app such that it can be protected by authentication? Right now, I'd be happy to find ANY means to authenticate this request (not necessarily a service account) that doesn't leave it completed open to public.
Should I use this hack?
One idea I had was to put a "secret" into my lambda function, and then make the web app public. The web app would check the secret, if if matched, would execute the function.
Modification points:
In order to access Web Apps using the access token with a script, the scopes of Drive API are required to be included. Those are https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.readonly, https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive, and so on. Ref
When I saw your showing script, it seems that the access token is retrieved using google-spreadsheet. When I saw the script of google-spreadsheet, it seems that this uses only the scope of https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets. Ref
From this situation, I thought that the reason for your current issue might be due to this. If my understanding is correct, how about the following modification? In this modification, the access token is retrieved by googleapis for Node.js from the service account. Ref
Modified script:
Google Apps Script side:
function doPost(e) {
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet();
const sheet = ss.getSheetByName("Sheet1");
sheet.getRange("A1").setValue("Hello!")
return ContentService.createTextOutput("Success!"); // Modified
}
When you modified the Google Apps Script, please modify the deployment as a new version. By this, the modified script is reflected in Web Apps. Please be careful about this.
You can see the detail of this in the report "Redeploying Web Apps without Changing URL of Web Apps for new IDE".
Node.js side:
const { google } = require("googleapis");
const HTTPS = require("https");
const auth = new google.auth.JWT(
"###", // Please set client_email here.
null,
"###", // Please set private_key here. When you set private_key of service account, please include \n.
["https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.readonly"],
null
);
function req(token) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const data = { key1: "value1" }; // Please set your value.
const options = {
host: "script.google.com",
path: "/macros/s/{myscriptid}/exec", //<-- my web app path!
method: "POST",
headers: {Authorization: "Bearer " + token},
};
const req = HTTPS.request(options, (res) => {
if (res.statusCode == 302) {
HTTPS.get(res.headers.location, (res) => {
if (res.statusCode == 200) {
res.setEncoding("utf8");
res.on("data", (r) => resolve(r));
}
});
} else {
res.setEncoding("utf8");
res.on("data", (r) => resolve(r));
}
});
req.on("error", (e) => reject(e.message));
req.write(JSON.stringify(data));
req.end();
});
}
auth.getAccessToken().then(({ token }) => {
req(token).then((e) => console.log(e)).catch((e) => console.log(e));
});
When this script is run, when the Web Apps is correctly deployed, the script of Web Apps is run and Success! is returned.
Note:
If this modified script was not useful for your Web Apps setting, please test as follows.
Please confirm whether your service account can access to the Spreadsheet again.
Please share the email address of the service account on the Spreadsheet. From your showing Google Apps Script, I thought that your Google Apps Script is the container-bound script of the Spreadsheet.
Please reflect the latest script to the Web Apps.
When you modified the Google Apps Script, please modify the deployment as a new version. By this, the modified script is reflected in Web Apps. Please be careful about this.
You can see the detail of this in the report "Redeploying Web Apps without Changing URL of Web Apps for new IDE".
When you set private_key of service account, please include \n.
References:
Web Apps
Taking advantage of Web Apps with Google Apps Script
Added:
When you will directly put the value to the Spreadsheet using Sheets API with google-spreadsheet module, you can also use the following script.
const { GoogleSpreadsheet } = require("google-spreadsheet");
const sample = async () => {
const doc = new GoogleSpreadsheet("###"); // Please set your Spreadsheet ID.
await doc.useServiceAccountAuth({
client_email: client_email: process.env.GOOGLE_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_EMAIL,
private_key: process.env.GOOGLE_PRIVATE_KEY,
});
await doc.loadInfo();
const sheet = doc.sheetsByTitle["Sheet1"];
await sheet.loadCells("A1");
sheet.getCell(0, 0).value = "Hello!";
await sheet.saveUpdatedCells();
};
sample();
In this case, your service account is required to be able to access to the Spreadsheet. Please be careful about this.

Can Bunjs be used as a backend server?

Now we can start a react App with bun as a server
Can we use Bunjs as complete backend server?
For Example, Can bun run this code?
const express = require('express')
const app = express()
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
res.send('hello world')
})
app.listen(3000)
I guess Bun does not YET implement all node.js api's. I tried http and it seems currently missing. And as much I understand it currently has its own built-in HTTP server.
Check the "Getting started" section on -> https://bun.sh/
A sample server:
export default {
port: 3000,
fetch(request) {
return new Response("Welcome to Bun!");
},
};
(This example reminds me of serverless functions.)
As this is the case, it seems you can not rely on Node.js http, or most probably any server framework like express.
At least for now, bun's roadmap (https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/159) shows a line, which I am not sure is talking about node's http server or sth. else about Bun's own server.
Once complete, the next step is integration with the HTTP server and
other Bun APIs
Bun api is really different from nodejs, I created a library called bunrest, a express like api, so new user does not need to learn much about bun.
Here is how to use it
Install the package from npm
npm i bunrest
To create a server
const App = require('bunrest');
const server = new App.BunServer();
After that, you can call it like on express
server.get('/test', (req, res) => {
res.status(200).json({ message: 'succeed' });
});
server.put('/test', (req, res) => {
res.status(200).json({ message: 'succeed' });
});
server.post('/test', (req, res) => {
res.status(200).json({ message: 'succeed' });
});
To start the server
server.listen(3000, () => {
console.log('App is listening on port 3000');
});
Other way is using Hono: https://honojs.dev/
There is a working demo: https://github.com/cachac/bun-api
Import package and set new instance
import { Hono } from 'hono'
const app = new Hono()
Create routes:
Instead of NodeJs res.send(), use c.json({})
app.get('/hello', c => c.json({ message: 'Hello World' }))
export and run api server:
export default {
fetch: app.fetch,
port: 3000
}

