Repeat field based on quantity in Gravity Forms - gravity-forms-plugin

Im trying to setup a form with Gravity forms that automatically populates the field "Name of person" based on a quantity field.
So lets say a user sets product quantity to 1:
Then the list field shows 1 row with Name | Last name | Date of birth
But when a users sets product quantity to 4 im trying to achieven that automatically 4 rows are displayed like:
Row 1.
Name | Last name | Date of birth
Row 2.
Name | Last name | Date of birth
Row 3.
Name | Last name | Date of birth
Row 4.
Name | Last name | Date of birth
Im really hoping somebody can help me out with this issue.
Im stuck.
Thanks in advance.

We have a free snippet for that here:
https://gravitywiz.com/set-number-of-list-field-rows-by-field-value/
For your setup, you'll want to target the Product's quantity input:
new GWAutoListFieldRows( array(
'form_id' => {FORM_ID},
'list_field_id' => {LIST_FIELD_ID},
'input_html_id' => '#input_{PRODUCT_FIELD_ID}_3'
) );```

Related

Aggregate function to extract all fields based on maximum date

In one table I have duplicate values ​​that I would like to group and export only those fields where the value in the "published_at" field is the most up-to-date (the latest date possible). Do I understand it correctly as I use the MAX aggregate function the corresponding fields I would like to extract will refer to the max found or will it take the first found in the table?
Let me demonstrate you this on simple example (in real world example I am also joining two different tables). I would like to group it by id and extract all fields but only relating to the max published_at field. My query would be:
SELECT "t1"."id", "t1"."field", MAX("t1"."published_at") as "published_at"
FROM "t1"
GROUP By "t1"."id"
| id | field | published_at |
---------------------------------
| 1 | document1 | 2022-01-10 |
| 1 | document2 | 2022-01-11 |
| 1 | document3 | 2022-01-12 |
The result I want is:
1 - document3 - 2022-01-12
Also one question - why am I getting this error "ERROR: column "t1"."field" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function". Can I use MAX function on string type column?
If you want the latest row for each id, you can use DISTINCT ON. For example:
select distinct on (id) *
from t
order by id, published_at desc
If you just want the latest row in the whole result set you can use LIMIT. For example:
select *
from t
order by published_at desc
limit 1

Drools - Finding a single matching condition for a table of products ranked by consumers

I have a table displaying information for the top four ratings of produce in a store. I want to be able to find specific products in this rating table. Here is a structure of the table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
sectId | product_code | product_category | consumer_raniking
10444 | 11222 | PRODUCE | RATING_1
10444 | 45555 | PRODUCE | RATING_1
10444 | 10005 | PR0DUCE | RATING_1
20555 | 11344 | PRODUCE | RATING_2
20555 | 94003 | PRODUCE | RATING_2
... and so on.
I wrote a rule to find inserted products which ins not working the way I want, i.e. to find the targetted fact that was inserted into the table. Here is the rule I put together:
rule "find by product codes rating_1"
when
$product_table: ProductRanking( $rank1: this.getProductCodesRankFirst())
$product1 : Product( this.product_code memberOf $rank1, $product_code: product_code )
$product2 : Product( this.product_code == 10444,this.product_code != $product_code ,$product_code2: product_code)
then
System.out.println("Found Products for product_codes "+$product_code+ " "+$product_code2 ) ;
end
Unfortunately, this returns 3 rows. I inserted into the session the product in row 2 i.e. product with ocde 45555 and it does find row 2. However, ir also brings in row 1 and row3.
I can see why it's doing that. It's because the skus are in the sectId with sectId 10444. However, I want to only bring in the row
that I inserted, which is sectionId(10444), product_code(45555). How can I achieve that?
I solved it by using a global to filter out the extra products. In the first line that brings the rankings, I eliminate the extra-matching products this way:
global ProductHelper productHelper
$product_table: ProductRanking( $rank1: productHelper.getProductCodesRankFirst(),
productCode != productHelper.getProductCodeFruitCategory() && productCode!=
productHelper.productCodeVegetableCategory())
The ProductHelper identifies the product codes I want to eliminate and hence the extra 2 products brought in are ignored, creating a single match. I'm sure there is a better way, but since I'm no expert, this is what I was able to come up with.

Calculated Time weigthed return in Power BI

Im trying to calculate the Time Weigthed Return for a portfolio of stocks. The formula is:
I have the following data:
Im calculate the TWR (time weigthed return) in Power Bi as:
TWR = productx(tabel1;TWR denom/yield+1)
The grey and blue marked/selected fields are individual single stock. Here you see the TWR for the grey stock is = 0,030561631 and for the blue TWR = 0,012208719 which is correct for the period from 09.03.19 to 13.03.19.
My problem is, when im trying to calculate the TWR for a portfolio of the two stocks, it takes the product og every row. In the orange field I have calculated the correct result in excel. But in Power BI it takes the product of the grey and blue stocks TWR: (0,0305661631 * 0,012208719) = 0,03143468 which is incorrect.
I want to sum(yield for both stocks)/sum(TWRDenominator for both stocks) for both stocks every single date, such that I not end up with two rows (one for each stock) but instead a common number every date for the portfolio.
I have calculated the column TWR denom/yield -1 in a measure like this:
twr denom/yield-1 = CALCULATE(1+sumx(tabel1;tabel1(yield)/sumx(tabel1;tabel1[TwrDenominator])))
How can I solved this problem?
Thank you in advance!
This is one solution to your question but it assumes the data is in the following format:
[Date] | [Stock] | [TWR] | [Yield]
-----------------------------------
[d1] | X | 12355 | 236
[d1] | y | 23541 | 36
[d2] ... etc.
I.e. date is not a unique value in the table, though date-stock name will be.
Then you can create a new calculated table using the following code:
Portfolio_101 =
CalculateTable(
Summarize(
DataTable;
DataTable[Date];
"Yield_over_TWR"; Sum(DataTable[Yield])/Sum(DataTable[TWR_den])+1
);
Datatable[Stock] in {"Stock_Name_1"; "Stock_Name_2"}
)
Then in the new Portfolio_101 create a measure:
Return_101 =
Productx(
Portfolio_101;
Portfolio_101[Yield_over_TWR]
)-1
If using your data I en up with the following table, I have created three calculated tables, one fore each stock and a third (Portfolio_103) with the two combined. In addition I have a calendar table which has a 1:1 relationship between all Portfolio tables.
Hope this helps, otherwise let me know where I've misunderstood you.
Cheers,
Oscar

