This is the question about the Azure Management Libraries for Java.
First, some background:
The Azure Management REST API mentions at the createorupdate definition the ability to create the database and set different database properties like this (example from the page):
{
"location": "southeastasia",
"sku": {
"name": "S0",
"tier": "Standard"
},
"properties": {
"createMode": "Default",
"collation": "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS",
"maxSizeBytes": 1073741824
}
}
I'm looking how to do the similar request from the Azure Management Libraries for Java.
So far I have found how to set the "sku" part. This is done by using the appropriate ServiceObjectiveName object:
final SqlServer sqlServer = ...get SQL server object ...;
final Creatable<SqlDatabase> myDb = sqlServer.databases()
.define(targetDBName)
.withServiceObjective(ServiceObjectiveName.fromString("S0"));
...
myDb.createAsync(...); // create the db with sku S0
But I can't figure out how to set the properties. For my purpose I need to set a bit different properties than in the sample. Namely, the specific properties.maxSizeBytes and properties.autoPauseDelay.
I even found the .withMaxSizeBytes() method here but it's marked deprecated without any explanation.
I haven't found any way to set the autoPauseDelay.
By digging in the azure-sdk-for-java, I am sorry that I did not find any methods for setting these properties.
The complicated workaround I think of is to use resource deployment. It is supported in java sdk:
azure.deployments().define(deploymentName)
.withExistingResourceGroup(rgName)
.withTemplate(templateJson)
.withParameters("{}")
.withMode(DeploymentMode.INCREMENTAL)
.create();
And here is a sample which can give you some guidance: DeployUsingARMTemplate
By the way, you can try to create a database on Azure portal, and then you can download the template at the last step of the creation:
Related
i'm developing some apps, for which everyone needs to show a document in the same way. For this i created a new component which handles my documents in a separate component. I then just want to reuse this component from my different apps.
To embed my reuse component i used something like this in my view.xml:
<core:ComponentContainer
name="de.mycomp.base.DocViewer"
component="de.mycomp.base.DocViewer"
settings='\{"param1":"value1"\}'/>
To access it during runtime i have to declare the namespace of the reuse component and associate it with an resource-url. To achive this, i used the following coding in the init-method of my Component.js which uses my reuse-component DocViewer.
jQuery.sap.registerModulePath("de.mycomp.base.DocViewer", "/sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer");
zdocviewer in this case is the name of the bsp-application to which the reuse-component was deployed on premise. To have this also work in webide and on SAP-Cloud-Plattform i needed to add an entry to neo-app.json
like this:
{
"path": "/sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer",
"target": {
"type": "application",
"name": "docviewer"
},
"description": "my base document viewer"
},
where docviewer is the name of the deployed app with the reuse component on SCP.
The type application implies that this destination is an app.
This works so far on premise and on sap cloud.
but my problem is that i dont want to have the registerModulePath in my Component.js. Nearly every configuration of components takes place in the manifest.json file. So i tried to move this coding line to configuration in manifest.json, but i failed so far.
Here's what i did:
i added a dependency in section sap.ui5 and there in the dependency-entry like this:
"components": {
"de.dvelop.base.DvelopBaseDocViewer": {
"lazy": true
}
}
i added the following entry to sap.ui5 part
"resourceRoots": {
"de.dvelop.base.DvelopBaseDocViewer": "/sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer"
},
The problem here is, that its not allowed to use absolute paths in the value-part of the resource-root entries. So this is invalid:
- /sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer
- ../sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer
Only this is valid:
- sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer
- ./sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer
So this annotation is only usable for embedded components, where the reuse-component is in the same deployed project. But this is not my understanding of a reuseable component. So changing something in that component would make it neccessary to copy the files to all the app-projects using the component. And they all have to be deployed again.
So for now i made a fallback to the jquery.sap.registerModulePath because this works with deployed components to refer them from other independent components.
Or does anybody have an idea how to handle this better or more proper within manifest.json?
kind regards
Matthias
see here: ui5 reuse components: https://github.com/Yelcho/UI5-Comp-Routing
you mixed up here old and new approches, wrinting all steps in this answer would be very long. Here brief step to step approche:
define your componentUsages
"componentUsages": {
"myDoc": {
"name": "com.company.myDoc",
"settings": {},
"componentData": {},
"lazy": true
}}
define path mapping, in resourceRoots
"resourceRoots": {
"com.company.myDoc": "/sap/bc/ui5_ui5/sap/zdocviewer"
},
define a targed type component
"targets": {
"myDocTarget": {
"type": "Component",
"usage": "myDoc"
}
use nested routing
.getRouter()
.navTo("myDocRoute", {
id: oBindingContext.getProperty("CategoryID")
}, {
products: {
route: "list",
parameters: {
}
}
});
This is just a general clarification about building framework using cypress.io.
In cypress can we write a test framework like page object model in selenium?
These model make our life easy to maintain tests.
For eg if ID or class of a particular element which is used across multiple tests /files has changed with a new version of Application-In cypress it is hard to go to multiple test files/tests and change the ID right?
Can we follow the same page object model concept like declaring all elements as variables in each page and use the variable names in tests/functions?
Also can we reuse these variables across different test .js files ?
