I have a Postgres table where one id may have multiple Channel values as follows
ID |Channel | Column 3 | Column 4
_____|________|__________|_________
1 | Sports | x | null
1 | Organic| x | z
2 | Organic| null | q
3 | Arts | b | w
3 | Organic| e | r
4 | Sports | sp | t
No ID will have a duplicate channel name, and no ID will be both Sports and Arts. That is, ID 1 could have a Sports and Organic channel, a Sports and Arts channel, but not two sports or two organic entries and not a Sports and Arts channel. I want all IDs to be in the query, but if there is a non-organic channel I prefer that. The result I would want would be
ID |Channel | Column 3 | Column 4
_____|________|__________|_________
1 | Sports | x | null
2 | Organic| null | q
3 | Arts | b | w
4 | Sports | sp | t
I feel like there is some CTE here, a rank and partition or something that could do the trick, but I'm just not getting it. I'm only including Columns 3 and 4 to show there are extra columns.
Does anyone have any ideas on the code to deploy here?
You could use DISTINCT ON with an appropriate ORDER BY clause:
SELECT DISTINCT ON (id)
id, channel, column3, column4
FROM atable
ORDER BY id, channel = 'Organic';
This relies on the fact that FALSE < TRUE.
I ended up using a rank over function
ROW_NUMBER () over (partition by salesforce_id order by case when channel is organic then 0 else 1 end desc, timestamp desc) as id_rank
I didn't include in the original question that I had a timestamp! This works now. Thanks
Related
SQL newbie here. I'm trying to write a query that generates a scoring table, setting null to a student's grades in a module for which they haven't yet taken their exams (on PostgreSQL).
So I start with tables that look something like this:
student_evaluation:
|student_id| module_id | course_id |grade |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | 1 | 1 |3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |7 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 |8 |
| 2 | 4 | 2 |9 |
course_module:
| module_id | course_id |
| ---------- | --------- |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 |
In our use case, a course is made up of several modules. Each module has a single exam, but a student who failed his exam may have a couple of retries. The same module may also be present in different courses, but an exam attempt only counts for one instance of the module (ie. student A passed module 1's exam on course 1. If course 2 also has module 1, student A has to retake the same exam for course 2 if he also has access to that course).
So the output should look like this:
student_id
module_id
course_id
grade
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
7
1
2
1
8
1
3
1
null
2
4
2
9
I feel like this should have been a simple task, but I think I have a very flawed understanding of how outer and cross joins work. I have tried stuff like:
SELECT se.student_id, se.module_id, se.course_id, se.grade FROM student_evaluation se
RIGHT OUTER JOIN course_module ON course_module.course_id = se.course_id
AND course_module.module_id = se.module_id
or
SELECT se.student_id, se.module_id, se.course_id, se.grade FROM student_evaluation se
CROSS JOIN course_module WHERE course_module.course_id = se.course_id
Neither worked. These all feel wrong, but I'm lost as to what would be the proper way to go about this.
Thank you in advance.
I think you need both join types: first use a cross join to build a list of all combinations of students and courses, then use an outer join to add the grades.
SELECT sc.student_id,
sc.module_id,
sc.course_id,
se.grade
FROM student_evaluation se
RIGHT JOIN (SELECT s.student_id,
c.module_id,
c.course_id
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT student_id
FROM student_evaluation) AS s
CROSS JOIN course_module AS c) AS sc
USING (course_id));
I have a table of users like this:
Table user
id | name | date
1 | alice | 2021-03-28
2 | bob | 2021-03-29
...
And a table with their contacts:
Table contact
id | user_id | contact | has_profile
1 | 1 | facebook | 1
2 | 1 | gmail | 1
3 | 1 | yahoo | 0
4 | 2 | facebook | 0
5 | 2 | gmail | 1
6 | 2 | yahoo | 1
...
I want to write a query that aggregates average rates of the contacts in different dates, so that the result should be:
date | facebook | gmail | yahoo
2021-03-29 | 0.7 | 0.82 | 0.15
2021-03-28 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.18
...
I could reach it by the query:
select
u."date",
avg(f.has_profile) as facebook,
avg(g.has_profile) as gmail,
avg(y.has_profile) as yahoo
from user u
join contact f on f.user_id = u.id and f.contact = 'facebook'
join contact g on g.user_id = u.id and g.contact = 'gmail'
join contact y on y.user_id = u.id and y.contact = 'yahoo'
group by u."date"
order by u."date" desc
But the point is that this query depends on the certain contact names in the table contact, so if there are too many ones, the query is too long and complicated to modify. Is there a way to say to Postgresql to extract the names of the contacts automatically and to aggregate over them?
