Im trying to fetch both restaurants and cafes from googles Places API using the nearby search query.
Excerpt from my query string:
...&radius=2000&keyword=cafe+restaurant&key=myAPIKey
Using the plus '+' seems to bias towards one keyword type and returns a very limited quantity of places (limited versus using i.e. the restaurant and the cafe keywords on separate queries).
I've also tried using single pipe, %20, double pipe to name a few but nothing seems to work.
I've looked at this SO thread, the solution here (its 7 years old now) uses a workaround making two separate calls which I was hoping has now been resolved within the query string?
Is it possible to query nearby search for two keywords i.e. cafe and restaurant using a single query string?
No, it is not possible. You need to make multiple requests to the API for this, one with keyword=cafe or type=cafe, and the other with keyword=restaurant or type=restaurant.
You may also want to file a feature request for this in Google's Issue Tracker.
Hope this helps!
Related
I am new to MongoDB. And I have the following issue on currently developing web application.
We have an application where we use mongoDB to store data.
And we have an API where we search for the document via text search.
As an example: if the user type “New York” then the request should send the all the available data in the collection to the keyword “New York". (Here we call the API for each letter typed.) We have nearly 200000 data in the DB. Once the user searches for a document then it returns nearly 4000 data for some keywords. We tried with limiting the data to 5 – so it returns the top 5 data, and not the other available data. And we tried without limiting data now it returns hundreds and thousands of data as I mentioned. And it causes the request to slow down.
At Frontend we Bind search results to a dropdown. (NextJs)
My question:
Is there an optimizing way to search a document?
Are there any suggestions of a suitable way that I can implement this requirement using mongoDB and net5.0?
Or any other Implementation methods regarding this requirement?
Following code segment shows the query to retrieve the data to the incomming keyword.
var hotels = await _hotelsCollection
.Find(Builders<HotelDocument>.Filter.Text(keyword))
.Project<HotelDocument>(hotelFields)
.ToListAsync();
var terminals = await _terminalsCollection
.Find(Builders<TerminalDocument>.Filter.Text(keyword))
.Project<TerminalDocument>(terminalFeilds)
.ToListAsync();
var destinations = await _destinationsCollection
.Find(Builders<DestinationDocument>.Filter.Text(keyword))
.Project<DestinationDocument>(destinationFields)
.ToListAsync();
So this is a classic "autocomplete" feature, there are some known best practices you should follow:
On the client side you should use a debounce feature, this is a most. there is no reason to execute a request for each letter. This is most critical for an autocomplete feature.
On the backend things can get a bit more complicated, naturally you want to be using a db that is suited for this task, specifically MongoDB have a service called Atlas search that is a lucene based text search engine.
This will get you autocomplete support out of the box, however if you don't want to make big changes to your infra here are some suggestions:
Make sure the field your searching on is indexed.
I see your executing 3 separate requests, consider using something like Task.WhenAll to execute all of them at once instead of 1 by 1, I am not sure how the client side is built but if all 3 entities are shown in the same list then ideally you merge the labels into 1 collection so you could paginate the search properly.
As mentioned in #2 you must add server side pagination, no search engine can exist without one. I can't give specifics on how you should implement it as you have 3 separate entities and this could potentially make pagination implementation harder, i'd consider wether or not you need all 3 of these in the same API route.
I'm currently attempting to use the CoinMarketCap API but finding it frustrating.
I'm wanting to use this URL to query their API:
https://pro-api.coinmarketcap.com/v1/cryptocurrency/listings/latest
However, rather than finding all, or just simply filtering based upon the number, I want to find a certain few coins.
So for example, I want to only find Bitcoin, Ethereum and Cardano.
Looking at their docs, it suggests you can sort by name, but it appears this is only listing them alphabetically, which I don't want to do.
So can anyone suggest how to query their API successfully and find just Bitcoin, Ethereum and Cardano using that GET URL above?
Here's the URL to the specific URL for the API request: https://coinmarketcap.com/api/documentation/v1/#operation/getV1CryptocurrencyListingsLatest
For this purpose, you can use the endpoint Quotes Latest:
https://pro-api.coinmarketcap.com/v1/cryptocurrency/quotes/latest
It allows you to pass a list of identifiers in a string as a parameter, like this:
1,1027,328
or a list of slugs:
bitcoin,ethereum,monero
or a list of symbols
BTC,ETH,XMR
If you trying to scrape information about new listings at crypto exchanges, you can be interested in this API:
https://rapidapi.com/Diver44/api/new-cryptocurrencies-listings/
It includes an endpoint with New Listings, New Pairs from the biggest exchanges and a very useful endpoint with information about exchanges where you can buy specific coins and prices for this coin at that exchange. It's a bit paid, but it's worth it!
I wonder how can I send a GET request to GitHub search API, specifically https://api.github.com/search/repositories and make the query to include several languages instead of one.
