These days I've been working with kubernetes and kubectl at work, the point is that each time I open a console I have to write:
export http_proxy=http://<username>:<pass>#<proxy>:8080 for unix OS
set http_proxy=http://<username>:<pass>#<proxy>:8080 for windows OS
because my Pc is behind a coorporative proxy.
This is very anoying because i have to write it a lot of time every days.
Is there any way to configure kubectl proxy with a config file or something else?
One option is to add the export line to your .bashrc (or equivalent if you're using another shell) as this is sourced every time you open up a new terminal.
I had this problem some months ago.
What I did to fix this was to start to use iTerm2 (I'm using Mac) and set PROFILES.
You can have 1 profile to work from office and another to work from home, then you can set some commands when you enter the profile: you can set proxies, ssh login.. whatever =)
Hope it helps.
Related
As part of rundeck task i'm trying to login to a global zone, use the command zoneadm list and trying to login to each of the local zone [to shut down various apps & to issue reboot] using the command /usr/sbin/zlogin and execute hostname command to ensure it did login to localzone
however this is not working
Is there a better way to do this? Please guide
Make sure that your job is dispatching to your remote node correctly, you can call the command on "Commands" (right panel) pointing to your node (referenced in the "Nodes" textbox) in that way you can discard possible path/user rights issue, take a look at this. Now, zlogin seems an interactive shell, and as you can see, you need to use it in the non-interactive mode.
I'm setting up some new VNC servers. I already have this setup working with CentOS 6.3, although I'm not certain that this difference is the real problem.
One of the window managers I'm making available is fluxbox, but when I start it, I always get the following: Error: Couldn't connect to XServer. Here's my setup:
fluxbox: fluxbox-1.1.1-5.el6.x86_64
vnc : tigervnc-server-1.1.0-5.el6_4.1.x86_64
OS : CentOS 6.4
Note that I can start other window managers: Gnome, KDE, openbox, xfce4, etc.
I gutted my ~/.vnc/xstartup script so it only loads an xterm. Then, I tried running startfluxbox &, but still got the error. Obviously, VNC is working, since my xterm opened up OK. I can start firefox, another xterm or other app requiring X, and even fluxbox comes up, but it is worthless in its current state, since it is not connected to the X session.
What is fluxbox looking for? Are there some log files I can look at to give me some clues?
Thanks,
David
CentOS/RHEL 6.4 and up have upgraded libX11 and Xorg.
The $DISPLAY var handling has changed in libX11.
This one in particular is described in this git commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/?id=f92e754297ec5fdb81068b56a4435026666224fa
we run our fluxbox with this script in our vnc configs now:
/usr/bin/fluxbox -display "$DISPLAY.0"
OK, I think I've figured out the problem, so I'm answering my own question.
In VNC, I usually specify a display number. (Note, however, that the problem occurs even if vncserver uses the first available display number.) So, I start the vncserver as:
vncserver :17
This should create an X session where my $DISPLAY is set to :17.0, but in CentOS 6.4, the $DISPLAY is set to :17 instead. Apparently, unlike other window managers, fluxbox is unable to handle this inaccuracy. The problem, then, was that fluxbox was trying to connect to :17 and was unable to do so.
My solution, as suggested by someone answering a different problem, was to set $DISPLAY as part of the invocation of fluxbox. So, in my ~/.vnc/xstartup file, I have:
DISPLAY=$DISPLAY.0 startfluxbox &
Note that this may not work for other releases of CentOS, so you might wish to test the release of the box you are using before adding the DISPLAY=... setting to the command.
I am working on a simple Perl app that copies another Perl app and builds all the required Apache config files.
The thing I can't seem to figure out is how to reload the apache config on the fly. I know I could do a system call and reload apache there, but that would mean I would have to get root access to this app, and that is a little scary.
Is there a way to ask apache to reload its config files from within the CGI container?
