I'm trying to use one way association because I need only to have reference from 1 model to other model but not vice versa.
Model Arts:
module.exports = {
attributes: {
fileName: {type: 'string', required: true},
softwareUsed: {
model: 'Softwares'
}
}
}
Model Softwares:
module.exports = {
attributes: {
name: {type: 'string', required: true}
}
}
This is my api:
http://localhost:1337/api/v1/arts/create
if this is my request body, it works fine:
request body:
{
"fileName": "booking.jpeg",
"softwareUsed": "5e70309cbf12b61299d6c528",
}
but i want to store array of softwareUsed, so i tried:
request body:
{
"fileName": "booking.jpeg",
"softwareUsed": ["5e70309cbf12b61299d6c528", "5e70309cbf12b61299d6c529"],
}
but i got an error with that:
error: OperationalError [UsageError]: Invalid new record.
Details:
Could not use specified `softwareUsed`. Expecting an id representing the associated record, or `null` to indicate there will be no associated record. But the specified value is not a valid `softwareUsed`. Instead of a string (the expected pk type), the provided value is: [ '5e70309cbf12b61299d6c528', '5e70309cbf12b61299d6c529' ]
I also tried to make it array in model:
softwareUsed: [{
model: 'Softwares'
}]
but still don't work.
Is there a way to that in one way association or I need to use other association, but how can I achieve that?
Thank you.
I think you need to label the softwareUsed attribute with a collection, not a model:
module.exports = {
attributes: {
fileName: {type: 'string', required: true},
softwareUsed: {
collection: 'Softwares'
}
}
}
All the documentation on one-to-many in the sails docs involves two-way associations and adding a via attribute, but I think this way works for a one-way association.
Of course, your first api call may now longer work: you may need to wrap the single software id in an array.
Related
I need to implement a through association in order to have a many-to-many relationship with a custom field in the join table. In SailsJS through associations require three models; two models are your business objects, Species and Lands in my case, and a third representing the join table SpeciesLands. See my SailsJS models at the bottom of this post.
Once I have the association set up how do I go about associating two objects through the blueprint API? Do I need to POST data to the /specieslands endpoint using the id of the Species and Land I want to link? Is it possible to create and link objects at the same time like you can with the many-to-many relationship? Is this something that needs to be done in a SailsJS controller rather than through the blueprint API?
Here are my models:
Species
module.exports = {
attributes: {
scientificName: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
unique: true
},
commonName: {
type: 'string'
},
taxon: {
type: 'string',
required: true
},
leadOffice: {
type: 'string'
},
lands: {
collection: 'lands',
via: 'land',
through: 'specieslands'
}
}
};
Lands
module.exports = {
attributes: {
agency: {
type: 'string',
required: true
},
name: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
unique: true
},
species: {
collection: 'species',
via: 'species',
through: 'specieslands'
}
}
};
SpeciesLands
module.exports = {
attributes: {
species: {
model: 'species'
},
land: {
model: 'lands'
},
population: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
enum: ['O', 'O+', 'P', 'U'] // THIS IS THE REASON FOR ASSOCIATION
}
}
};
I do not think it is possible like that.
I am pretty sure you have to:
Create Specie
Lands
Relation
1 & 2 using POST /modelName
3 using http://sailsjs.com/documentation/reference/blueprint-api/add-to
When using a through association, the Blueprint API will expect associations to be generated by POST into the associative model (The relation model).
In your case, if you wanted to associate an item from the Species model with an item from the Lands model, you would do something like this:
curl --header "Content-Type: application/json"
--request POST
--data '{species:15,land:51,population:"O"}'
http://www.example.com/SpeciesLands
Or in Postman:
In my Stacks schema i have a dimensions property defined as such:
dimensions: {
type: [String],
autoform: {
options: function() {
return Dimensions.find().map(function(d) {
return { label: d.name, value: d._id };
});
}
}
}
This works really well, and using Mongol I'm able to see that an attempt to insert data through the form worked well (in this case I chose two dimensions to insert)
However what I really what is data that stores the actual dimension object rather than it's key. Something like this:
[
To try to achieve this I changed type:[String] to type:[DimensionSchema] and value: d._id to value: d. The thinking here that I'm telling the form that I am expecting an object and am now returning the object itself.
However when I run this I get the following error in my console.
Meteor does not currently support objects other than ObjectID as ids
Poking around a little bit and changing type:[DimensionSchema] to type: DimensionSchema I see some new errors in the console (presumably they get buried when the type is an array
So it appears that autoform is trying to take the value I want stored in the database and trying to use that as an id. Any thoughts on the best way to do this?.
For reference here is my DimensionSchema
export const DimensionSchema = new SimpleSchema({
name: {
type: String,
label: "Name"
},
value: {
type: Number,
decimal: true,
label: "Value",
min: 0
},
tol: {
type: Number,
decimal: true,
label: "Tolerance"
},
author: {
type: String,
label: "Author",
autoValue: function() {
return this.userId
},
autoform: {
type: "hidden"
}
},
createdAt: {
type: Date,
label: "Created At",
autoValue: function() {
return new Date()
},
autoform: {
type: "hidden"
}
}
})
According to my experience and aldeed himself in this issue, autoform is not very friendly to fields that are arrays of objects.
