I'm currently working on a project that uses raspberry pis to communicate with WebRTC. I want one pi to initiate a call with the press of a single button for emergency purposes. Initiating the call means, waking up, opening a browser full screen and starting the call. The problem is that Chromium has a pop up that asks if you want to allow the microphone and camera to be accessed by the browser. I would like to always allow this but the address is a local file and not a site I can add to Chromium's trusted list. Is there a way to circumvent this? Is there another browser I can trust to run quickly on a raspberry pi?
Thanks for your time!
"have you tried starting chrome with --use-fake-ui-for-media-stream? Caveat: will allow camera without prompt for everything – Philipp Hancke 19 hours ago" -first comment
Thanks!
Related
I tried to articulate my question better but that was my best. Basically I want to make a headless setup for a Raspberry Pi and want it to connect Wi-Fi automatically to be used for an MQTT application.
My challenge is, I most of the time work in a cafe shop and it requires user to push/confirm a button(no password needed) as shown below, to be able to connect to internet. And after certain hours it will drop you from internet you need to repeat the same again.
In this case is there any setup that would by pass this step?
I have downloaded and installed an extension to preview a webpage I'm working on inside the editor. It works fine, but I would like to also test the same HTML code on my mobile device as well. I have a normal home WiFi network. I was wondering if it is possible to somehow hook into the preview from another device besides the host computer. Is there a way to view the website from my phone on the same WiFi network, and access all of the website's served files, like index.html, /styles/.css, /scripts/.js, /images/*.jpg, etc?
Thank You!
very simple solution
turn on the live server on your pc
check the port where it's running
will look like 4400
check your LAN IP address will look like 192.172.123
Enter the address with the port number in this form (192.172.123:4400) on another device connected to the same router or device
Boom you can view changes as same you are using the same device
Sorry, I didn't realize that this functionality is already included in the wonderful extension that I originally downloaded - it's called Live Server by Ritwick Dey. On his GitHub repo, he outlines steps to remotely connect to the served website via another device on the same network (your phone for example). Tried it and it worked the first time!
https://github.com/ritwickdey/vscode-live-server/blob/master/docs/faqs.md
Now I face a tricky problem. My Blackberry Classics has a black screen problem. When I connect it to my laptop with USB cable, Blackberry Link can detect it. However when it tried to connect to it, the Blackberry Blend prompted me to set the Allow Connections switch to on on the device. Obviously, I could not do that. I am thinking maybe there is a method to let me connect to the Blackberry 10 through the USB port just like a console port, but I am not sure. Does anyone know about it? Thanks in advance.
Momenitcs does provide a few ways to connect with a device. But generally the device has to be in development mode, which requires interacting with the device which you apparently can't do. The access is also limited to the development user so you could not use it to, for example, access data from installed applications.
About the only thing you can do at this point is use link to backup your data and restore to that phone once repaired, or to a new phone.
Also, since this question is not really suitable for StackOverflow I'm going to flag it for closing. Questions like this properly belong on SuperUser http://meta.superuser.com/questions/4836/what-is-the-difference-between-super-user-and-stack-overflow/4838
I want to run a server on Windows Phone 8. It is important that the server keeps running even if the user opens another app or the screen lock turns on. Relying on an internet connection is not an option. It should work in a local network.
UseCase: The server is needed for a multiplayer game. The idea is that one player starts a local server. After that, all players (including the player who starts the local server) can connect to this server using a webbrowser. The server delivers html and responds to ajax calls.
It seems that PeriodicTask and ResourceIntensiveTask do not fit my needs. Is that correct? How can I run an app in the background that is always listening for incoming tcp connections?
I don't know a clean way. But if you're happy with a hack: You could use the Geolocator. This blog gives a step by step guidance: How to create application which executes in the background on Windows Phone 8?
As most of the hacks, this brings some problems and questions (probably more than I mention here):
If the user turns off the GPS, your server won't be reachable anymore.
I don't know how strict Microsoft is with what you can publish on their store.
No way to do this on Windows Phone.
I'm behind a corporate firewall and all network traffic goes thru the main proxy. In my iOS simulator, I get proxy popups a few times each time I run my app. The thing is, my app doesn't make any network calls (yet), and doesn't import any network frameworks. In fact, I can reproduce this by making a new project in XCode using one of the standard templates and run it straight away; it'll still prompt for the proxy credentials every time.
In my OSX network settings, I've obviously set my proxy credentials in all the different protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, Socks, RTSP, Gopher). I found that I needed to put the domain and backslash before my username to allow web access in any OSX browsers etc...so given that I did that and then the OSX proxy prompts went away and I was allowed access, I would have thought that the iOS simulator would just inherit those settings...?
Any ideas?
One more bit which may be unrelated: we haven't yet figured out how to get access to the App Store on this Mac; despite supposedly getting past the proxy, any use of the App Store just results in timeouts and we can't even see the "home page". I'm wondering if somehow the iOS simulator is making similar network calls using some other protocol that is like the App Store...? (I would have thought App Store would have been HTTPS but I don't know).
Any thoughts appreciated.
If you put *.apple.com in your proxy passthrough list, the simulator will stop whining about it.
Like you, I can't get the Apple Store to work through our corporate proxy either. I've worked around it by using a wireless network that doesn't use a proxy when I have to use the App Store.
I've found plenty of other things in the OS that don't work through our proxy.
I had the same issue and found another way without touching the proxy settings!
I'm working on a Mac with OSX-El Capitan so maybe in other versions these steps might be slightly different:
Go to System Preferences
Go to Network
Choose your connection (Wireless/Ethernet/Thunderbolt-Ethernet)
Click on Advanced Options
Go to the tab Proxies
The two boxes Automatically detect proxy (for the internet connection on your mac) and Web-Proxy (HTTP)
Insert your login credentials at Web-Proxy (HTTP).
This reduced the occurence of the Proxy-PopUp greatly on all the 3 macs I work with. (At least it doesn't appear periodically anymore when I start my app from xcode)