I have my collection like this:
{
"_id" : "ID1234",
"read_object" : "sss-ssss",
"expireAt" : ISODate("2020-04-30T22:00:00.000Z")
}
In case he encounters the same ID, I would like to update the read_object field, otherwise create a new document.
I tried to do it like this:
db.collection.update(
{ _id: "ID1234" },
{
$set: { read_object: { $concat: ["$read_object", "test"] } },
},
{ upsert: true }
)
but I get an error every time:
The dollar ($) prefixed field '$concat' in 'read_object.$concat' is not valid for storage.
If I add square brackets before $set, like this:
db.collection.update(
{ _id: "1b1b871493-14a0-4d21-bd74-086442df953c-2020-02" },
[{
$set: { read_object: { $concat: ["$read_object", "test"] } },
}],
{ upsert: true }
)
I get this error:
The dollar ($) prefixed field '$concat' in 'read_object.$concat' is not valid for storage.
Where do I have a mistake?
$concat is an aggregation operator, meaning you can't use it while using the basic update syntax as you can only use update operators on it.
With that said Mongo version 4.2 introduces pipeline updates, which is basically what you're trying to do with the square brackets.
Assuming you are using Mongo version 4.2 heres a working example:
db.test1.update({_id: "ID1234"}, [
{$set: {"read_object": {$concat: [{$ifNull: ["$read_object", ""]}, "test"]}}}
], {upsert: true});
Basically we just need to "replace" read_object if document does not exist as it is undefined in that case.
If you are using Mongo version that's smaller than 4.2 then unfortunately there is no way to do what you want in one operation, you'll have to first read the document and then adjust accordingly.
Related
I have a mongoDB (4.4.8) collection where I want to change the value of some field based on its previous value. For example, I want to convert all strings to uppercase.
For this, I use the following query:
db.collection.updateMany(
{ field: { $regex: "[a-z]+"}},
{ $set: { field: { $toUpper: "$field" } } }
)
when executing the query, it gives me the following error:
MongoError: The dollar ($) prefixed field '$toUpper' in 'field.$toUpper' is not valid for storage
The same occurs if I use similar operations such as $concat (with an array parameter) to append something to the field.
When I look up similar questions, it all uses update and tells me to use updateMany instead, or it says that it only works in mongoDB >= 4.2. However, I have both of these things.
If I am correct, you are able to use aggregation syntax (among which $toUpper) in conjunction with $set inside updateMany queries for these newer versions of mongoDB.
Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong here?
As in the comments of J.F. and turivishal, I managed to solve this by changing it into the following:
db.collection.updateMany(
{ field: { $regex: "[a-z]+"}},
[ { $set: { field: { $toUpper: "$field" } } } ]
)
I have a collection filled with docs that contain an "ip_addresses" field, which is an array of strings (IPs). I want to append '/32' to all of these values in all of my docs that don't already have a CIDR range suffix.
Here's my issue:
I don't know how to use the current value of the IP which is being iterated on.
Even if I did, $concat doesn't seem to work and throws an error even with placeholder values (as in the query below) - The dollar ($) prefixed field '$concat' in 'ip_addresses.0.$concat' is not valid for storage.
Here is my current query which throws the error:
db.getCollection('docs').update(
{},
{ $set: { "ip_addresses.$[ip]": { "$concat": [ "1.1.1.1", "/32" ] } } },
{
arrayFilters: [ { "ip": { $not: /.+\/\d{1,2}/ } } ],
multi: true
}
)
I'd appreciate help using the current values in the array in the $concat command and resolving the error.
Let's tackle each of the problems.
2 - $concat is an aggregation operator, hence it cannot be used for an update. you can view the list of available operators for an update here. You might notice that none of these "work" on actual document values which brings me back to the first question you had.
1 - In order you use a current document values within an update you have to use pipelined updates which is only available for Mongo v4.2+, if you're using a lesser Mongo version you have to fetch the documents into memory and do the update one by one in code. If you are on Mongo v4.2+ then the pipeline update syntax goes like this:
db.collection.updateMany(
{ip_addresses: {$exists: true}},
[
{
$set: {
ip_addresses: {
$map: {
input: '$ip_addresses',
as: 'ipAddress',
in: {
$cond: [
{
$regexMatch: {input: "$$ipAddress", regex: /.+\/\d{1,2}/}
},
'$$ipAddress',
{
$concat: [
'$$ipAddress',
'/32'
]
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
]
);
I'm trying to update the value of a field in a MongoDB collection by concatenating it with a literal string. Besides this, the field is an integer, and I want to add a "0" in front, so it will became a string.
