Maybe I'm defeating the purpose of Code First but for one reason or another let's look at the problem.
I'm working in EF Code First. My 'Cars' POCO has a "Make" field,.. that matches the "Make" column in the db. Now I come along and I manually rename the column in the db to "Manufacturer". How can I force EF to catch up and update/ rename the POCO?
At the moment I'm using EntityFramework 6.1.3 and VS 2010.
The only solution I could find to this problem of the database being out of sync with EF on the code side was to delete all of the MIGRATIONS and the ENTITIES poco classes, and on the db side delete the _migrations table. Then go back to your application and add to your project a new "Code First from Existing Database".
This solved the problem for me easily and will allow me to work with Code First AND SQL Server Management Studio (as I like to do (until I get better at EF)).
I know it's a bit of a work-around but it'll get you out of jail if you find yourself in this situation.
Context:
I currently have a system built on Entity Framework 5, which we'd like to upgrade to 6.
However, it already has dozens of migrations applied. And not just that, we have unit tests that verify all migrations by creating a test database and updating to latest and back to initial, to ensure all Up and Down migrations can be properly applied.
From what I've been reading, if migrations have different EF version numbers, Update-database fails to cross that boundary, meaning, the unit test covering all migrations would never pass. I could be mistaken and EF migrations might be backwards-compatible.
Question:
In that scenario, would it be wiser to actually merge all old migrations into one large InitialCreate migration (recreated using EF6), deleting the MigrationHistory table and "fake-apply" the migration to the live database (by commenting out the code of that migration temporarily) to get the new history entry?
And second of all, is this something we'll have to do again when updating EF in the near future? If that's the case then it might seem like EF is missing some support regarding cross-version migrations.
I ultimately ended up implementing what I described above in the question itself. All this was done AFTER migrating everything to EF6.
In my case I not only needed to apply this to my local database but to a live database as well.
The steps I used to accomplish that where the following (hopefully I'm not forgetting any, since this was a while back):
Backup your databases (both local and live), just in case you need to undo this.
First we need to create one merged migration for the entire database.
Change your ConnectionString to point to a new blank database.
Physically delete all migrations from your solution, as well as your initial creation one.
Run Add-Migration InitialCreate, which should add a migration to regenerate the entire database.
Now you don't really want to run that migration. In my case I only need that for unit tests, or to create new databases from scratch.
So then we continue:
Change your ConnectionString back to your local database.
Physically delete the MigrationHistory table in the database (or possibly just remove the rows, I can't recall exactly).
Comment out ALL the code whithin the InitialCreate migration, to make sure it will do nothing when applied.
Run Update-Database, which should add an entry to the MigrationHistory table simulating an initial creation of the database.
Uncomment the code in the InitialCreate migration.
The same process can be applied for the Live database. You can point to it in the ConnString, manually remove migration history, comment the implementation of the migration and apply it, to simulate creation, then uncomment.
From then on, the database and migrations should be in sync, and unit tests (on a separate database) should be able to call Down() and Up() on all migrations and still function properly.
I had also done same thing today (5-May-2014) and did not face issue mentioned by you
and had used steps suggested in
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/upgradeef6.aspx
so my old migrations still remains the same.
Though i faced some other issues related to
- Miniprofiler (need to use new with EF6 support)
- and one issue related to re-creation of all index after upgrading.
I am using Entity Framework 5.0 Data migrations along with code first.
When i add a new field to my model and execute the following command in the package manager console.
"Add-migration AddedField"
All I get is an empty migration called "n_AddedField", the up and down methods contain no logic.
I tried a bunch of things, reinstalling the EF nuget package, cleaning my solution, rebuilding, manually removing all generated files and directories.
Then i decided that i would scrap all my migrations and start over, and then it got weird.
After deleting all my migrations, and the migrationhistory table in the database, i recreated the database using the CreateDatabaseIfNotExists initializer. After doing this, I should be able to create a new initial migration. But when i try to create create a new migration, I get an error saying that there are pending migrations, and lists all the migrations that i just deleted from my project.
I have no idea why and how EF still has any recollection of those migrations.
