Advanced case when statement in T-SQL using three columns
Hope someone can help with the following :)
I have two tables in SQL.
Table 1 has 4 columns - person_id, A, B, and C.
Table 2 has 3 look-up columns - A, B, and C
I want to carry out the following:
Look down Table 1, column A, find value in Table 2, column A
If no value, go to Table 1, column B.
Look down Table 1, column B, find value in Table 2, column B
If no value, go to Table 1, column C
Look down Table 1, column C, find value in Table 2, column C
If no values in any column put 'Null'
So I know how to write a simple case when statement. However, I think that 'case when' only works on one column. I've started to write out the code but need help to get it right.
Select person_id,
case when 1.A is not null then 2.A
when 1.B is not null then 2.B
else 1.C
end as CODE
from table 1
left join table 2
Order by person_id
Would appreciate any help you can give, thank you.
Your sql seems mostly correct, except for the else 1.C.
Since a CASE WHEN will return 1 value, depending on the first positive WHEN criteria.
And a CASE returns NULL as default.
So ELSE null isn't really needed.
The table descriptions do indicate that Table2 only contains 1 row.
If so, then you can cross join them.
SELECT t1.person_id,
CASE
WHEN t1.A IS NOT NULL THEN t2.A
WHEN t1.B IS NOT NULL THEN t2.B
WHEN t1.C IS NOT NULL THEN t2.C
END AS [CODE]
FROM [Table 1] t1
CROSS JOIN (
SELECT TOP 1 A, B, C
FROM [Table 2]
ORDER BY A DESC, B DESC, C DESC
) t2
Related
I have a requirement something like there are two db tables A and B.
Table A and table B both have column 'merit' of type integer. The requirement is to find the entries from table A those have merit that matches with the least merit number in table B.
If merit in B is NULL for all the entries, the query should result all the entries from table A.
If merit in B has valid numbers, the query should result the entries of A those match the least merit number in table B.
Sample data is like this::
TABLE A TABLE B
COL1 COL2 MERIT COL1 COL2 MERIT
a ab 1 c ac 1
b bc 2 d ad 3
From above data the least merit in B is 1 so, only the matching entry should result from Table A.
If merit column in B is null for all the entries ie. B has no valid number for merit, two entries from A should result.
So, I came up with the below sql query::
select A.* from A where A.merit IS NOT DISTINCT FROM (
select min(B.merit) from B where B.merit IS NOT NULL);
I am unable to write the JPA equivalent of this sql because of "IS NOT DISTINCT FROM".
The below queries are not working.
select a from A a where a.merit in (select min(b.merit) from B b where b.merit is not null)
select a from A a where a.merit = (select min(b.merit) from B b where b.merit is not null)
My environment is POSTGRESQL, HIBERNATE in QUARKUS.
Thanks for any suggestions.
I have two tables A and B.
Both the tables have same number of columns.
Table A always contains all ids of Table B.
Need to fetch row from Table B first if it does not exist then have
to fetch from Table A.
I was trying to dynamically do this
select
CASE
WHEN b.id is null THEN
a.*
ELSE
b.*
END
from A a
left join B b on b.id = a.id
I think this syntax is not correct.
Can some one suggest how to proceed.
It looks like you want to select all columns from table A except when a matching ID exists in table B. In that case you want to select all columns from table B.
That can be done with this query as long as the number and types of columns in both tables are compatible:
select * from a where not exists (select 1 from b where b.id = a.id)
union all
select * from b
If the number, types, or order of columns differs you will need to explicitly specify the columns to return in each sub query.
I have table a, in this table after a SQL request, I have the same records a few times.
Here is my request.
for server_id in (select bs.id from status.servers bs
join settings.config blc on bs.id = blc.server_id
where blc.lane_number = (dataitem->>'No')::SMALLINT AND blc.min_length <= (dataitem->>'len')::real
)
LOOP
insert into a(measurement_id, server_id, status)
VALUES (
measurement_id,server_id,false
);
END LOOP;
And as result i have in table a, records like:
id meas_id serv_id status
1 12 1 f
2 12 1 f
3 12 1 f
i've changed code a little, in working code there are not syntax mistakes
answering
"why i have the same records with dif id?"
table a probably have a default value for column id, so values are taken from sequence. most probably you created it with serial data type... Those results are expected then. If you want to define your value, you should not skip column in scalar list, so
insert into a(measurement_id, server_id, status)
must become
insert into a(id, measurement_id, server_id, status)
and the value passed accordingly...
If you expected one result (assuming it from same value of server_id), you need to add distinct to the
for server_id in (select distinct bs.id from status.servers bs
because currently your select returns three rows with same bs.id as result of a join with three matching rows on join key...