Here's my current query.
https://api.github.com/search/repositories?q=stars:%3E=1000+language:scala&sort=stars&order=desc&per_page=10
I have tried doing something like this but it didn't work as well
https://api.github.com/search/repositories?q=stars:%3E=1000+language:[scala, java]&sort=stars&order=desc&per_page=10
Thanks for your help
You need to pass in multiple language: element for being able to pass multiple languages to the query as per the doc.
For your specific case, the query would be :
https://api.github.com/search/repositories?q=stars:%3E=1000+language:scala+language:java&sort=stars&order=desc
with pagination applied it would be :
https://api.github.com/search/repositories?q=stars:%3E=1000+language:scala+language:java&sort=stars&order=desc&per_page=10
However, with pagination applied your search results will be limited in the browser.
I originally posted multiple filters containing multiple values in JSON as part of my GET request but I believe this is bad practise, so I changed it to a POST but I don't like it as getting results from a query has nothing to do with a POST so I guess I'll have to use a query string
Most filter examples I have found are either using one filter or one value, but I am looking as to whether or not there is a best practise to pass multiple filters with multiple values for filtering as a single parameter in the query string.
For example, this is a basic one which looks for all cars that are red
GET /cars?color=red
But what if I wanted to look for all cars that are
red, blue or green and
have 2 seats or less and
their brand name starts with b and
can be bought in the US, UK or Germany
Would the following be ok?
http://myserver/api/cars?color=red|blue|green¬seats<=2¬brand[startswith]b¬country=USA|UK|Germany
I'm suggesting the use of the:
| character as a separator between each values for a given filter
¬ character as a separator between each filters
[startsWith] to handle the search type, but could contain [=, <=, >=, <>, [contains],[endswith], etc...
This would then be parsed in the server end and the relevant filters would be build accordingly based on the provided values
Hope this make sense but I'm really interested as to whether or not there is a standard/best practise used for such scenarios with REST in mind?
Thanks.
As in most design questions, the key is having a consistent design for all your APIs. You can follow certain well-known guidelines/standards to make your API easily discoverable.
For example, take a look at OData. The "Queries" section on this page is relevant to your question. Here's an example:
https://services.odata.org/v4/TripPinServiceRW/People?$top=2 & $select=FirstName, LastName & $filter=Trips/any(d:d/Budget gt 3000)
Another option is the OpenSearch standard. The relevant section is here. Here's an example:
https://opensearch.php?recordSchema=html&query=dc.creator any Mill* Grad*
Another interesting option is GraphQL, which makes it easier to map query parameters to data fetch parameters. It uses a filter payload instead of query parameters. See the spec here: GraphQL Spec.
I have a physician graph that looks something like this:
The query I use to get data from a WebApi backend looks like this:
var query = new breeze.EntityQuery().from("Physicians")
.expand("ContactInfo")
.expand("ContactInfo.Phones")
.expand("ContactInfo.Addresses")
.expand("PhysicianNotes")
.expand("PhysicianSpecialties")
.where("ContactInfo.LastName", "startsWith", lastInitial).take(5);
(note the ContactInfo is a pseudonym of the People object)
What I find is that If I request Contact.Phones to be expanded, I'll get just phones and no Notes or Specialties. If I comment out the phones I'll get Contact.Addresses and no other collections. If I comment out ContactInfo along with Phones and Addresses I'll get Notes only etc. Essentially, it seems like I can only get one collection at a time.
So, Is this a built in 'don't let the programmer shoot himself in the foot'?? safeguard or do I have to enable something?
OR is this graph too complicated?? should I consider a NoSql object store??
Thanks
You need to put all your expand clauses in a single one like this:
var query = new breeze.EntityQuery().from("Physicians")
.expand("ContactInfo, ContactInfo.Phones, ContactInfo.Addresses, PhysicianNotes, PhysicianSpecialties")
.where("ContactInfo.LastName", "startsWith", lastInitial).take(5);
You can see the documentation here: http://www.breezejs.com/sites/all/apidocs/classes/EntityQuery.html#method_expand
JY told you HOW. But BEWARE of performance consequences ... both on the data tier and over the wire. You can die a miserable death by grabbing too widely and deeply at once.
I saw the take(5) in his sample. That is crucial for restraining a runaway request (something you really must do also on the server). In general, I would reserve extended graph fetches of this kind for queries that pulled a single root entity. If I'm presenting a list for selection and I need data from different parts of the entity graph, I'd use a projection to get exactly what I need to display (assuming, of course, that there is no SQL View readily available for this purpose).
If any of the related items are reference lists (color, status, states, ...), consider bringing them into cache separately in a preparation step. Don't include them in the expand; Breeze will connect them on the client to your queried entities automatically.
Finally, as a matter of syntax, you don't have to repeat the name of a segment. When you write "ContactInfo.Phones", you get both ContactInfos and Phones so you don't need to specify "ContactInfo" by itself.