I even tried searching through filecontents looking if the migrations were saved somewhere else or something. But nothing..
Data migrations look really neat when scott hansleman demo's it on stage, but for real work, I'm starting to look for alternatives.
When the project started, we were using EF 4.x and a while back switcted to 5.0, but since the switch i have added a bunch of migrations successfully.
Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem?
Basically i just want to be able to add migrations, and generate a sql script with the changes.
I had a similar problem where a new migration was not being found, and so update-database was giving me the following error no matter what I did:
Unable to update database to match the current model because there are pending changes and automatic migration is disabled. Either write the pending model changes to a code-based migration or enable automatic migration. Set DbMigrationsConfiguration.AutomaticMigrationsEnabled to true to enable automatic migration.
You can use the Add-Migration command to write the pending model changes to a code-based migration.
Doing a "batch clean" solved my problem, suggesting EF was using an old/invalid assembly from a folder other than the currently selected 'solution configuration (e.g. DEBUG)'.
Hope this helps someone else out there.
oops. In my case I was adding a new root entity not referenced by any other entity. The result was simply that code first had no reason to generate a migration for the entity. Once I added the code into the DbContext (a dbset) it worked like a charm.
The problem in my case was caused by:
Create a migration (successfully)
Decide that I want to re-create it, and delete the migration .cs file
Try to regenerate it, and end up with empty migration's Down and Up functions
In this case, I forgot to also delete the ApplicationDbContextModelSnapshot.cs entries for the model changes. Removing the new mappings in this file solved my problem and it then generated correctly.
Just got the same problem but figured out that my new field was added as a member variable and not a property - it was missing the {get; set;} part and that makes migration skip that field.
May not be your case but it might help someone else.
You're 'out of sync' - Db, migrations, code - and you can expect all sorts of problems like that.
I did this million times (almost:) and it works really well - but you need to go steady, and be meticulous with what you're doing.
You can read through this 'summary' I made - start half-way somewhere (but also check connection).
Code first create tables
...and if it doesn't work I'd suggest you make a small 'repeatable' scenario / model - post exactly what you have.
How migrations work:
Migrations are tied to the 'migration table'.
When Add-Migration is run - it checks against the 'existing database' structure and migration table - and makes the 'difference' (sometimes you get none 'up' 'down' simply as too are in sync).
So, each 'migration' is a complex diff in between your code, existing migrations, and database, and migration table. Short of removing the database nothing else is certain to reset - Db 'migration' table may not be enough - that doesn't guarantee full 'cleanup' (if possible, I always do full Db delete). You also need to delete your code migrations.
Make sure to 'compile' the projects (best make them compile automatically in configuration) after/before where relevant.
Make sure your 'connection' matches.
Once all is in sync - all should work nicely - but you gotta keep it in sync. Unless you plan to delete the Db (testing) - don't remove migrations just like that (you can use Update-Database -0 (I think) to get back to some migration (this is 'zero state').
I had a problem similar to this, where using the -force flag on add-migration to re-scaffold an existing migration stopped working for no apparent reason.
No matter what I did I got the stupid "Unable to generate an explicit migration because the following explicit migrations are pending" error message. After trying nearly everything I could think of and stopping just short of smashing my laptop to pieces, out of desperation I ran enable-migrations again and of course got the "Migrations have already been enabled in project 'Blah.Blah'" message. Tried add-migration -force again and magically it was working.
I have no idea what it changed- must have been some user settings/config file outside of source control. Hopefully this will help someone else.
The batch build -> clean option did not work for me.
I solved the problem by:
Creating a migration with 'Add-Migration NameOfMigration'
Deleting the contents of the up and down functions of the created migration class.
Updating the database by running the migration script (which will just add a row to the _MigrationHistory table with 'Update-Database -Verbose'
The web application now runs successfully, so essentially I had an issue that was fixed by adding meta-data only.
It happened to me and nothing worked. Then i did this on my own and everything works now.