(JSON aggregate as requested in the comments)
demo:db<>fiddle
SELECT
my_date,
jsonb_object_agg(contact, avg) -- 3
FROM (
SELECT
my_date,
contact,
AVG(has_profile) -- 2
FROM
contact c
JOIN users u ON c.user_id = u.id -- 1
GROUP BY my_date, contact
) s
GROUP BY my_date
Join tables
Calculate average values by date and contact
Aggregate these values into a JSON object
Unrelated note: date and user are unrecommended names for database entities because they are reserved keywords. You have to handle them carefully (always use " characters). It's better to rename these properly. Moreover, date is not very descriptive. Maybe login_date or something
I'm working on a problem, involving these two tables.
books
isbn | title | author
------------+-----------------------------------------+------------------
1840918626 | Hogwarts: A History | Bathilda Bagshot
3458400871 | Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them | Newt Scamander
9136884926 | Advanced Potion-Making | Libatius Borage
transactions
id | patron_id | isbn | checked_out_date | checked_in_date
----+-----------+------------+------------------+-----------------
1 | 1 | 1840918626 | 2012-05-05 | 2012-05-06
2 | 4 | 9136884926 | 2012-05-05 | 2012-05-06
3 | 2 | 3458400871 | 2012-05-05 | 2012-05-06
4 | 3 | 3458400871 | 2018-04-29 | 2018-05-02
5 | 2 | 9136884926 | 2018-05-03 | NULL
6 | 1 | 3458400871 | 2018-05-03 | 2018-05-05
7 | 5 | 3458400871 | 2018-05-05 | NULL
the query "Make a list of all book titles and denote whether or not a copy of that book is checked out." so pretty much just the first table with a checked out column.
im trying to SELECT DISTINCT on a sub query with the checkout books first, but that doesn't work. I've researched and others say to accomplish this use a GROUP BY clause instead of DISTINCT but the examples they provide are one column queries and when more columns are added it doesn't work.
this is my closest attempt
SELECT DISTINCT ON (title)
title, checked_out
FROM(
SELECT b.title, t.checked_in_date IS NULL AS checked_out
FROM transactions t
natural join books b
ORDER BY checked_out DESC
) t;
or you can join only transactions where books are not checked in:
SELECT b.title, t.isbn IS NOT NULL AS checked_out
, t.checked_out_date
FROM books b
LEFT JOIN transactions t ON t.isbn = b.isbn AND t.checked_in_date IS NULL
ORDER BY checked_out DESC
I adjusted your attempt a little bit. Basically I changed the way your data is joined
SELECT DISTINCT ON (title)
title, checked_out
FROM(
SELECT b.title, t.checked_in_date IS NULL AS checked_out
FROM books b
LEFT OUTER JOIN transactions t USING (isbn)
ORDER BY checked_out DESC
) t;
Situation
Using Python 3, Django 1.9, Cubes 1.1, and Postgres 9.5.
These are my datatables in pictorial form:
The same in text format:
Store table
------------------------------
| id | code | address |
|-----|------|---------------|
| 1 | S1 | Kings Row |
| 2 | S2 | Queens Street |
| 3 | S3 | Jacks Place |
| 4 | S4 | Diamonds Alley|
| 5 | S5 | Hearts Road |
------------------------------
Product table
------------------------------
| id | code | name |
|-----|------|---------------|
| 1 | P1 | Saucer 12 |
| 2 | P2 | Plate 15 |
| 3 | P3 | Saucer 13 |
| 4 | P4 | Saucer 14 |
| 5 | P5 | Plate 16 |
| and many more .... |
|1000 |P1000 | Bowl 25 |
|----------------------------|
Sales table
----------------------------------------
| id | product_id | store_id | amount |
|-----|------------|----------|--------|
| 1 | 1 | 1 |7.05 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 |9.00 |
| 3 | 2 | 3 |1.00 |
| 4 | 2 | 3 |1.00 |
| 5 | 2 | 5 |1.00 |
| and many more .... |
| 1000| 20 | 4 |1.00 |
|--------------------------------------|
The relationships are:
Sales belongs to Store
Sales belongs to Product
Store has many Sales
Product has many Sales
What I want to achieve
I want to use cubes to be able to do a display by pagination in the following manner:
Given the stores S1-S3:
-------------------------
| product | S1 | S2 | S3 |
|---------|----|----|----|
|Saucer 12|7.05|9 | 0 |
|Plate 15 |0 |0 | 2 |
| and many more .... |
|------------------------|
Note the following:
Even though there were no records in sales for Saucer 12 under Store S3, I displayed 0 instead of null or none.
I want to be able to do sort by store, say descending order for, S3.
The cells indicate the SUM total of that particular product spent in that particular store.
I also want to have pagination.
What I tried
This is the configuration I used:
"cubes": [
{
"name": "sales",
"dimensions": ["product", "store"],
"joins": [
{"master":"product_id", "detail":"product.id"},
{"master":"store_id", "detail":"store.id"}
]
}
],
"dimensions": [
{ "name": "product", "attributes": ["code", "name"] },
{ "name": "store", "attributes": ["code", "address"] }
]
This is the code I used:
result = browser.aggregate(drilldown=['Store','Product'],
order=[("Product.name","asc"), ("Store.name","desc"), ("total_products_sale", "desc")])
I didn't get what I want.