I've read that I can't use the old value of the field in a single update instruction, so I'm using a forEach() method.
Here is the code:
db.col_1.find({"field_1": {$lt: 10000}}).forEach( function(i){
db.col_1.update({_id: i._id},
{$set: { "field_1": {$concat: ["0", i.field_1]}}}
)
});
The return result is :
The dollar ($) prefixed field '$concat' in 'field_1.$concat' is not valid for storage.
I'm sure I'm not writting the $concat command properly, is there any way to do this?
$concat is an aggregation pipeline, not an update operator/modifier.
It seems that what you're trying to do can be achieved by doing the following:
db.col_1
.find({ "field_1": { $lt: 10000 } })
.forEach( function(i) {
db.col_1.update(
{ _id: i._id },
{ $set: { "field_1": "0" + i.field_1 } }
)
});
To update the MongoDB field using the value of another field for MongoDB version 4.2 also introduced the $set pipeline stage operator which is an alias for $addFields. You can use $set here as it maps with what we are trying to achieve.
let query = {
"field_1": {
$lt: 10000
}
};
let changes = {
$set: {
"field_1": {
"$concat": ["0", "$field_1"]
}
}
};
let UpdatedStatus = await col_1.updateMany(query, [changes]).lean();
console.log(UpdatedStatus);
I just upgraded to Mongo 2.6.1 and one update statement that was working before is not returning an error. The update statement is:
db.post.update( { 'answers.comments.name': 'jeff' },
{ '$set': {
'answers.$.comments.$.name': 'joe'
}},
{ multi: true }
)
The error I get is:
WriteResult({
"nMatched" : 0,
"nUpserted" : 0,
"nModified" : 0,
"writeError" : {
"code" : 2,
"errmsg" : "Too many positional (i.e. '$') elements found in path 'answers.$.comments.$.createUsername'"
}
})
When I update an element just one level deep instead of two (i.e. answers.$.name instead of answers.$.comments.$.name), it works fine. If I downgrade my mongo instance below 2.6, it also works fine.
You CAN do this, you just need Mongo 3.6! Instead of redesigning your database, you could use the Array Filters feature in Mongo 3.6, which can be found here:
https://thecodebarbarian.com/a-nodejs-perspective-on-mongodb-36-array-filters
The beauty of this is that you can bind all matches in an array to a variable, and then reference that variable later. Here is the prime example from the link above:
Use arrayFilters.
MongoDB 3.5.12 extends all update modifiers to apply to all array
elements or all array elements that match a predicate, specified in a
new update option arrayFilters. This syntax also supports nested array
elements.
Let us assume a scenario-
"access": {
"projects": [{
"projectId": ObjectId(...),
"milestones": [{
"milestoneId": ObjectId(...),
"pulses": [{
"pulseId": ObjectId(...)
}]
}]
}]
}
Now if you want to add a pulse to a milestone which exists inside a project
db.users.updateOne({
"_id": ObjectId(userId)
}, {
"$push": {
"access.projects.$[i].milestones.$[j].pulses": ObjectId(pulseId)
}
}, {
arrayFilters: [{
"i.projectId": ObjectId(projectId)
}, {
"j.milestoneId": ObjectId(milestoneId)
}]
})
For PyMongo, use arrayFilters like this-
db.users.update_one({
"_id": ObjectId(userId)
}, {
"$push": {
"access.projects.$[i].milestones.$[j].pulses": ObjectId(pulseId)
}
}, array_filters = [{
"i.projectId": ObjectId(projectId)
}, {
"j.milestoneId": ObjectId(milestoneId)
}])
Also,
Each array filter must be a predicate over a document with a single
field name. Each array filter must be used in the update expression,
and each array filter identifier $[] must have a corresponding
array filter. must begin with a lowercase letter and not contain
any special characters. There must not be two array filters with the
same field name.