Android Enterprises Device Enrollment Stuck with NodeJs Generated QR Code with Service Account Authentication

As mentioned in the google documents i have tested the following process
URL to quick start: https://colab.research.google.com/github/google/android-management-api-samples/blob/master/notebooks/quickstart.ipynb#scrollTo=pjHfDSb8BoBP
Create Enterprise
Create Policy
Enroll the device
Then I have used the NODEJS API of Android Enterprises to develop the server based solution, which is working fine as per the documentation for all the functions such as get, create, delete the policy, devices, enterprises.
The issue i am facing is with the QR code generated from NODE application, when i scan the QR code generated from NODEJS application, the device got stuck at system update.
Following is my Policy update function
router.post('/update/:id', async function(req, res) {
const {title,policy_body,update_mask,enroll_url} = req.body;
// here we are callng the android managment API to and then the response we will update to database
const amApiBody = {
name: policy_body.name,
updateMask:update_mask,
requestBody:policy_body
}
const policy_update_response = await amApi.updatePolicy(amApiBody);
const p = await policyModel.update(req.params.id,title,policy_update_response,enroll_url);
res.json(p)
});
AmAPI file
this.updatePolicy = async function (body)
{
const auth = new google.auth.GoogleAuth({
scopes: ['https://www.googleapis.com/auth/androidmanagement'],
});
const authClient = await auth.getClient();
google.options({auth: authClient});
// Get the list of available policies
const res = await androidmanagement.enterprises.policies.patch(body);
console.log('requestFinalBody=',body);
return res.data;
}
Following is my policy data obtained by running above function
policy_create_response= {
name: 'enterprises/LC019rjnor/policies/policy1',
version: '14',
applications: [
{
packageName: 'com.google.samples.apps.iosched',
installType: 'FORCE_INSTALLED',
autoUpdateMode: 'AUTO_UPDATE_HIGH_PRIORITY'
},
{
packageName: 'com.dekaisheng.courier',
installType: 'FORCE_INSTALLED',
autoUpdateMode: 'AUTO_UPDATE_HIGH_PRIORITY'
}
],
keyguardDisabledFeatures: [ 'KEYGUARD_DISABLED_FEATURE_UNSPECIFIED' ],
defaultPermissionPolicy: 'GRANT',
uninstallAppsDisabled: true,
keyguardDisabled: true,
tetheringConfigDisabled: true,
dataRoamingDisabled: true,
networkEscapeHatchEnabled: true,
bluetoothDisabled: true,
debuggingFeaturesAllowed: true,
funDisabled: true,
kioskCustomLauncherEnabled: true
}
Note i have exported the variable to the terminal as follows before running the app, the auth.json is the service account credential file.
export GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS="/Users/Mac/Projects/wajid/mdm/server/env/auth.json"
Thanks for the help in advance
I figured out that in nodeJS API I was passing wrong property name of Policy value in the request body.
Code before fix
parent: this.getParent(policyName),
requestBody:{
“name”: “my_policy"
}
Code after fix
parent: this.getParent(policyName),
requestBody:{
"policyName”: “my_policy"
}

Error trying to get authenticated user email with googleapis and node.js

I'm implementing auth on my website using googleapis. The function plus.people.get doesn't work. I have seen it is deprecated on some forums but it's still documented at google which has me confused. The error I get is "Legacy People API has not been used in project 328985958128 before or it is disabled. Enable it by visiting https://console.developers.google.com/apis/api/legacypeople.googleapis.com then retry. If you enabled this API recently, wait a few minutes for the action to propagate to our systems and retry." The webpage doesn't even load. My code is
if (!req.body.token) return res.status(500).json({ type: 'error', message: 'No access token provided.' })
const OAuth2 = google.auth.OAuth2
const oauth2Client = new google.auth.OAuth2(keys.client_id, keys.client_secret)
google.options({ auth: oauth2Client });
const plus = google.plus('v1')
oauth2Client.setCredentials({
access_token: req.body.token
})
plus.people.get({
userId: 'me',
auth: oauth2Client
}, (error, response) => {
if (error)
console.log(error)
return res.status(500).json({ type: 'error',error })
const emails = (response.data || {}).emails
You are using google.plus('v1'), which has been deprecated
Instead you should use
const service = google.people({version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client})
to create a service object.
To perform a request an additional auhtorization is not required anymore, so:
service.people.get({
userId: 'me'
}, (error, response) => {
...
})
Further information:
Creating a service account client with node.js
People API quide for node.js

flutter web: how to connect to a rest API or localhost

My code:
void checkState() async {
print("CTC");
var url = "http://localhost:3000";
try {
var respX = await http.get(url);
} catch (err) {
print("response Arrived: $err");
}
}
But it is not possible:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/43015#issuecomment-543835637
I am using google chrome for debugging. simply pasting http://localhost:3000 allows me to connect to the URL from the same browser.
Is there any way to do it?
This issue was not with the flutter. It is the CORS policies in the browser as well as the server that blocked the request. I hosted it in a nodejs server with express. Here what I have did to solve this:
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.use((req, res, next) => {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
next();
});
You can change the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' to the domain you are calling from if you want to. Else it will allow request from everywhere.
Remember, the localhost of your emulator is not the localhost of your machine. To test the API running on your machine you have to point to the ip adress of your computer