Problem:
I created a Model "Cars". And When I create a migration for it using command "add-migartion AddCarModel", a migratoin was created but it was empty. I tried with different names and also tried delete migration's .cs file but nothing worked. Then I did the following:
Solution:
Follow below steps:
1. Delete all the empty migrations that you created for the Model. (But remember the names of the migrations for step 2)
2. Also delete those migration entries from "_MigrationHistory" table.
3. Comment out you line(s) of your model DB context, (in my case it is "public DbSet Cars{ get; set; }")
4. Clean and Rebuild solution. (Its best that if you batch clean)
5. Make sure that your update command is working and not throwing errors. (Command: "update-database -verbose")
6. Now uncomment line(s) that you commented in step 3.
7. Now create the migration for that model. (I created the migration with same name as before)
Hopefully it works. :-)
I added a new class to my data model to a sub-directory, the resultant namespace was not visible to scaffolding using add-migration.
Fix was to rename the namespace of the new class to conform to the rest of model, and/or add "public virtual DbSet .." etc into your entity context class, which will require you to reference this new namespace, then run add-migration again.
It seems that i managed to solve the problem by moving the models and the context class to another project.
I still have no idea why this happened, and this solution is really no solution at all :(
I had the same problem. Migrations were enabled but they weren't detecting any changes.
My solution was to re-enable migrations using -Force attribute and then everything worked.
Enable-Migrations -ProjectName -StartupProjectName --ConnectionStringName -Force
I had to delete the _MigrationHistory table that is generated by EF. Then I ran add-migration again. Be careful with this though, as it will generate the queries needed from scratch, including tables that are already there.
In my case it was because I had added a secondary context 'ApplicationDbContext' as part of the ASP.net identity stuff. When I ran the 'enable-migrations' command again I got an error that there was more than one context. Once I combined the two things started working again.
Maybe the stupidest of all:
I was adding a migration with the same name as the new object I was creating.
I had to run dotnet ef migrations remove even though I'd deleted the previous migration
If you are using fluent api to set up your configurations for the DbSets then you won't have any problems with it
I am working with EF very first time. For some reason I was having difficulty to run my application and every time I was getting exception that your model is not synced up with the current database. I tried everything and since data wasn't important, I thought to re-create all tables by running all the migrations. So, I removed all tables and tried to run the following command. I am using model based approach here to define my entities.
Update-database -targetMigration:InitialCreate -verbose
I was under the impression that it will re-create all tables starting from the very first migration but it actually reverted all to that very first point. Now, whenever i run update-database command, I always get the following
No pending explicit migrations.
I am very confused what should I do to take my table generated back and set my app in working condition. Can anybody help?
Thanks
-Fahad
If you are using model first then you can click on the Model whitespace and do "Generate database from Model". If you are doing code first, EF creates a table on the database called "__MigrationHistory". If you delete that table code first will recreate the database model from your current code based model.
Where is stored information about current database state (what migration is applied)? I suppose it can be "dbo.__MigrationHistory" table or this table is just for logging purpose?
If I enabled migration, added migration and updated my database. After that I checked-in code to SVN and another developer checked it out. What this another developer has to do to create/update his own database?
I see such options:
1) Call Update-Database command right away.
2) Do everything from beginning (Enable-Migration, Add-Migration, Update-Database).
3) Do everything but skip Add-Migration step (it is already present and it seems strange to add it once again for every new developer).
Which of my assumption is right or if no one where is the right way?
To retrieve which migrations have been applied to the database, you can use the Get-Migrations command (reference).
Everything depends on how the database is created, which initializer you are using.
This article is worth reading if you are unfamiliar with those.
When using the DropCreateDatabaseAlways initializer, you don't really need to care about updating your database, because your database will be deleted & recreated at each application startup.
When using the DropCreateDatabaseWhenModelChanges initiliazer, your database will be dropped then recreated if EF detects the model has changed at the application startup.
When using the CreateDatabaseIfNotExists initilizer or if no initializer has been defined, your database will be created if it does not already exists. If the database already exists & you added a Migration, you (and every developer retrieving your code) need to use the Update-Database command to update the database.
There is a new initializer introduced with Code-First Migrations: MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion, this initializer automatically update the database to the latest Migration defined.
See this page's last section: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/jj591621.