-------------------------Additional info------------------------------
I have done some more research and the problem is that Apache must be run with elevated privileges to bind to port 80. So one solution would be to set Apache to run on another port and forward that port to 80 via iptables. (This may be a last resort but a very messy solution).
Here is what gets me, Apache should be able to maintain its current port bindings and recheck its config files, all I am doing is adding another script alias.
Is there any way to add a new script alias with out a reload?
you also have the options to reload the config:
/etc/init.d/httpd reload
or
apachectl -k graceful
But unfortunately, those need root also. This differs from a normal restart in that currently open connections are not aborted. A side effect is that old log files will not be closed immediately. This means that if used in a log rotation script, a substantial delay may be necessary to ensure that the old log files are closed before processing them.
Also, if running Apache with daemontools you can do this by:
svc -h /service/apache
Sorry to ask a question then not give some one else the opportunity to answer but I figured out a solution and I hope it may help some one else.
What I had to do was leave the config alone it is not possible to reload in the manner that I required with out root privileges or some fancy port forwarding (That would make this application less portable than I would like).
So the only thing that Apache appears to load dynamically is the file system.
What I have done is used mod_rewrite to redirect the script requests and simply put them in /var/www/appname/copyname/cgi-bin/
Lets say I have an Emacs-Server running on some remote server, with all the libraries and software necessary for running my application.
Then I want several clients to connect to that remote machine, using Emacs-client. Does each client need a full Emacs installation, or is there a minimal installation that is just enough to communicate with the remote server, where all the action is?
Could this (Emacs-)client installation be so minimal, that almost all software-updates can be done on the server, without affecting the Emacs-clients?
Is there a reason not to run the clients remotely as well, and simply use a local display? That way, pretty much all you need on the local machines is the ssh client and the X Window server.
ssh -X (user)#(server) "emacsclient -c"
Edits for the comments:
This command starts a new client to connect to an existing Emacs server (which it assumes is already running). You can use "emacsclient -a '' -c" to automatically start emacs --daemon if there is no existing server, but I don't know whether you want the connecting user to be starting the server.
In fact, I'm pretty unsure about the whole multi-user side of this to be honest, as I've never done that before. Authentication for the above is handled by ssh, but there may well be subsequent permission issues to deal with, or similar, when the server and the clients are started by different users.
This approach should be possible with Windows/Cygwin as client and/or server, as Cygwin provides Emacs, OpenSSH, and X.org packages. (I regularly use Windows/Cygwin as a local display for Emacs running on Linux.) It may be harder to set up, though, and any permissions issues are probably different when you're using Cygwin.
I'm less sure how this would work without Cygwin. NTEmacs certainly won't talk to X.org, so I imagine you'd be terminal based in that instance. (There are probably other options, but Cygwin sounds to me like the best-integrated approach to using all of Emacs, SSH, and X on Windows).
Lastly, I imagine you're probably getting your "Connection refused" error because localhost is not running a sshd daemon? I would say that configuration of ssh is outside the scope of this question, but there are lots of resources online for that.
Depending on what you're trying to achieve, you may be able to use a combination of Emacs and Screen. By starting up Emacs from Screen on the remote machine and detaching from it, you can subsequently re-attach from a different machine that doesn't have Emacs. Again, whether this will work for you or not depends on what you're trying to do; however, for many Emacs use-cases, this can be very effective. If you're not familiar with using Screen in this manner, here is some reading material:
screen - The Terminal Multiplexer
I am not sure that would be possible. emacsclient uses tramp to connect to a remote server, and just by looking at the number of requires in the tramp elisp files (41) it seems very unlikely. You can try it yourself with the following:
zgrep -oE "\(require '[a-z-]+\)" *el.gz | sed -e 's%[a-z0-9-]\+\.el\.gz:%%g' | sort | uniq -cu | wc -l
I'm not an expert in emacsclient, but I don't think is was designed to do what you're looking for. I think the general use case is that emacsclient allows you to redirect new requests to open a file with emacs to a persistent emacs process to avoid what may be a bit of an overhead in startup time. You seem to be looking for more of a true client/server relationship.