I got it like this:
----------------------------------------------
| product_id | store_id | total_products_sale |
|------------|----------|---------------------|
| 1 | 1 | 7.05 |
| 1 | 2 | 9 |
| 2 | 3 | 2.00 |
| and many more .... |
|---------------------------------------------|
which is the whole table with no pagination and if the products not sold in that store it won't show up as zero.
My question
How do I get what I want?
Do I need to create another data table that aggregates everything by store and product before I use cubes to run the query?
Update
I have read more. I realised that what I want is called dicing as I needed to go across 2 dimensions. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLAP_cube#Operations
Cross-posted at Cubes GitHub issues to get more attention.
This is a pure SQL solution using crosstab() from the additional tablefunc module to pivot the aggregated data. It typically performs better than any client-side alternative. If you are not familiar with crosstab(), read this first:
PostgreSQL Crosstab Query
And this about the "extra" column in the crosstab() output:
Pivot on Multiple Columns using Tablefunc
SELECT product_id, product
, COALESCE(s1, 0) AS s1 -- 1. ... displayed 0 instead of null
, COALESCE(s2, 0) AS s2
, COALESCE(s3, 0) AS s3
, COALESCE(s4, 0) AS s4
, COALESCE(s5, 0) AS s5
FROM crosstab(
'SELECT s.product_id, p.name, s.store_id, s.sum_amount
FROM product p
JOIN (
SELECT product_id, store_id
, sum(amount) AS sum_amount -- 3. SUM total of product spent in store
FROM sales
GROUP BY product_id, store_id
) s ON p.id = s.product_id
ORDER BY s.product_id, s.store_id;'
, 'VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5)' -- desired store_id's
) AS ct (product_id int, product text -- "extra" column
, s1 numeric, s2 numeric, s3 numeric, s4 numeric, s5 numeric)
ORDER BY s3 DESC; -- 2. ... descending order for S3
Produces your desired result exactly (plus product_id).
To include products that have never been sold replace [INNER] JOIN with LEFT [OUTER] JOIN.
SQL Fiddle with base query.
The tablefunc module is not installed on sqlfiddle.
Major points
Read the basic explanation in the reference answer for crosstab().
I am including with product_id because product.name is hardly unique. This might otherwise lead to sneaky errors conflating two different products.
You don't need the store table in the query if referential integrity is guaranteed.
ORDER BY s3 DESC works, because s3 references the output column where NULL values have been replaced with COALESCE. Else we would need DESC NULLS LAST to sort NULL values last:
PostgreSQL sort by datetime asc, null first?
For building crosstab() queries dynamically consider:
Dynamic alternative to pivot with CASE and GROUP BY
I also want to have pagination.
That last item is fuzzy. Simple pagination can be had with LIMIT and OFFSET:
Displaying data in grid view page by page
I would consider a MATERIALIZED VIEW to materialize results before pagination. If you have a stable page size I would add page numbers to the MV for easy and fast results.
To optimize performance for big result sets, consider:
SQL syntax term for 'WHERE (col1, col2) < (val1, val2)'
Optimize query with OFFSET on large table
I have a table in SQL Server 2008 R2 which contains product orders. For the most part, it is one entry per product
ID | Prod | Qty
------------
1 | A | 1
4 | B | 1
7 | A | 1
8 | A | 1
9 | A | 1
12 | C | 1
15 | A | 1
16 | A | 1
21 | B | 1
I want to create a view based on the table which looks like this
ID | Prod | Qty
------------------
1 | A | 1
4 | B | 1
9 | A | 3
12 | C | 1
16 | A | 2
21 | B | 1
I've written a query using a table expression, but I am stumped on how to make it work. The sql below does not actually work, but is a sample of what I am trying to do. I've written this query multiple different ways, but cannot figure out how to get the right results. I am using row_number to generate a sequential id. From that, I can order and compare consecutive rows to see if the next row has the same product as the previous row since ReleaseId is sequential, but not necessarily contiguous.
;with myData AS
(
SELECT
row_number() over (order by a.ReleaseId) as 'Item',
a.ReleaseId,
a.ProductId,
a.Qty
FROM OrdersReleased a
UNION ALL
SELECT
row_number() over (order by b.ReleaseId) as 'Item',
b.ReleaseId,
b.ProductId,
b.Qty
FROM OrdersReleased b
INNER JOIN myData c ON b.Item = c.Item + 1 and b.ProductId = c.ProductId
)
SELECT * from myData
Usually you drop the ID out of something like this, since it is a summary.
SELECT a.ProductId,
SUM(a.Qty) AS Qty
FROM OrdersReleased a
GROUP BY a.ProductId
ORDER BY a.ProductId
-- if you want to do sub query you can do it as a column (if you don't have a very large dataset).
SELECT a.ProductId,
SUM(a.Qty) AS Qty,
(SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM OrdersReleased b
WHERE b.ReleasedID - 1 = a.ReleasedID
AND b.ProductId = b.ProductId) as NumberBackToBack
FROM OrdersReleased a
GROUP BY a.ProductId
ORDER BY a.ProductId