https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-831
The positional operator can be used only once in a query. This is a limitation, there is an open ticket for improvement: https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-831
As mentioned; more than one positional elements not supported for now. You may update with mongodb cursor.forEach() method.
db.post
.find({"answers.comments.name": "jeff"})
.forEach(function(post) {
if (post.answers) {
post.answers.forEach(function(answer) {
if (answer.comments) {
answer.comments.forEach(function(comment) {
if (comment.name === "jeff") {
comment.name = "joe";
}
});
}
});
db.post.save(post);
}
});
db.post.update(
{ 'answers.comments.name': 'jeff' },
{ '$set': {
'answers.$[i].comments.$.name': 'joe'
}},
{arrayFilters: [ { "i.comments.name": { $eq: 'jeff' } } ]}
)
check path after answers for get key path right
I have faced the same issue for the as array inside Array update require much performance impact. So, mongo db doest not support it. Redesign your database as shown in the given link below.
https://pythonolyk.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/mongodb-update-nested-array-using-positional-operator/
db.post.update( { 'answers.comments.name': 'jeff' },
{ '$set': {
'answers.$.comments.$.name': 'joe'
}},
{ multi: true }
)
Answer is
db.post.update( { 'answers.comments.name': 'jeff' },
{ '$set': {
'answers.0.comments.1.name': 'joe'
}},
{ multi: true }
)
What I'm trying to do is pretty straightforward, but I can't find out how to give one field the value of another.
I simply want to update one field with the character count of another.
db.collection.update({$exists:true},{$set : {field1 : field2.length}})
I've tried giving it dot notation
db.collection.update({$exits:true},{$set : {field1: "this.field2.length"}})
As well as using javascript syntax
db.collection.update({$exits:true},
{$set : {field1: {$where : "this.field2.length"}})
But just copied the string and got a "notOkforstorage" respectively. Any help?
Update:
I only get the "notOkforStorage" when I query by ID:
db.collection.update({_id:ObjectID("38289842bbb")},
{$set : {field1: {$where :"this.field2.length"}}})
Try the following code:
db.collection.find(your_querry).forEach(function(doc) {
doc.field1 = doc.field2.length;
db.collection.save(doc);
});
You can use your_querry to select only part of the original collection do perform an update. If you want to process an entire collection, use your_querry = {}.
If you want all operations to be atomic, use update instead of save:
db.collection.find( your_querry, { field2: 1 } ).forEach(function(doc) {
db.collection.update({ _id: doc._id },{ $set: { field1: doc.field2.length } } );
});
Starting Mongo 4.2, db.collection.update() can accept an aggregation pipeline, finally allowing the update/creation of a field based on another field:
// { "_id" : ObjectId("5e84c..."), "field1" : 12, "field2" : "world" }
db.collection.update(
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5e84c...") },
[{ $set: { field1: { $strLenCP: "$field2" } } }]
)
// { "_id" : ObjectId("5e84c..."), "field1" : 5, "field2" : "world" }
The first part {} is the match query, filtering which documents to update.
The second part [{ $set: { field1: { $strLenCP: "$field2" } } }] is the update aggregation pipeline (note the squared brackets signifying the use of an aggregation pipeline). $set is a new aggregation operator and an alias for $addFields. Any aggregation operator can be used within the $set stage; in our case $strLenCP which provides the length of field2.
As far I know the easiest way is the read and write aproach:
//At first, get/prepare your new value:
var d= db.yourColl.fetchOne({....});
d.field1== d.field2.length;
// then update with your new value
db.yourColl.save(d);
Your are using exists in the wrong way.
Syntax: { field: { $exists: <boolean> } }
You use of $where is also incorrect
Use the $where operator to pass either a string containing a JavaScript expression or a full JavaScript function to the query system
db.myCollection.find( { $where: "this.credits == this.debits" } );
db.myCollection.find( { $where: "obj.credits == obj.debits" } );
db.myCollection.find( { $where: function() { return (this.credits == this.debits) } } );
db.myCollection.find( { $where: function() { return obj.credits == obj.debits; } } );
I think you should use Map-Reduce for what you are trying to do.