I think to meet the goal you're aiming at you'll probably need to look a little outside emacs, probably a project unto itself - 'emacsRemoteClient. It boils down to one or two models; the file you want to edit would need to have it's path sent over to the server machine so that emacs could do some sort of remote tramp access & then spawn the xwindow locally (using the local X env or requiring an x server on windows)... or two, transferring the file to some temp location on the server box and again spawning the remote x window locally (followed by syncing the changes between the tmp & local file).
Would be cool to have something like that... but suspecting it'll involve a bit of work. Maybe we just need a version of emacs written in javascript and it can live in the cloud or on your browser... oh to have emacs keybindings in the browser ;-)
-Steve
This page from the Emacs manual describes a function called make-frame-on-display that allows you to access a remote Emacs session. My interest in this function is to use it to share buffers for pair programming remotely with a colleague.
From the page:
It is even possible to use this feature to let two or more users type simultaneously on the two displays, within the same Emacs job. In practice, however, the different users can easily interfere with each others' edits if they are not careful.
How exactly do I set this up? What do I need? What does my partner need? The details are not stated, but I don't know enough about Emacs to know where to start.
Is there any other way to get a shared Emacs session? This page from the Emacs Wiki refers to something called multi-tty. The questions I asked above also apply to this.
Which is better: multi-tty or make-frame-on-display?
I haven't tried multi-tty, but make-frame-on-display is pretty simple. You type M-x make-frame-on-display, hit return, then type the display you want the frame to show up on. For example:
I have my local host (thor) running emacs and I want to make a frame pop up on a machine called zeus, on its only X display (0.0). So I would type M-x make-frame-on-display<ret>zeus:0.0<ret>
All set!
You may need to configure the remote machine's X server to accept incoming connections from your machine with "xhost +thor". You may also need to configure its firewall to allow incoming connections on the X11 port, which is 6000. Keep in mind that X forwarding is not encrypted, so if you aren't working with someone on your LAN you may want to go through a VPN in order to keep things private.
Edited to fix brackets.
You can also have the person at zeus type ssh -X thor emacsclient -c.
Did you ever consider using GNU screen on a shared account for pair programming? It's dead easy to get it to work and you get to pick any console based editor you and your partner like (emacs, vim, joe, nano, zile, ...). However, this does of course not work with editors that cannot run inside a terminal.
To set it up, create a shared account on a computer running ssh. Then both log in to that account. One of the partners starts screen with
screen
and the other connects to it with
screen -x
where -x means "attach to a not detached screen session". The users can detach from their sessions w/ "C-a d".
Old question, new solution for anyone landed on this page from year 2016.
I set this up in Ubuntu 14.04 and it works perfectly:
Suppose I want to co-edit or demo some cool stuffs on emacs with my colleague Joe on the other end of the world.
Make sure an ssh server with emacs installed at either end. That is, either MyPC or JoePC must be a SSH server and have Emacs installed. From now on, let's say I asked Joe to install SSH server and Emacs on his computer.
Make sure byobu is installed on JoePC. Byobu supports both tmux and screen as backends (I prefer tmux for a more mordern and feature-rich).
I connect to JoePC with ssh remoteuser#joepc. No need for X-forwarding.
Open emacs from byobu-ssh terminal: TERM=xterm-256color && emacsclient --alternate-editor="" -t. One can make an alias for this command. I recommend this long command because it enables both better color support in the terminal and running Emacs in daemon mode. The daemon mode make it fast to close and reopen frames.
Now the magic unfold: Ask Joe to login with the same remoteuser I am loggin in; open the terminal and start byobu if it hasn't for him.
Start hacking or fumbling :-)
Comment:
Because the way byobu work. This approach works for any other program inside the byobu terminal.
This setup performs much better than Teamviewer or any other GUI remote desktop solutions.
Because the connection is through ssh to the remote server directly, it is as secure as the ssh conenction can offer.