I'm trying to create a table with the following columns:
I want to use a with recursive table to do this. The following code however is giving the following error:
'ERROR: column "b" does not exist'
WITH recursive numbers AS
(
SELECT 1,2,4 AS a, b, c
UNION ALL
SELECT a+1, b+1, c+1
FROM Numbers
WHERE a + 1 <= 10
)
SELECT * FROM numbers;
I'm stuck because when I just include one column this works perfectly. Why is there an error for multiple columns?
This appears to be a simple syntax issue: You are aliasing the columns incorrectly. (SELECT 1,2,4 AS a, b, c) is incorrect. Your attempt has 5 columns: 1,2,a,b,c
Break it down to just: Select 1,2,4 as a,b,c and you see the error but Select 1 a,2 b,4 c works fine.
b is unknown in the base select because it is being interpreted as a field name; yet no table exists having that field. Additionally the union would fail as you have 5 fields in the base and 3 in the recursive union.
DEMO: http://rextester.com/IUWJ67486
One can define the columns outside the select making it easier to manage or change names.
WITH recursive numbers (a,b,c) AS
(
SELECT 1,2,4
UNION ALL
SELECT a+1, b+1, c+1
FROM Numbers
WHERE a + 1 <= 10
)
SELECT * FROM numbers;
or this approach which aliases the fields internally so the 1st select column's names would be used. (a,b,c) vs somereallylongalias... in union query. It should be noted that not only the name of the column originates from the 1st query in the unioned sets; but also the datatype for the column; which, must match between the two queries.
WITH recursive numbers AS
(
SELECT 1 as a ,2 as b,4 as c
UNION ALL
SELECT a+1 someReallyLongAlias
, b+1 someReallyLongAliasAgain
, c+1 someReallyLongAliasYetAgain
FROM Numbers
WHERE a<5
)
SELECT * FROM numbers;
Lastly, If you truly want to stop at 5 then the where clause should be WHERE a < 5. The image depicts this whereas the query does not; so not sure what your end game is here.
I'll just put this in layman's terms since I'm a complete noobie:
I have 2 tables A and B, both having 2 columns of interest namely: employee_number and salary.
What I am looking to do is to extract rows of 'combination' of employee_number and salary from A that are NOT present in B, but each of employee_number and salary should be present in both.
I am looking to doing it with the 2 following conditions(please forgive the wrong function
names.. this is just to present the problem 'eloquently'):
1.) A.unique(employee_number) exists in B.unique(employee_number) AND A.unique(salary)
exists in B.unique(salary)
2.) A.concat(employee_number,salary) <> B.concat(employee_number,salary)
Note: A and B are in different databases, so I'm looking to use dblink to do this.
This is what I tried doing:
SELECT distinct * FROM dblink('dbname=test1 port=5432
host=test01 user=user password=password','SELECT employee_number,salary, employee_number||salary AS ENS FROM empsal.A')
AS A(employee_number int8, salary integer, ENS numeric)
LEFT JOIN empsalfull.B B on B.employee_number = A.employee_number AND B.salary = A.salary
WHERE A.ENS not in (select distinct employee_number || salary from empsalfull.B)
but it turned out to be wrong as I had it cross-checked by using spreadsheets and I don't get the same result.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
For easier understanding I left out the dblink.
Because, the first one selects lines in B that equal the employeenumber in A as well as the salery in A, so their concatenated values will equal as well (if you expect this to not be true, please provide some test data).
SELECT * from firsttable A
LEFT JOIN secondtable B where
(A.employee_number = B.employee_number AND a.salery != b.salery) OR
(A.salery = B.salery AND A.employee_number != B.employee_number)
If you have troubles with lines containing nulls, you might also try somthing like this:
AND (a.salery != b.salery OR (a.salery IS NULL AND b.salery IS NOT NULL) or (a.salery IS NOT
NULL and b.salery IS NULL))
I think you're looking for something along these lines.
(Sample data)
create table A (
employee_number integer primary key,
salary integer not null
);
create table B (
employee_number integer primary key,
salary integer not null
);
insert into A values
(1, 20000),
(2, 30000),
(3, 20000); -- This row isn't in B
insert into B values
(1, 20000), -- Combination in A
(2, 20000), -- Individual values in A
(3, 50000); -- Only emp number in A
select A.employee_number, A.salary
from A
where (A.employee_number, A.salary) NOT IN (select employee_number, salary from B)
and A.employee_number IN (select employee_number from B)
and A.salary IN (select salary from B)
output: 3, 20000