If yes - can you please give a sample
Thanks
I have seen only a few people using POM concept while creating an automation framework using Cypress. Is that advisable to follow POM model, it depends on reading the following link from team. I would say this may depend upon automation tools/ architecture. According to Cypress team this is not recommendable, may be a debatable topic, read this: https://www.cypress.io/blog/2019/01/03/stop-using-page-objects-and-start-using-app-actions/#
We can declare the variable names in Cypress.env.json file or cypress.json file like below:
{
"weight": "85",
"height": "180",
"age": "35"
}
Then if you want to use them in a test-spec, create a new variable and receive it like below in test-spec.
const t_weight = Cypress.env('weight');
const t_height = Cypress.env('height');
Now you can use the variable in respective textbox input of pages as below:
cy.get('#someheighttextfieldID').type(t_weight);
cy.get('#someweighttextfieldID').type(t_height);
or receive it directly;
cy.get('#someweighttextfieldID').type(Cypress.env('weight'));
example:
/* declare varaibles in 'test-spec.js' file*/
const t_weight = Cypress.env('weight');
const t_height = Cypress.env('height');
//Cypress test - assume below test to test some action and receive the variable to text box
describe('Cypress test to receive variable', function(){
it('Cypress test to receive variable', function(){
cy.visit('/')
cy.get('#someweighttextfieldID').type(t_weight);
cy.get('#someheighttextfieldID').type(t_height);
//even receive the variable straight away
cy.get('#someweighttextfieldID').type(Cypress.env('weight'));
})
});
I have an ARM template with a section with a function app, and I deploy all I need, except this parameter. I need to set in read / write mode, but I can not find how to do. I don't find the property. Any idea?
Think you need to set FUNCTION_APP_EDIT_MODE to readwrite as per: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-app-settings
Therefore you probably need something like this in your ARM json…
"appSettings": [
{
"name": "FUNCTION_APP_EDIT_MODE",
"value": "readwrite"
}]
Hope that helps,
Colin.
My goal is to add custom PropertySource to spring-cloud-server. What I want to achieve is to get some custom properties from that custom source in spring-cloud-config-client application.
Basing on suggestions from Adding environment repository in spring-config-server I've created spring-cloud-config-server application and separate project spring-cloud-config-custom. Second one is based on spring-cloud-consul-config code. So, I've created all necessary classes like CustomPropertySource, CustomPropertySourceLocator, CustomConfigBootstrapConfiguration and so on and configured them in spring.factories.
At the end, I've added maven dependency to spring-cloud-config-custom inside my spring-cloud-config-server.
So far so good. Everything works well. When I start server I can see that my CustomPropertySource is on the list of propertySources inside EnviromentRepository bean injected to EnvironmentController.
Problem: When I send GET request to #RequestMapping("/{name}/{profiles}/{label:.*}") (in EnvironmentController), injected EnviromentRepository bean is being used to find requested property source (repository.findOne(name, profiles, label) method).
Unfortunately my property source could not be found here. Why?
I've spent a lot of time on debugging this. I've found that repository delegates findOne() method call to other repositories: MultipleJGitEnvironmentRepository which delegates it to NativeEnvironmentRepository. Inside this delegates, findOne() method doesn't use propertySources from EnviromentRepository primary injected to controller. It creates new environment repository with new list of PropertySources and new separate SpringApplication. At the end, this list does not contain my CustomPropertySource and that is why findOne() returns empty propertySources in resulting Environment object.
Am I doing something wrong?
Is CustomPropertySourceLocator (and/or ConsulPropertySourceLocator) supposed to be used (autowired/bootstrapped) in spring-cloud-config-server or spring-cloud-config-client
Can spring-cloud-config-server deliver many different kind of PropertySources at the same time, via REST interface (saying "different" I mean all Git, Consul and Zookeeper)?
What you are doing is adding a property source to the config server itself, not the configuration it serves. Adding spring-boot-starter-actuator to your config server and viewing /env reveals:
{
"profiles": [
],
"server.ports": {
"local.server.port": 8888
},
"bootstrapProperties:custom": {
"test.prop3": "CUSTOM-VALUE-3",
"test.prop2": "CUSTOM-VALUE-2",
"test.prop1": "CUSTOM-VALUE-1"
},
}
To add something that will be served by config server, you have to implement an EnvironmentRepository.
Support for a composite EnvironmentRepository was recently added.
EF People,
My understanding is that the newly made public APIs for metadata will allow us to add enough metadata in to the model so that TVF can be called and be composable.
If anyone can point me in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it. Without Composable TVF I have to jump through some major work a rounds.
From looking at the unit test it looks like something a long this line of thought:
var functionImport = EdmFunction.Create()
"Foo", "Bar", DataSpace.CSpace,
new EdmFunctionPayload
{
IsComposable = true,
IsFunctionImport = true,
ReturnParameters = new[]
{
FunctionParameter.Create("functionname", EdmType.GetBuiltInType()
EdmConstants.ReturnType,
TypeUsage.Create(collectionTypeMock.Object),
ParameterMode.ReturnValue),
}
});
...
entityContainer.AddFunctionImport(functionImport);
Thanks,
Brian F
Yes, it is now possible in EF6.1. I actually created a custom model convention which allows using store functions in CodeFirst using the newly opened mapping API. The convention is available on NuGet http://www.nuget.org/packages/EntityFramework.CodeFirstStoreFunctions. Here is the link to the blogpost containing all the details: http://blog.3d-logic.com/2014/04/09/support-for-store-functions-tvfs-and-stored-procs-in-entity-framework-6-1/. The project is open source and you can get sources here: https://codefirstfunctions.codeplex.com/