I would generally advise against embedding this data in such a way. It makes the data more difficult to maintain in case a dimension document is modified in the future.
alternatives
You can use a package like publish-composite to create a reactive-join in a publication, while only embedding the _ids in the stack documents.
You can use something like the PeerDB package to do the de-normalization for you, which will also update nested documents for you. Take into account that it comes with a learning curve.
Manually code the specific forms that cannot be easily created with AutoForm. This gives you maximum control and sometimes it is easier than all of the tinkering.
if you insist on using AutoForm
While it may be possible to create a custom input type (via AutoForm.addInputType()), I would not recommend it. It would require you to create a template and modify the data in its valueOut method and it would not be very easy to generate edit forms.
Since this is a specific use case, I believe that the best approach is to use a slightly modified schema and handle the data in a Meteor method.
Define a schema with an array of strings:
export const StacksSchemaSubset = new SimpleSchema({
desc: {
type: String
},
...
dimensions: {
type: [String],
autoform: {
options: function() {
return Dimensions.find().map(function(d) {
return { label: d.name, value: d._id };
});
}
}
}
});
Then, render a quickForm, specifying a schema and a method:
<template name="StacksForm">
{{> quickForm
schema=reducedSchema
id="createStack"
type="method"
meteormethod="createStack"
omitFields="createdAt"
}}
</template>
And define the appropriate helper to deliver the schema:
Template.StacksForm.helpers({
reducedSchema() {
return StacksSchemaSubset;
}
});
And on the server, define the method and mutate the data before inserting.
Meteor.methods({
createStack(data) {
// validate data
const dims = Dimensions.find({_id: {$in: data.dimensions}}).fetch(); // specify fields if needed
data.dimensions = dims;
Stacks.insert(data);
}
});
The only thing i can advise at this moment (if the values doesnt support object type), is to convert object into string(i.e. serialized string) and set that as the value for "dimensions" key (instead of object) and save that into DB.
And while getting back from db, just unserialize that value (string) into object again.
I recently started working with Sails and mongo.
I use Sails blueprints to generate part of my api.
The problem is, that the request body I send is being saved to the mongo collection, regardless of the fields defined in the model.
So for example, let's say I have the following Event model:
module.exports = {
attributes: {
title: {
type: 'string',
required: true
},
}
}
When I Send a POST request to the /event/ endpoint with the following params:
{"title":"Some Event", "random":"string"}
The saved mongo document contains also the "random":"string" value, even though it's not part of the model.
I've tried to come up with some common method to remove non-model attributes before creation for all models, but the possible solutions seemed not right and dirty.
Am I missing something?
Any help would be appreciated!
You can use schema option in your model. Just add it to model declaration and that's it.
// api/models/Model.js
module.exports = {
schema: true,
attributes: {
title: {
type: 'string',
required: true
}
}
};
I am new to SailsJS and stuck in Data Model as follows:
I have a User model as follows:
module.exports = {
attributes: {
firstName: {
type: 'string'
},
email: {
type: 'email',
required: true
},
password: {
type: 'String'
},
passwordSalt: {
type: 'String'
},
projects:{
collection: 'ProjectMember',
via: 'userId'
}
}
};
Task Model :
module.exports = {
taskName: {
type: 'String'
},
userId: {
model: 'User'
}
};
In Task model, it is getting all fields from User table which is not required while task data is rendered. I was planning to create one more model called TinyUser which stores only required fields to be shown when task data is rendered.
But TinyUser should just refer User table and get required data from it rather than we creating all data for TinyUser manually when user data is created.
Is there any way this can be achieved in Sails?
Thanks in Advance..
I'm not sure about your question, but this will return a list of required attributes for any model
_.find(sails.models.<YOUR MODEL>._attributes, function(attr){return attr.required})
If your intent it to simply remove undesirable fields you can override the toJSON / toObject methods
see
https://github.com/balderdashy/waterline-docs/blob/master/models.md#toobjecttojson-instance-methods
User.find({select:['firstName', 'email']}).exec()
Does Mongoose support, or is there an available package that supports multiple "options" for the embedded schemas in an array?
For example, the things property can contain only one of two schemas:
new Schema({
things: [{
requiredProp: String,
otherProp: Number
}, {
otherOption: Number
}]
});
In other words, I do not want to just allow anything (AKA Schema.Types.Mixed) to be stored in this property, but only these two possible definitions.
Or, do schema design recommendations exist to avoid this problem?
You should only define one dict in the array type of the schema, and then set if they are required or not with the mongoose schema types logic. Use pre save if you want to do more logic to assure that either one of the fields have been set, like this:
var MySchema = new Schema({
things: [{
requiredProp: {type: String, required: true},
otherProp: Number,
otherOption: Number,
}]
});
MySchema.pre('save', function(next) {
if (!this.otherProp && !this.otherOption) {
next(new Error('Both otherProp and otherOption can\'t be null'))
} else {
next()
}
})
Opon saving the object it will return an error if neither otherProp nor otherOption has been set.