populate cells defined by dates period

Sorry if the post is in fact a duplicate. Just could not google anything similar and I am bit stuck on approach.
I am trying to populate cells in one sheet depending on date in rows of a different sheet, like these:
Sheet1 - entry sheet
ID | Name | Start date | End date
10 | Mike | 1.06.2016 | 2.06.2016
13 | Dido | 1.06.2016 | 5.06.2016
8 | Rene | 2.06.2016 | 20.06.2016
Sheet2 - report sheet
ids/dates | 1.06.2016 | 2.06.2016 | 3.06.2016 | date+1
8 | | Rene | Rene | Rene
10 | Mike | Mike | |
13 | Dido | Dido | Dido | Dido
Column Name cell's are to be populated in sheet2 depending on Sheet1 Column ID, Start date, end date. The position of the populated cell is defined in sheet2 by column ID and row Dates that should equal the same values in sheet1.
This report could be done with help of one formula. Please, check this Example File.
Assumptions
Suppose, you have Sheet1 with data:
Col A: ID
Col B: Name
Col C: Start date
Col D: End Date
Case 1. ID's are unique.
Go to Sheet2 and paste this formula in it:
={{"ids/dates";filter(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>"")},{ArrayFormula(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1));ArrayFormula(if(--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)>=filter(Sheet1!C2:C,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))*--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)<=filter(Sheet1!D2:D,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))=1,VLOOKUP(FILTER(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>""),Sheet1!A:B,2,0),""))}}
That's all. Report will expand automatically when new data arrives on Sheet1. The report will return error if Data is not complete (misssing Names or dates) on Sheet1.
Case 2. ID's are NOT unique.
This solution works when ID's are not unique, ID's will be grouped together. One ID belongs to one person in this case.
The formula will be a bit longer:
={{"ids/dates";sort(UNIQUE(filter(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>"")))},{ArrayFormula(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1));ArrayFormula(if(QUERY(QUERY({filter(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>""),ArrayFormula((--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)>=filter(Sheet1!C2:C,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))*--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)<=filter(Sheet1!D2:D,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))))},"select Col1, sum(Col"&JOIN("), sum(Col",ArrayFormula(COLUMN(OFFSET(B2,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))))&") group by Col1"),"Select Col"&JOIN(", Col",ArrayFormula(COLUMN(OFFSET(B2,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))))&" where Col1>0",0)=1,VLOOKUP(sort(UNIQUE(filter(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>""))),Sheet1!A:B,2,0),""))}}
See example here.
Case 3. IDs are NOT unique. One ID <> one name
Here's working example, please check it. This case is the hardest one. We can have multiple IDs referring to multiple names. The final formula:
={{"ids/dates",ArrayFormula(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1))};{sort(UNIQUE(FILTER(Sheet1!A2:A,Sheet1!A2:A<>""))),ArrayFormula(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(QUERY(QUERY({FILTER(Sheet1!A2:B,Sheet1!A2:A<>""),ArrayFormula(--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)>=filter(Sheet1!C2:C,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))*--(add(MIN(Sheet1!C:D),COLUMN(OFFSET(A1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))-1)<=filter(Sheet1!D2:D,Sheet1!C2:C<>0))*row(OFFSET(A1,,,rows(FILTER(Sheet1!A2:B,Sheet1!A2:A<>"")))))},"select Col1, sum(Col"&JOIN("), sum(Col",ArrayFormula(COLUMN(OFFSET(C1,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))))&") group by Col1"),"Select Col"&JOIN(", Col",ArrayFormula(COLUMN(OFFSET(B2,,,1,MAX(Sheet1!C:D)-MIN(Sheet1!C:D)))))&" where Col1>0",0),{ArrayFormula(row(OFFSET(A1,,,rows(FILTER(Sheet1!A2:B,Sheet1!A2:A<>""))))),FILTER(Sheet1!A2:B,Sheet1!A2:A<>"")},3,0)))}}
The formula will work incorrectly if two Date ranges intersect:
102 Mike 6/21/2016 6/27/2016
102 Mike 6/11/2016 6/22/2016

group records & get size of each group in rails

Hi I have table called Sold Products which stores buying information for product & schema is as follows.
id |username | product_id| timestamp
I have another table product its schema is
id | product_name | description
I want to get most sold products. How to get that in active record?Please help.
Two ways of doing this... the first one being easier and more efficient than the second:
Method 1: Use a counter cache
class SoldProduct < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :product, :counter_cache => true
end
Then you'd add a sold_products_count attribute to the Product table and find them using this:
Product.find(:all, :order => 'sold_products_count')
Method 2: Do it based on SQL
sales_count = Product.joins(:sold_products).count(:group=>"sold_products.product_id").sort_by{|product, sales| sales}.reverse
sales_count.each {|product, sales| puts "Product #{product} has #{sales} sales"}